AzTrials
AzTrials

Success RateNCT06887790

Success, Academic Self-efficacy; ARCS Model

A study testing Education method (ARCS) in people with Success Rate and Self-Efficacy, run by Muş Alparslan University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cassels and Redman have offered some suggestions such as teaching students basic ethical principles and theories, the International Council of Nurses (ICN) Code of Ethics, and the rights and laws of nurses in all kinds of ethical issues they may encounter in practice in order to increase their ethical decision-making… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Success Rate, Self-Efficacy
What is being tested?
Education method (ARCS)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Nov 2024to 2 Apr 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Being over 18 years old,
  • Being educated in the nursing program,
  • Not having taken the "Nursing Ethics" course before,
  • Not being absent during the data collection processes.
  • Having a phone and internet connection that can enter Google forms.

Who cannot join

  • Being absent during the research process,
  • Dropping from education,
  • Not cooperating, Protocol registration

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Muş Alparslan University

    Muş, 49250

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: An Investigation of the Effect of the Ethics Course Based on the Arcs Model on Achievement, Academic Self-efficacy and the Effectiveness of Education in Ethics

Cassels and Redman have offered some suggestions such as teaching students basic ethical principles and theories, the International Council of Nurses (ICN) Code of Ethics, and the rights and laws of nurses in all kinds of ethical issues they may encounter in practice in order to increase their ethical decision-making skills. When the academic literature is examined, it is seen that ethics education has positive effects on the development of nursing students. Ethics education in nursing from a multi-dimensional perspective is very important in determining the quality of education and restructuring education. According to Bandura, self-efficacy is based on our belief in our abilities and is necessary to organize and demonstrate a behavior necessary to achieve our goals. In today's world where the quality and structure of education are seriously discussed, the importance of these evaluations in terms of university education is rapidly increasing. When researching the increase in quality in education, it is important to consider the individual's perspective on his/her own abilities as well as social abilities and to accept this as an important element of the individual's ability to act. Self-efficacy, which is one of the concepts that comes to the fore when the individual's self-predictions and evaluations are expressed, should also be addressed in relation to university education.

Read the detailed description

Ethical decision-making requires knowledge and management skills about ethical theories, ethical principles and practices. Therefore, ethics education for nurses is extremely important, especially at undergraduate and graduate levels, in practical professional life. Otherwise, only an intuitive path will be followed in the ethical decision-making process and professionalism will be abandoned. In recent years, ethics education has gained great importance in nursing education and more contemporary models (such as clinical practice models, case studies) have begun to be integrated in education so that nurses can participate in the ethical decision-making process. Cassels and Redman have offered some suggestions for students to increase their ethical decision-making skills, such as teaching them basic ethical principles and theories, the International Council of Nurses (ICN) Code of Ethics, and the rights and laws of nurses in all kinds of ethical problems they may encounter in practice. When the academic literature is examined, it is seen that ethics education has positive effects on the development of nursing students. In addition, nursing students also state that ethics education is an important part of their undergraduate education. On the other hand, studies have shown that nurses do not feel prepared to solve ethical problems in practice. This raises the question of whether ethics education in nursing is sufficiently effective in developing ethical knowledge and skills of nursing students in terms of method and content. Because, effective measurement, evaluation and feedback of learning outcomes and behavioral changes in students are important factors in the learning process. When the literature is examined; various surveys have been used to examine the effectiveness of ethics education in nursing students. Some of these focused on the theoretical content of ethics education, while others focused on specific methods used in education. In some surveys, only the satisfaction levels of students with ethics education were determined. However, evaluating the effectiveness of ethics education in nursing from multiple perspectives is very important in determining the quality of education and restructuring education. In this way, nursing students who receive qualified ethics education can develop a certain ethical awareness and sensitivity, and they can be provided with responsibility in ethical decision-making. The concept of self-efficacy is frequently applied, especially in processes related to education - for example, in terms of learning and performance - to combat stress and investigate the physical health status of teachers and students. Self-efficacy expectation is defined as "the person's self-convincing about their abilities". It is reported that positive self-efficacy expectations increase motivation, enable the person to cope with new and difficult tasks, and make them willing to make an effort; whereas negative self-efficacy expectations cause the person to fail to act on their own initiative or to leave a task unfinished. Self-efficacy belief is defined as "the belief that an individual has in their capacity to organize and successfully perform the necessary activity to demonstrate a certain performance". According to Bandura, self-efficacy is based on our belief in our abilities and is necessary to organize and demonstrate a behavior necessary to achieve our goals. In today's world where the quality and structure of education are seriously discussed, the importance of these evaluations in terms of university education is rapidly increasing. While researching the increase in quality in education, the view that the individual's perspective on their own abilities should be taken into consideration in addition to social abilities and that this should be accepted as an important element of the individual's ability to act is gaining importance. Self-efficacy, which is one of the prominent concepts when the individual's self-predictions and evaluations are expressed, should also be addressed in relation to university education.

Being tested
Education method (ARCS)
Keywords
Success, self-efficacy, ethics training, ARCS
Medical subject headings
Arthrogryposis renal dysfunction cholestasis syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Education method (ARCS)Other

    The control group will not be intervened in the study. The experimental group will be given structured training with the ARCS method.

Study groups in NCT06887790
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ARCS GroupExperimentalThe experimental group will be given structured training with the ARCS method.
Receives: Other: Education method (ARCS)
Control GroupNo interventionThe control group will not be intervened in the study.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. achievement test

    achievement test average

    Measured: 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2025
  2. Study start1 Nov 2024
  3. Primary completion28 Mar 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion2 Apr 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
72 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06887790
Sponsor's protocol ID
MusAlparslanU
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
22 Feb 2025
Last updated
20 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: In order to determine the privacy of individuals.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Education method (ARCS) in people with Success Rate and Self-Efficacy, run by Muş Alparslan University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

achievement test (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in