AzTrials
AzTrials

Procedural Pain ReliefNCT06901271

Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Methods for Children in Venipuncture Pain

A study testing EMLA Cream, Buzzy and Cold spray in people with Procedural Pain Relief and Fear Pain, run by Aynur Aytekin Ozdemir at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aimed to examine the effect of EMLA cream, cold spray, and Buzzy applied during venipuncture on the pain and fear levels of children aged 7-12 years. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 7 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Procedural Pain Relief, Fear Pain
What is being tested?
EMLA Cream, Buzzy and Cold spray
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
192 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
29 Mar 2018to 28 Jun 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 7 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • being between the ages of 7 to 12 years,
  • literate,
  • requiring blood tests

Who cannot join

  • having chronic diseases,
  • hospital stay for treatment,
  • visual, audio, or speech impairments,
  • a history of allergies,
  • mental disorders,
  • history of sedative, analgesic, or narcotic use within 24 h before admission,
  • inflammatory disease during admission.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Istanbul Medeniyet University

    Istanbul, Istanbul, 34862

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effect of EMLA Cream, Cold Spray, and Buzzy on Venipuncture Pain and Fear in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aimed to examine the effect of EMLA cream, cold spray, and Buzzy applied during venipuncture on the pain and fear levels of children aged 7-12 years.

Read the detailed description

The International Guide to Pediatric Anesthesia (Good Practice in Postoperative and Procedural Pain) recommends pharmacological and nonpharmacological methods to effectively manage and prevent acute procedural pain in children. Nonpharmacological methods alone or in combination with pharmacological methods help reduce pain, and therefore, have become popular especially in recent years. For pain management, nonpharmacological methods are easy to use, and cost- and time-effective methods with no side effects. Studies have evaluated a large number of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for procedural pain management in children. However, most of those interventions are not used by healthcare professionals because they are expensive, time-consuming or hard to use. Therefore, easy-to-use, practical, non-invasive, cost-effective, and reusable pharmacological and nonpharmacological methods can be used especially in acute settings. EMLA cream, cold spray, and Buzzy examined in this study may serve as alternative effective pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods to reduce venipuncture pain and fear.

Being tested
EMLA Cream, Buzzy, Cold spray
Keywords
Procedural pain, venipuncture, children
Medical subject headings
Pain, Procedural

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EMLA CreamDrug

    EMLA cream (2.5 grams) was applied to the treatment area 60 minutes before the procedure and covered with a transparent and impermeable dressing.

  • BuzzyDevice

    The buzzy device was placed on the procedure area 60 seconds before the procedure and turned on. The cold and vibration application continued during the procedure.

  • Cold sprayDrug

    Cold spray was applied to the procedure area for 5 seconds from a distance of 15 cm immediately before the procedure.

Study groups in NCT06901271
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control GroupNo interventionThe control group received the routine venipuncture procedure.
Intervention 1 GroupExperimentalIn this group, EMLA cream was applied to the procedure area (antecubital region) 60 minutes before the venipuncture procedure. Then, the venipuncture procedure was performed.
Receives: Drug: EMLA Cream
Intervention 2 GroupExperimentalIn this group, cold spray was applied to the procedure area for 5 seconds just before the venipuncture procedure. Then, the venipuncture procedure was performed.
Receives: Drug: Cold spray
Intervention 3 GroupExperimentalIn this group, Buzzy was placed in the procedure area. Buzzy was operated for 60 seconds. Then, the venipuncture procedure was performed. It also operated during this procedure.
Receives: Device: Buzzy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Procedural pain score- Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The VAS is used to measure and monitor pain intensity. VAS is a 10 cm or 100 mm long horizontal or vertical line with anchor statements "no pain or pain at its least" at the left-most end and "unbearable pain or worst pain imaginable" at the right-most end. The participant is asked to mark a point on the line that best represents their pain level. The VAS score is determined by measuring the distance of the mark from the left end of the line. VAS is an easy-to-understand and easy-to-measure scale for children aged 7 and over

    Measured: Through painful procedure completion, an average of 5 minutes

  2. Procedural pain score- Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale

    The scale is used to diagnose pain in children aged 3-18 years. It consists of six facial expressions, each one representing an increasing degree of pain scored on a scale 0 to 5 from left to right. The first face is a happy face representing "no pain=0" while the last face is a crying face representing "the worst pain imaginable=5". Higher scores indicate low pain tolerance. Participants are asked to choose the facial expression that best represents their pain.

    Measured: Through painful procedure completion, an average of 5 minutes

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Procedural fear score- Children's Fear Scale (CFS)

    The CFS was developed to measure fear and anxiety in children. It consists of five facial expressions that represent a range from neutral to extreme fear. It is scored between 0 and 4. Both researchers and family members can use the CFS to measure fear and anxiety in children before and during procedures.

    Measured: Through painful procedure completion, an average of 5 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Mar 2025
  2. Study start29 Mar 2018
  3. Primary completion28 Jun 2019
  4. Study completion28 Jun 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial in parallel groups. The variables used for blocking were age (7-9 and 10-12 years), sex (female and male), and fear of the procedure (yes and no). The blocks were repeated six times in each group (2 × 2 × 2 × 6 ), resulting in 48 participants per group.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
192 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06901271
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-3/19
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
24 Mar 2025
Last updated
28 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data may be shared upon request from the principal investigator, subject to the appropriateness of the request, while ensuring adherence to the rules of confidentiality regarding individual data.

Publications

  • Dalvandi A, Ranjbar H, Hatamizadeh M, Rahgoi A, Bernstein C. Comparing the effectiveness of vapocoolant spray and lidocaine/procaine cream in reducing pain of intravenous cannulation: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;35(8):1064-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.02.039. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

    PubMed 28285862
  • Celik EG, Sonmez Duzkaya D. The Impact of Cold Spray and Ice Application During Intravenous Access on Pain and Fear in Children Aged 7-15 Years in the Pediatric Emergency Unit: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Emerg Nurs. 2024 Mar;50(2):264-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2023.11.012. Epub 2023 Dec 24.

    PubMed 38142386
  • Erdogan B, Aytekin Ozdemir A. The Effect of Three Different Methods on Venipuncture Pain and Anxiety in Children: Distraction Cards, Virtual Reality, and Buzzy(R) (Randomized Controlled Trial). J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 May-Jun;58:e54-e62. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

    PubMed 33485746

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EMLA Cream, Buzzy and Cold spray in people with Procedural Pain Relief and Fear Pain, run by Aynur Aytekin Ozdemir at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Procedural pain score- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (time frame: Through painful procedure completion, an average of 5 minutes). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06901271, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in