AzTrials
AzTrials

Inclusion Body MyositisRisk of fallNCT07072676

The Use of Assistive Gait Devices Can Reduce the Risk of Falls in Patients With Neuromuscular Diseases Following a Training Period.

A study testing Assistive gait devices combined with physiotherapy in people with Inclusion Body Myositis and Myotonic Dystrophy 1, run by LMU Klinikum at 1 site in Germany.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The planned project is an intervention study to assess the risk of falling after adaptation of an assistive gait devices in patients with the following neuromuscular diseases: Inclusion body myositis, myotonic dystrophy, limb girdle and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophies, Pompe disease, Lambert-Eaton syndrome… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 65 years
What is being tested?
Assistive gait devices combined with physiotherapy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
1 Sep 2025to 1 Aug 2028
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The Patients with sufficient cognitive and communicative abilities,
  • The Patients with confirmed by the genetic report and/or the final clinical diagnosis.

Who cannot join

  • The Patients scored more than 23 points on the falls efficacy Scale-International
  • The Patients are unable to walk at least ten metres without assistance,
  • The patient had knee, hip or back surgery in the last three months.
  • Patients suffering from polyneuropathy without a diagnosis of inflammatory autoimmune neuropathy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Germany1 site
  • Medical Park, Bad Feilnbach, Reithofpark

    Bad Feilnbach, 53075

Other trials in Germany

About this study

The planned project is an intervention study to assess the risk of falling after adaptation of an assistive gait devices in patients with the following neuromuscular diseases: Inclusion body myositis, myotonic dystrophy, limb girdle and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophies, Pompe disease, Lambert-Eaton syndrome, myasthenia gravis, spinal muscular atrophy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, Friedreich's ataxia and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy.

The primary aim is to assess the risk of falling after a suitable assistive gait device has been provided with an adaptation phase through training. The data should help to improve the provision of aids for patients with neuromuscular diseases. This should have a positive effect on the risk of falling and thus improve quality of life and reduce mortality and morbidity. To achieve these goals, a one-week intervention with training sessions on handling, balance and coordination as well as fall prevention will becarried out after the patient has been fitted with a suitable assistive gait device.

Read more

The interventions will be embedded in the inpatient rehabilitation programme. The functional gait and balance tests 'Timed Up and Go', '10 metre walk test', '6-minute walk test' and 'Dynamic Gait Index' will be recorded additionally.

The Falls Efficacy Scale International questionnaire will be utilised to evaluate the risk of falling, while the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire will be employed to ascertain satisfaction with the assistive devices. The study is scheduled to run for a period of 14 days, during which participants will undergo three functional walking and balance tests. As part of the inpatient rehabilitation programme, participants will undergo a week-long period of rehabilitation without assistive technology, followed by a subsequent week of rehabilitation with adapted assistive technology.

Being tested
Assistive gait devices combined with physiotherapy
Keywords
assistive gait device, neuromuscular diseases
Medical subject headings
Myositis, Inclusion Body, Myotonic Dystrophy, Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral, Muscular Dystrophies, Limb-Girdle, Glycogen Storage Disease Type II, Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome, Muscular Atrophy, Spinal, Guillain-Barre Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Assistive gait devices combined with physiotherapyDevice

    During the intervenation week, the patient undergoes 12 hours/week of gait training, fall prevention, balance group and physiotherapy as part of their inpatient rehabilitation programme. The individual sessions last 30 minutes each.

Study groups in NCT07072676
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pre-intervention periodNo interventionOne week without therapy with asssisitive gait devices. During this week, patients undergoing inpatient rehabilitation receive standard therapy for neuromuscular disorders.
Intervention periodExperimentalOne week therapy with assisitve gait devices.
Receives: Device: Assistive gait devices combined with physiotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 6 Minute Walk Test

    The aim of this test is to walk as far as possible for 6 minutes.

    Measured: At Day 1, end of pre-intervention period Day 7, and at the end of post-intervation period Day 14.

  2. Timed Up and Go (TUG)

    The TUG test measures the time it takes to stand up from a chair, walk three metres, turn around and sit back down on the same chair.

    Measured: At Day 1, end of pre-intervention period Day 7, and at the end of post-intervation period Day 14.

  3. 10 meter walk test

    Walking at maximum speed is measured in a long, flat-surface corridor of 10 meters, with a standing start and a "flying" finish 2.5 meters beyond the 10-meter mark.

    Measured: At Day 1, end of pre-intervention period Day 7, and at the end of post-intervation period Day 14.

  4. Dynamic Gait Index

    Dynamic Gait Index tests the ability of the participant to maintain walking balance while responding to different task demands, through various dynamic conditions. It is a useful test in individuals with vestibular and balance problems and those at risk of falls.

    Measured: At Day 1, end of pre-intervention period Day 7, and at the end of post-intervation period Day 14.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0)

    The QUEST 2.0 evaluates a patient's satisfaction with various assistive technologies.

    Measured: At the end of post-intervention period, Day 14.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jul 2025
  2. Study start1 Sep 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 May 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A study protocol was developed with two cohorts that underwent a one-week pre-post intervention with gait assistive devices. The first group consisted of patients (n= 15) requiring orthopaedic support: Knee and/or ankle foot orthoses and orthopaedic shoes; the second group (n= 15) consists of patients requiring mobility aids: Forearm crutches, rollators and walking aids.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07072676
Sponsor's protocol ID
25-0252
Other IDs
25-0252
Acronym
Risk of fall
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
27 Jun 2025
Last updated
18 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: In accordance with the guidelines of the Ethics Committee.

Publications

  • Dias N, Kempen GI, Todd CJ, Beyer N, Freiberger E, Piot-Ziegler C, Yardley L, Hauer K. [The German version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International Version (FES-I)]. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2006 Aug;39(4):297-300. doi: 10.1007/s00391-006-0400-8. German.

    PubMed 16900450
  • Waterval NFJ, Brehm MA, Altmann VC, Koopman FS, Den Boer JJ, Harlaar J, Nollet F. Stiffness-Optimized Ankle-Foot Orthoses Improve Walking Energy Cost Compared to Conventional Orthoses in Neuromuscular Disorders: A Prospective Uncontrolled Intervention Study. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020 Oct;28(10):2296-2304. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3018786. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

    PubMed 32833637
  • Ounpuu S, Garibay E, Acsadi G, Brimacombe M, Pierz K. The impact of orthoses on gait in children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Gait Posture. 2021 Mar;85:198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

    PubMed 33610823
  • Mijic M, Wirner-Piotrowski C, Jung A, Gutschmidt K, Arndt M, Garcia-Angarita N, Wenninger S, Young P, Schoser B. The assistive gait devices and their implementation in activities of daily living for patients with neuromuscular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2026 Jan;13(1):53-76. doi: 10.1177/22143602241289216. Epub 2024 Dec 8.

    PubMed 39973408
  • Dharmadasa T, Matamala JM, Huynh W, Zoing MC, Kiernan MC. Chapter 22 - Motor neurone disease. In: Day BL, Lord SRBT-H of CN, editors. Balanc. Gait, Falls, vol. 159, Elsevier; 2018, p. 345-57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63916-5.00022-7

  • Atalaia A, Thompson R, Corvo A, Carmody L, Piscia D, Matalonga L, Macaya A, Lochmuller A, Fontaine B, Zurek B, Hernandez-Ferrer C, Reinhard C, Gomez-Andres D, Desaphy JF, Schon K, Lohmann K, Jennings MJ, Synofzik M, Riess O, Yaou RB, Evangelista T, Ratnaike T, Bros-Facer V, Gumus G, Horvath R, Chinnery P, Laurie S, Graessner H, Robinson P, Lochmuller H, Beltran S, Bonne G. A guide to writing systematic reviews of rare disease treatments to generate FAIR-compliant datasets: building a Treatabolome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020 Aug 12;15(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01493-7.

    PubMed 32787960

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in