AzTrials
AzTrials

Falls RiskNCT07078240

Examining Nurses' Trust and Acceptance of FAIR, an AI-powered Falls Risk Recommender

A study testing Falls risk - Artificial Intelligence Recommender (FAIR) and modified Western Health Falls Risk Assessment Tool (mWHeFRA) in people with Falls Risk, run by Tan Tock Seng Hospital.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

An exploratory mixed-method study will be conducted to test acceptance and trust of an AI-powered falls risk predictor system by inpatient hospital nurses Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Falls Risk
What is being tested?
Falls risk - Artificial Intelligence Recommender (FAIR) and modified Western Health Falls Risk Assessment Tool (mWHeFRA)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2027to 30 Jun 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Practicing nurse involved in falls risk assessments of patients

Who cannot join

  • -

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

George Glass, PhD Student contact

+65 6903-5384

GLAS0002@e.ntu.edu.sg

About this study

Official title: "You Sure or Not?" Examining the Trust, Acceptance and Adoption of Falls Risk - Artificial Intelligence Recommender (FAIR) System by Nurses

An exploratory mixed-method study will be conducted to test acceptance and trust of an AI-powered falls risk predictor system by inpatient hospital nurses

Read the detailed description

This protocol covers the trial component of a 4-year PhD research study covering focus group discussions with nurses on AI risk systems, workshops to gather feedback on the AI system and feasibility testing in a simulated environment and clinical environment

Conditions
Falls Risk
Being tested
Falls risk - Artificial Intelligence Recommender (FAIR), modified Western Health Falls Risk Assessment Tool (mWHeFRA)
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence trust, Artificial Intelligence acceptance, Artificial Intelligence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Falls risk - Artificial Intelligence Recommender (FAIR)Other

    FAIR is an alert system built into the hospital's electronic medical record system. It is an adaptation of a machine learning model for fall risk calculation built in another hospital in Singapore. FAIR combines multiple patient-specific variables to identify if a patient is at increased risk of falling during their inpatient stay, marking them as a 'falls risk'.

    Based on the 'flag' raised, the nurse will be instructed to prioritise her falls risk assessment of the patient (If deemed 'high risk') or to do so subsequently as a lower priority once other pressing patient care issues are resolved (if deemed 'low risk').

    That way, it ensures the requirements of each patient receiving a falls risk assessment as scored through mWHeFRA are still met, with FAIR allowing nurses to better prioritise their focus and attention on the patient that most needs the assessment at point of admission,

  • modified Western Health Falls Risk Assessment Tool (mWHeFRA)Other

    The mWHeFRA is the hospital's standard falls risk assessment tool. All nurses are expected to be proficient in its use to guide their risk assessment of patients

Study groups in NCT07078240
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention ArmExperimentalNurses in the intervention arm will perform will receive training on the nature of AI recommender (FAIR) and how it works, and how they can apply it in their assessment of the patient. After that, they will be introduced to three simulated patients with different conditions and needs - intended to reflect a patient at "low risk of falls", "moderate risk of falls" and "high risk of falls" and asked to read and interpret the FAIR recommendations before making their own falls risk assessment of the patient using mWHeFRA.
Receives: Other: Falls risk - Artificial Intelligence Recommender (FAIR)
Control armPlacebo comparatorNurses in the control arms will be reinforced on fall risk assessment methods using the modified Western modified Western Health Falls Risk Assessment Tool (mWHeFRA). After that, they will be introduced to three simulated patients with different conditions and needs - intended to reflect a patient at "low risk of falls", "moderate risk of falls" and "high risk of falls" and asked to perform assessments of the patient mWHeFRA.
Receives: Other: modified Western Health Falls Risk Assessment Tool (mWHeFRA)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of FAIR's flag acceptance

    Examination of how often the flags raised by FAIR are accepted by nurses, and whether they are accepted or ignored correctly.

    Measured: 1 Day of Study

  2. Time taken to do falls risk assessment

    The time taken by the nurses to perform their falls risk assessment will be recorded

    Measured: 1 Day of Study

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Time spent looking at FAIR

    The time each nurses takes looking at the FAIR falls risk assessment will be assessed

    Measured: 1 Day of Study

  2. Baseline and Post-Simulation Nurse trust and acceptance of FAIR

    Measured by the adapted Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technologies and System Usability Survey, adjusted to better capture the key predictors of nurse acceptance

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jul 2025
  2. Study start1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two phases of interventional study. First is a parallel arm study comparing nurse acceptance and trust in intervention vs control arm in simulation lab setting.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07078240
Sponsor's protocol ID
NMRCRTF25jan-004
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
22 Jun 2025
Last updated
22 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Will be agreeable to share Protocol Summary page

Publications

  • Schulz PJ, Lwin MO, Kee KM, Goh WWB, Lam TYT, Sung JJY. Modeling the influence of attitudes, trust, and beliefs on endoscopists' acceptance of artificial intelligence applications in medical practice. Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 28;11:1301563. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1301563. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 38089040

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Falls risk - Artificial Intelligence Recommender (FAIR) and modified Western Health Falls Risk Assessment Tool (mWHeFRA) in people with Falls Risk, run by Tan Tock Seng Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact George Glass, PhD Student (+65 6903-5384, GLAS0002@e.ntu.edu.sg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of FAIR's flag acceptance (time frame: 1 Day of Study). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07078240, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in