AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Dental PainPhase 4NCT06916234

Evaluation of the Analgesic Efficacy of the Combination of Dexketoprofen + Paracetamol and the Combination of Naproxen Sodium + Codeine in Patients With Acute Dental Pain

A Phase 4 study testing Dexketoprofen Trometamol + Paracetamol and Naproxen Sodium + Codeine Phosphate in people with Acute Dental Pain, run by ibrahim doğru at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Acute dental pain is one of the most challenging conditions to treat and manage in dental practice. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of naproxen sodium + codeine phosphate (550/30 mg) and dexketoprofen trometamol + paracetamol (25/300 mg) in the treatment of acute dental pain in individuals with acute… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Acute Dental Pain
What is being tested?
Dexketoprofen Trometamol + Paracetamol and Naproxen Sodium + Codeine Phosphate
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
10 Jan 2023to 20 Jan 2024
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Individuals aged 18 and over
  • Individuals with systemic status ASA0 and ASA1 according to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification,
  • Individuals with semi-erupted impacted lower third molar teeth associated with acute pericoronitis,
  • Individuals with a VAS score of 5 and above at the first visit.

Who cannot join

  • pregnant or lactating women,
  • smokers,
  • alcohol and/or drug users,
  • those who did not attend post-operative check-ups,
  • those who were using other than the recommended medication,
  • those who developed adverse drug reactions during the study and discontinued medication,
  • those who were allergic to the study drugs,
  • those who underwent additional dental treatment during the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Van Yuzuncu Yil University

    Van, 65080

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Acute dental pain is one of the most challenging conditions to treat and manage in dental practice. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of naproxen sodium + codeine phosphate (550/30 mg) and dexketoprofen trometamol + paracetamol (25/300 mg) in the treatment of acute dental pain in individuals with acute pericoronitis caused by impacted wisdom teeth.

Read the detailed description

This randomised, prospective, single-blind study was conducted on patients who presented to Van Yuzuncu Yil University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery between January 2023 and December 2023 with the complaint of acute pericoronitis originating from the lower impacted third molar teeth. At the first visit, the patients underwent a clinical examination to evaluated the patients' complaints, whether the complaints were caused by impacted lower third molar , and the presence of infection. For radiographic assessment, panoramic radiographs were taken of the region of the impacted lower third molars about which the patients complained. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomised into two groups, by the research assistants using the Research Randomizer (version 4.0) program to ensure blinding of the surgeons. Group A (active control group) received 550 mg naproxen sodium + 30 mg codeine phosphate and group B (research group) received 25 mg dexketoprofen trometamol + 300 mg paracetamol 2 times daily for 7 days; and amoxicillin 500 mg 3 times daily for 5 days in addition to analgesics for infection control due to acute pericoronitis. Paracetamol 500 mg was administered as rescue medication. Patients were instructed not to take rescue medication unless they had to and, if they did, to record the time and number of doses on the form given to them. Patients in the study groups received the first dose of the drugs from us and continued to receive subsequent doses every 12 hours.

A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with numbers ranging from 0 - no pain to 10 - un-bearable pain was used to evaluate pain. Patients were asked to record their VAS score on the form at the 6th hour (T1), 12th hour (T2), 18th hour (T3), 24th hour (T4), 2nd day (T5), 3rd day (T6), 4th day (T7), 5th day (T8), 6th day (T9) and 7th day (T10) after the first dose (T0 of study drug. Obtained data was analyzed and evaluated statistically.

Being tested
Dexketoprofen Trometamol + Paracetamol, Naproxen Sodium + Codeine Phosphate

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dexketoprofen Trometamol + ParacetamolDrug

    Dexketoprofen Trometamol + Paracetamol (25mg + 300mg) is a NSAID. It was given to the patients twice a day.

  • Naproxen Sodium + Codeine PhosphateDrug

    Naproxen Sodium + Codeine Phosphate (550mg + 30mg) is a NSAID. It was given to the patients twice a day.

Study groups in NCT06916234
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dexketoprofen Trometamol + Paracetamol (25mg + 300mg, 2x1)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Dexketoprofen Trometamol + Paracetamol
Naproxen Sodium + Codeine Phosphate (550 mg + 30 mg, 2X1)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Naproxen Sodium + Codeine Phosphate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Evaluation

    Patients were requested to mark their pain intensity on a pain assessment form using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).

    Measured: 6th hour

  2. Pain Evaluation

    Patients were requested to mark their pain intensity on a pain assessment form using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).

    Measured: 12th hour

  3. Pain Evaluation

    Patients were requested to mark their pain intensity on a pain assessment form using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).

    Measured: 18th hour

  4. Pain Evaluation

    Patients were requested to mark their pain intensity on a pain assessment form using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).

    Measured: 24th hour

  5. Pain Evaluation

    Patients were requested to mark their pain intensity on a pain assessment form using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).

    Measured: 2nd day

  6. Pain Evaluation

    Patients were requested to mark their pain intensity on a pain assessment form using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).

    Measured: 3rd day

  7. Pain Evaluation

    Patients were requested to mark their pain intensity on a pain assessment form using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).

    Measured: 4th day

  8. Pain Evaluation

    Patients were requested to mark their pain intensity on a pain assessment form using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).

    Measured: 5th day

  9. Pain Evaluation

    Patients were requested to mark their pain intensity on a pain assessment form using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).

    Measured: 6th day

  10. Pain Evaluation

    Patients were requested to mark their pain intensity on a pain assessment form using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging between 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).

    Measured: 7th day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Apr 2025
  2. Study start10 Jan 2023
  3. Primary completion20 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion20 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06916234
Sponsor's protocol ID
30.11.2022/07
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
21 Mar 2025
Last updated
8 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Dogru I, Cigerim L. Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of dexketoprofen trometamol and paracetamol with naproxen sodium and codeine phosphate combinations in acute toothache. Sci Rep. 2025 Oct 17;15(1):36381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-20361-7.

    PubMed 41107344

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Dexketoprofen Trometamol + Paracetamol and Naproxen Sodium + Codeine Phosphate in people with Acute Dental Pain, run by ibrahim doğru at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Evaluation (time frame: 6th hour). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06916234, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in