CataractNCT06904404
Physiologic Phacofluidics: Ghost Protocol
An observational study of Cataract, run by Wolfe Eye Clinic at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the early post-operative benefits of performing phacoemulsification at physiologic intraocular pressures. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is there less post operative corneal edema? Is there less post operative inflammation? Is the post operative vision… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 95 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cataract
- What is being tested?
- Cataract surgery at high IOP and Cataract surgery at low IOP
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2024to 31 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 95 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Visually significant cataract patients with no prior history of cataract surgery
Who may be able to join
- Patients without prior ocular surgery both eyes
- Adult patients with visually significant cataract with WHO-World Health Organization NUC grade 2-3
- First eye only undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery
- Unremarkable systemic history; controlled diabetes with HbA1c <7%
- Unremarkable ocular health
- Anterior chamber depth ACD >2.04mm10
- Age range 55-95
Who cannot join
- Prior ocular surgery including corneal refractive surgery, cataract surgery in fellow eye
- Thin corneas (<490 microns)
- Complicated (use of pupil expansion devices) or prolonged cataract surgeries (>15 mins) with post-operative complications (IOP spike >30mmHg), severe punctate keratitis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Wolfe Eye Clinic Cedar Rapids (Hiawatha)
Hiawatha, Iowa, 52233
About this study
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the early post-operative benefits of performing phacoemulsification at physiologic intraocular pressures. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is there less post operative corneal edema?
- Is there less post operative inflammation?
- Is the post operative vision better? Participants will undergo phacoemulsification cataract surgery with either high or low IOP settings Researchers will compare post op corneal edema, inflammatory marker levels and vision
Read the detailed description
Methods:
Study population Inclusion Criteria
- Patients without prior ocular surgery both eyes
- Adult patients with visually significant cataract with WHO-World Health Organization NUC grade 2-3
- First eye only undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery
- Unremarkable systemic history; controlled diabetes with HbA1c <7%
- Unremarkable ocular health
- Anterior chamber depth ACD >2.04mm10
- Age range 55-95
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior ocular surgery including corneal refractive surgery, cataract surgery in fellow eye
- Thin corneas (<490 microns)
- Complicated (use of pupil expansion devices) or prolonged cataract surgeries (>15 mins) with post-operative complications (IOP spike >30mmHg), severe punctate keratitis
Approximately 66 patients will be identified and included in the study. Patients at the day of surgery sign up will be randomized to high (65mmHg) vs low IOP (20mmHg) using a random online number generator; Even will be high IOP; Odd will be low IOP. Patients will undergo standard cataract surgery with equivalent vacuum and aspiration rates in both groups for the duration of the entire cataract surgery; IOP settings will be set at high vs low IOP but may be adjusted if necessary for the safety of the patient.
In all procedures, the intraocular lens (IOL) implanted and the ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) materials used will be standardized to the same materials and are part of routine surgery. Cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and surgical duration will be collected for all patients. An intraoperative aqueous sample 100-150µL will be collected at the end of the case 2 minutes after OVD removal and immediately transferred on dry ice to a laboratory, stored at -80°C until analysis as established in prior protocol. The extraction of aqueous sample will not require additional incisions.
All subjects will be prescribed the standard post-operative cataract surgery medications (not specific to study). Post-operative visits by the masked sub-investigator will perform the following procedures at 4hrs (early post-op), POD#1 (20-24hrs), POW#1:
Post-op Procedures Baseline Visit1 (4hrs) Visit2 (20-24hrs) Visit3 (1 week) Pachymetry X X X X Visual acuity BCVA UCVA/PHVA UCVA/PHVA UCVA/PHVA Slit Lamp- Cell /Flare X X X X
Pachymetry: a painless, simple test where a probe is gently placed on the front of the eye to measure the thickness of the cornea.
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA): this test is used to determine the smallest letters that can be read on a standardized chart. Un-corrected visual acuity (UCVA): the smallest letter that can be read unaided. Pinhole visual acuity (PHVA): the smallest letter that can be read without the interference of optical problems.
Slit lamp exam: a microscope is used to provide a magnified view of different parts of the eye and to determine inflammation (cell/flare) that is common with any ophthalmic surgery.
Visual acuity and slit lamp examinations are part of routine post-operative care.
Pachymetry measurements are for research purposes to determine if there's less corneal swelling after cataract surgery in the lower IOP group.
The primary end point is: difference in CCT post-op at 4 hours between High vs Low IOP groups.
Secondary endpoints include: CCT at POD#1 and POW#1, Cell/Flare at POHr4 and POD1, and inflammatory markers: levels of prostaglandin IL-6, IL-8, IL-Iβ, TNF-α, PGE2, MCP-1. Aqueous samples will be sent with de-identified patient information and aqueous analysis will be performed by the University of California, Irvine Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Labs. The laboratory will be masked to which treatment the subject received and will only provide the aqueous analysis report for the study.
Any adverse events (AE) will be recorded in subject's medical charts as well as an adverse event log. AEs are classified as serious or non-serious; expected or unexpected; and study-related, possibly study-related, or not study-related. Serious AEs will be reported immediately to the regulatory authorities as per standard of care. The potential risks involved are that of standard cataract surgery with potential complications and side effects associated with any surgical procedure. These include but are not limited to: infection, macular edema, increased IOP, general risk of anesthesia and surgery, bleeding in the eye, and decreased vision. Some potential benefits include: improved visual acuity, decreased glare symptoms, lowered IOP, and faster visual recovery.
Analysis:
Primary endpoint: Difference in mean CCT change at 4 hrs post-surgery between high vs low IOP will be assessed using t-test with a P-value <0.05. Descriptive statistics will be used for the other secondary endpoints
Sample Size Justification:
The expected mean CCT change between the high vs low groups is hypothesized to be 32um, with a standard deviation of 40um. With a Type I/II error rate of alpha=0.05 and power=0.85, a sample size of 56 eyes are needed; additional 10 eyes to account for ~15 attrition; N=66
Data Collection and Management:
Data is recorded in a manner that reduces the risk of a breach of confidentiality. Password protected Microsoft Excel files will be utilized for this study and only accessible by authorized study personnel.
Ethical and Regulatory Considerations:
The study is conducted in accordance with the following:
Protocol and study-related plans and documents
- Local regulations, as applicable
- Good Clinical Practices, as outlined in the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for GCP (ICH
E6(R2))Ethical and Regulatory Considerations:
The study is conducted in accordance with the following:
- Protocol and study-related plans and documents
- Local regulations, as applicable
- Good Clinical Practices, as outlined in the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for CP (ICH E6(R2))
- The ethical principles established by the Declaration of Helsinki
- Regional participant data protection laws and regulations
- Local IRB requirements
Institutional Review Board (IRB):
The study site will maintain an accurate and complete record of all reports, documents and other submissions made to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) concerning this protocol.
The investigator must supply ongoing study progress reports to the IRB, per local requirements, protocol deviations and amendments. In addition, the investigator must notify the IRB at the closure of the study.
Informed Consent:
It is the responsibility of the investigator and clinical coordinator to inform each subject of the purpose of this study, including possible risks and benefits and document the informed consent process in the subject's chart. Prior to entry into the study or initiation of any study-related testing, the subject must read, sign and date the informed consent form. If the subject's vision is impaired to the point where they cannot read the informed consent document, the document will be read to the subject. The person executing the consent must also sign and date the consent form. One original informed consent form is to be retained by the study site and a copy is to be given to the subject.
Protocol Amendments:
This protocol must be followed as written. Any change or addition to this protocol that impacts subject safety, or the validity of the study requires a written protocol amendment that must be approved in writing by the IRB and any required regulatory authorities before implementation.
Record Keeping and Retention:
Data generated for the study should be stored in a limited-access file area and be accessible only to study personnel of the site. All reports and communications relating to study participants will identify participants only by subject identification number. Complete subject identification will be kept by the investigator. This information will be treated with strict adherence to professional standards of confidentiality.
The Investigator will retain a copy in the study file:
- A copy of the IRB approved informed consent form
- All original informed consent forms with required signatures
- All participant source documents, etc.
- All IRB correspondence (i.e., informed consent [including any approved revisions], protocol, AE, advertisements, newsletters).
Confidentiality:
All clinical study findings and documents are regarded as confidential. Study documents (protocols and other material) must be stored appropriately to ensure their confidentiality.
The anonymity of participants must be maintained per applicable local and national laws. Subjects are specified on all documents by subject number but not by name. Documents that identify the subject, e.g., the signed ICF, must be maintained in confidence by the investigator.
- Conditions
- Cataract
- Being tested
- Cataract surgery at high IOP, Cataract surgery at low IOP
- Keywords
- phacoemulsification
- Medical subject headings
- Cataract
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cataract surgery at high IOPProcedure or surgery
Cataract surgery at high IOP (conventional)
Cataract surgery at low IOPProcedure or surgery
Cataract surgery at low IOP
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High IOP setting | Traditional High (65mm Hg) IOP phacoemulsification settings Receives: Procedure: Cataract surgery at high IOP | |
| Low IOP Setting | Physiologic Low (20 mm Hg) IOP phacoemulsification settings Receives: Procedure: Cataract surgery at low IOP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Early Post Operative Central Corneal Thickness
4 hours post operatively central corneal thickness assessment
Measured: 4 hours post operatively
Secondary outcomes (1)
IL-IB From Aqueous Sample
Early post op aqueous inflammatory marker of IL-IB level assessment
Measured: 2 minutes after cataract surgery completion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2024
- Primary completion30 Sep 2024
- Study completion31 Oct 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CataractStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wolfe Eye Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alcon Research
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Edward Hsu Hu, Wolfe Eye Clinic
- Investigators
- Edward H Hu, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Wolfe Eye Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06904404
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 83557125
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cyril D, Brahmani P, Prasad S, Rashme VL, R S, Kamble NR, Balakrishnan L, Nagu K, Shekhar M. Comparison of two phacoemulsification system handpieces: prospective randomized comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Mar 1;48(3):328-333. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000769.
PubMed 34371511Vasavada AR, Praveen MR, Vasavada VA, Vasavada VA, Raj SM, Asnani PK, Garg VS. Impact of high and low aspiration parameters on postoperative outcomes of phacoemulsification: randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;36(4):588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.009.
PubMed 20362850Lundberg B, Jonsson M, Behndig A. Postoperative corneal swelling correlates strongly to corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun;139(6):1035-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.080.
PubMed 15953433Suzuki H, Igarashi T, Takahashi H. Effect of a new phacoemulsification and aspiration handpiece on anterior chamber stability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Jan 1;49(1):91-96. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001071.
PubMed 36201661Kaup S, Pandey SK. Cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy. Community Eye Health. 2019;31(104):86-87. No abstract available.
PubMed 31086438Liu YC, Setiawan M, Ang M, Yam GHF, Mehta JS. Changes in aqueous oxidative stress, prostaglandins, and cytokines: Comparisons of low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Feb;45(2):196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
PubMed 30528516De Maria M, Iannetta D, Cimino L, Coassin M, Fontana L. Measuring Anterior Chamber Inflammation After Cataract Surgery: A Review of the Literature Focusing on the Correlation with Cystoid Macular Edema. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 9;14:41-52. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S237405. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32021067Schultz T, Joachim SC, Kuehn M, Dick HB. Changes in prostaglandin levels in patients undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2013 Nov;29(11):742-7. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20131021-03.
PubMed 24203805Feng MT, Belin MW, Ambrosio R Jr, Grewal SP, Yan W, Shaheen MS, McGhee C, Maeda N, Neuhann TH, Burkhard Dick H, Alageel SA, Steinmueller A. Anterior chamber depth in normal subjects by rotating scheimpflug imaging. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul;25(3):255-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
PubMed 23960933
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Physiologic Phacofluidics: Ghost Protocol
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06904404
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 83557125
- Conditions
- Cataract
- Keywords
- phacoemulsification
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wolfe Eye ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Alcon Research
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 12 Aug 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the early post-operative benefits of performing phacoemulsification at physiologic intraocular pressures. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is there less post operative corneal edema?
- Is there less post operative inflammation?
- Is the post operative vision better? Participants will undergo phacoemulsification cataract surgery with either high or low IOP settings Researchers will compare post op corneal edema, inflammatory marker levels and vision
Detailed description
Methods:
Study population Inclusion Criteria
- Patients without prior ocular surgery both eyes
- Adult patients with visually significant cataract with WHO-World Health Organization NUC grade 2-3
- First eye only undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery
- Unremarkable systemic history; controlled diabetes with HbA1c <7%
- Unremarkable ocular health
- Anterior chamber depth ACD >2.04mm10
- Age range 55-95
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior ocular surgery including corneal refractive surgery, cataract surgery in fellow eye
- Thin corneas (<490 microns)
- Complicated (use of pupil expansion devices) or prolonged cataract surgeries (>15 mins) with post-operative complications (IOP spike >30mmHg), severe punctate keratitis
Approximately 66 patients will be identified and included in the study. Patients at the day of surgery sign up will be randomized to high (65mmHg) vs low IOP (20mmHg) using a random online number generator; Even will be high IOP; Odd will be low IOP. Patients will undergo standard cataract surgery with equivalent vacuum and aspiration rates in both groups for the duration of the entire cataract surgery; IOP settings will be set at high vs low IOP but may be adjusted if necessary for the safety of the patient.
In all procedures, the intraocular lens (IOL) implanted and the ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) materials used will be standardized to the same materials and are part of routine surgery. Cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) and surgical duration will be collected for all patients. An intraoperative aqueous sample 100-150µL will be collected at the end of the case 2 minutes after OVD removal and immediately transferred on dry ice to a laboratory, stored at -80°C until analysis as established in prior protocol. The extraction of aqueous sample will not require additional incisions.
All subjects will be prescribed the standard post-operative cataract surgery medications (not specific to study). Post-operative visits by the masked sub-investigator will perform the following procedures at 4hrs (early post-op), POD#1 (20-24hrs), POW#1:
Post-op Procedures Baseline Visit1 (4hrs) Visit2 (20-24hrs) Visit3 (1 week) Pachymetry X X X X Visual acuity BCVA UCVA/PHVA UCVA/PHVA UCVA/PHVA Slit Lamp- Cell /Flare X X X X
Pachymetry: a painless, simple test where a probe is gently placed on the front of the eye to measure the thickness of the cornea.
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA): this test is used to determine the smallest letters that can be read on a standardized chart. Un-corrected visual acuity (UCVA): the smallest letter that can be read unaided. Pinhole visual acuity (PHVA): the smallest letter that can be read without the interference of optical problems.
Slit lamp exam: a microscope is used to provide a magnified view of different parts of the eye and to determine inflammation (cell/flare) that is common with any ophthalmic surgery.
Visual acuity and slit lamp examinations are part of routine post-operative care.
Pachymetry measurements are for research purposes to determine if there's less corneal swelling after cataract surgery in the lower IOP group.
The primary end point is: difference in CCT post-op at 4 hours between High vs Low IOP groups.
Secondary endpoints include: CCT at POD#1 and POW#1, Cell/Flare at POHr4 and POD1, and inflammatory markers: levels of prostaglandin IL-6, IL-8, IL-Iβ, TNF-α, PGE2, MCP-1. Aqueous samples will be sent with de-identified patient information and aqueous analysis will be performed by the University of California, Irvine Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Labs. The laboratory will be masked to which treatment the subject received and will only provide the aqueous analysis report for the study.
Any adverse events (AE) will be recorded in subject's medical charts as well as an adverse event log. AEs are classified as serious or non-serious; expected or unexpected; and study-related, possibly study-related, or not study-related. Serious AEs will be reported immediately to the regulatory authorities as per standard of care. The potential risks involved are that of standard cataract surgery with potential complications and side effects associated with any surgical procedure. These include but are not limited to: infection, macular edema, increased IOP, general risk of anesthesia and surgery, bleeding in the eye, and decreased vision. Some potential benefits include: improved visual acuity, decreased glare symptoms, lowered IOP, and faster visual recovery.
Analysis:
Primary endpoint: Difference in mean CCT change at 4 hrs post-surgery between high vs low IOP will be assessed using t-test with a P-value <0.05. Descriptive statistics will be used for the other secondary endpoints
Sample Size Justification:
The expected mean CCT change between the high vs low groups is hypothesized to be 32um, with a standard deviation of 40um. With a Type I/II error rate of alpha=0.05 and power=0.85, a sample size of 56 eyes are needed; additional 10 eyes to account for ~15 attrition; N=66
Data Collection and Management:
Data is recorded in a manner that reduces the risk of a breach of confidentiality. Password protected Microsoft Excel files will be utilized for this study and only accessible by authorized study personnel.
Ethical and Regulatory Considerations:
The study is conducted in accordance with the following:
Protocol and study-related plans and documents
- Local regulations, as applicable
- Good Clinical Practices, as outlined in the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for GCP (ICH
E6(R2))Ethical and Regulatory Considerations:
The study is conducted in accordance with the following:
- Protocol and study-related plans and documents
- Local regulations, as applicable
- Good Clinical Practices, as outlined in the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for CP (ICH E6(R2))
- The ethical principles established by the Declaration of Helsinki
- Regional participant data protection laws and regulations
- Local IRB requirements
Institutional Review Board (IRB):
The study site will maintain an accurate and complete record of all reports, documents and other submissions made to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) concerning this protocol.
The investigator must supply ongoing study progress reports to the IRB, per local requirements, protocol deviations and amendments. In addition, the investigator must notify the IRB at the closure of the study.
Informed Consent:
It is the responsibility of the investigator and clinical coordinator to inform each subject of the purpose of this study, including possible risks and benefits and document the informed consent process in the subject's chart. Prior to entry into the study or initiation of any study-related testing, the subject must read, sign and date the informed consent form. If the subject's vision is impaired to the point where they cannot read the informed consent document, the document will be read to the subject. The person executing the consent must also sign and date the consent form. One original informed consent form is to be retained by the study site and a copy is to be given to the subject.
Protocol Amendments:
This protocol must be followed as written. Any change or addition to this protocol that impacts subject safety, or the validity of the study requires a written protocol amendment that must be approved in writing by the IRB and any required regulatory authorities before implementation.
Record Keeping and Retention:
Data generated for the study should be stored in a limited-access file area and be accessible only to study personnel of the site. All reports and communications relating to study participants will identify participants only by subject identification number. Complete subject identification will be kept by the investigator. This information will be treated with strict adherence to professional standards of confidentiality.
The Investigator will retain a copy in the study file:
- A copy of the IRB approved informed consent form
- All original informed consent forms with required signatures
- All participant source documents, etc.
- All IRB correspondence (i.e., informed consent [including any approved revisions], protocol, AE, advertisements, newsletters).
Confidentiality:
All clinical study findings and documents are regarded as confidential. Study documents (protocols and other material) must be stored appropriately to ensure their confidentiality.
The anonymity of participants must be maintained per applicable local and national laws. Subjects are specified on all documents by subject number but not by name. Documents that identify the subject, e.g., the signed ICF, must be maintained in confidence by the investigator.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High IOP setting | – | Procedure: Cataract surgery at high IOPTraditional High (65mm Hg) IOP phacoemulsification settings |
| Low IOP Setting | – | Procedure: Cataract surgery at low IOPPhysiologic Low (20 mm Hg) IOP phacoemulsification settings |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 95 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Visually significant cataract patients with no prior history of cataract surgery
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients without prior ocular surgery both eyes
- Adult patients with visually significant cataract with WHO-World Health Organization NUC grade 2-3
- First eye only undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery
- Unremarkable systemic history; controlled diabetes with HbA1c <7%
- Unremarkable ocular health
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Prior ocular surgery including corneal refractive surgery, cataract surgery in fellow eye
- Thin corneas (<490 microns)
- Complicated (use of pupil expansion devices) or prolonged cataract surgeries (>15 mins) with post-operative complications (IOP spike >30mmHg), severe punctate keratitis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cataract surgery at high IOPCataract surgery at high IOP (conventional) | Procedure or surgery | High IOP setting |
| Cataract surgery at low IOPCataract surgery at low IOP | Procedure or surgery | Low IOP Setting |
Primary outcome
Change in Early Post Operative Central Corneal Thickness
Time frame: 4 hours post operatively
4 hours post operatively central corneal thickness assessment
1 secondary outcome
IL-IB From Aqueous Sample
Time frame: 2 minutes after cataract surgery completion
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Aug 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 34371511Cyril D, Brahmani P, Prasad S, Rashme VL, R S, Kamble NR, Balakrishnan L, Nagu K, Shekhar M. Comparison of two phacoemulsification system handpieces: prospective randomized comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Mar 1;48(3):328-333. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000769.
- Background: PubMed 20362850Vasavada AR, Praveen MR, Vasavada VA, Vasavada VA, Raj SM, Asnani PK, Garg VS. Impact of high and low aspiration parameters on postoperative outcomes of phacoemulsification: randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;36(4):588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.009.
- Background: PubMed 15953433Lundberg B, Jonsson M, Behndig A. Postoperative corneal swelling correlates strongly to corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jun;139(6):1035-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.12.080.
- Background: PubMed 36201661Suzuki H, Igarashi T, Takahashi H. Effect of a new phacoemulsification and aspiration handpiece on anterior chamber stability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Jan 1;49(1):91-96. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001071.
- Background: PubMed 31086438Kaup S, Pandey SK. Cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy. Community Eye Health. 2019;31(104):86-87. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30528516Liu YC, Setiawan M, Ang M, Yam GHF, Mehta JS. Changes in aqueous oxidative stress, prostaglandins, and cytokines: Comparisons of low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Feb;45(2):196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.022. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
- Background: PubMed 32021067De Maria M, Iannetta D, Cimino L, Coassin M, Fontana L. Measuring Anterior Chamber Inflammation After Cataract Surgery: A Review of the Literature Focusing on the Correlation with Cystoid Macular Edema. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 9;14:41-52. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S237405. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 24203805Schultz T, Joachim SC, Kuehn M, Dick HB. Changes in prostaglandin levels in patients undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2013 Nov;29(11):742-7. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20131021-03.
- Background: PubMed 23960933Feng MT, Belin MW, Ambrosio R Jr, Grewal SP, Yan W, Shaheen MS, McGhee C, Maeda N, Neuhann TH, Burkhard Dick H, Alageel SA, Steinmueller A. Anterior chamber depth in normal subjects by rotating scheimpflug imaging. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jul;25(3):255-9. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cataract
RecruitingPhase 4
Evaluating a Dropless Postoperative Regimen After Cataract Surgery in a Vulnerable, County-hospital Population
Cataract, Surgery
Recruiting
Trial Comparing miLOOP Device Assisted Phacoemulsification vs Standard Surgery for Dense Cataracts: Effects on Endothelial Cell Loss, Energy Use, and Vision Recovery
Cataract, Endothelial Cell Density
Not yet recruitingObservational study
PureSee/Odyssey Mix-and-Match IOL
Cataract
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment of Retinal Detachment in People Who Have Not Had Cataract Surgery With Vitrectomy vs Vitrectomy and Cataract Removal
Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Case-Control Study Revealing Intraocular Microenvironment Characteristics in Patients With Ocular Diseases Based on Multi-Omics Analysis
Age- Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Retinopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Edward H Hu, MD PhD principal investigator
Wolfe Eye Clinic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cataract, run by Wolfe Eye Clinic at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Aug 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Early Post Operative Central Corneal Thickness (time frame: 4 hours post operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06904404, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2025.