Acne VulgarisNCT07056673
Cold Atmospheric Plasma for Moderate-to-severe Acne Vulgaris Study
A study testing Active CAP therapy in people with Acne Vulgaris, run by Shenyang Medical College at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Acne vulgaris is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disease with complex pathogenesis and limited therapeutic options, especially for moderate-to-severe cases. Standard treatments-including topical and oral agents-are often constrained by side effects, antimicrobial resistance, and treatment resistance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acne Vulgaris
- What is being tested?
- Active CAP therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 220 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 26 Jul 2025to 20 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18-40 years;
- Clinically diagnosed with acne vulgaris, with moderate to severe disease (Pillsbury grade III or IV, lesion count ≥50);
- Will agree to use effective contraception during the treatment period;
- Will sign a written informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
- Known allergy to any active component of CAP;
- Use of systemic antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to enrollment;
- Presence of dyslipidemia or other severe systemic diseases;
- Participation in other clinical trials within the past 3 months or currently enrolled in another clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
the 989th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force
Luoyang, Henan
Xue Wen, MM, 86-0379-64169096, Ly150rlzyb@163.com
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Cold Atmospheric Plasma for Moderate-to-severe Acne Vulgaris: a Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial
Acne vulgaris is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disease with complex pathogenesis and limited therapeutic options, especially for moderate-to-severe cases. Standard treatments-including topical and oral agents-are often constrained by side effects, antimicrobial resistance, and treatment resistance. Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP), a novel technology that generates reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, has demonstrated antimicrobial and tissue-regenerative properties in dermatology, but robust clinical evidence in acne management remains scarce. Existing data suggest promising efficacy and safety, yet its use in moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris has not been adequately investigated. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two self-developed CAP devices as a potential innovative therapy for moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris.
Read the detailed description
Acne vulgaris is one of the most prevalent chronic inflammatory skin diseases worldwide, with a complex and multifactorial pathogenesis. The main contributing factors include excessive proliferation of follicular keratinocytes leading to follicular plugging, dysregulated sebum production, and the overgrowth and hyperactivity of Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes). Clinically, acne vulgaris is characterised by both non-inflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) and inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules, and nodules), with severity ranging from mild to severe.
Current therapeutic strategies primarily target reduction of inflammation, sebum production, and microbial load. The mainstays of topical therapy are antibiotics, benzoyl peroxide, and retinoids. For moderate-to-severe cases, oral antibiotics such as minocycline and doxycycline are widely used, and oral isotretinoin remains the cornerstone for severe and refractory disease. In patients with underlying hormonal disturbances, combined oestrogen/progestin therapy may be beneficial. Nevertheless, the long-term use of systemic antibiotics is associated with potential side effects, increasing antimicrobial resistance, and limited efficacy in some patients. Isotretinoin, while highly effective, can be contraindicated or poorly tolerated due to its teratogenicity and adverse effect profile. These challenges underscore the need for innovative and alternative therapeutic approaches, particularly for patients with moderate-to-severe disease, contraindications, or treatment resistance.
Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) has recently emerged as a novel technology in wound healing and aesthetic dermatology. CAP generates a range of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) via glow discharge at atmospheric pressure, producing strong oxidative effects that can denature and coagulate bacterial proteins, disrupt cell membranes, and induce apoptosis of pathogenic microorganisms. In addition to its antimicrobial properties, CAP stimulates local microcirculation, enhances nutrient absorption, accelerates collagen synthesis, and promotes tissue regeneration and wound healing. CAP has been approved by the US FDA since 2008 for use in a variety of dermatological indications, including acne scars, wrinkles, superficial skin lesions, actinic keratosis, viral warts, and seborrheic keratosis. Its broad-spectrum effects offer both anti-inflammatory and skin-rejuvenating benefits, with a favourable safety profile and good patient tolerability.
Although CAP holds promise as a therapeutic modality, its application in the management of acne vulgaris, particularly moderate-to-severe cases, remains underexplored. The high cost of CAP devices and limited availability in specialised dermatology centres have restricted its widespread adoption, and robust clinical data are still lacking. In a prospective study by Wasinee et al. (Mae Fah Luang University, Thailand), weekly CAP-assisted treatment over six weeks in 31 volunteers with mild-to-moderate acne led to approximately 75% reduction in lesion count, with the greatest improvement observed in inflammatory lesions. Most adverse events were mild, including transient dryness and superficial exfoliation. Arisi et al. also reported improvements in two young patients with mild-to-moderate facial acne following CAP treatment, as assessed by lesion count, sebum output, and transepidermal water loss, with no reported adverse effects. However, data on the use of CAP for moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris-where clinical management is most challenging-are particularly scarce. To date, there have been no large, randomised controlled trials specifically evaluating CAP in this population.
Given these gaps, CAP represents a potentially innovative and adjunctive therapeutic approach for moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris, particularly in cases refractory to or unsuitable for standard treatments. In this study, we combine two self-developed CAP devices to capitalise on their respective advantages, enabling personalised and precise coverage of diverse lesion sites. This strategy aims to maximise CAP's antimicrobial and wound-healing mechanisms, and to provide robust evidence regarding its safety and efficacy in the management of moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris.
- Conditions
- Acne Vulgaris
- Being tested
- Active CAP therapy, sham CAP therapy, standard care based on the JAAD acne guidelines
- Keywords
- Acne vulgaris, Cold atmospheric plasma
- Medical subject headings
- Acne Vulgaris
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Active CAP therapyDevice
The patients in the CAP group will receive six sessions of CAP treatment, administered once weekly for six consecutive weeks. If complete clearance of facial acne is achieved before all six sessions, CAP treatment will be discontinued early.
For device selection, the CAP patch trauma therapy device (CAP-PTTD) will be used for lesions located on relatively flat areas of the face. In cases of lesions on areas with greater anatomical curvature (eg, the mandibular angle or near the tragus), the CAP jet trauma therapy device (CAP-JTTD) will be used in combination.
sham CAP therapyDevice
the device will be operated with the plasma-generating field disabled, so that no plasma will be produced. Only environmental cues such as sound will be simulated to ensure blinding.
standard care based on the JAAD acne guidelinesOther
the group will receive standard care based on the JAAD acne guidelines
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| the CAP treatment group | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Active CAP therapy; Other: standard care based on the JAAD acne guidelines |
| the placebo group | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Device: sham CAP therapy; Other: standard care based on the JAAD acne guidelines |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The difference in lesion clearance rate change between the CAP treatment group and the placebo group.
Measured: Baseline and up to 6 weeks after randomisation
Secondary outcomes (2)
The difference between the two groups in time from randomisation to achieving 75% and 50% lesion clearance rates.
Measured: Baseline and up to 6 weeks after randomisation
The difference in change in quality of life (QoL) as measured by the QoL-acne questionnaire before and after treatment between the two groups.
Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks after randomisation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jul 2025
- Study start26 Jul 2025
- Primary completion30 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion20 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acne VulgarisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shenyang Medical College
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- the 989th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lin Tao, Shenyang Medical College
- Investigators
- Lin Tao, MM, Principal investigator, Shenyang Medical CollegeYun-En Liu, MD, Study chair, Shenyang Medical College
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07056673
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAP630
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 30 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 2 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Cold Atmospheric Plasma for Moderate-to-severe Acne Vulgaris: a Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07056673
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAP630
- Conditions
- Acne Vulgaris
- Keywords
- Acne vulgaris, Cold atmospheric plasma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shenyang Medical CollegeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- the 989th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force
- Study start
- 26 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 20 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acne vulgaris is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disease with complex pathogenesis and limited therapeutic options, especially for moderate-to-severe cases. Standard treatments-including topical and oral agents-are often constrained by side effects, antimicrobial resistance, and treatment resistance. Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP), a novel technology that generates reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, has demonstrated antimicrobial and tissue-regenerative properties in dermatology, but robust clinical evidence in acne management remains scarce. Existing data suggest promising efficacy and safety, yet its use in moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris has not been adequately investigated. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two self-developed CAP devices as a potential innovative therapy for moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris.
Detailed description
Acne vulgaris is one of the most prevalent chronic inflammatory skin diseases worldwide, with a complex and multifactorial pathogenesis. The main contributing factors include excessive proliferation of follicular keratinocytes leading to follicular plugging, dysregulated sebum production, and the overgrowth and hyperactivity of Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes). Clinically, acne vulgaris is characterised by both non-inflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) and inflammatory lesions (papules, pustules, and nodules), with severity ranging from mild to severe.
Current therapeutic strategies primarily target reduction of inflammation, sebum production, and microbial load. The mainstays of topical therapy are antibiotics, benzoyl peroxide, and retinoids. For moderate-to-severe cases, oral antibiotics such as minocycline and doxycycline are widely used, and oral isotretinoin remains the cornerstone for severe and refractory disease. In patients with underlying hormonal disturbances, combined oestrogen/progestin therapy may be beneficial. Nevertheless, the long-term use of systemic antibiotics is associated with potential side effects, increasing antimicrobial resistance, and limited efficacy in some patients. Isotretinoin, while highly effective, can be contraindicated or poorly tolerated due to its teratogenicity and adverse effect profile. These challenges underscore the need for innovative and alternative therapeutic approaches, particularly for patients with moderate-to-severe disease, contraindications, or treatment resistance.
Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) has recently emerged as a novel technology in wound healing and aesthetic dermatology. CAP generates a range of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) via glow discharge at atmospheric pressure, producing strong oxidative effects that can denature and coagulate bacterial proteins, disrupt cell membranes, and induce apoptosis of pathogenic microorganisms. In addition to its antimicrobial properties, CAP stimulates local microcirculation, enhances nutrient absorption, accelerates collagen synthesis, and promotes tissue regeneration and wound healing. CAP has been approved by the US FDA since 2008 for use in a variety of dermatological indications, including acne scars, wrinkles, superficial skin lesions, actinic keratosis, viral warts, and seborrheic keratosis. Its broad-spectrum effects offer both anti-inflammatory and skin-rejuvenating benefits, with a favourable safety profile and good patient tolerability.
Although CAP holds promise as a therapeutic modality, its application in the management of acne vulgaris, particularly moderate-to-severe cases, remains underexplored. The high cost of CAP devices and limited availability in specialised dermatology centres have restricted its widespread adoption, and robust clinical data are still lacking. In a prospective study by Wasinee et al. (Mae Fah Luang University, Thailand), weekly CAP-assisted treatment over six weeks in 31 volunteers with mild-to-moderate acne led to approximately 75% reduction in lesion count, with the greatest improvement observed in inflammatory lesions. Most adverse events were mild, including transient dryness and superficial exfoliation. Arisi et al. also reported improvements in two young patients with mild-to-moderate facial acne following CAP treatment, as assessed by lesion count, sebum output, and transepidermal water loss, with no reported adverse effects. However, data on the use of CAP for moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris-where clinical management is most challenging-are particularly scarce. To date, there have been no large, randomised controlled trials specifically evaluating CAP in this population.
Given these gaps, CAP represents a potentially innovative and adjunctive therapeutic approach for moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris, particularly in cases refractory to or unsuitable for standard treatments. In this study, we combine two self-developed CAP devices to capitalise on their respective advantages, enabling personalised and precise coverage of diverse lesion sites. This strategy aims to maximise CAP's antimicrobial and wound-healing mechanisms, and to provide robust evidence regarding its safety and efficacy in the management of moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| the CAP treatment group | Active comparator | Device: Active CAP therapy, Other: standard care based on the JAAD acne guidelines |
| the placebo group | Placebo comparator | Device: sham CAP therapy, Other: standard care based on the JAAD acne guidelines |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Aged 18-40 years;
- Clinically diagnosed with acne vulgaris, with moderate to severe disease (Pillsbury grade III or IV, lesion count ≥50);
- Will agree to use effective contraception during the treatment period;
- Will sign a written informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
- Known allergy to any active component of CAP;
- Use of systemic antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to enrollment;
- Presence of dyslipidemia or other severe systemic diseases;
- Participation in other clinical trials within the past 3 months or currently enrolled in another clinical trial.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Active CAP therapyThe patients in the CAP group will receive six sessions of CAP treatment, administered once weekly for six consecutive weeks. If complete clearance of facial acne is achieved before all six sessions, CAP treatment will be discontinued early. For device selection, the CAP patch trauma therapy device (CAP-PTTD) will be used for lesions located on relatively flat areas of the face. In cases of lesions on areas with greater anatomical curvature (eg, the mandibular angle or near the tragus), the CAP jet trauma therapy device (CAP-JTTD) will be used in combination. | Device | the CAP treatment group |
| sham CAP therapythe device will be operated with the plasma-generating field disabled, so that no plasma will be produced. Only environmental cues such as sound will be simulated to ensure blinding. | Device | the placebo group |
| standard care based on the JAAD acne guidelinesthe group will receive standard care based on the JAAD acne guidelines | Other | the CAP treatment group, the placebo group |
Primary outcome
The difference in lesion clearance rate change between the CAP treatment group and the placebo group.
Time frame: Baseline and up to 6 weeks after randomisation
2 secondary outcomes
The difference between the two groups in time from randomisation to achieving 75% and 50% lesion clearance rates.
Time frame: Baseline and up to 6 weeks after randomisation
The difference in change in quality of life (QoL) as measured by the QoL-acne questionnaire before and after treatment between the two groups.
Time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks after randomisation
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Acne Vulgaris
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CO₂ Laser With and Without Intradermal Botulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Inflammatory Facial Acne Vulgaris.
Acne, Acne Papulopustulosa
RecruitingPhase 4
Safety, Tolerability, and Clinical Effectiveness of Adapalene/Clindamycin Phosphate Gel (Klenzit®-C) in Vietnamese Patients With Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris
Acne
RecruitingPhase 3
Phase 3 Study of Denifanstat in Participants With Moderate to Severe Acne (AURORA)
Acne Vulgaris
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparing Nadifloxacin Plus Tretinoin Versus Clindamycin Plus Tretinoin Creams for Mild-to-Moderate Acne
Acne Vulgaris
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Candela Technology
Hair Reduction, Tattoo Removal
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Lin Tao, MM principal investigator
Shenyang Medical College
Yun-En Liu, MD study chair
Shenyang Medical College
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Active CAP therapy in people with Acne Vulgaris, run by Shenyang Medical College at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yun-En Liu, MD (86-24-62215130, lye9901@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The difference in lesion clearance rate change between the CAP treatment group and the placebo group. (time frame: Baseline and up to 6 weeks after randomisation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jan 2026.