AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaKareALLNCT07039383

A Real-world Study of the Effectiveness of Tisagenlecleucel in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients

An observational study of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, center-based chart review study that collected real-world data for relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients receiving tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel). Five centers in the United States were included for the study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
79 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Mar 2023to 18 Jun 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: This was a retrospective, noninterventional cohort study.

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with B-cell ALL.
  • Infusion of tisa-cel happened since December 2020 and at least 1 year before the chart abstraction date.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Novartis

    East Hanover, New Jersey, 07936

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Kymriah Real-world Effectiveness in ALL (KareALL): a Retrospective Chart Review Study of Tisagenlecleucel-treated ALL Patients

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, center-based chart review study that collected real-world data for relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients receiving tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel). Five centers in the United States were included for the study.

The date of the initial tisa-cel infusion was defined as the index date. A baseline period from ALL diagnosis to the index date was used to capture patient characteristics including demographics, and disease and treatment history. The study period, defined as the period from tisa-cel infusion to the end of follow-up date, i.e. the last contact date on medical charts or death, whichever was earlier, was used to capture the clinical outcomes of tisa-cel among ALL patients.

Keywords
Tisagenlecleucel, Real-world, Chart review
Medical subject headings
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07039383
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tisa-cel CohortPatients with R/R B-cell ALL who received tisa-cel infusions between December 2020 and September 2022.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Remission Rate

    Remission rate was defined as the best overall response as either complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) to tisa-cel.

    CR: <5% blasts in bone marrow based on morphologic assessment, no evidence of extramedullary disease, full recovery of peripheral blood counts (platelets > 100x10^9/L, absolute neutrophil > 1.0x10^9/L, and circulating blasts <1%), and blood transfusions independency (i.e., no transfusion or transfusion ≤7 days).

    CRi: <5% blasts in bone marrow, no evidence of extramedullary disease, but without full recovery of peripheral blood counts with or without blood transfusions independency.

    Measured: Month 1 and Month 3

Secondary outcomes (43)
  1. Number of Patients per Demographic Category

    Demographic categories included:

    • Age group
    • Gender
    • Race
    • Ethnicity
    • Geographical region
    • Distance between residence and referral center (<5, 5-30, 30-60, >60 miles)
    • Type of insurance

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Demgraphics: Weight

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Number of Patients by Disease Characteristics Category

    Disease characteristics categories included:

    • Relapse or refractory status before tisa-cel infusion
    • CD19 tumor expression among relapsed patients before tisa-cel infusion
    • Karnofsky or Lansky performance score (PS)
    • Lymphoblast proportion in bone marrow (<5%, >= 5%)
    • Conditions of interest before tisa-cel infusion
    • Patients with relapse before tisa-cel infusion
    • Number and type of relapse before tisa-cel infusion (any bone marrow and/or central nervous system relapse)
    • Cytogenic testing performed at tisa-cel infusion
    • Cytogenic abnormalities at tisa-cel infusion
    • Number of distinct cytogenic abnormalities (1, 2, 3, 4+)
    • Comorbidities at tisa-cel infusion
    • Remission status at time of tisa-cel infusion

    The Karnofsky and Lansky PS are measures of functional impairment. They run from 0 to 100, where 0 is death and 100 is normal health. The Karnofsky scale is for patients aged 16 years or older. The Lansky scale is for patients younger than 16 years old.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Number of Patients by Treatment Characteristics Category

    Treatment characteristic categories included:

    • Treatments of interest before tisa-cel infusion
    • Number of prior lines of treatment category (1 to 7)
    • Received prior allogenic stem cell transplant (alloSCT)
    • Number of alloSCT received (0, 1, 2)
    • Year of initial tisa-cel infusion
    • Bridging treatment agent received before tisa-cel infusion
    • Lymphodepleting regimen received before tisa-cel infusion
    • Type of tisa-cel infusion dose received (single, multiple)
    • Weight at tisa-cel infusion (<= 50 kilograms [kg], >50 kg)

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Lymphoblast Proportion in Bone Marrow Before Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: Baseline

  6. ALL Disease Duration at Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: Baseline

  7. Time From Initial Diagnosis to First Relapse

    Measured: From initial diagnosis up to first tisa-cel infusion, approximately 13 years

  8. Number of Patients by Time From Initial Diagnosis to First Relapse

    Time intervals: <18 months, 18-36 months, and >36 months.

    Measured: Baseline

  9. Time From Most Recent Relapse to Initial Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: From initial diagnosis up to first tisa-cel infusion, approximately 13 years

  10. Number of Lines of Treatment Prior to Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: Baseline

  11. Time From Tisa-cel Infusion to Loss of Follow-up or Death due to Any Cause

    Measured: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

  12. Time From Leukapheresis to Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: From initial diagnosis up to first tisa-cel infusion, approximately 13 years

  13. Number of Doses for Initial Tisa-cel Infusion

    Number of doses for initial infusion was measured among those who received multiple doses.

    Measured: Baseline

  14. Weight Adjusted Transduced Cell Dose Infused in Patients Who Weighed 50 kg or Less at Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: Baseline

  15. Total Cell Dose Infused in Patients Who Weighed More Than 50 kg at Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: Baseline

  16. Number of Patients by Conditions Experienced After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

  17. Number of Patients by Bone Marrow Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Status

    Bone marrow MRD is a measure of the number of cancer cells remaining in the body after treatment. The number of patients overall with bone marrow MRD negative and those who achieved CR or CRi response with bone marrow MRD negative after tisa-cel infusion was measured. Bone marrow MRD negative was based on clinical assessment by the investigator.

    CR: <5% blasts in bone marrow based on morphologic assessment, no evidence of extramedullary disease, full recovery of peripheral blood counts (platelets > 100x10^9/L, absolute neutrophil > 1.0x10^9/L, and circulating blasts <1%), and blood transfusions independency (i.e., no transfusion or transfusion ≤7 days).

    CRi: <5% blasts in bone marrow, no evidence of extramedullary disease, but without full recovery of peripheral blood count with or without blood transfusions independency.

    Measured: Month 1 and Month 3

  18. Duration of Remission (DOR)

    DOR was defined as the time from onset of remission to relapse or death due to ALL.

    Relapse was defined as:

    • Reappearance of blasts in the blood (≥1%), or
    • Reappearance of blasts in bone marrow (≥5%), or
    • Appearance of any extramedullary disease

    Measured: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30

  19. Relapse-free Survival (RFS)

    RFS was defined as the time from onset of remission to relapse or death due to any cause.

    Relapse was defined as:

    • Reappearance of blasts in the blood (≥1%), or
    • Reappearance of blasts in bone marrow (≥5%), or
    • Appearance of any extramedullary disease

    Measured: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30

  20. Event-free Survival (EFS)

    EFS was defined as the time from tisa-cel infusion to the earliest of the following events: death due to any cause, relapse, treatment failure (i.e., no response), or new anticancer therapy for ALL (i.e., treatments other than tisa-cel or SCT).

    Relapse was defined as:

    • Reappearance of blasts in the blood (≥1%), or
    • Reappearance of blasts in bone marrow (≥5%), or
    • Appearance of any extramedullary disease

    Measured: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30

  21. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from tisa-cel infusion to the date of death due to any cause.

    Measured: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30

  22. Number of Patients who had AlloSCT After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Patient counts were categorized by:

    • Pre-planned/not pre-planned at time of tisa-cel infusion
    • Achieved/had not achieved B-cell recovery at time of alloSCT
    • Unknown B-cell recovery status
    • Did not have B-cell aplasia
    • alloSCT received within 12 months after tisa-cel infusion
    • Relapse status after tisa-cel infusion before alloSCT

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  23. Time From Tisa-cel Infusion to Subsequent AlloSCT

    Measured: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

  24. Number of Patients by Tisa-cel Reinfusion Received After Initial Infusion

    Patient counts were categorized by:

    • Received/did not receive reinfusion
    • Received infusion within 12 months after initial infusion
    • Reason for reinfusion

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  25. Time From Initial Tisa-cel Infusion to Tisa-cel Reinfusion

    Measured: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

  26. Number of Patients by Type of new Anticancer Therapy (Other Than AlloSCT or Reinfusion) Received After Tisa-cel infusion

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  27. Number of Patients by B-cell Aplasia Status After Tisa-cel Infusion

    B-cell aplasia status included:

    • Experienced B-cell aplasia
    • Recovered from B-cell aplasia

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  28. Time from Tisa-cel Infusion to B-cell Aplasia

    Measured: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

  29. Number of Patients by use of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Replacement Therapy Among Those who Experienced B-cell Aplasia

    Ig replacement therapy use was categorized as follows:

    • Received Ig replacement therapy
    • Received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy
    • Ongoing IVIG therapy
    • Stopped IVIG therapy
    • Received subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy
    • Ongoing SCIG therapy
    • B-cell aplasia recovered

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  30. Average Dose of Ig Replacement Therapy

    Ig replacement therapy included IVIG and SCIG.

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  31. Duration of Ig Replacement Therapy

    Ig replacement therapy included IVIG and SCIG.

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  32. Rate of Maintenance of B-cell Aplasia

    Measured: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30

  33. Number of Patients by Hospitalizations at Initial Tisa-cel Infusion

    Hospitalization categories included not hospitalized, hospitalized for Tisa-cel infusion, and subsequently admitted to intensive care unit (ICU).

    Measured: Baseline

  34. Length of Stay in Hospital for Initial Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  35. Number of Patients by Hospitalizations After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Hospitalization categories included hospitalized, not hospitalized, and first hospitalization.

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  36. Number of Hospitalizations After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  37. Length of Stay in Hospital After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  38. Time From Initial Tisa-cel Infusion to the First Hospitalization

    Measured: Baseline up to approximately 3 years

  39. Number of Patients by Primary Reason for the First Hospitalization

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  40. Number of Patients by ICU Admissions After Tisa-cel Infusion

    ICU admission categories included admitted to ICU, not admitted to ICU, and first ICU admission.

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  41. Number of ICU Admissions After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  42. Length of Stay per ICU Admission After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

  43. Number of Patients by Primary Reason for ICU Admission After Tisa-cel Infusion

    Measured: Up to approximately 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jun 2025
  2. Study start1 Mar 2023
  3. Primary completion18 Jun 2024
  4. Study completion18 Jun 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
79 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07039383
Sponsor's protocol ID
CCTL019BUS08
Acronym
KareALL
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
18 Jun 2025
Last updated
26 Jun 2025
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Remission Rate (time frame: Month 1 and Month 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in