Lung Cancer (NSCLC)NCT06926179
Safety, Efficacy, and Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant/Induction Immunotherapy in Surgical and Radiotherapeutic Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
An observational study of Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy, run by Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute at 4 sites in China.
Trial summary
This multicenter retrospective real-world study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant/induction immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study covers diverse treatment pathways, including surgery, definitive radiotherapy, and non-surgical strategies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer (NSCLC), Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy, Radiotherapy
- What is being tested?
- neoadjuvant immunotherapy
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2024to 31 Mar 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: This study will include real-world patients diagnosed with stage IA-IIIC non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (with or without chemotherapy). According to surgical evaluation, patients eligible for inclusion were assessed as either resectable or potentially resectable before treatment. Subsequent treatment following the neoadjuvant therapy may include surgical resection, radiotherapy, or non-localized therapy.
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of the presence of EGFR or ALK sensitive driver gene mutations;
- Clinical staging of IA-IIIC according to the AJCC 8th Edition before neoadjuvant treatment;
- Received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (with or without chemotherapy);
- Assessed as resectable or potentially resectable by surgical experts prior to treatment.
Who cannot join
- Confirmed M1 disease;
- History of previous lung malignancy or other metastatic malignant tumors;
- Participation in other randomized controlled trials involving neoadjuvant treatment;
- Significant missing clinical data.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100142
Nan Wu, MD, 0086-10-88196569, nanwu@bjmu.edu.cn
Nan Wu, MD
- Recruiting
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality
Guangliang Qiang, MD, 86-010-82267600, pkudd@bjmu.edu.cn
Guangliang Qiang, MD
- Recruiting
Inner Mongolia Hospital of Peking University Cancer Hospital
Hohhot, Inner Mongolia
Bateer Han, MD, 86-13948120033, hanbateer_2004@163.com
Bateer Han, MD
- Recruiting
The Third Affliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
Kunming, Yunnan
Yujie Lei, MD, 86-0871-68173760, 583271025@qq.com
Yujie Lei, MD
About this study
Official title: Safety, Efficacy, and Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant/Induction Immunotherapy in Surgical and Radiotherapeutic Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study
This multicenter retrospective real-world study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant/induction immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study covers diverse treatment pathways, including surgery, definitive radiotherapy, and non-surgical strategies. It addresses gaps in existing trials by establishing a comprehensive cohort spanning neoadjuvant/induction therapy, perioperative management, and follow-up, providing real-world evidence to support treatment decisions in both operable and inoperable cases.
Read the detailed description
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both China and the world. In recent years, neoadjuvant immunotherapy has achieved breakthrough advancements in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evidence from multiple Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), such as CheckMate 816, KEYNOTE-671, and AEGEAN, has demonstrated clear benefits of this therapy in improving survival. However, these studies exhibited several limitations: first, stringent selection criteria resulting in limited heterogeneity among participants challenge the generalizability of their conclusions; Second, some studies and clinical observations have preliminarily suggested that neoadjuvant immunotherapy may increase technical surgical difficulty; however, large-sample, real-world data on its perioperative safety remain limited; third, clinical practice involves numerous borderline resectable and unresectable cases, leading to highly complex treatment decisions (such as timing of surgical intervention after conversion therapy, radiotherapy strategies, etc.), with none of the existing guidelines reach clear consensus.
This study employs a multicenter real-world design, establishing a retrospective cohort covering from neoadjuvant/induction therapy period to the surveillance period. It evaluates the safety, efficacy, and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant/induction immunotherapy across diverse treatment strategies including both surgery and radiotherapy, providing real-world evidence to inform clinical decision-making.
- Being tested
- neoadjuvant immunotherapy
- Keywords
- lung cancer, neoadjuvant immunotherapy, real-world study, radiotherapy, thoracic surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
neoadjuvant immunotherapyDrug
Patients in the cohort received neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, as part of routine clinical care. The specific regimens included monotherapy or combination with chemotherapy. The agents used may include nivolumab, camrelizumab, sintilimab, atezolizumab, or others.
This is a retrospective observational study. All interventions (neoadjuvant immunotherapy ± chemotherapy, surgery, or other treatments) were determined by treating physicians as part of standard care. The study aims to evaluate perioperative and survival outcomes across different treatment paths in real-world clinical settings.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Technical Dissection Difficulty (TDD) Rate
Defined as the intraoperative presence of fibrosis and/or tight adhesion between lymph nodes and surrounding structures around the hilar and fissure. TDD is considered present if either fibrosis or significant adhesion is noted, potentially increasing surgical complexity. Surgical difficulty is assessed based on operative reports and predefined intraoperative criteria, as documented by the operating surgeon.
Measured: During the radical surgery (Day 0 of surgery)
Disease-Free Survival (DFS)
Defined as the time from the date of radical surgery to the first occurrence of disease recurrence, progression, or death from any cause. Patients without an event will be censored at the date of the last follow-up. Disease status is determined through radiological, pathological, or clinical assessment as documented during follow-up.
Measured: From the date of radical surgery to the date of disease recurrence, progression, death, or last follow-up, up to 5 years.
Secondary outcomes (12)
Postoperative Complications Incidence (Clavien- Dindo ≥ III)
Defined as the proportion of patients experiencing postoperative complications graded as Clavien-Dindo classification grade III or higher within 30 days after radical surgery. Complication data are collected from postoperative records, discharge summaries, and follow-up documentation.
Measured: Within 30 days after surgery
Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAEs) Incidence (CTCAE Grade ≥ 3)
The incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) graded ≥3 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), v5.0, occurring during the neoadjuvant/induction phase and within 90 days following the initiation of definitive local therapy (surgery or radiotherapy). TRAEs are assessed based on clinical presentation, laboratory findings, imaging results, and physician judgment, with causality reviewed by the research team.
Measured: From the start of neoadjuvant or induction therapy to 90 days after the initiation of definitive local treatment (surgery or radiotherapy).
Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) Incidence
Defined as the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurring from the start of neoadjuvant immunotherapy until 90 days after radical surgery or the initiation of definitive radiotherapy, whichever applies. irAEs are adverse events potentially attributable to immune checkpoint inhibitors and may involve organs such as the lung, liver, skin, or endocrine system. Events are graded according to CTCAE v5.0, and diagnosis is based on clinical presentation, laboratory/imaging findings, and expert clinical judgment.
Measured: From the start of neoadjuvant or induction therapy to 90 days after the initiation of definitive local treatment (surgery or radiotherapy).
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Defined as the time from the initiation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy to the first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Disease progression includes local recurrence, regional relapse, distant metastasis, or any clinically or radiologically confirmed progression. Patients without an event will be censored at the date of the last follow-up.
Measured: From the start of neoadjuvant immunotherapy to the date of disease progression, death, or last follow-up, up to 5 years.
Overall Survival (OS)
Defined as the time from the initiation of neoadjuvant therapy to death from any cause. For patients who remain alive at the end of follow-up, OS will be censored at the date of the last known contact. Survival status is confirmed through electronic medical records, follow-up visits, or telephonic interviews. OS is measured in days and analyzed using time-to-event methods.
Measured: From the date of treatment initiation to death from any cause or last follow-up, up to 5 years
Conversion Rate to Thoracotomy
Defined as the proportion of patients initially planned for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) who required unplanned conversion to open thoracotomy during radical resection. Conversion events and their intraoperative causes will be extracted from operative records and confirmed by surgical documentation. The outcome reflects intraoperative difficulty and is used as a surrogate marker of surgical complexity.
Measured: During the radical surgery (Day 0)
Operative Time (minutes)
Defined as the total operative time, measured in minutes, from the initial skin incision to the completion of skin closure during radical lung resection. Time data are extracted from intraoperative anesthesia or surgical records. Operative time is used as a continuous variable and may reflect the technical complexity of surgery.
Measured: During the radical surgery (Day 0)
pathologic Complete Response (pCR) Rate
Defined as the proportion of patients achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR), which is characterized by the absence of any viable tumor cells in the resected primary tumor and all sampled regional lymph nodes (ypT0N0), as confirmed by postoperative pathological examination. Pathologic assessments are conducted by experienced thoracic pathologists according to standardized criteria.
Measured: At the time of postoperative pathological assessment
Major Pathologic Response (MPR) Rate
Defined as the proportion of patients achieving a major pathologic response (MPR), characterized by ≤10% residual viable tumor cells in the resected primary tumor specimen after neoadjuvant therapy, regardless of lymph node status. The percentage of residual tumor is assessed by experienced thoracic pathologists according to standardized pathological evaluation protocols.
Measured: At the time of postoperative pathological assessment
Number of Dissected Lymph Nodes (N1, N2)
Defined as the total number of lymph nodes dissected and pathologically examined from N1 and N2 stations during radical lung cancer resection. The counts are recorded separately for N1 and N2 regions based on operative and pathological reports. This outcome reflects the extent of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenectomy and may serve as an indicator of surgical thoroughness and potential prognostic value.
Measured: During radical surgery (Day 0)
Number of Dissected Lymph Node Stations (N1, N2)
Defined as the number of lymph node stations sampled or dissected from the N1 and N2 regions during radical lung cancer surgery. The count is recorded separately for N1 and N2 stations based on operative and pathological reports. This measure reflects the anatomical extent of lymphadenectomy and is used to evaluate surgical thoroughness and adherence to oncologic guidelines.
Measured: During radical surgery (Day 0)
Reduction Rate of Surgical Resection Extent
Among patients whose anticipated surgical resection before neoadjuvant immunotherapy involved more than one pulmonary lobe, this outcome measures the proportion whose actual surgical resection was less extensive than originally planned. The anticipated extent is based on pre-treatment multidisciplinary evaluations, including imaging and bronchoscopy.
Measured: During the radical surgery (Day 0 of surgery)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Apr 2025
- Study start1 Dec 2024
- Primary completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung Cancer (NSCLC)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Wu Nan, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06926179
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10412
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 16 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Tao Y, Guo R, Li X, Cui X, Wang Y, Du H, Wen Z, Yan S, Li N, Wu N. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who achieved a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Cancer Imaging. 2026 Jun 4. doi: 10.1186/s40644-026-01057-1. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42237141
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety, Efficacy, and Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant/Induction Immunotherapy in Surgical and Radiotherapeutic Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06926179
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 10412
- Keywords
- lung cancer, neoadjuvant immunotherapy, real-world study, radiotherapy, thoracic surgery
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This multicenter retrospective real-world study aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant/induction immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study covers diverse treatment pathways, including surgery, definitive radiotherapy, and non-surgical strategies. It addresses gaps in existing trials by establishing a comprehensive cohort spanning neoadjuvant/induction therapy, perioperative management, and follow-up, providing real-world evidence to support treatment decisions in both operable and inoperable cases.
Detailed description
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both China and the world. In recent years, neoadjuvant immunotherapy has achieved breakthrough advancements in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evidence from multiple Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), such as CheckMate 816, KEYNOTE-671, and AEGEAN, has demonstrated clear benefits of this therapy in improving survival. However, these studies exhibited several limitations: first, stringent selection criteria resulting in limited heterogeneity among participants challenge the generalizability of their conclusions; Second, some studies and clinical observations have preliminarily suggested that neoadjuvant immunotherapy may increase technical surgical difficulty; however, large-sample, real-world data on its perioperative safety remain limited; third, clinical practice involves numerous borderline resectable and unresectable cases, leading to highly complex treatment decisions (such as timing of surgical intervention after conversion therapy, radiotherapy strategies, etc.), with none of the existing guidelines reach clear consensus.
This study employs a multicenter real-world design, establishing a retrospective cohort covering from neoadjuvant/induction therapy period to the surveillance period. It evaluates the safety, efficacy, and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant/induction immunotherapy across diverse treatment strategies including both surgery and radiotherapy, providing real-world evidence to inform clinical decision-making.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This study will include real-world patients diagnosed with stage IA-IIIC non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (with or without chemotherapy). According to surgical evaluation, patients eligible for inclusion were assessed as either resectable or potentially resectable before treatment. Subsequent treatment following the neoadjuvant therapy may include surgical resection, radiotherapy, or non-localized therapy.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of the presence of EGFR or ALK sensitive driver gene mutations;
- Clinical staging of IA-IIIC according to the AJCC 8th Edition before neoadjuvant treatment;
- Received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (with or without chemotherapy);
- Assessed as resectable or potentially resectable by surgical experts prior to treatment.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Confirmed M1 disease;
- History of previous lung malignancy or other metastatic malignant tumors;
- Participation in other randomized controlled trials involving neoadjuvant treatment;
- Significant missing clinical data.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| neoadjuvant immunotherapyPatients in the cohort received neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, as part of routine clinical care. The specific regimens included monotherapy or combination with chemotherapy. The agents used may include nivolumab, camrelizumab, sintilimab, atezolizumab, or others. This is a retrospective observational study. All interventions (neoadjuvant immunotherapy ± chemotherapy, surgery, or other treatments) were determined by treating physicians as part of standard care. The study aims to evaluate perioperative and survival outcomes across different treatment paths in real-world clinical settings. | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Technical Dissection Difficulty (TDD) Rate
Time frame: During the radical surgery (Day 0 of surgery)
Defined as the intraoperative presence of fibrosis and/or tight adhesion between lymph nodes and surrounding structures around the hilar and fissure. TDD is considered present if either fibrosis or significant adhesion is noted, potentially increasing surgical complexity. Surgical difficulty is assessed based on operative reports and predefined intraoperative criteria, as documented by the operating surgeon.
Disease-Free Survival (DFS)
Time frame: From the date of radical surgery to the date of disease recurrence, progression, death, or last follow-up, up to 5 years.
Defined as the time from the date of radical surgery to the first occurrence of disease recurrence, progression, or death from any cause. Patients without an event will be censored at the date of the last follow-up. Disease status is determined through radiological, pathological, or clinical assessment as documented during follow-up.
12 secondary outcomes
Postoperative Complications Incidence (Clavien- Dindo ≥ III)
Time frame: Within 30 days after surgery
Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAEs) Incidence (CTCAE Grade ≥ 3)
Time frame: From the start of neoadjuvant or induction therapy to 90 days after the initiation of definitive local treatment (surgery or radiotherapy).
Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) Incidence
Time frame: From the start of neoadjuvant or induction therapy to 90 days after the initiation of definitive local treatment (surgery or radiotherapy).
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From the start of neoadjuvant immunotherapy to the date of disease progression, death, or last follow-up, up to 5 years.
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From the date of treatment initiation to death from any cause or last follow-up, up to 5 years
Conversion Rate to Thoracotomy
Time frame: During the radical surgery (Day 0)
Operative Time (minutes)
Time frame: During the radical surgery (Day 0)
pathologic Complete Response (pCR) Rate
Time frame: At the time of postoperative pathological assessment
Major Pathologic Response (MPR) Rate
Time frame: At the time of postoperative pathological assessment
Number of Dissected Lymph Nodes (N1, N2)
Time frame: During radical surgery (Day 0)
Number of Dissected Lymph Node Stations (N1, N2)
Time frame: During radical surgery (Day 0)
Reduction Rate of Surgical Resection Extent
Time frame: During the radical surgery (Day 0 of surgery)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Apr 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42237141Tao Y, Guo R, Li X, Cui X, Wang Y, Du H, Wen Z, Yan S, Li N, Wu N. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who achieved a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Cancer Imaging. 2026 Jun 4. doi: 10.1186/s40644-026-01057-1. Online ahead of print.
Related trials for Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy, run by Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute at 4 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Nan Wu, MD (0086-10-88196569, nanwu@bjmu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Technical Dissection Difficulty (TDD) Rate (time frame: During the radical surgery (Day 0 of surgery)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06926179, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2025.