AzTrials
AzTrials

Neck PainNCT06996015

Effects of SNAGs & CBT on Pain, Craniovertebral Angle & Disability in Non Specific Neck Pain

A study testing Cognitive behavior therapy and Cervical Stabilization Exercises in people with Neck Pain and Cognitive Behavior Therapy, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Non-specific neck pain is a prevalent condition causing discomfort, reduced craniovertebral angle, and disability. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the combined effects of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) on pain, posture, and function. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 28 years
Conditions the study is for
Neck Pain, Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Cervicalgia
What is being tested?
Cognitive behavior therapy and Cervical Stabilization Exercises
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
32 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
10 Jun 2025to 10 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 28 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age group: 18-28 Years(20)
  • Gender Group: Both male and female participants(20)
  • Individuals with a Craniovertebral angle <53(20)
  • Individuals having grade 2 neck pain according to KNGF Guidelines.(21)
  • Individuals having localized pain or stiffness in spine or both combined between C3 and C7 without upper-limb radiculopathy(22)
  • Individual who had not received any treatment for neck pain for the last 3 months will be included in the study.
  • Patients willing to sign written consent form.

Who cannot join

  • Those who had undergone spinal surgery(23)
  • Neck pain caused by various pathologies (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, fracture, tumor, etc.)(23)
  • Nerve root compression, (23)
  • A positive vertebrobasilar artery test, (23)
  • Severe radiculopathy,(23)
  • Osteoporosis, or osteopenia(23)
  • Long-term use of corticosteroids or anticoagulants (23)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Syeda Khatoon e Jannat Trust Hospital,

    Faisalabad, Punjab Province, 38000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Effects of SNAGs and Cognitive Behavior Therapy on Pain, Craniovertebral Angle and Disability in Patients With Non-Specific Neck Pain

Non-specific neck pain is a prevalent condition causing discomfort, reduced craniovertebral angle, and disability. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the combined effects of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) on pain, posture, and function. Group A will receive SNAGs and CBT, while Group B will undergo SNAGs with cervical stabilization exercises, twice weekly for four weeks. Outcomes will include pain, craniovertebral angle, and disability, analyzed using SPSS.

Read the detailed description

Non-specific neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder that will affect a significant portion of the population, leading to discomfort, reduced craniovertebral angle, and functional disability. While traditional physical therapy methods provide symptomatic relief, there is growing interest in integrating psychological interventions to address underlying factors contributing to chronic pain. This study will investigate the combined effects of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) on pain reduction, craniovertebral angle improvement, and disability in patients with non-specific neck pain.

This study will be a randomized controlled trial involving -- patients diagnosed with non-specific neck pain. Participants will be randomly assigned into two groups. Both groups will receive conservative treatment, including a 5-minute hot pack application and 5 minutes of myofascial release. Subsequently, SNAGs will be administered for 10 minutes to both groups. Group A will receive an additional 20-minute session of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) focusing on pain management strategies. In contrast, Group B will receive cervical stabilization exercises for 20 minutes. The intervention will be administered twice a week for four weeks. Pain intensity, craniovertebral angle, and disability will be measured at baseline and post-intervention using standardized assessment tools. Data analysis will be performed using SPSS version 25, with within-group and between-group comparisons to evaluate the efficacy of the interventions.

Existing studies focus on manual therapies and short-term outcomes but lack insights into the combined and sustained effects of SNAGs and CBT. This research aims to bridge that gap, exploring the physical and psychological dimensions of treatment to improve long-term function and patient well-being.

Being tested
Cognitive behavior therapy, Cervical Stabilization Exercises
Keywords
snags, Non-Specific Neck Pain, Craniovertebral Angle, disability
Medical subject headings
Neck Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive behavior therapyOther

    The treatment session will begin with a 10-minute conventional therapy, including a 5-minute hot pack applied to the cervical region and a 5-minute Myofascial Release (MFR) using skin rolling and cross-hand techniques to relax and stretch the fascia layers. This will be followed by a 10-minute application of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs), where the physiotherapist will guide the patient's active neck movements with accessory glides to improve joint ROM and reduce pain. Lastly, a 20-minute Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) session will include visual aids, explanations of cervical spine biomechanics, pain pathways, ergonomics, and posture management. Patients will receive manuals summarizing key points and be encouraged to engage actively. The 40-minute session will be conducted twice weekly for four weeks

  • Cervical Stabilization ExercisesOther

    The treatment session will last 40 minutes, twice a week for 4 weeks. It begins with a 10-minute conventional treatment: a 5-minute hot pack application to the cervical region followed by a 5-minute Myofascial Release (MFR) using the skin rolling technique. Natural wax will be applied for smooth strokes. MFR will engage all fascia layers with superficial strokes, progressing to deeper fascia using cross-hand stretch, depending on the pain tolerance.

    Next, SNAGs (Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides) will be applied for 10 minutes. The patient, seated, will actively move the painful joint through its range of motion while the therapist applies a glide force. This will be repeated 10 times for 3 sets.

    Then session includes 20 minutes of Cervical Stabilization Exercises (CSE) with bracing in neurodevelopment stages (supine, prone, quadrupedal, bipedal), holding each position for 10 seconds. Isometric exercises and functional training with elastic bands and exercise balls follow.

Study groups in NCT06996015
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cognitive Behavior TherapyExperimentalCognitive Behavioral Therapy will be delivered in 20-minute sessions using visual aids like videos, images, and pamphlets to explain cervical spine structure, biomechanics, pain pathways, and ergonomic practices. Techniques for managing flare-ups and maintaining good posture will be taught, ensuring active engagement and focus. A manual summarizing key points will be provided, and students will be encouraged to ask questions. Sessions will occur twice weekly for four weeks.
Receives: Other: Cognitive behavior therapy
Cervical Stabilization ExercisesActive comparatorCervical Stabilization Exercises (CSE) will include bracing techniques in neurodevelopmental stages (supine, prone, quadrupedal, bipedal) with 10-second holds for 10 repetitions. Extremity ROM exercises will be done while maintaining spinal stability, progressing from 8 to 12 reps. Cervical isometric exercises will target multiple directions using elastic bands, with 10 reps and 6-10 second holds. Functional training with elastic resistance and exercise balls on unstable surfaces will also be incorporated, with 10 reps and 10-15 second holds. Sessions will occur twice weekly for four weeks.
Receives: Other: Cervical Stabilization Exercises

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. NPRS

    Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) To determine the degree of pain that the patient will report, the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) will be utilized. This scale consists of 11 points ranging from 0-10, where zero indicates no pain, five represents moderate pain intensity, and ten signifies severe pain intensity.

    An intraclass correlation value (ICC) of 0.67 indicated a moderate level of reliability for the NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), indicating a moderate level of consistency and stability in the scores obtained from the measurement tool.(24) NPRS have shown high test-retest reliability (r = 0.96 and 0.95, respectively) (19).

    The measurements for pain intensity will be recorded through this scale at baseline, and after 4 weeks of treatment

    Measured: 4th week

  2. Neck Disability Index

    To assess neck-related disability, a questionnaire called the Neck Disability Index (NDI) will be used. It consists of eleven things that address pain and regular tasks such personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, focusing, work status, driving, sleeping, and recreation.

    The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the NDI (Neck Disability Index) is 0.88, indicating very high reliability, indicating a high level of consistency and stability of scores obtained from the measurement tool.(24) It has been demonstrated that the NDI-U questionnaire can accurately assess neck impairment in Urdu-speaking individuals with chronic musculoskeletal neck pain (CMNP). Its two-factor structure and use of simple language make it easy for patients to understand, making it a suitable assessment tool in both clinical and research settings for patients population.(25)

    Measured: 4th week

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Craniovertebral Angle

    Photogrammetric method (for Measuring Craniovertebral Angle):

    Neck pain is frequently brought on by the forward head posture, also referred to as the Craniovertebral Angle (CA). It is calculated using the angle created by a horizontal line going through the spinous process of C7 and a line originating from the tragus of the ear.

    According to intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values ranging from 0.88 to 0.98, photogrammetry in the sagittal plane is a trustworthy technique for determining forward head posture. This method has been utilized in several research studies to measure forward head posture.

    When used to evaluate cervical range of motion in the sagittal plane, the Kinovea software has also been demonstrated to have both intrarater and interrater reliability.

    This angle will be used to assess the degree of forward head posture in patients.

    Measured: 4th week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 May 2025
  2. Study start10 Jun 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2025
  4. Study completion10 Dec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
32 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06996015
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC/RCR&AHS/24/0154
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
10 Mar 2025
Last updated
28 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in