Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaKareALLNCT07039383
A Real-world Study of the Effectiveness of Tisagenlecleucel in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients
An observational study of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, center-based chart review study that collected real-world data for relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients receiving tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel). Five centers in the United States were included for the study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 79 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2023to 18 Jun 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: This was a retrospective, noninterventional cohort study.
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with B-cell ALL.
- Infusion of tisa-cel happened since December 2020 and at least 1 year before the chart abstraction date.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Kymriah Real-world Effectiveness in ALL (KareALL): a Retrospective Chart Review Study of Tisagenlecleucel-treated ALL Patients
This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, center-based chart review study that collected real-world data for relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients receiving tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel). Five centers in the United States were included for the study.
The date of the initial tisa-cel infusion was defined as the index date. A baseline period from ALL diagnosis to the index date was used to capture patient characteristics including demographics, and disease and treatment history. The study period, defined as the period from tisa-cel infusion to the end of follow-up date, i.e. the last contact date on medical charts or death, whichever was earlier, was used to capture the clinical outcomes of tisa-cel among ALL patients.
- Conditions
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Keywords
- Tisagenlecleucel, Real-world, Chart review
- Medical subject headings
- Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tisa-cel Cohort | Patients with R/R B-cell ALL who received tisa-cel infusions between December 2020 and September 2022. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Remission Rate
Remission rate was defined as the best overall response as either complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) to tisa-cel.
CR: <5% blasts in bone marrow based on morphologic assessment, no evidence of extramedullary disease, full recovery of peripheral blood counts (platelets > 100x10^9/L, absolute neutrophil > 1.0x10^9/L, and circulating blasts <1%), and blood transfusions independency (i.e., no transfusion or transfusion ≤7 days).
CRi: <5% blasts in bone marrow, no evidence of extramedullary disease, but without full recovery of peripheral blood counts with or without blood transfusions independency.
Measured: Month 1 and Month 3
Secondary outcomes (43)
Number of Patients per Demographic Category
Demographic categories included:
- Age group
- Gender
- Race
- Ethnicity
- Geographical region
- Distance between residence and referral center (<5, 5-30, 30-60, >60 miles)
- Type of insurance
Measured: Baseline
Demgraphics: Weight
Measured: Baseline
Number of Patients by Disease Characteristics Category
Disease characteristics categories included:
- Relapse or refractory status before tisa-cel infusion
- CD19 tumor expression among relapsed patients before tisa-cel infusion
- Karnofsky or Lansky performance score (PS)
- Lymphoblast proportion in bone marrow (<5%, >= 5%)
- Conditions of interest before tisa-cel infusion
- Patients with relapse before tisa-cel infusion
- Number and type of relapse before tisa-cel infusion (any bone marrow and/or central nervous system relapse)
- Cytogenic testing performed at tisa-cel infusion
- Cytogenic abnormalities at tisa-cel infusion
- Number of distinct cytogenic abnormalities (1, 2, 3, 4+)
- Comorbidities at tisa-cel infusion
- Remission status at time of tisa-cel infusion
The Karnofsky and Lansky PS are measures of functional impairment. They run from 0 to 100, where 0 is death and 100 is normal health. The Karnofsky scale is for patients aged 16 years or older. The Lansky scale is for patients younger than 16 years old.
Measured: Baseline
Number of Patients by Treatment Characteristics Category
Treatment characteristic categories included:
- Treatments of interest before tisa-cel infusion
- Number of prior lines of treatment category (1 to 7)
- Received prior allogenic stem cell transplant (alloSCT)
- Number of alloSCT received (0, 1, 2)
- Year of initial tisa-cel infusion
- Bridging treatment agent received before tisa-cel infusion
- Lymphodepleting regimen received before tisa-cel infusion
- Type of tisa-cel infusion dose received (single, multiple)
- Weight at tisa-cel infusion (<= 50 kilograms [kg], >50 kg)
Measured: Baseline
Lymphoblast Proportion in Bone Marrow Before Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: Baseline
ALL Disease Duration at Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: Baseline
Time From Initial Diagnosis to First Relapse
Measured: From initial diagnosis up to first tisa-cel infusion, approximately 13 years
Number of Patients by Time From Initial Diagnosis to First Relapse
Time intervals: <18 months, 18-36 months, and >36 months.
Measured: Baseline
Time From Most Recent Relapse to Initial Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: From initial diagnosis up to first tisa-cel infusion, approximately 13 years
Number of Lines of Treatment Prior to Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: Baseline
Time From Tisa-cel Infusion to Loss of Follow-up or Death due to Any Cause
Measured: Baseline up to approximately 3 years
Time From Leukapheresis to Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: From initial diagnosis up to first tisa-cel infusion, approximately 13 years
Number of Doses for Initial Tisa-cel Infusion
Number of doses for initial infusion was measured among those who received multiple doses.
Measured: Baseline
Weight Adjusted Transduced Cell Dose Infused in Patients Who Weighed 50 kg or Less at Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: Baseline
Total Cell Dose Infused in Patients Who Weighed More Than 50 kg at Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: Baseline
Number of Patients by Conditions Experienced After Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: Baseline up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by Bone Marrow Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Status
Bone marrow MRD is a measure of the number of cancer cells remaining in the body after treatment. The number of patients overall with bone marrow MRD negative and those who achieved CR or CRi response with bone marrow MRD negative after tisa-cel infusion was measured. Bone marrow MRD negative was based on clinical assessment by the investigator.
CR: <5% blasts in bone marrow based on morphologic assessment, no evidence of extramedullary disease, full recovery of peripheral blood counts (platelets > 100x10^9/L, absolute neutrophil > 1.0x10^9/L, and circulating blasts <1%), and blood transfusions independency (i.e., no transfusion or transfusion ≤7 days).
CRi: <5% blasts in bone marrow, no evidence of extramedullary disease, but without full recovery of peripheral blood count with or without blood transfusions independency.
Measured: Month 1 and Month 3
Duration of Remission (DOR)
DOR was defined as the time from onset of remission to relapse or death due to ALL.
Relapse was defined as:
- Reappearance of blasts in the blood (≥1%), or
- Reappearance of blasts in bone marrow (≥5%), or
- Appearance of any extramedullary disease
Measured: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30
Relapse-free Survival (RFS)
RFS was defined as the time from onset of remission to relapse or death due to any cause.
Relapse was defined as:
- Reappearance of blasts in the blood (≥1%), or
- Reappearance of blasts in bone marrow (≥5%), or
- Appearance of any extramedullary disease
Measured: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30
Event-free Survival (EFS)
EFS was defined as the time from tisa-cel infusion to the earliest of the following events: death due to any cause, relapse, treatment failure (i.e., no response), or new anticancer therapy for ALL (i.e., treatments other than tisa-cel or SCT).
Relapse was defined as:
- Reappearance of blasts in the blood (≥1%), or
- Reappearance of blasts in bone marrow (≥5%), or
- Appearance of any extramedullary disease
Measured: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from tisa-cel infusion to the date of death due to any cause.
Measured: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30
Number of Patients who had AlloSCT After Tisa-cel Infusion
Patient counts were categorized by:
- Pre-planned/not pre-planned at time of tisa-cel infusion
- Achieved/had not achieved B-cell recovery at time of alloSCT
- Unknown B-cell recovery status
- Did not have B-cell aplasia
- alloSCT received within 12 months after tisa-cel infusion
- Relapse status after tisa-cel infusion before alloSCT
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Time From Tisa-cel Infusion to Subsequent AlloSCT
Measured: Baseline up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by Tisa-cel Reinfusion Received After Initial Infusion
Patient counts were categorized by:
- Received/did not receive reinfusion
- Received infusion within 12 months after initial infusion
- Reason for reinfusion
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Time From Initial Tisa-cel Infusion to Tisa-cel Reinfusion
Measured: Baseline up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by Type of new Anticancer Therapy (Other Than AlloSCT or Reinfusion) Received After Tisa-cel infusion
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by B-cell Aplasia Status After Tisa-cel Infusion
B-cell aplasia status included:
- Experienced B-cell aplasia
- Recovered from B-cell aplasia
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Time from Tisa-cel Infusion to B-cell Aplasia
Measured: Baseline up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by use of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Replacement Therapy Among Those who Experienced B-cell Aplasia
Ig replacement therapy use was categorized as follows:
- Received Ig replacement therapy
- Received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy
- Ongoing IVIG therapy
- Stopped IVIG therapy
- Received subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy
- Ongoing SCIG therapy
- B-cell aplasia recovered
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Average Dose of Ig Replacement Therapy
Ig replacement therapy included IVIG and SCIG.
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Duration of Ig Replacement Therapy
Ig replacement therapy included IVIG and SCIG.
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Rate of Maintenance of B-cell Aplasia
Measured: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30
Number of Patients by Hospitalizations at Initial Tisa-cel Infusion
Hospitalization categories included not hospitalized, hospitalized for Tisa-cel infusion, and subsequently admitted to intensive care unit (ICU).
Measured: Baseline
Length of Stay in Hospital for Initial Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by Hospitalizations After Tisa-cel Infusion
Hospitalization categories included hospitalized, not hospitalized, and first hospitalization.
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Number of Hospitalizations After Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Length of Stay in Hospital After Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Time From Initial Tisa-cel Infusion to the First Hospitalization
Measured: Baseline up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by Primary Reason for the First Hospitalization
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by ICU Admissions After Tisa-cel Infusion
ICU admission categories included admitted to ICU, not admitted to ICU, and first ICU admission.
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Number of ICU Admissions After Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Length of Stay per ICU Admission After Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by Primary Reason for ICU Admission After Tisa-cel Infusion
Measured: Up to approximately 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2025
- Study start1 Mar 2023
- Primary completion18 Jun 2024
- Study completion18 Jun 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 79 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07039383
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CCTL019BUS08
- Acronym
- KareALL
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 26 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Kymriah Real-world Effectiveness in ALL (KareALL): a Retrospective Chart Review Study of Tisagenlecleucel-treated ALL Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07039383
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KareALL / CCTL019BUS08
- Conditions
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Keywords
- Tisagenlecleucel, Real-world, Chart review
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 79 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jun 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, center-based chart review study that collected real-world data for relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients receiving tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel). Five centers in the United States were included for the study.
The date of the initial tisa-cel infusion was defined as the index date. A baseline period from ALL diagnosis to the index date was used to capture patient characteristics including demographics, and disease and treatment history. The study period, defined as the period from tisa-cel infusion to the end of follow-up date, i.e. the last contact date on medical charts or death, whichever was earlier, was used to capture the clinical outcomes of tisa-cel among ALL patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tisa-cel Cohort | – | –Patients with R/R B-cell ALL who received tisa-cel infusions between December 2020 and September 2022. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This was a retrospective, noninterventional cohort study.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosed with B-cell ALL.
- Infusion of tisa-cel happened since December 2020 and at least 1 year before the chart abstraction date.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Remission Rate
Time frame: Month 1 and Month 3
Remission rate was defined as the best overall response as either complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) to tisa-cel. CR: <5% blasts in bone marrow based on morphologic assessment, no evidence of extramedullary disease, full recovery of peripheral blood counts (platelets > 100x10^9/L, absolute neutrophil > 1.0x10^9/L, and circulating blasts <1%), and blood transfusions independency (i.e., no transfusion or transfusion ≤7 days). CRi: <5% blasts in bone marrow, no evidence of extramedullary disease, but without full recovery of peripheral blood counts with or without blood transfusions independency.
43 secondary outcomes
Number of Patients per Demographic Category
Time frame: Baseline
Demgraphics: Weight
Time frame: Baseline
Number of Patients by Disease Characteristics Category
Time frame: Baseline
Number of Patients by Treatment Characteristics Category
Time frame: Baseline
Lymphoblast Proportion in Bone Marrow Before Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Baseline
ALL Disease Duration at Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Baseline
Time From Initial Diagnosis to First Relapse
Time frame: From initial diagnosis up to first tisa-cel infusion, approximately 13 years
Number of Patients by Time From Initial Diagnosis to First Relapse
Time frame: Baseline
Time From Most Recent Relapse to Initial Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: From initial diagnosis up to first tisa-cel infusion, approximately 13 years
Number of Lines of Treatment Prior to Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Baseline
Time From Tisa-cel Infusion to Loss of Follow-up or Death due to Any Cause
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 3 years
Time From Leukapheresis to Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: From initial diagnosis up to first tisa-cel infusion, approximately 13 years
Number of Doses for Initial Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Baseline
Weight Adjusted Transduced Cell Dose Infused in Patients Who Weighed 50 kg or Less at Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Baseline
Total Cell Dose Infused in Patients Who Weighed More Than 50 kg at Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Baseline
Number of Patients by Conditions Experienced After Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by Bone Marrow Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Status
Time frame: Month 1 and Month 3
Duration of Remission (DOR)
Time frame: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30
Relapse-free Survival (RFS)
Time frame: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30
Event-free Survival (EFS)
Time frame: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Months 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30
Number of Patients who had AlloSCT After Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Time From Tisa-cel Infusion to Subsequent AlloSCT
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by Tisa-cel Reinfusion Received After Initial Infusion
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Time From Initial Tisa-cel Infusion to Tisa-cel Reinfusion
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by Type of new Anticancer Therapy (Other Than AlloSCT or Reinfusion) Received After Tisa-cel infusion
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by B-cell Aplasia Status After Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Time from Tisa-cel Infusion to B-cell Aplasia
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by use of Immunoglobulin (Ig) Replacement Therapy Among Those who Experienced B-cell Aplasia
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Average Dose of Ig Replacement Therapy
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Duration of Ig Replacement Therapy
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Rate of Maintenance of B-cell Aplasia
Time frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30
Number of Patients by Hospitalizations at Initial Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Baseline
Length of Stay in Hospital for Initial Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by Hospitalizations After Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Number of Hospitalizations After Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Length of Stay in Hospital After Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Time From Initial Tisa-cel Infusion to the First Hospitalization
Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by Primary Reason for the First Hospitalization
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Number of Patients by ICU Admissions After Tisa-cel Infusion
Time frame: Up to approximately 3 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jun 2025.
Related trials for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Recruiting
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Testing and Monitoring of B-Cell Recovery to Guide Management Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CART) Induced Remission in Children and Young Adults With B Lineage Acute Lymph...
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Dose Finding Study of MB-CART2219.1
Lymphoma, CLL
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
RecruitingPhase 1
Anti-CRLF2-R/TSLPR Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells (TSLPR-CART) in Participants With Recurrent or Refractory CRLF2-R/TSLPR-Overexpressing B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Remission Rate (time frame: Month 1 and Month 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2025.