Colorectal CarcinomaMOTIONNCT07035691
New bioMarkers tO straTIfy cOlorectal caNcer Referrals
An observational study of Colorectal Carcinoma and Polyp, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate if a blood test for circulating progastrin (hPG80) and transposable elements (TEs) can accurately predict colorectal cancer (CRC) or polyps in adult patients referred to the 2-week wait (2WW) or Straight to Test (STT) pathways for suspected lower gastrointestinal… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Carcinoma, Polyp, Colorectal Adenoma
- How many people
- 582 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2025to 31 Aug 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All adult patients who are referred by the GPs to the Barts Health NHS trust under the 2WW referral pathway and the STT pathway would be potentially eligible. We are planning to recruit patients initially only from the Royal London Hospital site and there is potential to expand recruitment to other hospital sites of Barts Health NHS Trust, if necessary.
Who may be able to join
- Adult, lower GI 2WW and or Straight to Test (STT) referral patients with suspected lower GI cancer.
- Male and Female patients aged >18 years.
- 2WW referral patients with no history of inflammatory bowel disease.
- Performance status (ECOG 0-2; and 3 pending clinical assessment of fitness).
- Patients with capacity to consent to the study.
Who cannot join
- Any patients referred outside of the 2WW and or STT referral pathways with suspected Lower GI cancer or those referred as an emergency with or suspected CRC.
- Age < 18 years.
- Patients not fit for standard investigations (e.g. not fit for gastroscopy, colonoscopy or CT colonography) in the 2WW pathway.
- Patients with no capacity to consent or who declined consent for participation.
- Patients with untreated solid organ cancers.
- Patients with known inflammatory bowel disease.
- Patients with documented familial type CRC.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Barts Health NHS Trust
London, England, E1 2AT
Valentin Butnari, MBBS, MSc, +44 02078828747, v.butnari@qmul.ac.uk
sherif.raouf@nhs.net
About this study
Official title: Plasma Biomarkers in Stratifying Patients Referred Via the Lower Gastro-intestinal (LGI) Suspected Cancer Two-week Wait (2WW) Pathway
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate if a blood test for circulating progastrin (hPG80) and transposable elements (TEs) can accurately predict colorectal cancer (CRC) or polyps in adult patients referred to the 2-week wait (2WW) or Straight to Test (STT) pathways for suspected lower gastrointestinal cancer.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
Can plasma hPG80 levels accurately predict a diagnosis of CRC or polyps in patients undergoing standard 2WW investigations? Can transposable elements (TEs) in the plasma serve as predictive biomarkers for CRC diagnosis in these patients? What are the patient preferences for different diagnostic tests for CRC, particularly a blood-based test compared to more invasive methods?
Participants will:
Provide a 20ml blood sample during a routine hospital visit for their 2WW diagnostic test (e.g., colonoscopy, CT Colon).
Undergo standard clinical investigations as determined by their treating clinicians.
Have their final diagnosis (cancer, polyp, or normal) correlated with their plasma hPG80 levels.
For a subset of 100 participants (25 with confirmed CRC, 75 non-cancer), have their plasma analyzed for circulating signatures using RNAseq and DNAseq.
Complete an electronic post-study questionnaire to explore their preferences and experiences with different CRC diagnostic tests used within the 2WW pathway.
Read the detailed description
Current Challenges in CRC Diagnosis Currently, the 2WW pathway for bowel symptoms typically involves a stool-based faecal immunochemical test (FIT) before referral. While the 2WW pathway is vital for expedited diagnosis, a systematic review from 2009 revealed that only 9.5% of patients referred with lower gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms through this pathway are ultimately diagnosed with cancer. This low positive predictive value places immense pressure on an already overstretched healthcare system, leading to unnecessary invasive investigations, increased costs, and prolonged patient anxiety. There's a clear need for more accurate and less invasive diagnostic tools to better stratify patients.
Progastrin (hPG80) as a Biomarker hPG80, a circulating blood biomarker, is a precursor to gastrin and has shown promise in detecting various GI cancers, including CRC. In healthy individuals, hPG80 is typically undetectable as it's converted to gastrin. However, elevated hPG80 levels can be found in the plasma of many patients with both early and advanced GI malignancies. Studies have shown an elevated hPG80 level in CRC subjects compared to those with benign polyps. This study will investigate whether plasma hPG80 levels can accurately predict CRC or polyps in 2WW patients and distinguish the absence of cancer based on PG levels.
Transposable Elements (TEs) as Biomarkers Transposable elements (TEs), which are mobile genetic elements, are also emerging as potential cancer biomarkers. Recent research has linked TEs to various cancers, including CRC. The Dr. Madapura's lab has shown that transposable element-derived RNA signatures can be superior predictors of diseases. This study will explore the role of TEs in predicting CRC diagnosis within the 2WW referral cohort. Specifically, it will identify and evaluate TEs in the plasma of these patients as potential predictive biomarkers. The analysis will involve RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and nanopore DNA sequencing (DNAseq) of plasma samples to look for transcript signatures and epigenetic modifications of DNA.
Study Design and Population This is a prospective, observational, cohort study conducted at Barts Health NHS Trust, initially focusing on the Royal London Hospital site. The study will recruit 582 adult patients referred via the 2WW or Straight to Test (STT) pathways for suspected lower GI cancer. Eligible patients will be aged over 18 years, have no history of inflammatory bowel disease, and have a performance status of ECOG 0-2 (or 3, pending clinical assessment). Patients with a family history of CRC are not excluded. Those with a documented familial type of CRC, untreated solid organ cancers, or who are not fit for standard investigations will be excluded.
Data Collection and Analysis Upon informed consent, a 20ml venous blood sample will be collected from participants at their first clinical appointment, usually during a routine hospital visit for their 2WW diagnostic test (e.g., colonoscopy, CT colonography). This sample will be used for both PG and TE analysis. Plasma PG levels will be measured, and a subset of 100 samples (25 confirmed CRC and 75 non-cancer samples) will undergo RNAseq and DNAseq for TE analysis.
The primary objective is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of plasma hPG80 levels in diagnosing CRC and benign colonic polyps. This will involve calculating positive and negative predictive values, and performing Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess the discriminatory ability of PG.
The secondary objective is exploratory and focuses on identifying and validating novel TEs as potential biomarkers for CRC diagnosis. This will involve the RNAseq and DNAseq analysis of the selected 100 samples.
A tertiary objective involves a post-study patient questionnaire survey to understand patient preferences and choices regarding CRC diagnostic tests, exploring their experience with a blood-based test compared to more invasive methods. This will be distributed electronically via SurveyMonkey™.
Expected Outcomes and Benefits
The study aims to provide crucial insights into whether adding a simple blood test (hPG80 and/or TE analysis) to the existing 2WW pathway can:
Improve diagnostic accuracy and speed: Leading to more effective and timely treatment.
Alleviate patient stress: By providing quicker and more accurate diagnoses, reducing anxiety associated with uncertainty.
Reduce unnecessary invasive procedures: Potentially avoiding colonoscopy-related complications and overall costs for the NHS.
Prioritize urgent cases: By better stratifying patients, allowing healthcare resources to be directed to those most in need.
There are no direct benefits to the study participants, but the knowledge gained is expected to have a significant long-term clinical impact on screening for suspected lower GI malignancies.
The study is funded by a research grant from LAPResearch UK.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Carcinoma, Polyp, Colorectal Adenoma
- Keywords
- Colorectal cancer, Cancer, Polyp, Adenoma, Cancer surveillance, Flag symptoms, Liquid biopsy, Progastrin, Circulating biomarkers, Biomarkers, Risk stratification, Early diagnosis
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Polyps, Neoplasms, Adenoma, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with flag symptoms referred via 2 week wait pathway to exclude colorectal cancer. | An additional blood sample for the study. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Predictive value of hPG80 to identify colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyp
Sensitivity and Specificity of hPG80 to determine colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyp
Measured: From enrollment to 8 weeks (or until the 2WW diagnostic test is completed and the outcome available).
Identification of Transposable Element (TE) signatures in plasma of colorectal cancer patients
Expression of transposable element (TE) signatures in the plasma of patients with colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps compared to healthy controls.
Measured: From enrollment to 8 weeks (or until the 2WW diagnostic test is completed and the outcome available).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jun 2025
- Study start30 Jun 2025
- Primary completion31 Aug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Queen Mary University of LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 582 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Barts & The London NHS Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mohamed A Thaha, MBBS, FRCS, PhD, PGCe Hlt Econ, Principal investigator, Queen Mary University of London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07035691
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 321809
- Other IDs
- WT 10042913
- Acronym
- MOTION
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD used in the publications might be shared under strict regulations.
Publications
Reggiardo RE, Maroli SV, Peddu V, Davidson AE, Hill A, LaMontagne E, Aaraj YA, Jain M, Chan SY, Kim DH. Profiling of repetitive RNA sequences in the blood plasma of patients with cancer. Nat Biomed Eng. 2023 Dec;7(12):1627-1635. doi: 10.1038/s41551-023-01081-7. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
PubMed 37652985Alix-Panabieres C, Pantel K. Liquid Biopsy: From Discovery to Clinical Application. Cancer Discov. 2021 Apr;11(4):858-873. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1311.
PubMed 33811121Lykoskoufis NMR, Planet E, Ongen H, Trono D, Dermitzakis ET. Transposable elements mediate genetic effects altering the expression of nearby genes in colorectal cancer. Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 25;15(1):749. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42405-0.
PubMed 38272908Prieur A, Cappellini M, Habif G, Lefranc MP, Mazard T, Morency E, Pascussi JM, Flaceliere M, Cahuzac N, Vire B, Dubuc B, Durochat A, Liaud P, Ollier J, Pfeiffer C, Poupeau S, Saywell V, Planque C, Assenat E, Bibeau F, Bourgaux JF, Pujol P, Sezeur A, Ychou M, Joubert D. Targeting the Wnt Pathway and Cancer Stem Cells with Anti-progastrin Humanized Antibodies as a Potential Treatment for K-RAS-Mutated Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):5267-5280. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0533. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
PubMed 28600477You B, Mercier F, Assenat E, Langlois-Jacques C, Glehen O, Soule J, Payen L, Kepenekian V, Dupuy M, Belouin F, Morency E, Saywell V, Flaceliere M, Elies P, Liaud P, Mazard T, Maucort-Boulch D, Tan W, Vire B, Villeneuve L, Ychou M, Kohli M, Joubert D, Prieur A. The oncogenic and druggable hPG80 (Progastrin) is overexpressed in multiple cancers and detected in the blood of patients. EBioMedicine. 2020 Jan;51:102574. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.11.035. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
PubMed 31877416
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Plasma Biomarkers in Stratifying Patients Referred Via the Lower Gastro-intestinal (LGI) Suspected Cancer Two-week Wait (2WW) Pathway
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07035691
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MOTION / 321809
- Conditions
- Colorectal Carcinoma, Polyp, Colorectal Adenoma
- Keywords
- Colorectal cancer, Cancer, Polyp, Adenoma, Cancer surveillance, Flag symptoms, Liquid biopsy, Progastrin
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 582 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Barts & The London NHS Trust
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate if a blood test for circulating progastrin (hPG80) and transposable elements (TEs) can accurately predict colorectal cancer (CRC) or polyps in adult patients referred to the 2-week wait (2WW) or Straight to Test (STT) pathways for suspected lower gastrointestinal cancer.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Can plasma hPG80 levels accurately predict a diagnosis of CRC or polyps in patients undergoing standard 2WW investigations? Can transposable elements (TEs) in the plasma serve as predictive biomarkers for CRC diagnosis in these patients? What are the patient preferences for different diagnostic tests for CRC, particularly a blood-based test compared to more invasive methods?
Participants will:
Provide a 20ml blood sample during a routine hospital visit for their 2WW diagnostic test (e.g., colonoscopy, CT Colon).
Undergo standard clinical investigations as determined by their treating clinicians.
Have their final diagnosis (cancer, polyp, or normal) correlated with their plasma hPG80 levels.
For a subset of 100 participants (25 with confirmed CRC, 75 non-cancer), have their plasma analyzed for circulating signatures using RNAseq and DNAseq.
Complete an electronic post-study questionnaire to explore their preferences and experiences with different CRC diagnostic tests used within the 2WW pathway.
Detailed description
Current Challenges in CRC Diagnosis Currently, the 2WW pathway for bowel symptoms typically involves a stool-based faecal immunochemical test (FIT) before referral. While the 2WW pathway is vital for expedited diagnosis, a systematic review from 2009 revealed that only 9.5% of patients referred with lower gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms through this pathway are ultimately diagnosed with cancer. This low positive predictive value places immense pressure on an already overstretched healthcare system, leading to unnecessary invasive investigations, increased costs, and prolonged patient anxiety. There's a clear need for more accurate and less invasive diagnostic tools to better stratify patients.
Progastrin (hPG80) as a Biomarker hPG80, a circulating blood biomarker, is a precursor to gastrin and has shown promise in detecting various GI cancers, including CRC. In healthy individuals, hPG80 is typically undetectable as it's converted to gastrin. However, elevated hPG80 levels can be found in the plasma of many patients with both early and advanced GI malignancies. Studies have shown an elevated hPG80 level in CRC subjects compared to those with benign polyps. This study will investigate whether plasma hPG80 levels can accurately predict CRC or polyps in 2WW patients and distinguish the absence of cancer based on PG levels.
Transposable Elements (TEs) as Biomarkers Transposable elements (TEs), which are mobile genetic elements, are also emerging as potential cancer biomarkers. Recent research has linked TEs to various cancers, including CRC. The Dr. Madapura's lab has shown that transposable element-derived RNA signatures can be superior predictors of diseases. This study will explore the role of TEs in predicting CRC diagnosis within the 2WW referral cohort. Specifically, it will identify and evaluate TEs in the plasma of these patients as potential predictive biomarkers. The analysis will involve RNA sequencing (RNAseq) and nanopore DNA sequencing (DNAseq) of plasma samples to look for transcript signatures and epigenetic modifications of DNA.
Study Design and Population This is a prospective, observational, cohort study conducted at Barts Health NHS Trust, initially focusing on the Royal London Hospital site. The study will recruit 582 adult patients referred via the 2WW or Straight to Test (STT) pathways for suspected lower GI cancer. Eligible patients will be aged over 18 years, have no history of inflammatory bowel disease, and have a performance status of ECOG 0-2 (or 3, pending clinical assessment). Patients with a family history of CRC are not excluded. Those with a documented familial type of CRC, untreated solid organ cancers, or who are not fit for standard investigations will be excluded.
Data Collection and Analysis Upon informed consent, a 20ml venous blood sample will be collected from participants at their first clinical appointment, usually during a routine hospital visit for their 2WW diagnostic test (e.g., colonoscopy, CT colonography). This sample will be used for both PG and TE analysis. Plasma PG levels will be measured, and a subset of 100 samples (25 confirmed CRC and 75 non-cancer samples) will undergo RNAseq and DNAseq for TE analysis.
The primary objective is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of plasma hPG80 levels in diagnosing CRC and benign colonic polyps. This will involve calculating positive and negative predictive values, and performing Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess the discriminatory ability of PG.
The secondary objective is exploratory and focuses on identifying and validating novel TEs as potential biomarkers for CRC diagnosis. This will involve the RNAseq and DNAseq analysis of the selected 100 samples.
A tertiary objective involves a post-study patient questionnaire survey to understand patient preferences and choices regarding CRC diagnostic tests, exploring their experience with a blood-based test compared to more invasive methods. This will be distributed electronically via SurveyMonkey™.
Expected Outcomes and Benefits
The study aims to provide crucial insights into whether adding a simple blood test (hPG80 and/or TE analysis) to the existing 2WW pathway can:
Improve diagnostic accuracy and speed: Leading to more effective and timely treatment.
Alleviate patient stress: By providing quicker and more accurate diagnoses, reducing anxiety associated with uncertainty.
Reduce unnecessary invasive procedures: Potentially avoiding colonoscopy-related complications and overall costs for the NHS.
Prioritize urgent cases: By better stratifying patients, allowing healthcare resources to be directed to those most in need.
There are no direct benefits to the study participants, but the knowledge gained is expected to have a significant long-term clinical impact on screening for suspected lower GI malignancies.
The study is funded by a research grant from LAPResearch UK.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with flag symptoms referred via 2 week wait pathway to exclude colorectal cancer. | – | –An additional blood sample for the study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All adult patients who are referred by the GPs to the Barts Health NHS trust under the 2WW referral pathway and the STT pathway would be potentially eligible. We are planning to recruit patients initially only from the Royal London Hospital site and there is potential to expand recruitment to other hospital sites of Barts Health NHS Trust, if necessary.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adult, lower GI 2WW and or Straight to Test (STT) referral patients with suspected lower GI cancer.
- Male and Female patients aged >18 years.
- 2WW referral patients with no history of inflammatory bowel disease.
- Performance status (ECOG 0-2; and 3 pending clinical assessment of fitness).
- Patients with capacity to consent to the study.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Any patients referred outside of the 2WW and or STT referral pathways with suspected Lower GI cancer or those referred as an emergency with or suspected CRC.
- Age < 18 years.
- Patients not fit for standard investigations (e.g. not fit for gastroscopy, colonoscopy or CT colonography) in the 2WW pathway.
- Patients with no capacity to consent or who declined consent for participation.
- Patients with untreated solid organ cancers.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Predictive value of hPG80 to identify colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyp
Time frame: From enrollment to 8 weeks (or until the 2WW diagnostic test is completed and the outcome available).
Sensitivity and Specificity of hPG80 to determine colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyp
Identification of Transposable Element (TE) signatures in plasma of colorectal cancer patients
Time frame: From enrollment to 8 weeks (or until the 2WW diagnostic test is completed and the outcome available).
Expression of transposable element (TE) signatures in the plasma of patients with colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps compared to healthy controls.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 37652985Reggiardo RE, Maroli SV, Peddu V, Davidson AE, Hill A, LaMontagne E, Aaraj YA, Jain M, Chan SY, Kim DH. Profiling of repetitive RNA sequences in the blood plasma of patients with cancer. Nat Biomed Eng. 2023 Dec;7(12):1627-1635. doi: 10.1038/s41551-023-01081-7. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
- Background: PubMed 33811121Alix-Panabieres C, Pantel K. Liquid Biopsy: From Discovery to Clinical Application. Cancer Discov. 2021 Apr;11(4):858-873. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1311.
- Background: PubMed 38272908Lykoskoufis NMR, Planet E, Ongen H, Trono D, Dermitzakis ET. Transposable elements mediate genetic effects altering the expression of nearby genes in colorectal cancer. Nat Commun. 2024 Jan 25;15(1):749. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42405-0.
- Background: PubMed 28600477Prieur A, Cappellini M, Habif G, Lefranc MP, Mazard T, Morency E, Pascussi JM, Flaceliere M, Cahuzac N, Vire B, Dubuc B, Durochat A, Liaud P, Ollier J, Pfeiffer C, Poupeau S, Saywell V, Planque C, Assenat E, Bibeau F, Bourgaux JF, Pujol P, Sezeur A, Ychou M, Joubert D. Targeting the Wnt Pathway and Cancer Stem Cells with Anti-progastrin Humanized Antibodies as a Potential Treatment for K-RAS-Mutated Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):5267-5280. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0533. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
- Background: PubMed 31877416You B, Mercier F, Assenat E, Langlois-Jacques C, Glehen O, Soule J, Payen L, Kepenekian V, Dupuy M, Belouin F, Morency E, Saywell V, Flaceliere M, Elies P, Liaud P, Mazard T, Maucort-Boulch D, Tan W, Vire B, Villeneuve L, Ychou M, Kohli M, Joubert D, Prieur A. The oncogenic and druggable hPG80 (Progastrin) is overexpressed in multiple cancers and detected in the blood of patients. EBioMedicine. 2020 Jan;51:102574. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.11.035. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD used in the publications might be shared under strict regulations.
Related trials for Colorectal Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Alberta Cancer Exercise Dose in Colorectal Cancer
Cancer, Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Mohamed A Thaha, MBBS, FRCS, PhD, PGCe Hlt Econ principal investigator
Queen Mary University of London
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Colorectal Carcinoma and Polyp, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Valentin Butnari, MBBS, MSc (+442078828747, v.butnari@qmul.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Predictive value of hPG80 to identify colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyp (time frame: From enrollment to 8 weeks (or until the 2WW diagnostic test is completed and the outcome available).). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07035691, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2026.