AzTrials
AzTrials

CataractNCT06904404

Physiologic Phacofluidics: Ghost Protocol

An observational study of Cataract, run by Wolfe Eye Clinic at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the early post-operative benefits of performing phacoemulsification at physiologic intraocular pressures. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is there less post operative corneal edema? Is there less post operative inflammation? Is the post operative vision… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 55 to 95 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cataract
What is being tested?
Cataract surgery at high IOP and Cataract surgery at low IOP
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
66 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jan 2024to 31 Oct 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 55 to 95 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Visually significant cataract patients with no prior history of cataract surgery

Who may be able to join

  • Patients without prior ocular surgery both eyes
  • Adult patients with visually significant cataract with WHO-World Health Organization NUC grade 2-3
  • First eye only undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery
  • Unremarkable systemic history; controlled diabetes with HbA1c <7%
  • Unremarkable ocular health
  • Anterior chamber depth ACD >2.04mm10
  • Age range 55-95

Who cannot join

  • Prior ocular surgery including corneal refractive surgery, cataract surgery in fellow eye
  • Thin corneas (<490 microns)
  • Complicated (use of pupil expansion devices) or prolonged cataract surgeries (>15 mins) with post-operative complications (IOP spike >30mmHg), severe punctate keratitis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Wolfe Eye Clinic Cedar Rapids (Hiawatha)

    Hiawatha, Iowa, 52233

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the early post-operative benefits of performing phacoemulsification at physiologic intraocular pressures. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is there less post operative corneal edema?
  • Is there less post operative inflammation?
  • Is the post operative vision better? Participants will undergo phacoemulsification cataract surgery with either high or low IOP settings Researchers will compare post op corneal edema, inflammatory marker levels and vision
Read the detailed description

Methods:

Study population Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients without prior ocular surgery both eyes
  • Adult patients with visually significant cataract with WHO-World Health Organization NUC grade 2-3
  • First eye only undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery
  • Unremarkable systemic history; controlled diabetes with HbA1c <7%
  • Unremarkable ocular health
  • Anterior chamber depth ACD >2.04mm10
  • Age range 55-95

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior ocular surgery including corneal refractive surgery, cataract surgery in fellow eye
  • Thin corneas (<490 microns)
  • Complicated (use of pupil expansion devices) or prolonged cataract surgeries (>15 mins) with post-operative complications (IOP spike >30mmHg), severe punctate keratitis

Approximately 66 patients will be identified and included in the study. Patients at the day of surgery sign up will be randomized to high (65mmHg) vs low IOP (20mmHg) using a random online number generator; Even will be high IOP; Odd will be low IOP. Patients will undergo standard cataract surgery with equivalent vacuum and aspiration rates in both groups for the duration of the entire cataract surgery; IOP settings will be set at high vs low IOP but may be adjusted if necessary for the safety of the patient.

In all procedures, the intraocular lens (IOL) implanted and the ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) materials used will be standardized to the same materials and are part of routine surgery. Cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and surgical duration will be collected for all patients. An intraoperative aqueous sample 100-150µL will be collected at the end of the case 2 minutes after OVD removal and immediately transferred on dry ice to a laboratory, stored at -80°C until analysis as established in prior protocol. The extraction of aqueous sample will not require additional incisions.

All subjects will be prescribed the standard post-operative cataract surgery medications (not specific to study). Post-operative visits by the masked sub-investigator will perform the following procedures at 4hrs (early post-op), POD#1 (20-24hrs), POW#1:

Post-op Procedures Baseline Visit1 (4hrs) Visit2 (20-24hrs) Visit3 (1 week) Pachymetry X X X X Visual acuity BCVA UCVA/PHVA UCVA/PHVA UCVA/PHVA Slit Lamp- Cell /Flare X X X X

Pachymetry: a painless, simple test where a probe is gently placed on the front of the eye to measure the thickness of the cornea.

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA): this test is used to determine the smallest letters that can be read on a standardized chart. Un-corrected visual acuity (UCVA): the smallest letter that can be read unaided. Pinhole visual acuity (PHVA): the smallest letter that can be read without the interference of optical problems.

Slit lamp exam: a microscope is used to provide a magnified view of different parts of the eye and to determine inflammation (cell/flare) that is common with any ophthalmic surgery.

Visual acuity and slit lamp examinations are part of routine post-operative care.

Pachymetry measurements are for research purposes to determine if there's less corneal swelling after cataract surgery in the lower IOP group.

The primary end point is: difference in CCT post-op at 4 hours between High vs Low IOP groups.

Secondary endpoints include: CCT at POD#1 and POW#1, Cell/Flare at POHr4 and POD1, and inflammatory markers: levels of prostaglandin IL-6, IL-8, IL-Iβ, TNF-α, PGE2, MCP-1. Aqueous samples will be sent with de-identified patient information and aqueous analysis will be performed by the University of California, Irvine Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Labs. The laboratory will be masked to which treatment the subject received and will only provide the aqueous analysis report for the study.

Any adverse events (AE) will be recorded in subject's medical charts as well as an adverse event log. AEs are classified as serious or non-serious; expected or unexpected; and study-related, possibly study-related, or not study-related. Serious AEs will be reported immediately to the regulatory authorities as per standard of care. The potential risks involved are that of standard cataract surgery with potential complications and side effects associated with any surgical procedure. These include but are not limited to: infection, macular edema, increased IOP, general risk of anesthesia and surgery, bleeding in the eye, and decreased vision. Some potential benefits include: improved visual acuity, decreased glare symptoms, lowered IOP, and faster visual recovery.

Analysis:

Primary endpoint: Difference in mean CCT change at 4 hrs post-surgery between high vs low IOP will be assessed using t-test with a P-value <0.05. Descriptive statistics will be used for the other secondary endpoints

Sample Size Justification:

The expected mean CCT change between the high vs low groups is hypothesized to be 32um, with a standard deviation of 40um. With a Type I/II error rate of alpha=0.05 and power=0.85, a sample size of 56 eyes are needed; additional 10 eyes to account for ~15 attrition; N=66

Data Collection and Management:

Data is recorded in a manner that reduces the risk of a breach of confidentiality. Password protected Microsoft Excel files will be utilized for this study and only accessible by authorized study personnel.

Ethical and Regulatory Considerations:

The study is conducted in accordance with the following:

Protocol and study-related plans and documents

  • Local regulations, as applicable
  • Good Clinical Practices, as outlined in the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for GCP (ICH

E6(R2))Ethical and Regulatory Considerations:

The study is conducted in accordance with the following:

  • Protocol and study-related plans and documents
  • Local regulations, as applicable
  • Good Clinical Practices, as outlined in the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for CP (ICH E6(R2))
  • The ethical principles established by the Declaration of Helsinki
  • Regional participant data protection laws and regulations
  • Local IRB requirements

Institutional Review Board (IRB):

The study site will maintain an accurate and complete record of all reports, documents and other submissions made to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) concerning this protocol.

The investigator must supply ongoing study progress reports to the IRB, per local requirements, protocol deviations and amendments. In addition, the investigator must notify the IRB at the closure of the study.

Informed Consent:

It is the responsibility of the investigator and clinical coordinator to inform each subject of the purpose of this study, including possible risks and benefits and document the informed consent process in the subject's chart. Prior to entry into the study or initiation of any study-related testing, the subject must read, sign and date the informed consent form. If the subject's vision is impaired to the point where they cannot read the informed consent document, the document will be read to the subject. The person executing the consent must also sign and date the consent form. One original informed consent form is to be retained by the study site and a copy is to be given to the subject.

Protocol Amendments:

This protocol must be followed as written. Any change or addition to this protocol that impacts subject safety, or the validity of the study requires a written protocol amendment that must be approved in writing by the IRB and any required regulatory authorities before implementation.

Record Keeping and Retention:

Data generated for the study should be stored in a limited-access file area and be accessible only to study personnel of the site. All reports and communications relating to study participants will identify participants only by subject identification number. Complete subject identification will be kept by the investigator. This information will be treated with strict adherence to professional standards of confidentiality.

The Investigator will retain a copy in the study file:

  • A copy of the IRB approved informed consent form
  • All original informed consent forms with required signatures
  • All participant source documents, etc.
  • All IRB correspondence (i.e., informed consent [including any approved revisions], protocol, AE, advertisements, newsletters).

Confidentiality:

All clinical study findings and documents are regarded as confidential. Study documents (protocols and other material) must be stored appropriately to ensure their confidentiality.

The anonymity of participants must be maintained per applicable local and national laws. Subjects are specified on all documents by subject number but not by name. Documents that identify the subject, e.g., the signed ICF, must be maintained in confidence by the investigator.

Conditions
Cataract
Being tested
Cataract surgery at high IOP, Cataract surgery at low IOP
Keywords
phacoemulsification
Medical subject headings
Cataract

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cataract surgery at high IOPProcedure or surgery

    Cataract surgery at high IOP (conventional)

  • Cataract surgery at low IOPProcedure or surgery

    Cataract surgery at low IOP

Study groups in NCT06904404
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High IOP settingTraditional High (65mm Hg) IOP phacoemulsification settings
Receives: Procedure: Cataract surgery at high IOP
Low IOP SettingPhysiologic Low (20 mm Hg) IOP phacoemulsification settings
Receives: Procedure: Cataract surgery at low IOP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Early Post Operative Central Corneal Thickness

    4 hours post operatively central corneal thickness assessment

    Measured: 4 hours post operatively

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. IL-IB From Aqueous Sample

    Early post op aqueous inflammatory marker of IL-IB level assessment

    Measured: 2 minutes after cataract surgery completion

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Apr 2025
  2. Study start1 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
66 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06904404
Sponsor's protocol ID
83557125
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
24 Mar 2025
Last updated
12 Aug 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cyril D, Brahmani P, Prasad S, Rashme VL, R S, Kamble NR, Balakrishnan L, Nagu K, Shekhar M. Comparison of two phacoemulsification system handpieces: prospective randomized comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Mar 1;48(3):328-333. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000769.

    PubMed 34371511
  • Vasavada AR, Praveen MR, Vasavada VA, Vasavada VA, Raj SM, Asnani PK, Garg VS. Impact of high and low aspiration parameters on postoperative outcomes of phacoemulsification: randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;36(4):588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.009.

    PubMed 20362850
  • Lundberg B, Jonsson M, Behndig A. Postoperative corneal swelling correlates strongly to corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun;139(6):1035-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.080.

    PubMed 15953433
  • Suzuki H, Igarashi T, Takahashi H. Effect of a new phacoemulsification and aspiration handpiece on anterior chamber stability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Jan 1;49(1):91-96. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001071.

    PubMed 36201661
  • Kaup S, Pandey SK. Cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy. Community Eye Health. 2019;31(104):86-87. No abstract available.

    PubMed 31086438
  • Liu YC, Setiawan M, Ang M, Yam GHF, Mehta JS. Changes in aqueous oxidative stress, prostaglandins, and cytokines: Comparisons of low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Feb;45(2):196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Dec 6.

    PubMed 30528516
  • De Maria M, Iannetta D, Cimino L, Coassin M, Fontana L. Measuring Anterior Chamber Inflammation After Cataract Surgery: A Review of the Literature Focusing on the Correlation with Cystoid Macular Edema. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 9;14:41-52. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S237405. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32021067
  • Schultz T, Joachim SC, Kuehn M, Dick HB. Changes in prostaglandin levels in patients undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2013 Nov;29(11):742-7. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20131021-03.

    PubMed 24203805
  • Feng MT, Belin MW, Ambrosio R Jr, Grewal SP, Yan W, Shaheen MS, McGhee C, Maeda N, Neuhann TH, Burkhard Dick H, Alageel SA, Steinmueller A. Anterior chamber depth in normal subjects by rotating scheimpflug imaging. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul;25(3):255-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 Apr 30.

    PubMed 23960933

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cataract, run by Wolfe Eye Clinic at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Aug 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Early Post Operative Central Corneal Thickness (time frame: 4 hours post operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06904404, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Physiologic Phacofluidics: Ghost Protocol | AzTrials