AzTrials
AzTrials

Myopia ProgressingMALCOLMNCT06887920

Comparison of MiSight 1-Day and Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia in Myopic Children

A study testing Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia and MiSight 1 Day in people with Myopia Progressing, run by Pauline Kang at 1 site in Australia.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will compare the effects on myopia progression over the course of one year for eyes wearing MiSight 1 Day contact lenses compared to ACUVUE OASYS for PRESBYOPIA contact lenses. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 12 years
Conditions the study is for
Myopia Progressing
What is being tested?
Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia and MiSight 1 Day
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteAustralia
Study dates
11 Feb 2021to Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 6-12 years (inclusive)
  • Is willing to wear soft contact lenses daily
  • Spherical equivalent myopic refractive error between -0.50 to -5.00 D in each eye and astigmatism < 1.00 D
  • Best corrected logMAR visual acuity of 0.1 or better in both eyes
  • Good ocular and general health
  • No previous use of myopia control interventions for more than 1 month or within the last 30 days
  • Competent enough in English to be able to fully understand the participant information and consent form

Who cannot join

  • Strabismus at distance or near, amblyopia or significant anisometropia (>1D)
  • Systemic or ocular conditions that may affect contact lens use (e.g., allergy) or that may affect refractive development (e.g., ptosis)
  • Previous history of ocular surgery, trauma, or chronic ocular disease
  • Contraindications to contact lens use
  • Ocular or systemic medication use which may interfere or interact with contact lens wear or ocular development
  • Plans to migrate or move during the study
  • Child, parents or guardians not willing to comply with treatment and/or follow-up schedule

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Australia1 site
  • University of New South Wales

    Sydney, New South Wales, 2052

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: MultifocAL COntact Lenses for Myopia and Their Effect on Axial Length Elongation in Children

This study will compare the effects on myopia progression over the course of one year for eyes wearing MiSight 1 Day contact lenses compared to ACUVUE OASYS for PRESBYOPIA contact lenses.

Being tested
Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia, MiSight 1 Day

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Acuvue Oasys for PresbyopiaDevice

    ACUVUE OASYS for PRESBYOPIA contact lenses will be prescribed to children with myopia to be worn in one eye for 10 hours a day for one year.

  • MiSight 1 DayDevice

    MiSight 1 Day contact lenses will be prescribed to children with myopia to be worn in one eye for 10 hours a day for one year.

Study groups in NCT06887920
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia in the RIGHT eyeOtherAcuvue Oasys for Presbyopia in the RIGHT eye and MiSight 1-Day contact lens in the LEFT eye RIGHT eye has intervention, LEFT eye has active comparator
Receives: Device: Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia
MiSight 1-Day in the RIGHT eyeOtherMiSight 1-Day contact lens in the RIGHT eye and Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia in the LEFT eye RIGHT eye has active comparator, LEFT eye has intervention
Receives: Device: MiSight 1 Day

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Axial length progression

    Change in Axial Length between two eyes measured by laser interferometry (IOL Master)

    Measured: 1 month, 6 months and 12-months post intervention commencement. Initial protocol also included 3-month time point, but the 3-month visit was updated to a telehealth consultation due to COVID-19 restrictions. Updated after 9 participants.

  2. Cycloplegic autorefraction

    Change in Autorefraction between two eyes as measured by autorefractor

    Measured: 1 month, 6 months and 12-months post intervention commencement. Initial protocol also included 3-month time point, but the 3-month visit was updated to a telehealth consultation due to COVID-19 restrictions. Updated after 9 participants.

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Subjective refraction

    Change in subjective refraction between two eyes using phoropter or trial frame

    Measured: 1 month, 6 months and 12-months post intervention commencement. Initial protocol also included 3-month time point, but the 3-month visit was updated to a telehealth consultation due to COVID-19 restrictions. Updated after 9 participants.

  2. Estimates of outdoor time and near work

    Estimates of time spent outdoors and on near work with study specific questionnaire. Duration will be reported in minutes or hours.

    Measured: 1-month, 6-month and 12-month study visits. Also 3-month and 9-month telehealth visits. 3-month visit was changed to telehealth and 9-month visit added after already enrolling 9 participants.

  3. Quality of Life (PREP2)

    Quality of Life measured using the PREP2 survey. Scores are derived from a scale between 0 to 100, with higher values incating better Quality of Life.

    Measured: Baseline, 6-month and 12-month study visits. Added after already enrolling 9 participants.

  4. Quality of Life (PedEyeQ)

    Quality of Life measured using the PedEyeQ survey. Scores are derived from a scale between 0 to 100, with higher values incating better Quality of Life.

    Measured: Baseline, 6-month and 12-month study visits. Added after already enrolling 9 participants.

  5. Treatment adherence (Questions)

    Contact lens wear duration will be calculated from study-specific questionnaire conducted at study visits. Duration will be reported as hours per day and days per week.

    Measured: 1-month, 6-month and 12-month study visits. Added to initial protocol prior to enrolment commencement.

  6. Treatment adherence (Text-message surveys)

    Contact lens wear duration will be calculated from study-specific questionnaire sent via text-message. Duration will be reported as hours per day and days per week.

    Measured: Study month 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12. 1-month, 6-month and 12-month study visits. Added to initial protocol prior to enrolment commencement.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Mar 2025
  2. Study start11 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completionDec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Non-inferiority, contralateral eye, randomised controlled trial
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
72 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06887920
Sponsor's protocol ID
HC200052
Acronym
MALCOLM
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
14 Mar 2025
Last updated
26 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Dang R, Hui A, Jalbert I, Kho D, Vi M, Briggs N, Kang P. MultifocAL COntact Lenses for Myopia (MALCOLM) control in Australian children: a study protocol for a double-blind, contralateral eye, non-inferiority, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 14;15(4):e086173. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086173.

    PubMed 40228855

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia and MiSight 1 Day in people with Myopia Progressing, run by Pauline Kang at 1 site in Australia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Axial length progression (time frame: 1 month, 6 months and 12-months post intervention commencement. Initial protocol also included 3-month time point, but the 3-month visit was updated to a telehealth consultation due to COVID-19 restrictions. Updated after 9 participants.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06887920, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in