Mixed Method Implementation StudyNCT06978634
The Effect of SBAR Communication Program on Nursing Students' Perceptions of Clinical Decision Making and Medical Error Prevention Levels: A Mixed Methods Study
A study testing SBAR training with cases in people with Mixed Method Implementation Study and Nursing, run by Aytap DİNCER at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
In clinical settings, teamwork plays a vital role in improving patient care outcomes. Effective and structured communication within the team ensures that a holistic service is provided to patients. However, unclear and inadequate communication between healthcare professionals is a common problem. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Mixed Method Implementation Study, Nursing, Nursing Students
- What is being tested?
- SBAR training with cases
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 15 May 2025to 15 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Being a student registered in the nursing department,
- Having clinical practice experience (being a 3rd year student),
- Not being a student in an exchange program such as Erasmus,
Who cannot join
- Coming with a vertical transfer exam
- No clinical practice experience
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ataturk University
Erzurum, Yakutiye, 25000
Gülay i Çoban, Professor, +90 442 231 1111, gulaycoban@atauni.edu.tr
About this study
In clinical settings, teamwork plays a vital role in improving patient care outcomes. Effective and structured communication within the team ensures that a holistic service is provided to patients. However, unclear and inadequate communication between healthcare professionals is a common problem. Such communication problems can be one of the main factors that compromise patient safety and lead to medication errors. Nurses play a key role in this process as they are the healthcare professionals who interact most with patients. Nurses need to not only correctly understand the instructions to be given to the patient, but also to convey information about the patient clearly and accurately to other nurses, doctors and other members of the healthcare team. In this context, opportunities to communicate using a common language and develop these skills form an essential part of the education of nursing students. The use of structured communication tools, especially SBAR, can play an important role in the prevention of medical errors while improving the clinical decision-making skills of future nurses. The SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) communication tool is a structured model used to ensure effective communication in healthcare. "The Effect of SBAR Communication Program on Clinical Decision Making and Medical Error Awareness Levels of Nursing Students: A Mixed Method Study" is a mixed method research using experimental and qualitative research designs. The data of the research will be collected with the "Student Information Form", "Clinical Decision Making Scale in Nursing" and "Medical Error Scale for Nursing Students" "Semi-Structured Interview Form". Quantitative data processing and statistical analysis will be done with SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software. Qualitative data analysis will be done using hand coding and content analysis method. As a result, this research will clearly demonstrate the benefits of integrating communication tools such as SBAR into nursing education, contribute to the development of new methods in education and the reduction of medical errors.
Read the detailed description
The main purpose of handover communication is stated to provide accurate and up-to-date information about patient care, treatment, service use, current status and expected changes in this situation. Ineffective handovers, such as not providing all necessary information, can pose a danger to patients and staff, lead to irrelevant, repetitive and hypothetical information being communicated in the shift report and can cause misuse of resources. The aim of this study, designed as a mixed method, is to develop and implement a role-playing program with scenarios for nursing students using the SBAR communication technique. In addition, it is to examine students' clinical decision-making and medical error awareness as a result of the program. In this direction, when the literature is examined, it is concluded that the role-playing program conducted by Yu and Kang in 2017 using the SBAR technique with nursing students can be used to improve communication skills in nurse-doctor handover and to develop communicative competence in nursing students. In another study examining the experiences and perspectives of nurses who use the SBAR technique to improve patient care, it has been revealed that there are significant improvements in active patient controls and documentation control. It has also been shown that the use of standard protocols and communication tools for bedside handover improves patient care continuity.
A review of the literature on teaching SBAR to nursing students reveals that a variety of teaching methods are used. Methods such as standard patient video recording and feedback, role playing, and computer training have been used to teach communication skills. Several studies have used a combination of didactic and interactive teaching methods (such as role playing) to teach SBAR and have demonstrated positive effects on nurses' communication knowledge, attitudes, and abilities.
Clinical decision making, data analysis, and the application of these skills in a clinical context are important components of the nursing profession. Rapid decision making by nurses shortens treatment time, promotes care, and reduces treatment costs. On the other hand, failure to make timely and appropriate decisions leads to delays in treatment and waste of resources. Therefore, it affects the quality of care. Moreover, in the organizational context, nurses are members of a clinical team. Teamwork requires continuous decision-making. These decisions can affect teamwork and determine the quality of care. When the literature is examined, a study examining the effect of the SBAR communication program on the clinical decision-making levels of nursing students has shown that SBAR-based education can improve nursing students' communication skills and clinical decision-making skills. Similarly, Oh et al. (2021) showed that SBAR-based simulation learning can improve nursing students' clinical judgments and increase confidence in interprofessional communication. Medical errors often occur after breakdowns in handover communications. An analysis of assessment notes conducted by the Joint Commission shows that more than two-thirds of on-call incidents are caused by communication breakdowns, and at least 50% of them occur during handover. To avoid communication breakdown, the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) technique provides a standardized communication framework for conveying information to healthcare professionals, especially in critical situations that require immediate intervention. Both the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and the Joint Commission recommend the SBAR tool as one of the ways to improve patient and staff safety with its standardized and easy-to-use format for organizing and sharing clinical data among clinicians.
- Being tested
- SBAR training with cases
- Keywords
- SBAR, nursing, nursing students, communication, medical error, clinical decision making
- Medical subject headings
- Communication
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SBAR training with casesOther
The researcher will hold a face-to-face meeting with the students in the intervention group and provide information about the purpose of the study, the content of the training, the Student Guidelines for the SBAR Role Playing Application and the research process. Then, "SBAR Training with Cases" will be given. In addition, a group will be established via Whatsapp and communication during the process will be provided through this channel. The days and times of the training will be determined by looking at the students' course schedules. The training will be carried out in the Skills Laboratory of the Faculty of Health Sciences at Yüzüncü Yıl University.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| control | No intervention | In the control group, students who agree to participate in the study and meet the inclusion criteria will receive written permission with a voluntary consent form. The researcher will meet with the students one-on-one and provide information about the purpose of the study. Pre-test data for the study will be collected before the SBAR training with cases. Post-test data will be collected 4 weeks after the training given to the intervention group. Students in the control group will receive no intervention and continue with their standard nursing education. They will complete only the pre-test and post-test and will not participate in the SBAR training. Their data will serve as a comparison to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. |
| intervention | Experimental | The researcher will hold a face-to-face meeting with the students in the intervention group and provide information about the purpose of the study, the content of the training, the Student Guidelines for the SBAR Role Playing Application and the research process. Then, "SBAR Training with Cases" will be given. In addition, a group will be established via Whatsapp and communication during the process will be provided through this channel. The days and times of the training will be determined by looking at the students' course schedules. The training will be carried out in the Skills Laboratory of the Faculty of Health Sciences at Yüzüncü Yıl University. Receives: Other: SBAR training with cases |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical Decision Making in Nursing
It was developed by Jenkins (1983) to measure the perceptions of clinical decision-making of nursing students and nurses. Validity and reliability studies in Türkiye were conducted by Durmaz-Edir and Sarıkaya (2015). The scale; Exploring options and ideas (10 items) (1, 3, 6, 7, 16, 22, 27, 30, 32, 37), exploring goals and values (10 items) (2, 9, 10, 14, 21, 31, 33, 35, 38, 40), evaluating consequences (10 items) (13, 17, 18, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29, 34, 39) and searching for information and adopting new information objectively (10 items) (4, 5, 8, 11, 12, 15, 19, 20, 24), 36 items) consists of four subscales and 40 items. The options on a five-point Likert scale are; (1) Never (2) Rarely (3) Sometimes (4) Often (5) Always. The scale's 22 items (1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18, 20, 26, 27, 28, 29, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38) have positive and 18 items (2, 4, 6, 12, 13, 15, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 30, 31, 32, 34, 39, 40) have negative values. The 18 scale items with negative meanings ar
Measured: 5 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 May 2025
- Study start15 May 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion15 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Mixed Method Implementation StudyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aytap DİNCER
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Aytap DİNCER, Ataturk University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06978634
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 9 May 2025
- Last updated
- 18 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of SBAR Communication Program on Nursing Students' Perceptions of Clinical Decision Making and Medical Error Prevention Levels: A Mixed Methods Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06978634
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/
- Keywords
- SBAR, nursing, nursing students, communication, medical error, clinical decision making
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Aytap DİNCERUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 May 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 15 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In clinical settings, teamwork plays a vital role in improving patient care outcomes. Effective and structured communication within the team ensures that a holistic service is provided to patients. However, unclear and inadequate communication between healthcare professionals is a common problem. Such communication problems can be one of the main factors that compromise patient safety and lead to medication errors. Nurses play a key role in this process as they are the healthcare professionals who interact most with patients. Nurses need to not only correctly understand the instructions to be given to the patient, but also to convey information about the patient clearly and accurately to other nurses, doctors and other members of the healthcare team. In this context, opportunities to communicate using a common language and develop these skills form an essential part of the education of nursing students. The use of structured communication tools, especially SBAR, can play an important role in the prevention of medical errors while improving the clinical decision-making skills of future nurses. The SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) communication tool is a structured model used to ensure effective communication in healthcare. "The Effect of SBAR Communication Program on Clinical Decision Making and Medical Error Awareness Levels of Nursing Students: A Mixed Method Study" is a mixed method research using experimental and qualitative research designs. The data of the research will be collected with the "Student Information Form", "Clinical Decision Making Scale in Nursing" and "Medical Error Scale for Nursing Students" "Semi-Structured Interview Form". Quantitative data processing and statistical analysis will be done with SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software. Qualitative data analysis will be done using hand coding and content analysis method. As a result, this research will clearly demonstrate the benefits of integrating communication tools such as SBAR into nursing education, contribute to the development of new methods in education and the reduction of medical errors.
Detailed description
The main purpose of handover communication is stated to provide accurate and up-to-date information about patient care, treatment, service use, current status and expected changes in this situation. Ineffective handovers, such as not providing all necessary information, can pose a danger to patients and staff, lead to irrelevant, repetitive and hypothetical information being communicated in the shift report and can cause misuse of resources. The aim of this study, designed as a mixed method, is to develop and implement a role-playing program with scenarios for nursing students using the SBAR communication technique. In addition, it is to examine students' clinical decision-making and medical error awareness as a result of the program. In this direction, when the literature is examined, it is concluded that the role-playing program conducted by Yu and Kang in 2017 using the SBAR technique with nursing students can be used to improve communication skills in nurse-doctor handover and to develop communicative competence in nursing students. In another study examining the experiences and perspectives of nurses who use the SBAR technique to improve patient care, it has been revealed that there are significant improvements in active patient controls and documentation control. It has also been shown that the use of standard protocols and communication tools for bedside handover improves patient care continuity.
A review of the literature on teaching SBAR to nursing students reveals that a variety of teaching methods are used. Methods such as standard patient video recording and feedback, role playing, and computer training have been used to teach communication skills. Several studies have used a combination of didactic and interactive teaching methods (such as role playing) to teach SBAR and have demonstrated positive effects on nurses' communication knowledge, attitudes, and abilities.
Clinical decision making, data analysis, and the application of these skills in a clinical context are important components of the nursing profession. Rapid decision making by nurses shortens treatment time, promotes care, and reduces treatment costs. On the other hand, failure to make timely and appropriate decisions leads to delays in treatment and waste of resources. Therefore, it affects the quality of care. Moreover, in the organizational context, nurses are members of a clinical team. Teamwork requires continuous decision-making. These decisions can affect teamwork and determine the quality of care. When the literature is examined, a study examining the effect of the SBAR communication program on the clinical decision-making levels of nursing students has shown that SBAR-based education can improve nursing students' communication skills and clinical decision-making skills. Similarly, Oh et al. (2021) showed that SBAR-based simulation learning can improve nursing students' clinical judgments and increase confidence in interprofessional communication. Medical errors often occur after breakdowns in handover communications. An analysis of assessment notes conducted by the Joint Commission shows that more than two-thirds of on-call incidents are caused by communication breakdowns, and at least 50% of them occur during handover. To avoid communication breakdown, the SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) technique provides a standardized communication framework for conveying information to healthcare professionals, especially in critical situations that require immediate intervention. Both the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and the Joint Commission recommend the SBAR tool as one of the ways to improve patient and staff safety with its standardized and easy-to-use format for organizing and sharing clinical data among clinicians.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| control | No intervention | –In the control group, students who agree to participate in the study and meet the inclusion criteria will receive written permission with a voluntary consent form. The researcher will meet with the students one-on-one and provide information about the purpose of the study. Pre-test data for the study will be collected before the SBAR training with cases. Post-test data will be collected 4 weeks after the training given to the intervention group. Students in the control group will receive no intervention and continue with their standard nursing education. They will complete only the pre-test and post-test and will not participate in the SBAR training. Their data will serve as a comparison to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. |
| intervention | Experimental | Other: SBAR training with casesThe researcher will hold a face-to-face meeting with the students in the intervention group and provide information about the purpose of the study, the content of the training, the Student Guidelines for the SBAR Role Playing Application and the research process. Then, "SBAR Training with Cases" will be given. In addition, a group will be established via Whatsapp and communication during the process will be provided through this channel. The days and times of the training will be determined by looking at the students' course schedules. The training will be carried out in the Skills Laboratory of the Faculty of Health Sciences at Yüzüncü Yıl University. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Being a student registered in the nursing department,
- Having clinical practice experience (being a 3rd year student),
- Not being a student in an exchange program such as Erasmus,
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Coming with a vertical transfer exam
- No clinical practice experience
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SBAR training with casesThe researcher will hold a face-to-face meeting with the students in the intervention group and provide information about the purpose of the study, the content of the training, the Student Guidelines for the SBAR Role Playing Application and the research process. Then, "SBAR Training with Cases" will be given. In addition, a group will be established via Whatsapp and communication during the process will be provided through this channel. The days and times of the training will be determined by looking at the students' course schedules. The training will be carried out in the Skills Laboratory of the Faculty of Health Sciences at Yüzüncü Yıl University. | Other | intervention |
Primary outcome
Clinical Decision Making in Nursing
Time frame: 5 week
It was developed by Jenkins (1983) to measure the perceptions of clinical decision-making of nursing students and nurses. Validity and reliability studies in Türkiye were conducted by Durmaz-Edir and Sarıkaya (2015). The scale; Exploring options and ideas (10 items) (1, 3, 6, 7, 16, 22, 27, 30, 32, 37), exploring goals and values (10 items) (2, 9, 10, 14, 21, 31, 33, 35, 38, 40), evaluating consequences (10 items) (13, 17, 18, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29, 34, 39) and searching for information and adopting new information objectively (10 items) (4, 5, 8, 11, 12, 15, 19, 20, 24), 36 items) consists of four subscales and 40 items. The options on a five-point Likert scale are; (1) Never (2) Rarely (3) Sometimes (4) Often (5) Always. The scale's 22 items (1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18, 20, 26, 27, 28, 29, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38) have positive and 18 items (2, 4, 6, 12, 13, 15, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 30, 31, 32, 34, 39, 40) have negative values. The 18 scale items with negative meanings ar
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 May 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Mixed Method Implementation Study
Enrolling by invitation
Implementing DBT in Short-Term SUD-treatment
Substance Abuse Disorder, Dialectical Behavior Therapy
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Accelerated ART Initiation for PWHIV Who Are Out of Care
HIV Infections, ART
Not yet recruitingObservational study
THRIVE-Belize: A School-Based Life-Skills Program to Support Teen Health in Toledo District, Belize (Feasibility)
Health Behavior, Adolescence
Recruiting
ACT Together: Implementing a Web-Based Program With Brief Coaching for Parents of Children With Disabilities in Pediatric Outpatient Clinics
Parents, Children With Disabilities
Recruiting
The Implementation of the Go Wish Game to Promote Advance Care Planning in Onco- Hematologic Disease
Leukemia, Multiple Mieloma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SBAR training with cases in people with Mixed Method Implementation Study and Nursing, run by Aytap DİNCER at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact aytap dincer, research assistan (+9004382126213, aytapdncr@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical Decision Making in Nursing (time frame: 5 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2025.