AzTrials
AzTrials

Dry EyePhase 1/2NCT06921525

Comparing Efficacy of Tea Tree Oil Versus Topical Azithromycin in Treating Dry Eye

A Phase 1/2 study testing Tea Tree Oil Topical Application Oil and Azithromycin Ophthalmic Solution in people with Dry Eye, run by Ehab Mohamed Elsayed Mohamed Saad at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to compare the effects of azithromycin and tea tree oil on the clinical outcomes and inflammatory profile of patients with MGD-associated DED. By focusing on changes in tear IL-8 and IL-17 levels, the study seeks to provide insights into the differential mechanisms of these two treatments and their… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Dry Eye
What is being tested?
Tea Tree Oil Topical Application Oil and Azithromycin Ophthalmic Solution
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Mar 2025to 1 Oct 2025
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) ≤10 seconds.
  • Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score ≥20.
  • Willingness to comply with study requirements and provide informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • History of ocular surgery or trauma within the past 6 months.
  • Use of systemic or topical anti-inflammatory medications within 4 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Known hypersensitivity to azithromycin or tea tree oil.
  • Presence of other ocular surface diseases unrelated to MGD.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Ebsar Eye Center

    Banhā, Benha, 13111

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparing Efficacy of Tea Tree Oil Versus Topical Azithromycin in Treating Dry Eye Disease Associated With Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Focus on Tear Interleukin Level

This study aims to compare the effects of azithromycin and tea tree oil on the clinical outcomes and inflammatory profile of patients with MGD-associated DED. By focusing on changes in tear IL-8 and IL-17 levels, the study seeks to provide insights into the differential mechanisms of these two treatments and their potential in addressing inflammation-driven DED.

Read the detailed description

Dry eye disease (DED) is a multifactorial condition affecting the ocular surface, characterized by the loss of tear film homeostasis, resulting in discomfort, visual disturbances, and tear film instability . The prevalence of DED is significant, impacting approximately 5%-50% of the global population, with variability influenced by geographic location, age, and environmental factors . The condition not only affects the quality of life but also poses a substantial economic burden due to increased healthcare utilization and reduced productivity .

A hallmark of DED is its complex pathophysiology, which involves a vicious cycle of tear film instability, hyperosmolarity, and chronic inflammation of the ocular surface. Recent advances underscore the critical interplay between these factors and their contribution to symptomatology . Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-8 (IL-8) and interleukin-17 (IL-17), have emerged as key mediators of ocular surface inflammation, amplifying the recruitment of neutrophils and T-helper 17 cells, respectively .

Among the various etiologies of DED, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is recognized as a leading cause. MGD results from abnormalities in the secretion of meibum, a lipid essential for stabilizing the tear film and preventing evaporation . Dysregulation of the lipid layer exacerbates evaporative dry eye and promotes a pro-inflammatory microenvironment, further destabilizing the tear film.

Conventional therapeutic approaches to MGD, such as warm compresses and eyelid hygiene, aim to restore gland function and relieve symptoms. In addition, topical antibiotics, particularly azithromycin, are commonly employed due to their dual antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory properties . Azithromycin has demonstrated efficacy in improving meibomian gland function and reducing inflammation and improving symptoms of dryness of the eye .

Emerging treatments for MGD have focused on addressing the underlying inflammatory and microbial components. Tea tree oil (TTO), derived from the leaves of Melaleuca alternifolia, has garnered attention due to its antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and demodicidal properties . TTO has demonstrated efficacy in eradicating Demodex mites, microscopic parasites frequently associated with MGD and DED . Despite these promising effects, its impact on tear cytokine modulation remains an area of active investigation .

Preclinical and clinical studies have begun to elucidate the mechanisms by which TTO exerts its effects. For instance, TTO has been shown to inhibit pro-inflammatory pathways, reduce oxidative stress, and enhance epithelial barrier integrity . These findings suggest a broader therapeutic role for TTO in addressing not only MGD but also other ocular surface diseases characterized by inflammation and microbial dysbiosis .

Despite its potential, challenges remain in the widespread adoption of TTO for MGD. Patient tolerability, particularly regarding ocular irritation, is a critical consideration. Additionally, the lack of large-scale, randomized controlled trials limits the generalizability of existing findings .

In conclusion, while conventional therapies for MGD have been effective, emerging treatments such as TTO offer a promising alternative, particularly in addressing inflammation and microbial factors. Understanding the interplay between TTO, cytokines like IL-8 and IL-17, and the ocular surface could pave the way for novel therapeutic paradigms, ultimately improving outcomes for patients with DED and MGD .

Conditions
Dry Eye
Being tested
Tea Tree Oil Topical Application Oil, Azithromycin Ophthalmic Solution
Medical subject headings
Dry Eye Syndromes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tea Tree Oil Topical Application OilDrug

    Tea tree oil (TTO), derived from the leaves of Melaleuca alternifolia,

  • Azithromycin Ophthalmic SolutionDrug

    Azithromycin has demonstrated efficacy in improving meibomian gland function and reducing inflammation and improving symptoms of dryness of the eye

Study groups in NCT06921525
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A (Azithromycin group)Active comparatorGroup A (Azithromycin group): 22 patients who will receive topical azithromycin applied twice daily, along with preservative-free lubricant eye drops five times daily for 4 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Azithromycin Ophthalmic Solution
Group B (Tea Tree Oil group)Active comparatorGroup B (Tea Tree Oil group): 22 patients who will receive topical tea tree oil applied twice daily, along with preservative-free lubricant eye drops five times daily for 4 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Tea Tree Oil Topical Application Oil

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in IL-8 and IL-17 levels .

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in clinical parameters (TBUT, OSDI, DEQS, Schirmer test).

    Change in the parameters TBUT "Tear breakup time'', OSDI ''Ocular Surface Disease Index'', DEQS ''Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score'' and Schirmer test.

    TBUT (from less than 5 to more than 10 seconds). OSDI (from 0 to 100 points) where patients rate their responses on a 0 to 4 scale with 0 corresponding to "none of the time" and 4 corresponding to "all of the time" a final score is calculated which ranges from 0 to 100 with scores and based on their OSDI scores, patients can be categorized as having a normal ocular surface (0-12 points) or as having mild (13-22 points), moderate (23-32 points), or severe (33-100 points) ocular surface disease.

    DEQS (from 0 to 100 points) which is a questionnaire and it was calculated using the following formula: (sum of the degree scores for all questions answered) × 25/(total number of questions answered), with higher scores indicating increased severity of DED symptoms and a greater impact on daily life.

    Schirmer test (from 0 to 15 mm).

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

  2. Change in meibomian gland function grading (from 0 to 4)

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

  3. Change in parameter OSDI (ocular surface disease index) from 0 to 100 points.

    OSDI (from 0 to 100 points) where patients rate their responses on a 0 to 4 scale with 0 corresponding to "none of the time" and 4 corresponding to "all of the time" a final score is calculated which ranges from 0 to 100 with scores and based on their OSDI scores, patients can be categorized as having a normal ocular surface (0-12 points) or as having mild (13-22 points), moderate (23-32 points), or severe (33-100 points) ocular surface disease.

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

  4. Change in the parameter DEQS (Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-Life Score) from 0 to 100 points.

    DEQS (from 0 to 100 points) which is a questionnaire and it was calculated using the following formula: (sum of the degree scores for all questions answered) × 25/(total number of questions answered), with higher scores indicating increased severity of DED symptoms and a greater impact on daily life.

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

  5. Change in the parameter Schirmer test (from 0 to 15 mm).

    Change in the parameter Schirmer test (from 0 to 15 mm) as Schirmer test results are interpreted as follows: 0 to 5 mm: extremely dry eyes. 5 to 10 mm: moderately dry eyes. 10 to 15 mm: possible dry eyes.

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Apr 2025
  2. Study start1 Mar 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2025
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06921525
Sponsor's protocol ID
TTO vs Azithromycine in MGD
Other IDs
Rewan Hassan Hamid Mohamoud, Dalia Refat El-Afify, Tamer Ibrahim Abdelhalim, Fedaa Abd Elmonem Kotkata
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
23 Mar 2025
Last updated
30 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • El-Afify DR, Mahmoud RHH, Kotkata FA, Abdelhalim TI, Saad EME. Evaluating the efficacy of topical tea tree oil versus preservative-free azithromycin in the treatment of dry eye disease associated with meibomian gland dysfunction: A randomized controlled trial focusing on tear interleukin levels. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2026 Sep 20;49(6):102843. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2026.102843. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42764009

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Tea Tree Oil Topical Application Oil and Azithromycin Ophthalmic Solution in people with Dry Eye, run by Ehab Mohamed Elsayed Mohamed Saad at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in IL-8 and IL-17 levels . (time frame: after 4 weeks of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06921525, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in