Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis in the Subacute StageCOMPENSATORNCT06999876
The Effect of Combined Transcranial Pulse Current Stimulation (tPCS) and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Lower Limb Motor Function in Subacute to Chronic Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia (COMPENSATOR-Stroke)
A study testing The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device) in people with Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis in the Subacute Stage, run by National University Health System, Singapore at 2 sites in Singapore.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in lower limb motor function recovery in stroke patients with hemiplegia or hemiparesis in the subacute stage.The main questions it aims to answer are: Primary objective - To evaluate… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 79 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis in the Subacute Stage
- What is being tested?
- The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSingapore
- Study dates
- 31 May 2025to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 79 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants aged 21 years old and below 80 years old with a clinically diagnosed first onset ischaemic stroke confirmed by imaging modalities such as computerised tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Previous transient ischemic attack or clinically silent infarct detected by CT/MRI are not considered as previous stroke.
- Participants within the subacute stage of stroke (Within 14 days from stoke onset)
- Able to walk with or without assistance
- Able to understand instructions and give informed consent
Who cannot join
- History of craniotomy or placement of implant materials/ device in the body that may affect NIBS including, but not limited to, deep brain stimulator, cardiac implant, cochlear implant
- Intracranial haemorrhage in the cortical regions
- History of epilepsy or seizures
- History of major depression and a history of psychotic disorders
- Contraindications to tPCS/TENS e.g., pregnancy, presence of skin lesion at the intended treatment areas.
- Concurrent use of benzodiazepine pyschoactive class of drugs which may affect effects of tPCS
Show all 11Show fewer
- Concurrent use of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) which may affect effects of tPCS
- Presence of significant cognitive impairment/ aphasia rendering patient unable to comply with the treatment protocol
- Presence of disabling comorbidities that compromises limb function such as orthopaedics or neurological pathologies other than stroke
- Previous treatments of the lower limb spasticity with botulinum toxin, or alcohol.
- Prior history of non-invasive brain stimulations
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Singapore2 sites
National University Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, 119228
Hariz Halik, +65 9724 9458, hariz_halik@nuhs.edu.sg
Sreed Durga Subramaniam, +65 9724 9458, sreesdurgasubramaniam@nuhs.edu.sg
Alexandra Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, 159964
Hariz Halik, +65 9724 9458, hariz_halik@nuhs.edu.sg
Srees Durga Subramaniam, +65 9724 9458, sreesdurgasubramaniam@nuhs.edu.sg
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Combined Transcranial Pulse Current Stimulation (tPCS) and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Lower Limb Motor Function in Subacute to Chronic Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia: A Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Randomized Controlled Study
The goal of this study is to evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in lower limb motor function recovery in stroke patients with hemiplegia or hemiparesis in the subacute stage.The main questions it aims to answer are:
Primary objective - To evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in lower limb motor function recovery, in stroke patients with hemiplegia or hemiparesis in the subacute stage
Read more
Secondary Objectives -
- To evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS in treatment of lower limb spasticity related to stroke.
- To evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS in gait function improvement post stroke, including walking speed, mobility, balance and walking endurance.
- To evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS on pain, mood and QOL.
Researchers will compare the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS to a control group which involves intervention with Sham device stimulation + TENS.
Participants will:
- Be identified, recruited and have baseline assessments during screening period
- First undergo a mandatory 2-hour device training at Visit 2 to ensure device competence.
- Proceed with up to 7 days of habituation for device use and tolerability.
- Carry out daily intervention sessions of 30 minutes for 30 days at home or inpatient setting.
- Phone call follow-up (Telephone/ Video Call Interview) 2 weeks post intervention
- Clinic visit at day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days for study assessments
- Clinic visit at day 90 post intervention with allowance of +/- 7 days for study assessments
- Update study coordinators via messaging platforms with regards to device issues, adverse events, any other reporting or questions
Read the detailed description
In this prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled randomized control study, a total of 90 participants with hemiplegia or hemiparesis post stroke will be recruited from National University Hospital (NUH) and Alexandra Hospital (AH) inpatient wards and outpatient clinic. 45 participants will be randomized to the intervention arm (Intervened with tPCS + TENS) and 45 participants will be randomized to the control arm (Sham device stimulation + TENS).
The study will consist of a Screening period of up to 14 days. Participants who fulfil all the inclusion criteria will be consented and recruited during this screening period, constituting as Visit 1 (Recruitment). During this visit, PI/ Co-I obtaining consent will ensure that patient/ caregiver meets the following criteria:
- For patients where the caregiver is administering the treatment, study team will ensure that they are the primary caregiver of the patient.
- Patient/ caregiver must be comfortable and committed in following directions for device usage.
- Patient/ caregiver must not have mental disability.
After confirmation of the above criteria, patient/ caregiver will undergo a 2-hour hands-on training at NUH by trained study team.
A set of training slides titled "AscenZ-VIII User training slides" that is adapted from the standard "Instruction Manual AscenZVIII" will be utilized for the training session for patient/ caregiver. After which, a checklist titled "Home Training Checklist" will be completed by both the trainer and patient/caregiver. This checklist is aimed to ensure that all necessary components of training have been covered by the trainer and also for trainers to indicate confidence of patient/ caregiver during the training before both trainer and patient/ caregiver signs as a form of training acknowledgement.
Post training, a copy of the standard "Instruction Manual AscenZVIII" will be given to patient/ caregiver. Study team will emphasize to patient/ caregiver that they can contact study team at any juncture where they need additional clarifications relating to the device.
Depending on the hospitalization status at time of screening, the patient will be seen in the inpatient ward or specialist outpatient clinic at day 14 which is considered as Visit 2 (Randomization with allowance + 3 days). Allowance of up to 3 days is given in the event day 14 falls on a weekend/long weekend. Following Visit 2 (Randomization with allowance + 3 days), up to 3 days of habituation for device use and tolerability will take place. Participants will be required to receive the intervention at low levels of intensity to allow conditioning for the habituation period. Because of the nature of the intervention, it may cause some discomfort to the participants, hence conditioning will increase the tolerability of the treatment for the participants.
Intervention with tPCS will take place over 30 days either in the inpatient setting of NUH and AH or in the home setting, while the rehabilitation therapy sessions with physiotherapy and occupational therapy happening concurrently as per existing clinical treatment protocol. Treatment with tPCS and TENS will consist of a daily session of 30 minutes for 30 days. Compliance will be checked by research assistant via telephone or video call interview at regular interval. One group will be randomised to the sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) arm and one group will be randomised to the active device intervention arm (intervened with tPCS + TENS). The sham device stimulation (Control) arm have electrode placement in the exact manner as the treatment arm but receive very little transcranial stimulation such that the output is negligible.
Assessment will be done at the time of recruitment which constitutes as Visit 1 (Recruitment), and again at the Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days) and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Activities and assessments that are done under research activities include:
Visit 1 (Recruitment)
- Eligibility screening
- Consent taking
- Blood Pressure (Research procedure if not done clinically)
- Standard physio and occupational therapy sessions as prescribed by patient's physician (Research procedure if not done clinically)
- Stroke deficit scale (Baseline mRS, NIHSS)
- Clinical measures on lower limb motor function (Lower Extremity - Fugl Meyer Assessment Baseline, Time UP and Go Baseline, 6 Minute Walk Test Baseline, 10 Meter Walk Test Baseline)
- Clinical measures on lower limb spasticity - Hip, Knee Flexion, Ankle Flexor, Plantar (Modified Ashworth Scale Baseline, Modified Tardieu Scale Baseline)
- Balance (Berg Balance Scale Baseline)
- Pain (Pain Numeric Rating Scale Baseline)
- Mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Baseline)
- FIM
- EQ5D-5L Baseline
- Overall length of stay in hospital
- Outcomes events/Complications
Visit 2 (Randomization with allowance of + 3 days):
- Randomization
- Commence first day of habituation, up to 3 days
Follow-up Telephone/ Video Call Interview, at 2 weeks post intervention (Research procedure)
- Patients will be asked regarding: i) Device related side-effects ii) Hospital re-admissions iii) Changes in medications iv) Device management (eg. Difficulties faced while using the device, Device working condition Damage to device, Device parts that require replacement, Re-supply of consumables, etc)
Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days):
- Treatment group OR Control Group - 30min daily for 30 days
- Stroke deficit scale (mRS, NIHSS)
- Clinical measures on lover limb motor function (Lower Extremity - Fugl Meyer Assessment, Time Up and Go, 6 Minute Walk Test, 10 Meter Walk Test )
- Clinical measures on lower limb spasticity - Hip, Knee Flexion, Ankle Flexor, Plantar (Modified Ashworth Scale, Modified Tardieu Scale)
- Balance (Berg Balance Scale)
- Pain (Pain Numeric Rating Scale)
- Mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
- FIM
- EQ5D-5L
- Overall length of stay in hospital
- Outcomes events/Complications
Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of +/- 7 days):
- Stroke deficit scale (mRS, NIHSS)
- Clinical measures on lower limb motor function (Lower Extremity - Fugl Meyer Assessment, Time Up and Go, 6 Minute Walk Test, 10 Meter Walk Test)
- Clinical measures on lower limb spasticity - Hip, Knee Flexion, Ankle Flexor, Plantar (Modified Ashworth Scale, Modified Tardieu Scale)
- Balance (Berg Balance Scale)
- Pain (Pain Numeric Rating Scale)
- Mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
- FIM
- EQ5D-5L
- Overall length of stay in hospital
- Outcomes events/Complications
Management of adverse events (AEs and SAEs):
At recruitment (Visit 1), patients/ caregivers will be informed to take note and save research coordinator's contact number stated in the ICF. Patients/ caregivers will be reminded to contact research coordinators if patients experience any AE/SAE stated on ICF section 6 from the day of recruitment up to randomization (Visit 2). At randomization (Visit 2) it will again be emphasized to patients and caregivers that they are to continue to monitor for AE/SAE. During the duration of habituation through to the 30-day intervention period, patients/ caregivers are additionally required to report to the study coordinators with regards to any discomfort or issues with the device before proceeding with intervention. During the habituation and the 30-day intervention period, study coordinator will be keeping close contact with the patient/ caregiver by means of messaging apps to ensure compliance to the treatment regime and for AE/SAE reporting.
Patients who are starting the intervention in the inpatient setting will be monitored by the study team for any adverse events.
- Being tested
- The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device)
- Keywords
- Transcranial Pulsed Current Simulation, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Lower limb motor function recovery, Spasticity, Gait dysfunction, Standing balance, Ambulation, Stroke, Hemiplegia, Hemiparesis
- Medical subject headings
- Muscle Spasticity, Stroke, Hemiplegia, Paresis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device)Device
Sham tPCS current will be delivered through Channel 1, while active TENS treatment delivered through Channel 2, 3 and 4 of The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator via surface electrodes. The placement of electrodes will be exactly the same as the active tPCS montage.
The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device)Device
This group will receive active TENS treatment delivered through Channel 2, 3 and 4 of The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator via 6*9cm Silica gel electrodes on top of the tPCS that is delivered through Channel 1. The placement of the electrodes will be on the part of the spinal segment innervating the lower limbs (L1-L5), the adductor muscles and the gastrocnemius muscles.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Experimental | Active tPCS + TENS treatment Receives: Device: The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device) |
| Control arm | Sham comparator | Sham tPCS + TENS treatment Receives: Device: The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lower Extremity Portion of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (LE-FMA)
Effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in Lower Extremity Portion of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (LE-FMA).
Mean change in LE-FMA from Visit 1 (Recruitment) to Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days) and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Measured: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in functional independence measured using Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score, in stroke patients with hemiplegia or hemiparesis in the subacute stage.
Mean change in FIM from Visit 1 (Recruitment) to Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days) and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Measured: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Secondary outcomes (9)
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation +TENS (Control) in lower limb spasticity related to stroke objectively measured using Modified Ashworth scale (MAS).
Mean change in MAS from Visit 1 (Recruitment) to Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days), and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Measured: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS)
Effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation +TENS (Control) in treatment of lower limb spasticity related to stroke objectively measured using Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS)..
Mean change in MTS from Visit 1 (Recruitment) to Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days), and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Measured: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Time Up and Go (TUG)
Effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in walking speed, objectively measured with Time Up and Go (TUG).
Mean change in TUG from Visit 1 (Recruitment) to Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days), and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Measured: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
10-meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in walking endurance objectively measured with 10-meter Walk Test (10MWT).
Mean change in 10MWT from Visit 1 (Recruitment) to Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days), and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Measured: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
6-minute Walk Test
Effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in walking endurance objectively measured using 6-minute Walk Test.
Mean change in 6-minute Walk Test from Visit 1 (Recruitment) to Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days), and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Measured: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in balance objectively measured using Berg Balance Scale (BBS).
Mean change in BBS from Visit 1 (Recruitment) to Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days), and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Measured: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) on pain using pain numeric rating scale (NRS).
Mean change in NRS from Visit 1 (Recruitment) to Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days), and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Measured: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
EQ5D-5L
Effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) on quality of life (QOL) measured objectively using EQ5D-5L.
Mean change in EQ5D-5L from Visit 1 (Recruitment) to Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days), and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Measured: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS)
Effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) on mood using Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS).
Mean change in HADS from Visit 1 (Recruitment) to Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days), and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Measured: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 May 2025
- Study start31 May 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (63)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis in the Subacute StageStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Active tPCS + TENS treatment (Intervention arm) This group will receive active TENS treatment delivered through Channel 2, 3 and 4 of The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator via 6\*9cm Silica gel electrodes on top of the tPCS that is delivered through Channel 1. The placement of the electrodes will be on the part of the spinal segment innervating the lower limbs (L1-L5), the adductor muscles and the gastrocnemius muscles. Sham tPCS + TENS treatment (Control arm) Sham tPCS current will be delivered through Channel 1, while active TENS treatment delivered through Channel 2, 3 and 4 of The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator via surface electrodes. The placement of electrodes will be exactly the same as the active tPCS montage.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National University Health System, Singapore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, JING MINGXUE, National University Health System, Singapore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06999876
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-3371
- Acronym
- COMPENSATOR
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 13 May 2025
- Last updated
- 31 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: all IPD that underlie results in a publication
Publications
Kwong PW, Ng GY, Chung RC, Ng SS. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improves walking capacity and reduces spasticity in stroke survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2018 Sep;32(9):1203-1219. doi: 10.1177/0269215517745349. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
PubMed 29232981Kim DY, Lim JY, Kang EK, You DS, Oh MK, Oh BM, Paik NJ. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;89(11):879-86. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181f70aa7.
PubMed 20962598Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, de Ferranti S, Despres JP, Fullerton HJ, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Liu S, Mackey RH, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER 3rd, Moy CS, Muntner P, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Rodriguez CJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Willey JZ, Woo D, Yeh RW, Turner MB; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):e29-322. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152. Epub 2014 Dec 17. No abstract available.
PubMed 25520374Chib VS, Yun K, Takahashi H, Shimojo S. Noninvasive remote activation of the ventral midbrain by transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex. Transl Psychiatry. 2013 Jun 11;3(6):e268. doi: 10.1038/tp.2013.44.
PubMed 23756377Xueyi Ni, Liru Cui, Ruixia Bi, Jinghua Qian. "Effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on lower limb function in patients after stroke: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis." Neurology Asia 2021; 26(3) : 501 - 508
Julious, S.A. 2010. Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials. Chapman & Hall/CRC. Boca Raton, FL.
Dong XL, Sun X, Sun WM, Yuan Q, Yu GH, Shuai L, Yuan YF. A randomized controlled trial to explore the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation on patients with post-stroke fatigue. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Oct 15;100(41):e27504. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027504.
PubMed 34731132Zhao W, Wang C, Li Z, Chen L, Li J, Cui W, Ding S, Xi Q, Wang F, Jia F, Xiao S, Guo Y, Zhao Y. Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation to treat muscle spasticity following brain injury: a double-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 2;10(2):e0116976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116976. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 25643051Wang XB, Chen J, Li TJ, Tao J, Chen LD, He J, Chen LR. [Effect of electroacupuncture in different frequencies on electromyography and ambulation in stroke patients with lower-extremity spasticity: a randomized controlled study]. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2011 Jul;31(7):580-4. Chinese.
PubMed 21823273Young-Nim Y, Gwang-Cheon P, Myung-Rae C, Min-Yeong S, Chang-Su N, Jae-Young H, Jae-Hong K. Meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials for scalp acupuncture treatment of stroke: A systematic review. J Tradit Chin Med. 2018 Aug;38(4):465-479.
PubMed 32186072Mogyoros I, Kiernan MC, Burke D. Strength-duration properties of human peripheral nerve. Brain. 1996 Apr;119 ( Pt 2):439-47. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.2.439.
PubMed 8800939Alon G, Roys SR, Gullapalli RP, Greenspan JD. Non-invasive electrical stimulation of the brain (ESB) modifies the resting-state network connectivity of the primary motor cortex: a proof of concept fMRI study. Brain Res. 2011 Jul 27;1403:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.013. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
PubMed 21696709Paneri, B., Khadka, N., Patel, V., Thomas, C., Tyler, W., Parra, L. C., & Bikson, M. (2015). The tolerability of transcranial electrical stimulation used across extended periods in a naturalistic context by healthy individuals (No. e1574). PeerJ PrePrints.
Fregni F, Gimenes R, Valle AC, Ferreira MJ, Rocha RR, Natalle L, Bravo R, Rigonatti SP, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Boggio PS. A randomized, sham-controlled, proof of principle study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Dec;54(12):3988-98. doi: 10.1002/art.22195.
PubMed 17133529Plazier M, Joos K, Vanneste S, Ost J, De Ridder D. Bifrontal and bioccipital transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) does not induce mood changes in healthy volunteers: a placebo controlled study. Brain Stimul. 2012 Oct;5(4):454-61. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
PubMed 21962976
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Combined Transcranial Pulse Current Stimulation (tPCS) and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Lower Limb Motor Function in Subacute to Chronic Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia: A Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06999876
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COMPENSATOR / 2024-3371
- Keywords
- Transcranial Pulsed Current Simulation, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Lower limb motor function recovery, Spasticity, Gait dysfunction, Standing balance, Ambulation, Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National University Health System, SingaporeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 31 May 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in lower limb motor function recovery in stroke patients with hemiplegia or hemiparesis in the subacute stage.The main questions it aims to answer are:
Primary objective - To evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in lower limb motor function recovery, in stroke patients with hemiplegia or hemiparesis in the subacute stage
Secondary Objectives -
- To evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS in treatment of lower limb spasticity related to stroke.
- To evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS in gait function improvement post stroke, including walking speed, mobility, balance and walking endurance.
- To evaluate the effects of high frequency tPCS on pain, mood and QOL.
Researchers will compare the effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS to a control group which involves intervention with Sham device stimulation + TENS.
Participants will:
- Be identified, recruited and have baseline assessments during screening period
- First undergo a mandatory 2-hour device training at Visit 2 to ensure device competence.
- Proceed with up to 7 days of habituation for device use and tolerability.
- Carry out daily intervention sessions of 30 minutes for 30 days at home or inpatient setting.
- Phone call follow-up (Telephone/ Video Call Interview) 2 weeks post intervention
- Clinic visit at day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days for study assessments
- Clinic visit at day 90 post intervention with allowance of +/- 7 days for study assessments
- Update study coordinators via messaging platforms with regards to device issues, adverse events, any other reporting or questions
Detailed description
In this prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled randomized control study, a total of 90 participants with hemiplegia or hemiparesis post stroke will be recruited from National University Hospital (NUH) and Alexandra Hospital (AH) inpatient wards and outpatient clinic. 45 participants will be randomized to the intervention arm (Intervened with tPCS + TENS) and 45 participants will be randomized to the control arm (Sham device stimulation + TENS).
The study will consist of a Screening period of up to 14 days. Participants who fulfil all the inclusion criteria will be consented and recruited during this screening period, constituting as Visit 1 (Recruitment). During this visit, PI/ Co-I obtaining consent will ensure that patient/ caregiver meets the following criteria:
- For patients where the caregiver is administering the treatment, study team will ensure that they are the primary caregiver of the patient.
- Patient/ caregiver must be comfortable and committed in following directions for device usage.
- Patient/ caregiver must not have mental disability.
After confirmation of the above criteria, patient/ caregiver will undergo a 2-hour hands-on training at NUH by trained study team.
A set of training slides titled "AscenZ-VIII User training slides" that is adapted from the standard "Instruction Manual AscenZVIII" will be utilized for the training session for patient/ caregiver. After which, a checklist titled "Home Training Checklist" will be completed by both the trainer and patient/caregiver. This checklist is aimed to ensure that all necessary components of training have been covered by the trainer and also for trainers to indicate confidence of patient/ caregiver during the training before both trainer and patient/ caregiver signs as a form of training acknowledgement.
Post training, a copy of the standard "Instruction Manual AscenZVIII" will be given to patient/ caregiver. Study team will emphasize to patient/ caregiver that they can contact study team at any juncture where they need additional clarifications relating to the device.
Depending on the hospitalization status at time of screening, the patient will be seen in the inpatient ward or specialist outpatient clinic at day 14 which is considered as Visit 2 (Randomization with allowance + 3 days). Allowance of up to 3 days is given in the event day 14 falls on a weekend/long weekend. Following Visit 2 (Randomization with allowance + 3 days), up to 3 days of habituation for device use and tolerability will take place. Participants will be required to receive the intervention at low levels of intensity to allow conditioning for the habituation period. Because of the nature of the intervention, it may cause some discomfort to the participants, hence conditioning will increase the tolerability of the treatment for the participants.
Intervention with tPCS will take place over 30 days either in the inpatient setting of NUH and AH or in the home setting, while the rehabilitation therapy sessions with physiotherapy and occupational therapy happening concurrently as per existing clinical treatment protocol. Treatment with tPCS and TENS will consist of a daily session of 30 minutes for 30 days. Compliance will be checked by research assistant via telephone or video call interview at regular interval. One group will be randomised to the sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) arm and one group will be randomised to the active device intervention arm (intervened with tPCS + TENS). The sham device stimulation (Control) arm have electrode placement in the exact manner as the treatment arm but receive very little transcranial stimulation such that the output is negligible.
Assessment will be done at the time of recruitment which constitutes as Visit 1 (Recruitment), and again at the Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days) and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Activities and assessments that are done under research activities include:
Visit 1 (Recruitment)
- Eligibility screening
- Consent taking
- Blood Pressure (Research procedure if not done clinically)
- Standard physio and occupational therapy sessions as prescribed by patient's physician (Research procedure if not done clinically)
- Stroke deficit scale (Baseline mRS, NIHSS)
- Clinical measures on lower limb motor function (Lower Extremity - Fugl Meyer Assessment Baseline, Time UP and Go Baseline, 6 Minute Walk Test Baseline, 10 Meter Walk Test Baseline)
- Clinical measures on lower limb spasticity - Hip, Knee Flexion, Ankle Flexor, Plantar (Modified Ashworth Scale Baseline, Modified Tardieu Scale Baseline)
- Balance (Berg Balance Scale Baseline)
- Pain (Pain Numeric Rating Scale Baseline)
- Mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Baseline)
- FIM
- EQ5D-5L Baseline
- Overall length of stay in hospital
- Outcomes events/Complications
Visit 2 (Randomization with allowance of + 3 days):
- Randomization
- Commence first day of habituation, up to 3 days
Follow-up Telephone/ Video Call Interview, at 2 weeks post intervention (Research procedure)
- Patients will be asked regarding: i) Device related side-effects ii) Hospital re-admissions iii) Changes in medications iv) Device management (eg. Difficulties faced while using the device, Device working condition Damage to device, Device parts that require replacement, Re-supply of consumables, etc)
Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days):
- Treatment group OR Control Group - 30min daily for 30 days
- Stroke deficit scale (mRS, NIHSS)
- Clinical measures on lover limb motor function (Lower Extremity - Fugl Meyer Assessment, Time Up and Go, 6 Minute Walk Test, 10 Meter Walk Test )
- Clinical measures on lower limb spasticity - Hip, Knee Flexion, Ankle Flexor, Plantar (Modified Ashworth Scale, Modified Tardieu Scale)
- Balance (Berg Balance Scale)
- Pain (Pain Numeric Rating Scale)
- Mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
- FIM
- EQ5D-5L
- Overall length of stay in hospital
- Outcomes events/Complications
Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of +/- 7 days):
- Stroke deficit scale (mRS, NIHSS)
- Clinical measures on lower limb motor function (Lower Extremity - Fugl Meyer Assessment, Time Up and Go, 6 Minute Walk Test, 10 Meter Walk Test)
- Clinical measures on lower limb spasticity - Hip, Knee Flexion, Ankle Flexor, Plantar (Modified Ashworth Scale, Modified Tardieu Scale)
- Balance (Berg Balance Scale)
- Pain (Pain Numeric Rating Scale)
- Mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
- FIM
- EQ5D-5L
- Overall length of stay in hospital
- Outcomes events/Complications
Management of adverse events (AEs and SAEs):
At recruitment (Visit 1), patients/ caregivers will be informed to take note and save research coordinator's contact number stated in the ICF. Patients/ caregivers will be reminded to contact research coordinators if patients experience any AE/SAE stated on ICF section 6 from the day of recruitment up to randomization (Visit 2). At randomization (Visit 2) it will again be emphasized to patients and caregivers that they are to continue to monitor for AE/SAE. During the duration of habituation through to the 30-day intervention period, patients/ caregivers are additionally required to report to the study coordinators with regards to any discomfort or issues with the device before proceeding with intervention. During the habituation and the 30-day intervention period, study coordinator will be keeping close contact with the patient/ caregiver by means of messaging apps to ensure compliance to the treatment regime and for AE/SAE reporting.
Patients who are starting the intervention in the inpatient setting will be monitored by the study team for any adverse events.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Active tPCS + TENS treatment (Intervention arm) This group will receive active TENS treatment delivered through Channel 2, 3 and 4 of The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator via 6*9cm Silica gel electrodes on top of the tPCS that is delivered through Channel 1. The placement of the electrodes will be on the part of the spinal segment innervating the lower limbs (L1-L5), the adductor muscles and the gastrocnemius muscles. Sham tPCS + TENS treatment (Control arm) Sham tPCS current will be delivered through Channel 1, while active TENS treatment delivered through Channel 2, 3 and 4 of The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator via surface electrodes. The placement of electrodes will be exactly the same as the active tPCS montage.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Experimental | Device: The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device)Active tPCS + TENS treatment |
| Control arm | Sham comparator | Device: The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device)Sham tPCS + TENS treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 79 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participants aged 21 years old and below 80 years old with a clinically diagnosed first onset ischaemic stroke confirmed by imaging modalities such as computerised tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Previous transient ischemic attack or clinically silent infarct detected by CT/MRI are not considered as previous stroke.
- Participants within the subacute stage of stroke (Within 14 days from stoke onset)
- Able to walk with or without assistance
- Able to understand instructions and give informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- History of craniotomy or placement of implant materials/ device in the body that may affect NIBS including, but not limited to, deep brain stimulator, cardiac implant, cochlear implant
- Intracranial haemorrhage in the cortical regions
- History of epilepsy or seizures
- History of major depression and a history of psychotic disorders
- Contraindications to tPCS/TENS e.g., pregnancy, presence of skin lesion at the intended treatment areas.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device)Sham tPCS current will be delivered through Channel 1, while active TENS treatment delivered through Channel 2, 3 and 4 of The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator via surface electrodes. The placement of electrodes will be exactly the same as the active tPCS montage. | Device | Control arm |
| The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device)This group will receive active TENS treatment delivered through Channel 2, 3 and 4 of The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator via 6*9cm Silica gel electrodes on top of the tPCS that is delivered through Channel 1. The placement of the electrodes will be on the part of the spinal segment innervating the lower limbs (L1-L5), the adductor muscles and the gastrocnemius muscles. | Device | Intervention Arm |
Primary outcome
Lower Extremity Portion of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (LE-FMA)
Time frame: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in Lower Extremity Portion of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (LE-FMA). Mean change in LE-FMA from Visit 1 (Recruitment) to Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days) and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time frame: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Effects of high frequency tPCS + TENS compared to Sham device stimulation + TENS (Control) in functional independence measured using Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score, in stroke patients with hemiplegia or hemiparesis in the subacute stage. Mean change in FIM from Visit 1 (Recruitment) to Visit 3 (Last day of intervention, Day 30 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days) and Visit 4 (Final follow-up, Day 90 post intervention with allowance of + 7 days).
9 secondary outcomes
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time frame: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS)
Time frame: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Time Up and Go (TUG)
Time frame: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
10-meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Time frame: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
6-minute Walk Test
Time frame: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time frame: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time frame: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
EQ5D-5L
Time frame: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS)
Time frame: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2025.
- Background: PubMed 29232981Kwong PW, Ng GY, Chung RC, Ng SS. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improves walking capacity and reduces spasticity in stroke survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2018 Sep;32(9):1203-1219. doi: 10.1177/0269215517745349. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
- Background: PubMed 20962598Kim DY, Lim JY, Kang EK, You DS, Oh MK, Oh BM, Paik NJ. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;89(11):879-86. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181f70aa7.
- Background: PubMed 25520374Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, de Ferranti S, Despres JP, Fullerton HJ, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Liu S, Mackey RH, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER 3rd, Moy CS, Muntner P, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Rodriguez CJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Willey JZ, Woo D, Yeh RW, Turner MB; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):e29-322. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152. Epub 2014 Dec 17. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23756377Chib VS, Yun K, Takahashi H, Shimojo S. Noninvasive remote activation of the ventral midbrain by transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex. Transl Psychiatry. 2013 Jun 11;3(6):e268. doi: 10.1038/tp.2013.44.
- BackgroundXueyi Ni, Liru Cui, Ruixia Bi, Jinghua Qian. "Effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on lower limb function in patients after stroke: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis." Neurology Asia 2021; 26(3) : 501 - 508
- BackgroundJulious, S.A. 2010. Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials. Chapman & Hall/CRC. Boca Raton, FL.
- Background: PubMed 34731132Dong XL, Sun X, Sun WM, Yuan Q, Yu GH, Shuai L, Yuan YF. A randomized controlled trial to explore the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation on patients with post-stroke fatigue. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Oct 15;100(41):e27504. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027504.
- Background: PubMed 25643051Zhao W, Wang C, Li Z, Chen L, Li J, Cui W, Ding S, Xi Q, Wang F, Jia F, Xiao S, Guo Y, Zhao Y. Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation to treat muscle spasticity following brain injury: a double-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 2;10(2):e0116976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116976. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 21823273Wang XB, Chen J, Li TJ, Tao J, Chen LD, He J, Chen LR. [Effect of electroacupuncture in different frequencies on electromyography and ambulation in stroke patients with lower-extremity spasticity: a randomized controlled study]. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2011 Jul;31(7):580-4. Chinese.
- Background: PubMed 32186072Young-Nim Y, Gwang-Cheon P, Myung-Rae C, Min-Yeong S, Chang-Su N, Jae-Young H, Jae-Hong K. Meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials for scalp acupuncture treatment of stroke: A systematic review. J Tradit Chin Med. 2018 Aug;38(4):465-479.
- Background: PubMed 8800939Mogyoros I, Kiernan MC, Burke D. Strength-duration properties of human peripheral nerve. Brain. 1996 Apr;119 ( Pt 2):439-47. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.2.439.
- Background: PubMed 21696709Alon G, Roys SR, Gullapalli RP, Greenspan JD. Non-invasive electrical stimulation of the brain (ESB) modifies the resting-state network connectivity of the primary motor cortex: a proof of concept fMRI study. Brain Res. 2011 Jul 27;1403:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.013. Epub 2011 Jun 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. all IPD that underlie results in a publication
Related trials for Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis in the Subacute Stage
Recruiting
Effects of Atalante Exoskeleton on Gait Recovery in Non- or Poorly Ambulatory Patients With Hemiparesis in the Acute/Subacute Phase (Month 1 to 4)
Stroke, Acute, Stroke, Ischemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing The AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device) in people with Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis in the Subacute Stage, run by National University Health System, Singapore at 2 sites in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lower Extremity Portion of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (LE-FMA) (time frame: From enrollment to Day 90 post intervention (with allowance of + 7 days).). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06999876, which also lists 63 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2025.