Nursing EducationNCT07090967
Effect of Project Planning Course on Nursing Students' Critical Thinking, Lifelong Learning, and Innovativeness
A study testing Project Planning Course in people with Nursing Education, run by Istanbul University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This randomized, controlled trial investigates the impact of a Project Planning Course on third-year undergraduate nursing students' critical thinking motivation, lifelong learning skills, and individual innovativeness. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nursing Education
- What is being tested?
- Project Planning Course
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 38 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 23 Feb 2025to 30 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Inclusion criteria were as follows: age ≥ 18 years, , and willing to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- who don't want to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of the Project Planning Course on Nursing Students' Critical Thinking, Lifelong Learning, and Individual Innovativeness Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This randomized, controlled trial investigates the impact of a Project Planning Course on third-year undergraduate nursing students' critical thinking motivation, lifelong learning skills, and individual innovativeness. Participants were randomized into two groups: an intervention group receiving the Project Planning Course and a control group with no intervention. The Project Planning Course consisted of 14 weeks of theoretical and practical training, aiming to develop students' skills in research project management and patent/utility model application. Data were collected using the Critical Thinking Motivation Scale (CTMS), the Lifelong Learning Scale (LLS), and the Individual Innovativeness Scale (IIS). Statistical analysis was conducted using non-parametric tests. The study complies with ethical standards, including approval from the relevant ethics committee, and is prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.
Read the detailed description
This study explores the effects of a structured Project Planning Course on the development of essential 21st-century competencies among undergraduate nursing students. Designed as a randomized controlled trial, the study involved third-year nursing students who were randomly assigned to either an intervention group, which completed a 14-week course in project planning, or a control group that received no intervention. The intervention focused on enhancing students' abilities in research planning, innovation, and intellectual property application, including patent and utility model procedures.
To assess the impact of the course, data were collected using validated instruments: the Critical Thinking Motivation Scale (CTMS), the Lifelong Learning Scale (LLS), and the Individual Innovativeness Scale (IIS). Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric tests appropriate for the data distribution. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board, and the trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. This study contributes to nursing education literature by evaluating how structured project-based learning influences students' motivation, learning orientation, and innovativeness in preparation for dynamic healthcare environments.
- Conditions
- Nursing Education
- Being tested
- Project Planning Course
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Project Planning CourseOther
The Project Planning Course is conducted as a two-hour theoretical class per week. This course is being introduced for the first time in the nursing faculty curriculum. The course was conducted by two faculty members, both of whom have knowledge and experience in research and project writing. Since the goal at the end of the course was for students either to carry out a research project or to apply for a patent/utility model, it was planned for 20 students to enroll; however, 19 students chose the course. The course lasted 14 weeks in total. In the first week, topics such as what a project is, its characteristics, and its components were introduced to the students. As part of the course, students were asked to brainstorm solutions for problems they encountered in clinical settings. During the first seven weeks, theoretical lectures were delivered, and during the following five weeks, students worked with their academic advisors on research projects or patent/utility model topics.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Students Taking the Project Planning Course Receives: Other: Project Planning Course |
| Control Group | No intervention | Students Dont Taking the Project Planning Course |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
critical thinking
Critical Thinking Motivation Scale: The CTMS is a 19-item, six-point Likert-type scale developed by Valenzuela et al. and adapted into Turkish by Dönmez and Kaya (2016). It includes five factors under two main dimensions: "expectation" and "value." Scores are calculated by averaging item responses within each subscale. The scale has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90. Higher scores indicate greater motivation for critical thinking.
Measured: From the beginning of the term and end of the term at 14 weeks.
lifelong learning
Lifelong Learning Scale: The LLS, developed by Wielkiewicz and Meuwissen (2014) and adapted into Turkish by Engin et al. (2017), is a 15-item, single-factor scale rated on a five-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 15 to 75, with higher scores indicating stronger lifelong learning tendencies. The scale's Cronbach's alpha is 0.86.
Measured: From the beginning of the term and end of the term at 14 weeks.
Individual Innovativeness
Individual Innovativeness Scale:The IIS, developed by Hurt et al. (1977) and adapted into Turkish by Kılıçer and Odabaşı (2010), is a 20-item scale with four factors: Resistance to Change, Opinion Leadership, Openness to Experience, and Risk-Taking. It uses a five-point Likert scale and has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.82. Total scores classify individuals as Innovators (>80), Early Adopters (69-80), Early Majority (57-68), Late Majority (46-56), or Laggards (<46).
Measured: From the beginning of the term and end of the term at 14 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jul 2025
- Study start23 Feb 2025
- Primary completion30 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jul 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nursing EducationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Istanbul UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Merve Tuncer, Istanbul University
- Investigators
- Merve TUNCER, Asist. Prof., Principal investigator, Istanbul University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07090967
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025-1
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 26 May 2025
- Last updated
- 29 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Aley M, Lee R, Wang J, Wang J, Zheng S. Project-based learning and student outcomes in health professions education: A literature review. Health Professions Education. 2023;9(3):251-266.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of the Project Planning Course on Nursing Students' Critical Thinking, Lifelong Learning, and Individual Innovativeness Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07090967
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2025-1
- Conditions
- Nursing Education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized, controlled trial investigates the impact of a Project Planning Course on third-year undergraduate nursing students' critical thinking motivation, lifelong learning skills, and individual innovativeness. Participants were randomized into two groups: an intervention group receiving the Project Planning Course and a control group with no intervention. The Project Planning Course consisted of 14 weeks of theoretical and practical training, aiming to develop students' skills in research project management and patent/utility model application. Data were collected using the Critical Thinking Motivation Scale (CTMS), the Lifelong Learning Scale (LLS), and the Individual Innovativeness Scale (IIS). Statistical analysis was conducted using non-parametric tests. The study complies with ethical standards, including approval from the relevant ethics committee, and is prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.
Detailed description
This study explores the effects of a structured Project Planning Course on the development of essential 21st-century competencies among undergraduate nursing students. Designed as a randomized controlled trial, the study involved third-year nursing students who were randomly assigned to either an intervention group, which completed a 14-week course in project planning, or a control group that received no intervention. The intervention focused on enhancing students' abilities in research planning, innovation, and intellectual property application, including patent and utility model procedures.
To assess the impact of the course, data were collected using validated instruments: the Critical Thinking Motivation Scale (CTMS), the Lifelong Learning Scale (LLS), and the Individual Innovativeness Scale (IIS). Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric tests appropriate for the data distribution. Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board, and the trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. This study contributes to nursing education literature by evaluating how structured project-based learning influences students' motivation, learning orientation, and innovativeness in preparation for dynamic healthcare environments.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized Controlled Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Other: Project Planning CourseStudents Taking the Project Planning Course |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Students Dont Taking the Project Planning Course |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Inclusion criteria were as follows: age ≥ 18 years, , and willing to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- who don't want to participate in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Project Planning CourseThe Project Planning Course is conducted as a two-hour theoretical class per week. This course is being introduced for the first time in the nursing faculty curriculum. The course was conducted by two faculty members, both of whom have knowledge and experience in research and project writing. Since the goal at the end of the course was for students either to carry out a research project or to apply for a patent/utility model, it was planned for 20 students to enroll; however, 19 students chose the course. The course lasted 14 weeks in total. In the first week, topics such as what a project is, its characteristics, and its components were introduced to the students. As part of the course, students were asked to brainstorm solutions for problems they encountered in clinical settings. During the first seven weeks, theoretical lectures were delivered, and during the following five weeks, students worked with their academic advisors on research projects or patent/utility model topics. | Other | Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
critical thinking
Time frame: From the beginning of the term and end of the term at 14 weeks.
Critical Thinking Motivation Scale: The CTMS is a 19-item, six-point Likert-type scale developed by Valenzuela et al. and adapted into Turkish by Dönmez and Kaya (2016). It includes five factors under two main dimensions: "expectation" and "value." Scores are calculated by averaging item responses within each subscale. The scale has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90. Higher scores indicate greater motivation for critical thinking.
lifelong learning
Time frame: From the beginning of the term and end of the term at 14 weeks.
Lifelong Learning Scale: The LLS, developed by Wielkiewicz and Meuwissen (2014) and adapted into Turkish by Engin et al. (2017), is a 15-item, single-factor scale rated on a five-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 15 to 75, with higher scores indicating stronger lifelong learning tendencies. The scale's Cronbach's alpha is 0.86.
Individual Innovativeness
Time frame: From the beginning of the term and end of the term at 14 weeks.
Individual Innovativeness Scale:The IIS, developed by Hurt et al. (1977) and adapted into Turkish by Kılıçer and Odabaşı (2010), is a 20-item scale with four factors: Resistance to Change, Opinion Leadership, Openness to Experience, and Risk-Taking. It uses a five-point Likert scale and has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.82. Total scores classify individuals as Innovators (>80), Early Adopters (69-80), Early Majority (57-68), Late Majority (46-56), or Laggards (<46).
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jul 2025.
- BackgroundAley M, Lee R, Wang J, Wang J, Zheng S. Project-based learning and student outcomes in health professions education: A literature review. Health Professions Education. 2023;9(3):251-266.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nursing Education
Not yet recruiting
Mobile Game-Based Versus Classic First Aid Education in Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial
First Aid, Health Education in Schoolchildren
Not yet recruiting
The Effectiveness of Comic-based Learning Materials on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence in Dementia Care
Dementia Care Education, Students, Nursing
Not yet recruiting
King's Theory-Based Multicomponent Interventions in Heart Failure Patient Rehabilitation
Heart Failure, Cardiac Rehabilitation
Not yet recruiting
SELF-ASSESSMENT AND KNOWLEDGE LEVEL OF NURSING STUDENTS' PATIENT SAFETY COMPETENCY
Simulation Training, Nursing Education
Not yet recruiting
Compression-Only Versus Standard Basic Life Support Training in Nursing Students
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Merve TUNCER, Asist. Prof. principal investigator
Istanbul University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Project Planning Course in people with Nursing Education, run by Istanbul University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
critical thinking (time frame: From the beginning of the term and end of the term at 14 weeks.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07090967, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2025.