Myofacial Pain SyndromeESWTNCT06987721
Extracorporeal Shock-wave Therapy in Myofascial Pain Syndrome
An observational study of Myofacial Pain Syndrome, run by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Introduction: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a syndrome characterized by painful trigger points on palpation located at certain points of common muscles of the musculoskeletal system. Active trigger points may cause spontaneous pain and many other consequences that affect quality of life and loss of work force. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Myofacial Pain Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Modus ESWT-Focused and Modus ESWT-Radial
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 57 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 18 Jan 2022to 1 Aug 2024
- How long will I take part?
- 6 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients between 18-75 years old with myofascial pain syndrome and that have trigger points in upper trapezius muscles were participated in the study
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged between 18-70 years with myofascial pain syndrome and active trigger points in the trapezius upper fibers
- Pain related to trapezius muscle trigger points were \> 4 according to numerical rating scale (NRS)
Who cannot join
- Revealed any cervical disc herniation (protrusion or extrusion) that cause cervical root compression showed with magnetic resonance imaging and/or radicular pain with motor or sensory deficit
- Presence of neurological and rheumatological disorders and/or malignancy 3. Detected cognitive impairment according to mini mental test (mini mental test score \<23)
- 4. Acute systemic infection or any other diseases that effect general condition 5. Participants have any open wound or sensory deficit in the application area.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
Ankara, None Selected, 06800
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Efficacy of Radial and Focused Extracorporeal Shock-wave Therapy (ESWT) in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: Prospective, Randomized, Sham Controlled Study
Introduction: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a syndrome characterized by painful trigger points on palpation located at certain points of common muscles of the musculoskeletal system. Active trigger points may cause spontaneous pain and many other consequences that affect quality of life and loss of work force. Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) is a treatment method performed with the help of acoustic waves created outside the body and used in musculoskeletal problems. There are radial or focused waves that are commonly used in ESWT. In Focused ESWT (F-ESWT), the depth of the body part to be injured can be adjusted. Thus, penetration into the tissue is better than radial waves. Radial ESWT (R-ESWT), on the other hand, has a more superficial effect, and its spread in liquids with a density similar to tissues is half that of focused ESWT. It has been shown in previous studies that radial and focused ESWT waves applied to trigger points in the upper trapezius fibers reduce reflected and local pain in myofascial pain syndrome. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of radial and focused ESWT types on trigger points in trapezoidal upper fibers in myofascial pain syndrome.
Methods: This prospective,sham-controlled double-blind study was carried out with total of 57 patients. They were randomized into 3 groups and received R-ESWT, F-ESWT and sham protocols for 10 sessions. Patients were evaluated and compared with Numerical rating scale (NRS), Health assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Beck Depression Scale (BDI) before treatment, just post treatment, 1st month, 3nd month and 6th month after treatment completed.
Read the detailed description
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a syndrome characterized by painful trigger points on palpation located at certain points of common muscles of the musculoskeletal system. Pain on palpation tends to radiate and is sometimes even accompanied by sensory symptoms (such as paresthesia) or autonomic findings (piloerection, sweating, etc.). Trigger points can be either latent or active. Active trigger points may cause spontaneous pain, while latent trigger points are more commonly manifested as pain radiating with palpation. Latent trigger points tend to turn into active trigger points as a result of acute stresses, microtraumas or postural disorders, and the trapezius muscle is the most common muscle in which myofascial trigger points are seen. Myofascial pain syndrome can cause many consequences such as disturbances in daily living acitivities, decrease in quality of life and loss of work force. It can also accompany anxiety and depression . Pharmacological therapy can be used in the treatment, since stretching exercises, dry needling, acupuncture or physical therapy modalities are another effective treatment options for patients who are not willing to use drugs or have co-morbidities .
Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) is a kind of physical therapy method performed with the help of acoustic waves created outside the body. It is frequently used in musculoskeletal conditions. Its effectiveness has been demonstrated in disorders such as calcaneal spur, lateral epicondylitis, calcific tendinitis, myofascial pain syndrome, and fibromyalgia .
Radial or focused waves are commonly used in application of ESWT. In Focused ESWT (F-ESWT), the depth of the body part to be injured can be adjusted. Thus, penetration into the tissue is better than radial waves. Radial ESWT (R-ESWT), on the other hand, has a more superficial effect, and its spread in liquids with a density similar to tissues is half that of F-ESWT . However some side effects were identified during the ESWT procedure, both wave types are thought to be safe and widely used.
It has been shown in previous studies that radial and focused ESWT waves applied to trigger points in the upper trapezius fibers reduce reflected and local pain in myofascial pain syndrome. The effectiveness of these waves has been evaluated in studies many times but the effectiveness of the two wave types has not been compared in patients with trigger points in the trapezius upper fibers in myofascial pain syndrome. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of R-ESWT and F-ESWT types on trigger points in trapezoidal upper fibers in myofascial pain syndrome.
This prospective, sham-controlled and double-blind study was carried out at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Hospital. Fifty nine male and/or female patients enrolled the study initially. The study protocol is compatible with Helsinki declaration and approved by Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Ethics Committee (Approval number: E2-22-3033). Written and oral informed consents were obtained from the participants before allocation.
Participants were diagnosed as MPS according to Travell and Simons' 5 major and 3 minor criteria. Major criteria were 1) localized spontaneous pain 2) presence of spontaneous pain and/or changed sensation in referred pain area 3) palpable bands in muscle 4) sharp tenderness along the taut bands 5) measurable limitation in range of motion. Minor criteria were 1) pain or change in sensation caused by touching the taut bands 2) Presence of a local twitch response in the muscle upon needle insertion 3) reduced pain after stretching or injection of taut bands. Five major and at least 1 minor criteria are needed for MPS diagnosis .
Inclusion criteria were 1) Patients aged between 18-70 years with myofascial pain syndrome and active trigger points in the trapezius upper fibers 2) Pain related to trapezius muscle trigger points were > 4 according to numerical rating scale (NRS).
Exclusion criteria were 1) revealed any cervical disc herniation (protrusion or extrusion) that cause cervical root compression showed with magnetic resonance imaging and/or radicular pain with motor or sensory deficit 2) Presence of neurological and rheumatological disorders and/or malignancy 3) Detected cognitive impairment according to mini mental test (mini mental test score <23) 4) Acute systemic infection or any other diseases that effect general condition 5) participants have any open wound or sensory deficit in the application area.
Patients who met inclusion criteria were included in the study. Randomization was done with a software system and totally 59 patients were enrolled (20 R-ESWT, 19 F-ESWT, 20 sham). One patient did not come to follow-ups and one patient left the study before the completion of sessions and eventually 57 patients were completed the study (Figure 1). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded before the procedure.
Exercise program for strecthing exercises of trapezius muscle were given for all the participants for 4 weeks. Weekly remindings were done with telephone calls and face-to-face follow-ups. All ESWT applications were made in a total of 4 sessions with one week between them by one of the researcher physician. Patients included in the study were evaluated at the beginning of the study (pre-treatment), just after completion of ESWT sessions, at 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month after the end of 4 sessions in terms of pain, functionality and depression.
In accordance with the literature, the ESWT adjustment is made as 1500 pulses, 0.1 mj/mm, 10-16 Hz for radial applications, and 1500 pulses, 0.056 mj/mm, 6 Hz for focused applications. The sham application was made in such a way that the device was set to 0 frequency and power, making only sound. All applications were done with the same device; Modus ESWT.
Randomization and blinding Patients diagnosis were done by the same physician. Informed consent were obtained and patients were informed that they were not going to be able to aware of the group they participate due to the type of the study, in addition first evaluations were done with a face to face interview by the same physician.
After diagnosed as MPS, patients were randomized by a data entry staff with a software. Another physician who had done all ESWT applications were informed about the application type by the staff according to that software. After all sessions were completed, first evaluator physician who is blind to application type, assessed patients at follow-ups.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Numerical rating scale (NRS) is used by patients to perform a self-assessment of pain intensity associated with myofascial pain syndrome. Higher scores indicates more pain related to trigger points of upper trapezius muscle fibers .
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is used to evaluate the characteristics of depression and anxiety. BDI consists of 21 questions, higher scores imply increased depression symptom severity .
Health Assesment Questionnaire (HAQ) This questionnaire has 8 sections: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. There are 2 or 3 questions for each section. Scoring within each item is between 0-3 (0=without any difficulty, 3=unable to do). Higher scores indicate worse health condition according to the patient's own reports.
- Conditions
- Myofacial Pain Syndrome
- Being tested
- Modus ESWT-Focused, Modus ESWT-Radial, Modus ESWT-Sham
- Keywords
- Trapezius muscle, Trigger points, Pain, Therapy: pain management
- Medical subject headings
- Facial Neuralgia, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Modus ESWT-FocusedDevice
In accordance with the literature, the ESWT adjustment is made as 1500 pulses, 0.056 mj/mm, 6 Hz for focused applications. All applications were done with the same device; Modus ESWT.
Modus ESWT-RadialDevice
In accordance with the literature, the ESWT adjustment is made as 1500 pulses, 0.1 mj/mm, 10-16 Hz for radial applications. All applications were done with the same device; Modus ESWT.
Modus ESWT-ShamDevice
The sham application was made in such a way that the device was set to 0 frequency and power, making only sound. All applications were done with the same device; Modus ESWT.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Radial ESWT | Group of participants received radial ESWT. Receives: Device: Modus ESWT-Radial | |
| Focused ESWT | Group of participants received focused ESWT. Receives: Device: Modus ESWT-Focused | |
| Sham group | group of participants received sham ESWT application Receives: Device: Modus ESWT-Sham |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Numerical Rating Scale
Numerical rating scale (NRS) (0-10 scores) is used by patients to perform a self-assessment of pain intensity associated with myofascial pain syndrome. Higher scores indicates more pain related to trigger points of upper trapezius muscle fibers
Measured: Before treatment, just post treatment, 1st month, 3nd month and 6th month after treatment completed.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Beck Depression Inventory
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is used to evaluate the characteristics of depression and anxiety. BDI consists of 21 questions, higher scores imply increased depression symptom severity. Scores are between 0-63 points.
Measured: Before treatment, just post treatment, 1st month, 3nd month and 6th month after treatment completed.
Health Assessment Questionnaire
This questionnaire has 8 sections: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. There are 2 or 3 questions for each section. Scoring within each item is between 0-3 (0=without any difficulty, 3=unable to do). Higher scores indicate worse health condition according to the patient's own reports
Measured: Before treatment, just post treatment, 1st month, 3nd month and 6th month after treatment completed.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 May 2025
- Study start18 Jan 2022
- Primary completion25 Jan 2024
- Study completion1 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myofacial Pain SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ankara City Hospital BilkentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 6 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hüma Bölük Şenlikci, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06987721
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AnkaraCHBilkent-E2-22-3033
- Acronym
- ESWT
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 24 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 23 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD is going to be shared in submission process
Publications
Urits I, Charipova K, Gress K, Schaaf AL, Gupta S, Kiernan HC, Choi PE, Jung JW, Cornett E, Kaye AD, Viswanath O. Treatment and management of myofascial pain syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Sep;34(3):427-448. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
PubMed 33004157Tasoglu O, Sahin Onat S, Boluk H, Tasoglu I, Ozgirgin N. Comparision of two different dry-needling techniques in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. Agri. 2017 Jan;29(1):9-16. doi: 10.5505/agri.2016.38991.
PubMed 28467572Schmitz C, Csaszar NB, Milz S, Schieker M, Maffulli N, Rompe JD, Furia JP. Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for orthopedic conditions: a systematic review on studies listed in the PEDro database. Br Med Bull. 2015;116(1):115-38. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldv047. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
PubMed 26585999Paoletta M, Moretti A, Liguori S, Toro G, Gimigliano F, Iolascon G. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Patients with Myofascial Pain or Fibromyalgia: A Scoping Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 28;58(8):1014. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081014.
PubMed 36013480
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Radial and Focused Extracorporeal Shock-wave Therapy (ESWT) in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: Prospective, Randomized, Sham Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06987721
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ESWT / AnkaraCHBilkent-E2-22-3033
- Conditions
- Myofacial Pain Syndrome
- Keywords
- Trapezius muscle, Trigger points, Pain, Therapy: pain management
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara City Hospital BilkentUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a syndrome characterized by painful trigger points on palpation located at certain points of common muscles of the musculoskeletal system. Active trigger points may cause spontaneous pain and many other consequences that affect quality of life and loss of work force. Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) is a treatment method performed with the help of acoustic waves created outside the body and used in musculoskeletal problems. There are radial or focused waves that are commonly used in ESWT. In Focused ESWT (F-ESWT), the depth of the body part to be injured can be adjusted. Thus, penetration into the tissue is better than radial waves. Radial ESWT (R-ESWT), on the other hand, has a more superficial effect, and its spread in liquids with a density similar to tissues is half that of focused ESWT. It has been shown in previous studies that radial and focused ESWT waves applied to trigger points in the upper trapezius fibers reduce reflected and local pain in myofascial pain syndrome. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of radial and focused ESWT types on trigger points in trapezoidal upper fibers in myofascial pain syndrome.
Methods: This prospective,sham-controlled double-blind study was carried out with total of 57 patients. They were randomized into 3 groups and received R-ESWT, F-ESWT and sham protocols for 10 sessions. Patients were evaluated and compared with Numerical rating scale (NRS), Health assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Beck Depression Scale (BDI) before treatment, just post treatment, 1st month, 3nd month and 6th month after treatment completed.
Detailed description
Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a syndrome characterized by painful trigger points on palpation located at certain points of common muscles of the musculoskeletal system. Pain on palpation tends to radiate and is sometimes even accompanied by sensory symptoms (such as paresthesia) or autonomic findings (piloerection, sweating, etc.). Trigger points can be either latent or active. Active trigger points may cause spontaneous pain, while latent trigger points are more commonly manifested as pain radiating with palpation. Latent trigger points tend to turn into active trigger points as a result of acute stresses, microtraumas or postural disorders, and the trapezius muscle is the most common muscle in which myofascial trigger points are seen. Myofascial pain syndrome can cause many consequences such as disturbances in daily living acitivities, decrease in quality of life and loss of work force. It can also accompany anxiety and depression . Pharmacological therapy can be used in the treatment, since stretching exercises, dry needling, acupuncture or physical therapy modalities are another effective treatment options for patients who are not willing to use drugs or have co-morbidities .
Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) is a kind of physical therapy method performed with the help of acoustic waves created outside the body. It is frequently used in musculoskeletal conditions. Its effectiveness has been demonstrated in disorders such as calcaneal spur, lateral epicondylitis, calcific tendinitis, myofascial pain syndrome, and fibromyalgia .
Radial or focused waves are commonly used in application of ESWT. In Focused ESWT (F-ESWT), the depth of the body part to be injured can be adjusted. Thus, penetration into the tissue is better than radial waves. Radial ESWT (R-ESWT), on the other hand, has a more superficial effect, and its spread in liquids with a density similar to tissues is half that of F-ESWT . However some side effects were identified during the ESWT procedure, both wave types are thought to be safe and widely used.
It has been shown in previous studies that radial and focused ESWT waves applied to trigger points in the upper trapezius fibers reduce reflected and local pain in myofascial pain syndrome. The effectiveness of these waves has been evaluated in studies many times but the effectiveness of the two wave types has not been compared in patients with trigger points in the trapezius upper fibers in myofascial pain syndrome. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of R-ESWT and F-ESWT types on trigger points in trapezoidal upper fibers in myofascial pain syndrome.
This prospective, sham-controlled and double-blind study was carried out at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Hospital. Fifty nine male and/or female patients enrolled the study initially. The study protocol is compatible with Helsinki declaration and approved by Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Ethics Committee (Approval number: E2-22-3033). Written and oral informed consents were obtained from the participants before allocation.
Participants were diagnosed as MPS according to Travell and Simons' 5 major and 3 minor criteria. Major criteria were 1) localized spontaneous pain 2) presence of spontaneous pain and/or changed sensation in referred pain area 3) palpable bands in muscle 4) sharp tenderness along the taut bands 5) measurable limitation in range of motion. Minor criteria were 1) pain or change in sensation caused by touching the taut bands 2) Presence of a local twitch response in the muscle upon needle insertion 3) reduced pain after stretching or injection of taut bands. Five major and at least 1 minor criteria are needed for MPS diagnosis .
Inclusion criteria were 1) Patients aged between 18-70 years with myofascial pain syndrome and active trigger points in the trapezius upper fibers 2) Pain related to trapezius muscle trigger points were > 4 according to numerical rating scale (NRS).
Exclusion criteria were 1) revealed any cervical disc herniation (protrusion or extrusion) that cause cervical root compression showed with magnetic resonance imaging and/or radicular pain with motor or sensory deficit 2) Presence of neurological and rheumatological disorders and/or malignancy 3) Detected cognitive impairment according to mini mental test (mini mental test score <23) 4) Acute systemic infection or any other diseases that effect general condition 5) participants have any open wound or sensory deficit in the application area.
Patients who met inclusion criteria were included in the study. Randomization was done with a software system and totally 59 patients were enrolled (20 R-ESWT, 19 F-ESWT, 20 sham). One patient did not come to follow-ups and one patient left the study before the completion of sessions and eventually 57 patients were completed the study (Figure 1). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded before the procedure.
Exercise program for strecthing exercises of trapezius muscle were given for all the participants for 4 weeks. Weekly remindings were done with telephone calls and face-to-face follow-ups. All ESWT applications were made in a total of 4 sessions with one week between them by one of the researcher physician. Patients included in the study were evaluated at the beginning of the study (pre-treatment), just after completion of ESWT sessions, at 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month after the end of 4 sessions in terms of pain, functionality and depression.
In accordance with the literature, the ESWT adjustment is made as 1500 pulses, 0.1 mj/mm, 10-16 Hz for radial applications, and 1500 pulses, 0.056 mj/mm, 6 Hz for focused applications. The sham application was made in such a way that the device was set to 0 frequency and power, making only sound. All applications were done with the same device; Modus ESWT.
Randomization and blinding Patients diagnosis were done by the same physician. Informed consent were obtained and patients were informed that they were not going to be able to aware of the group they participate due to the type of the study, in addition first evaluations were done with a face to face interview by the same physician.
After diagnosed as MPS, patients were randomized by a data entry staff with a software. Another physician who had done all ESWT applications were informed about the application type by the staff according to that software. After all sessions were completed, first evaluator physician who is blind to application type, assessed patients at follow-ups.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Numerical rating scale (NRS) is used by patients to perform a self-assessment of pain intensity associated with myofascial pain syndrome. Higher scores indicates more pain related to trigger points of upper trapezius muscle fibers .
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is used to evaluate the characteristics of depression and anxiety. BDI consists of 21 questions, higher scores imply increased depression symptom severity .
Health Assesment Questionnaire (HAQ) This questionnaire has 8 sections: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. There are 2 or 3 questions for each section. Scoring within each item is between 0-3 (0=without any difficulty, 3=unable to do). Higher scores indicate worse health condition according to the patient's own reports.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 6 Months
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Radial ESWT | – | Device: Modus ESWT-RadialGroup of participants received radial ESWT. |
| Focused ESWT | – | Device: Modus ESWT-FocusedGroup of participants received focused ESWT. |
| Sham group | – | Device: Modus ESWT-Shamgroup of participants received sham ESWT application |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients between 18-75 years old with myofascial pain syndrome and that have trigger points in upper trapezius muscles were participated in the study
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients aged between 18-70 years with myofascial pain syndrome and active trigger points in the trapezius upper fibers
- Pain related to trapezius muscle trigger points were \&gt; 4 according to numerical rating scale (NRS)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Revealed any cervical disc herniation (protrusion or extrusion) that cause cervical root compression showed with magnetic resonance imaging and/or radicular pain with motor or sensory deficit
- Presence of neurological and rheumatological disorders and/or malignancy 3. Detected cognitive impairment according to mini mental test (mini mental test score \&lt;23)
- 4. Acute systemic infection or any other diseases that effect general condition 5. Participants have any open wound or sensory deficit in the application area.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Modus ESWT-FocusedIn accordance with the literature, the ESWT adjustment is made as 1500 pulses, 0.056 mj/mm, 6 Hz for focused applications. All applications were done with the same device; Modus ESWT. | Device | Focused ESWT |
| Modus ESWT-RadialIn accordance with the literature, the ESWT adjustment is made as 1500 pulses, 0.1 mj/mm, 10-16 Hz for radial applications. All applications were done with the same device; Modus ESWT. | Device | Radial ESWT |
| Modus ESWT-ShamThe sham application was made in such a way that the device was set to 0 frequency and power, making only sound. All applications were done with the same device; Modus ESWT. | Device | Sham group |
Primary outcome
Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: Before treatment, just post treatment, 1st month, 3nd month and 6th month after treatment completed.
Numerical rating scale (NRS) (0-10 scores) is used by patients to perform a self-assessment of pain intensity associated with myofascial pain syndrome. Higher scores indicates more pain related to trigger points of upper trapezius muscle fibers
2 secondary outcomes
Beck Depression Inventory
Time frame: Before treatment, just post treatment, 1st month, 3nd month and 6th month after treatment completed.
Health Assessment Questionnaire
Time frame: Before treatment, just post treatment, 1st month, 3nd month and 6th month after treatment completed.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 May 2025.
- Background: PubMed 33004157Urits I, Charipova K, Gress K, Schaaf AL, Gupta S, Kiernan HC, Choi PE, Jung JW, Cornett E, Kaye AD, Viswanath O. Treatment and management of myofascial pain syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Sep;34(3):427-448. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
- Background: PubMed 28467572Tasoglu O, Sahin Onat S, Boluk H, Tasoglu I, Ozgirgin N. Comparision of two different dry-needling techniques in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. Agri. 2017 Jan;29(1):9-16. doi: 10.5505/agri.2016.38991.
- Results publication: PubMed 26585999Schmitz C, Csaszar NB, Milz S, Schieker M, Maffulli N, Rompe JD, Furia JP. Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for orthopedic conditions: a systematic review on studies listed in the PEDro database. Br Med Bull. 2015;116(1):115-38. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldv047. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 36013480Paoletta M, Moretti A, Liguori S, Toro G, Gimigliano F, Iolascon G. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Patients with Myofascial Pain or Fibromyalgia: A Scoping Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jul 28;58(8):1014. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081014.
- Study ProtocolLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD is going to be shared in submission process
Related trials for Myofacial Pain Syndrome
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Adding Sodium Bicarbonate to Lidocaine in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Myofacial Pain, Myofacial Pain Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Focused Versus Multi-Target Trigger Point Injection for Chronic Myofascial Neck Pain
Myofacial Pain Syndrome, Chronic Neck Pain
Recruiting
Dry Needling and Low-Level Laser Microcurrent Electrical Stimulation for Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Myofacial Pain Syndrome
Recruiting
Massage Gun vs Deep Friction Massage for Upper Trapezius Trigger Points
Myofacial Trigger Points of Upper Trapezius
Not yet recruiting
Artificial Intelligence Clinical Decision
Myofacial Pain Syndrome, Clinical Decision Support
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Myofacial Pain Syndrome, run by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Numerical Rating Scale (time frame: Before treatment, just post treatment, 1st month, 3nd month and 6th month after treatment completed.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06987721, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2025.