Cerebral Palsy (CP)NCT07002567
Predictors of Motor İmagery Performance in Cerebral Palsy
An observational study of Cerebral Palsy (CP) and Spasticity, run by Abant Izzet Baysal University at 3 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
There are very few studies in the literature examining the effect of age on motor imagery ability in children with cerebral palsy. To our knowledge, no studies have investigated the impact of other related factors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebral Palsy (CP), Spasticity, Motor Learning
- What is being tested?
- Implicit motor imagery and Explicit motor imagery
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 4 Jul 2025to 1 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 18 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Study population: This study included between the ages 6 and 18 years 27 children with unilateral and 27 bilateral cerebral palsy with level 1 or 2 according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Manual Ability Classification System (MACS),
Who may be able to join
- 6-18 year olds diagnosed with spastic type unilateral and bilateral diplegia CP,
- Those with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I - II,
- Hand Skill Classification System (EBSS) level I-II,
- Children with a Mini-Mental Test score of at least 24 points,
- Those with IQ <70, Those who can understand the guidelines of the study
Who cannot join
- Those with advanced vision, hearing and attention problems,
- Those with advanced cardiovascular or cognitive problems,
- Upper extremity botulinum toxin administration and surgery in the last 6 months,
- Those who have received MI training in the last 6 months
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University
Bolu, Gölköy, 14000
Seda AYAZ TAŞ, Phd, 05495458040, seda.ayaztas@ibu.edu.tr
Düzce Gökkuşağı Özel Eğitim ve Rehabilitasyon Merkezi
Düzce, Merkez, 81100
Seda AYAZ TAŞ, Phd, 05495458040, seda.ayaztas@ibu.edu.tr
Kdz. Ereğli Gökkuşağı Özel Eğitim ve Rehabilitasyon Merkezi
Zonguldak, Ereğli, 67300
Seda AYAZ TAŞ, Phd, 05495458040, seda.ayaztas@ibu.edu.tr
About this study
There are very few studies in the literature examining the effect of age on motor imagery ability in children with cerebral palsy. To our knowledge, no studies have investigated the impact of other related factors. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of age, sex, body mass index, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level, and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) level on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
H1-1: Age has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
Read more
H1-2: Sex has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
H1-3: Clinical type has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
H1-4: Body mass index has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
H1-5: GMFCS level has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
H1-6: MACS level has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
Read the detailed description
Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a group of permanent movement and posture disorders resulting from non-progressive damage to the developing brain. Along with motor impairments, individuals with CP often experience sensory, cognitive, communication, behavioral, and musculoskeletal challenges. The most widely accepted classification, developed by the Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE), categorizes CP into spastic, dyskinetic, and ataxic types. Spastic CP is the most common and may present with either bilateral or unilateral involvement. Dyskinetic CP includes dystonic and choreoathetotic subtypes.
Motor learning involves acquiring new skills to improve movement quality. While typically developing children learn motor activities naturally, children with CP may experience difficulties due to structural and motor planning deficits. Motor imagery (MI), defined as mentally simulating a movement without physical execution, is one strategy that supports motor learning. MI and actual movement engage similar brain regions and share cognitive and neurophysiological components.
MI can be experienced from a visual or kinesthetic perspective. Visual imagery involves watching the movement as an observer, while kinesthetic imagery involves internally experiencing the movement as the actor. Kinesthetic imagery is more closely associated with motor planning and functional improvement. MI can be explicit, involving conscious simulation of movement, or implicit, occurring unconsciously through internal body representations. Both forms are used in neurorehabilitation.
Previous studies on MI in children with CP have typically included participants aged 6 to 20 with relatively good motor and functional abilities. Although some researchers suggest that MI skills begin to develop between the ages of 5 and 7, findings are inconsistent, highlighting the need for further investigation.
Research exploring factors that may influence MI ability in children with CP is limited. While age has been studied to a small extent, the effects of sex, clinical type, body mass index (BMI), Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level, and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) level have not been thoroughly examined. This study aims to explore the influence of these variables on MI ability in children with CP. After recording the children's demographic characteristics (age, sex, height, weight, body mass index [BMI], and duration of physiotherapy), the following assessments will be conducted:
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS):
GMFCS is a five-level classification system used to assess gross motor function in individuals with CP, focusing on sitting, transfers, and mobility. It categorizes function based on self-initiated movement across specific age bands: 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, 6-12, and 12-18 years. Level I indicates independent walking with minimal limitations, while Level V indicates the need for a wheelchair for mobility.
Manual Ability Classification System (MACS):
MACS is used to classify how children with CP (aged 4-18 years) use their hands to handle objects in daily life. Level I indicates the highest manual ability, with ease in handling objects, while Level V indicates very limited ability and the need for maximum assistance.
Hand Laterality Task:
Implicit motor imagery ability will be assessed using the Hand Laterality Task, which requires participants to identify whether an image shows a left or right hand. The Recognise Hand app, developed by the NOI group, will be used for this purpose. Outcome measures include response accuracy (percentage of correct responses) and reaction time.
Mental Chronometry Task:
Explicit motor imagery will be assessed using the mental chronometry paradigm. Participants will first perform a physical movement and then imagine performing the same movement toward targets at varying distances. The duration of the actual and imagined movements will be recorded. The Box and Block Test will be used, and temporal congruence will be calculated using the delta time formula: [(actual movement time - imagined movement time) / ((actual movement time + imagined movement time) / 2)] x 100.
Box and Block Test:
This test evaluates manual dexterity and is commonly used in both clinical and research settings due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. Participants are instructed to move as many blocks as possible from one compartment to another in 60 seconds. The score reflects the number of successfully transferred blocks, with higher scores indicating better upper extremity performance. It will also be used in the mental chronometry task.
Movement Imagery Questionnaire for Children:
This questionnaire evaluates visual (internal, external) and kinesthetic imagery abilities. It includes 12 items: 4 for each imagery type. Participants will perform four movements physically and then imagine them from each perspective. Imagery vividness will be rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = very hard to feel, 7 = very easy to feel). Higher scores indicate better imagery ability.
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy (CP), Spasticity, Motor Learning
- Being tested
- Implicit motor imagery, Explicit motor imagery
- Keywords
- MOTOR İMAGERY, CEREBRAL PALSY, UPPER EXTREMİTY, PHYSIOTHERAPY
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Palsy, Muscle Spasticity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implicit motor imageryOther
Implicit motor imagery is the ability to engage with the projection and manipulation of the body schema from a first-person perspective. Implicit motor imagery skills were evaluated Recognize App Recognize Hand Hand Laterality Task with, developed by NOI group. (http://www.noigroup.com/ Recognise).
Explicit motor imageryOther
In explicit motor imagery, the person simulates a specific motor movement, that is, the individual is aware that she is imagining the movement.Explicit motor imagery skills were evaluated with Movement Imagery Questionnaire for Children (MIQ-C), mental chronometry and box block test.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Unilateral cerebral palsy | Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a group of permanent disorders in activity limitation, motor and posture development due to non-progressive damage to the developing fetus or infant brain. In spastic unilateral CP, involvement occurs unilaterally in one half of the body. Receives: Other: Implicit motor imagery; Other: Explicit motor imagery | |
| Bilateral cerebral palsy | Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a group of permanent disorders in activity limitation, motor and posture development due to non-progressive damage to the developing fetus or infant brain. In spastic bilateral CP, involvement is seen bilaterally in all 4 extremities. Receives: Other: Implicit motor imagery; Other: Explicit motor imagery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Explicit motor imagery -1
Box and block test,Participants were first asked to pass the maximum number of wooden blocks to the other side of the wooden box in 60 seconds, three times for each hand. The actual number of movement blocks was obtained by calculating the average of 3 applications. Then, each participant was asked to visually pass the maximum number of wooden blocks to the other side of the wooden box without moving, three times for both hands. While visualizing, the participants pressed the button in front of them for each wooden block they placed, thus the number of wooden blocks they imagined passing to the other side was seen. The number of imaged movement blocks was obtained by taking the average of 3 applications. The number of wooden blocks passed with actual movement and imagined movement was compared.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Explicit motor imagery - 2
Box and block test, mental chronometry, The mental chronometry paradigm was evaluated using the wooden box and 10 wooden blocks of the box block test. The participants were first asked to grasp 10 wooden blocks from one side of the wooden box and pass them to the other side, three times in both hands, and the time taken was calculated with a stopwatch. Then, they were asked to visualize passing 10 wooden blocks to the other side of the wooden box, 3 times for each hand, and to say when they imagined that all 10 wooden blocks had passed. When they said they were done, the stopwatch was stopped. The application was performed three times on the dominant and non-dominant sides for real and imagined movements, and the average was noted. Delta time was calculated based on real and imagined movement time. . Delta time is calculated with the formula =[(real movement-imagined movement) / [(real movement+imagined movement) / 2]x100.
Measured: 2 years
Explicit motor imagery - 3
Movement Imagery Questionnaire for Children (MIQ-C),The Movement Imagination Questionnaire for Children will be used to measure visual (intrinsic, extrinsic) and kinesthetic imagery ability. It contains a total of 12 items: 4 items on internal, 4 items on external, and 4 items on kinesthetic visualization skills. Within the scope of the survey, the individual will be asked to visualize 4 different movements from 3 different visualization perspectives. The individual will be expected to first actually perform the movement in the instruction once and then imagine doing the movement. The clarity of this imagery will be rated using a Likert-type scale from 1 (very difficult to feel) to 7 (very easy to feel). A higher score from the test indicates higher imagination ability.
Measured: 2 years
Implicit motor imagery
Hand Laterality Task, Implicit motor imagery capacity was assessed with the Laterality Task (choice task). Laterality task is based on deciding which side of the photograph belongs to the limb shown. Recognize Hand is an application developed by the NOI group and used to evaluate right-left discrimination.(http://www.noigroup.com/ Recognise). In terms of imagination ability and hand laterality, the sharpness of the choices made in right-left discrimination (percentage of correct answers) and the reaction time during the choice were evaluated.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jun 2025
- Study start4 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cerebral Palsy (CP)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Abant Izzet Baysal UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abant Izzet Baysal University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Seda AYAZ TAŞ, Abant Izzet Baysal University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07002567
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BAIBU-FTR-SAT-11
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 24 May 2025
- Last updated
- 4 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Predictors of Motor İmagery Performance in Cerebral Palsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07002567
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BAIBU-FTR-SAT-11
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy (CP), Spasticity, Motor Learning
- Keywords
- MOTOR İMAGERY, CEREBRAL PALSY, UPPER EXTREMİTY, PHYSIOTHERAPY
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Abant Izzet Baysal UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 Jul 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There are very few studies in the literature examining the effect of age on motor imagery ability in children with cerebral palsy. To our knowledge, no studies have investigated the impact of other related factors. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of age, sex, body mass index, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level, and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) level on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
H1-1: Age has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
H1-2: Sex has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
H1-3: Clinical type has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
H1-4: Body mass index has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
H1-5: GMFCS level has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
H1-6: MACS level has an effect on motor imagery abilities in children with cerebral palsy.
Detailed description
Cerebral Palsy (CP) is a group of permanent movement and posture disorders resulting from non-progressive damage to the developing brain. Along with motor impairments, individuals with CP often experience sensory, cognitive, communication, behavioral, and musculoskeletal challenges. The most widely accepted classification, developed by the Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe (SCPE), categorizes CP into spastic, dyskinetic, and ataxic types. Spastic CP is the most common and may present with either bilateral or unilateral involvement. Dyskinetic CP includes dystonic and choreoathetotic subtypes.
Motor learning involves acquiring new skills to improve movement quality. While typically developing children learn motor activities naturally, children with CP may experience difficulties due to structural and motor planning deficits. Motor imagery (MI), defined as mentally simulating a movement without physical execution, is one strategy that supports motor learning. MI and actual movement engage similar brain regions and share cognitive and neurophysiological components.
MI can be experienced from a visual or kinesthetic perspective. Visual imagery involves watching the movement as an observer, while kinesthetic imagery involves internally experiencing the movement as the actor. Kinesthetic imagery is more closely associated with motor planning and functional improvement. MI can be explicit, involving conscious simulation of movement, or implicit, occurring unconsciously through internal body representations. Both forms are used in neurorehabilitation.
Previous studies on MI in children with CP have typically included participants aged 6 to 20 with relatively good motor and functional abilities. Although some researchers suggest that MI skills begin to develop between the ages of 5 and 7, findings are inconsistent, highlighting the need for further investigation.
Research exploring factors that may influence MI ability in children with CP is limited. While age has been studied to a small extent, the effects of sex, clinical type, body mass index (BMI), Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level, and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) level have not been thoroughly examined. This study aims to explore the influence of these variables on MI ability in children with CP. After recording the children's demographic characteristics (age, sex, height, weight, body mass index [BMI], and duration of physiotherapy), the following assessments will be conducted:
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS):
GMFCS is a five-level classification system used to assess gross motor function in individuals with CP, focusing on sitting, transfers, and mobility. It categorizes function based on self-initiated movement across specific age bands: 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, 6-12, and 12-18 years. Level I indicates independent walking with minimal limitations, while Level V indicates the need for a wheelchair for mobility.
Manual Ability Classification System (MACS):
MACS is used to classify how children with CP (aged 4-18 years) use their hands to handle objects in daily life. Level I indicates the highest manual ability, with ease in handling objects, while Level V indicates very limited ability and the need for maximum assistance.
Hand Laterality Task:
Implicit motor imagery ability will be assessed using the Hand Laterality Task, which requires participants to identify whether an image shows a left or right hand. The Recognise Hand app, developed by the NOI group, will be used for this purpose. Outcome measures include response accuracy (percentage of correct responses) and reaction time.
Mental Chronometry Task:
Explicit motor imagery will be assessed using the mental chronometry paradigm. Participants will first perform a physical movement and then imagine performing the same movement toward targets at varying distances. The duration of the actual and imagined movements will be recorded. The Box and Block Test will be used, and temporal congruence will be calculated using the delta time formula: [(actual movement time - imagined movement time) / ((actual movement time + imagined movement time) / 2)] x 100.
Box and Block Test:
This test evaluates manual dexterity and is commonly used in both clinical and research settings due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. Participants are instructed to move as many blocks as possible from one compartment to another in 60 seconds. The score reflects the number of successfully transferred blocks, with higher scores indicating better upper extremity performance. It will also be used in the mental chronometry task.
Movement Imagery Questionnaire for Children:
This questionnaire evaluates visual (internal, external) and kinesthetic imagery abilities. It includes 12 items: 4 for each imagery type. Participants will perform four movements physically and then imagine them from each perspective. Imagery vividness will be rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = very hard to feel, 7 = very easy to feel). Higher scores indicate better imagery ability.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Unilateral cerebral palsy | – | Other: Implicit motor imagery, Other: Explicit motor imageryCerebral Palsy (CP) is a group of permanent disorders in activity limitation, motor and posture development due to non-progressive damage to the developing fetus or infant brain. In spastic unilateral CP, involvement occurs unilaterally in one half of the body. |
| Bilateral cerebral palsy | – | Other: Implicit motor imagery, Other: Explicit motor imageryCerebral Palsy (CP) is a group of permanent disorders in activity limitation, motor and posture development due to non-progressive damage to the developing fetus or infant brain. In spastic bilateral CP, involvement is seen bilaterally in all 4 extremities. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- This study included between the ages 6 and 18 years 27 children with unilateral and 27 bilateral cerebral palsy with level 1 or 2 according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Manual Ability Classification System (MACS),
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- 6-18 year olds diagnosed with spastic type unilateral and bilateral diplegia CP,
- Those with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I - II,
- Hand Skill Classification System (EBSS) level I-II,
- Children with a Mini-Mental Test score of at least 24 points,
- Those with IQ <70, Those who can understand the guidelines of the study
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Those with advanced vision, hearing and attention problems,
- Those with advanced cardiovascular or cognitive problems,
- Upper extremity botulinum toxin administration and surgery in the last 6 months,
- Those who have received MI training in the last 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implicit motor imageryImplicit motor imagery is the ability to engage with the projection and manipulation of the body schema from a first-person perspective. Implicit motor imagery skills were evaluated Recognize App Recognize Hand Hand Laterality Task with, developed by NOI group. (http://www.noigroup.com/ Recognise). | Other | Bilateral cerebral palsy, Unilateral cerebral palsy |
| Explicit motor imageryIn explicit motor imagery, the person simulates a specific motor movement, that is, the individual is aware that she is imagining the movement.Explicit motor imagery skills were evaluated with Movement Imagery Questionnaire for Children (MIQ-C), mental chronometry and box block test. | Other | Bilateral cerebral palsy, Unilateral cerebral palsy |
Primary outcome
Explicit motor imagery -1
Time frame: 2 years
Box and block test,Participants were first asked to pass the maximum number of wooden blocks to the other side of the wooden box in 60 seconds, three times for each hand. The actual number of movement blocks was obtained by calculating the average of 3 applications. Then, each participant was asked to visually pass the maximum number of wooden blocks to the other side of the wooden box without moving, three times for both hands. While visualizing, the participants pressed the button in front of them for each wooden block they placed, thus the number of wooden blocks they imagined passing to the other side was seen. The number of imaged movement blocks was obtained by taking the average of 3 applications. The number of wooden blocks passed with actual movement and imagined movement was compared.
3 secondary outcomes
Explicit motor imagery - 2
Time frame: 2 years
Explicit motor imagery - 3
Time frame: 2 years
Implicit motor imagery
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jul 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cerebral Palsy (CP)
Recruiting
Additional Effects on tDCS With AOT on Lower Limb Functions on Children With Diplegic CP
Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Comparison of Vestibular Stimulation and Core Stability Training on Sitting Balance in Hypotonic CP
Hypotonic Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruiting
Video-based Visual Feedback Combined With Task-oriented Physiotherapy Among Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy (CP)
RecruitingObservational study
Turkish Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the ABILHAND-Kids Young CP Scale
Cerebral Palsy
Active, not recruiting
Local Vibration for Drooling in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy (CP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cerebral Palsy (CP) and Spasticity, run by Abant Izzet Baysal University at 3 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Seda AYAZ TAŞ, Phd (05495458040, seda.ayaztas@ibu.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Explicit motor imagery -1 (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jul 2025.