AzTrials
AzTrials

MDRPANCT06992102

Clinical Study on the Treatment of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection With Pseudomonas Aeruginosa by Ceftazidime and Avibatam

An observational study of MDRPA, run by The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) is emerging globally as a pathogen of concern in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), and a threat to public health.There has been an alarming rise in the prevalence of MDR-GNB infections globally over the last decade.Multidrug-resistant or Carbapenem-resistant… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
MDRPA
How many people
500 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2022to 1 Jan 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: This was a single-centre, retrospective and observational study conducted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, a 2200-bed tertiary care teaching hospital in Nanjing, Jiangsu in China, from January 2019 to April 2023.The inclusion criteria consisted of (i) patients with MDRPA infection diagnosed by clinicians,(ii) patients treated with anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa antibiotics for at least 72h,(iii) patients older than 18 years old. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, mental illness, a medication course of less than 72 hours, or incomplete data were excluded.

Who may be able to join

  • patients with MDRPA infection diagnosed by clinicians
  • patients treated with anti-Pseudomonas aeruginosa antibiotics for at least 72h
  • patients older than 18 years old.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, mental illness, a medication course of less than 72 hours, or incomplete data were excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 21000

Other trials in China

About this study

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) is emerging globally as a pathogen of concern in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), and a threat to public health.There has been an alarming rise in the prevalence of MDR-GNB infections globally over the last decade.Multidrug-resistant or Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA or CRPA) are one of the major pathogens in the hospital setting,and are particularly challenging due to limited therapeutic options,associated with high mortality rates.Ceftazidime/avibactam(CAZ/AVI) combines the anti-pseudomonal cephalosporin ceftazidime and the novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam,which are now available for the treatment of MDR-GNB infections and favorable outcomes have been reported in hospitalized patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE).However, there are only few publications available with a small sample size limit, focusing on the efficacy of CAZ/AVI for the treatment of CRPA or MDRPA infections.Therefore, a retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the clinical efficacy and microbiological efficacy of CAZ/AVI versus other antibiotics for the treatment of MDRPA infections.

Conditions
MDRPA

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical efficacy

    The clinical efficacy of the treatment was determined by two senior physicians with extensive clinical experience, who classified it as either effective (characterized by the resolution or significant improvement of clinical symptoms and signs, normalization or minimal residuals in pulmonary imaging, and normalization of inflammatory markers), uncertain or ineffective.

    Measured: 28 day after enrollment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Microbiological efficacy

    Microbiological efficacy was defined as eradication or reduction, indicated by the absence of MDRPA in lower respiratory tract secretion cultures post-treatment, or a decrease in bacterial load by more than 25% compared to pre-treatment levels. Microbiological ineffectiveness was defined as the continued presence of MDRAB in cultures after treatment and no change or an increase in bacterial load compared to pre-treatment levels.

    Measured: 28 day after enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 May 2025
  2. Study start1 Jan 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
500 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06992102
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022-SR-500
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
17 Apr 2025
Last updated
28 May 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of MDRPA, run by The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical efficacy (time frame: 28 day after enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in