AzTrials
AzTrials

Necrotic Immature Permanent TeethA-PRF+NCT07092488

Application of Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin Plus (A-PRF+) in Revascularisation of Necrotic Immature Permanent Teeth

A study testing Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin Plus (A-PRF+) Revascularization Procedure in people with Necrotic Immature Permanent Teeth and Regenerative Endodontic Treatment, run by University of Zagreb at 1 site in Croatia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of an advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus (A-PRF+) revascularization procedure to promote healing and root development in necrotic immature permanent single-rooted teeth in children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 years. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 8 to 18 years
What is being tested?
Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin Plus (A-PRF+) Revascularization Procedure
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
28 participants
Where
1 siteCroatia
Study dates
19 Mar 2018to 18 Jun 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 8 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 8 to 18 years presenting with immature permanent single-rooted teeth with necrotic pulp caused by caries or dental trauma
  • Preserved tooth crown
  • Negative response to cold and electric pulp tests
  • Radiographic evidence of incomplete root development (Cvek stages I-IV)
  • Apical diameter greater than 0.5 mm

Who cannot join

  • Presence of systemic illness or allergies to treatment components
  • Complicated crown or root fractures
  • Evidence of ankylosis or root resorption
  • Ongoing orthodontic treatment
  • Inability to comply with follow-up appointments (e.g., needle phobia or poor cooperation)
  • Subsequent trauma to the treated tooth during the study period
  • Missed recall appointments

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Croatia1 site
  • Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, University Hospital Centre Zagreb

    Zagreb, Croatia, 10000

Other trials in Croatia

About this study

Official title: Application of Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) in Revascularisation of Immature Permanent Teeth

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of an advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus (A-PRF+) revascularization procedure to promote healing and root development in necrotic immature permanent single-rooted teeth in children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 years.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Read more
  • Does the A-PRF+ protocol improve root length, dentinal wall thickness, and apical closure compared to traditional calcium hydroxide apexification treatment?
  • Does A-PRF+ promote restoration of pulp vitality and reduce clinical symptoms such as pain, inflammation, or tooth discoloration? Results from the A-PRF+ treatment group will be compared with those from a historical control group receiving traditional calcium hydroxide apexification to evaluate relative effectiveness.

Participants will:

  • Receive treatment following the A-PRF+ protocol, which includes disinfecting the tooth canal, applying an autologous platelet-rich fibrin scaffold, and sealing with glass ionomer cement;
  • Undergo clinical and radiographic follow-up visits at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months;
  • Have pulp vitality tested with cold, electric, and laser Doppler flowmetry methods;
  • Be monitored for clinical symptoms, healing progress, and restoration performance.

This study will help determine whether A-PRF+ is a safe and effective alternative to conventional apexification for regenerating necrotic immature teeth in young patients.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective interventional clinical trial evaluating an advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus (A-PRF+) revascularization protocol compared to a historical control group treated with traditional calcium hydroxide apexification for necrotic immature permanent single-rooted teeth in children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 years.

The main goal is to assess the regenerative effectiveness of the A-PRF+ protocol in promoting root development, including root lengthening, dentinal wall thickening, and apical closure, compared to conventional apexification. Secondary objectives include evaluating pulp vitality restoration and monitoring clinical outcomes such as symptom resolution, tooth survival, and adverse effects like tooth discoloration.

Participants in the experimental group were prospectively enrolled and received treatment involving minimal mechanical instrumentation, canal disinfection with sodium hypochlorite, intracanal calcium hydroxide medicament, followed by triple antibiotic paste. At the final appointment, autologous A-PRF+ was prepared from peripheral blood and applied as an intracanal scaffold extending into the coronal cavity, sealed permanently with glass ionomer cement.

The control group consists of patients previously treated at the same institution with calcium hydroxide apexification. Their clinical and radiographic records were retrospectively reviewed for comparison. Apexification was not performed as part of this study.

Clinical and radiographic follow-ups were conducted at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, including pulp vitality testing with cold, electric, and laser Doppler flowmetry methods, along with standardized periapical radiographs to measure root length, dentinal wall thickness, and apical diameter. Restoration quality was assessed using modified USPHS criteria.

This study aims to determine if the A-PRF+ protocol provides a safe and effective regenerative alternative to traditional apexification for treating necrotic immature teeth, potentially enhancing long-term tooth preservation in pediatric patients.

Being tested
Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin Plus (A-PRF+) Revascularization Procedure
Keywords
Advanced platelet-rich fibrin, Regenerative endodontics, Immature permanent teeth, Apexification, Calcium hydroxide, Dental pulp regeneration, Revascularization, Platelet-rich fibrin, Advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin Plus (A-PRF+) Revascularization ProcedureProcedure or surgery

    Also called Advanced platelet-rich fibrin, A-PRF+ revascularization, Platelet-rich fibrin scaffold, Regenerative endodontic procedure with PRF

    The intervention consists of the advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus (A-PRF+) revascularization protocol. It includes minimal mechanical instrumentation of the root canal, disinfection using sodium hypochlorite irrigation, and intracanal medicaments-initially calcium hydroxide followed by triple antibiotic paste. Peripheral venous blood was drawn from each participant into anticoagulant-free sterile tubes. The blood was immediately centrifuged at 1300 rpm for 8 minutes to obtain the A-PRF+ clot, which was then used as the scaffold material, extending through the root canal into the coronal cavity. The cavity was permanently sealed with glass ionomer cement. This protocol aims to promote regenerative healing and continued root development in necrotic immature permanent teeth.

Study groups in NCT07092488
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin Plus (A-PRF+) Revascularization GroupExperimentalParticipants receive the advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus (A-PRF+) revascularization protocol. This involves minimal mechanical instrumentation, canal disinfection with sodium hypochlorite, intracanal medicaments including calcium hydroxide and triple antibiotic paste, followed by placement of autologous A-PRF+ scaffold extending into the coronal cavity. The cavity is then permanently sealed with glass ionomer cement.
Receives: Procedure: Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin Plus (A-PRF+) Revascularization Procedure

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Root Lengthening

    Root lengthening was assessed by measuring the linear distance from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the radiographic apex on standardized periapical radiographs. Radiographs were obtained using a film holder to ensure consistent angulation and minimize distortion. Measurements were performed using diagnostic software with a precision of 0.1 mm by two independent blinded examiners. The change from baseline to follow-up measurements over the 12-month period was calculated to quantify root lengthening.

    Measured: From enrollment through 12 months post-treatment

  2. Dentinal Wall Thickening

    Dentinal wall thickening was evaluated by measuring the increase in dentinal wall width at the coronal two-thirds of the root on standardized periapical radiographs. Radiographs were obtained using a film holder to ensure reproducible angulation and reduce distortion. Two blinded examiners independently performed measurements using diagnostic software with an accuracy of 0.1 mm. The difference between baseline and follow-up measurements over 12 months quantified dentinal wall thickening.

    Measured: From enrollment through 12 months post-treatment

  3. Apical Closure

    Apical closure was assessed by measuring the reduction in apical diameter on standardized periapical radiographs. Radiographs were consistently acquired using a film holder to minimize angulation differences and distortion. Two independent blinded examiners used diagnostic software with 0.1 mm precision to measure the distance across the apical foramen. Changes from baseline to follow-up at 12 months were used to quantify apical closure.

    Measured: From enrollment through 12 months post-treatment

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Pulp Vitality Responses

    Pulp vitality was assessed at each follow-up visit using cold testing and electric pulp testing on the treated tooth and contralateral control tooth. Laser Doppler flowmetry was performed once per patient at either the 9- or 12-month recall to quantitatively measure pulpal blood flow, indicating revascularization. All tests were performed by clinicians blinded to treatment allocation, with responses recorded as positive or negative.

    Measured: From enrollment through 12 months post-treatment

  2. Presence of Periapical Pathology

    Presence or absence of periapical lesions was evaluated on standardized periapical radiographs at baseline and follow-up visits. Two blinded examiners independently assessed images for periapical pathology. Changes in lesion presence were recorded throughout the 12-month follow-up.

    Measured: From enrollment through 12 months post-treatment

  3. Tooth Survival

    Tooth survival was defined as retention of the treated tooth throughout the 12-month follow-up period. Any tooth loss or extraction was recorded as an event. Survival status was assessed during clinical recall visits.

    Measured: From enrollment through 12 months post-treatment

  4. Clinical Evaluation of Restorations Using Modified USPHS Criteria

    Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement restorations was assessed at each recall visit using Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Parameters evaluated included retention, marginal discoloration, anatomic form, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, and surface texture. Each parameter was scored as Alpha (clinically excellent), Bravo (clinically acceptable), or Charlie (clinically unacceptable/failure).

    Measured: From enrollment through 12 months post-treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jul 2025
  2. Study start19 Mar 2018
  3. Primary completion14 Apr 2021
  4. Study completion18 Jun 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
This is a prospective, single-group interventional study evaluating the regenerative effectiveness of an advanced platelet-rich fibrin plus (A-PRF+) revascularization protocol in necrotic immature permanent single-rooted teeth. Participants receive the A-PRF+ treatment without randomization or concurrent control groups. The control comparison is conducted retrospectively using historical patient records treated with calcium hydroxide apexification.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07092488
Sponsor's protocol ID
PRF-CT-01
Acronym
A-PRF+
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
21 Jul 2025
Last updated
30 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Advanced Platelet-Rich Fibrin Plus (A-PRF+) Revascularization Procedure in people with Necrotic Immature Permanent Teeth and Regenerative Endodontic Treatment, run by University of Zagreb at 1 site in Croatia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Croatia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Root Lengthening (time frame: From enrollment through 12 months post-treatment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in