Cognitive Functioning of Healthy IndividualsNCT06875388
Task-Specific Training vs. Yoga (With and Without Perturbation) for Balance and Leg Strength in Older Adults
A study testing Task specific Training, Specific Yoga Poses and Tasl specific Training with perturbation in people with Cognitive Functioning of Healthy Individuals and Balance, run by Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
This experimental study is designed to observe the effectiveness of task-specific training vs yoga with and without perturbation on reactive balance and leg strength in older individuals in Islamabad/Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Older adults meeting the criteria will be grouped into 4 intervention groups. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cognitive Functioning of Healthy Individuals, Balance, Strength, Muscle
- What is being tested?
- Task specific Training, Specific Yoga Poses and Tasl specific Training with perturbation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 9 Jan 2025to Jul 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age above 60
- Males and females with regular medical follow-up, physically autonomous but not doing regular physical activity.
- FRAT Score below 15
- Elders having difficulty in executive function (MMSE score more than 25¬).
Who cannot join
- • Elderly people confined to bed, using wheelchairs, or unable to walk
- Elderly individuals with severe cognitive impairment, hemodynamic instability, or severe heart disease.
- Patients with uncontrolled hypertension, as verified by physicians.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Task-specific Training vs Different Yoga Poses With and Without Perturbation to Improve Reactive Balance and Overall Leg Strength in Older Adults
This experimental study is designed to observe the effectiveness of task-specific training vs yoga with and without perturbation on reactive balance and leg strength in older individuals in Islamabad/Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Older adults meeting the criteria will be grouped into 4 intervention groups. One group will be doing task-specific training, the second will be doing yoga poses, the third will be doing task-specific with perturbation, and 4th will be doing yoga poses with perturbation.
Baseline readings through manual release from lean, minbest test, manual muscle testing (MMT), WHO quality of life, Barthel index, 30-sec sit-to-stand test, Stroop test, and mini-mental state examination, will be taken before starting the intervention, and post-intervention readings will be taken after 3 months of intervention. After this, all readings will be retaken 1 month after stopping the intervention
Read the detailed description
Plan of Work: males and females above 60 as per eligibility criteria will be enrolled Baseline Assessment: all variables Manual release from leans for reactive Balance, Minbest test questionnaire, Manual Muscle testing, Stroop test, Barthel Index scale, 30 sec-sit to stand test, WHOQOL questionnaire will be measured at the baseline Randomization \& Allocation: Eligible consenting subjects will be randomly allocated to all four groups Follow-up Assessment: All the outcome measures observed at baseline will be re-assessed after 3 months of intervention and then 1 month after stopping the intervention.
Statistical Analysis: Pre \& post-analysis will be conducted.
study design: it will be an experimental study and non- probability-convenient sampling method will be used. data will be collected from the old homes of Islamabad/ Rawalpindi after seeking approval from the authorities. A randomized control trial will be carried out to enroll older male and female individuals into 4 separate groups with random allocation through the sealed envelope method. 50 individuals will be located in each group. After achieving informed consent from all the participants, a baseline assessment will be conducted. Baseline- and post-intervention assessments of the reactive balance and overall leg strength will be completed one week before the intervention and following the last training session, respectively. Both variables will be tested through reliable tests stated in the next session. Only participants fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be recruited in the study. Then a 12-week intervention of task-specific training vs yoga poses in combination with and without perturbation will be implemented on the study population, having 3 sessions per week and a post-intervention assessment will be conducted afterward
Participants including males and females above 60 will be recruited with no restriction for ethnicity or race. The participants from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds will be considered eligible if they meet the inclusion criteria. The study objective will be explained and participants will be invited to participate based on their free will.
Sampling size: The sample size was calculated using G power and taking the following parameters: Effect size f = 0.25, α err prob = 0.05, Power (1-β err prob) = 0.85, No of groups = 04 Total sample size = 204
Randomization: After assessing the eligibility the participants will be randomly allocated in a study groups through sealed envelop method (group A task-specific training, Group B yoga training, group C task-specific with perturbation, group D yoga with perturbation ). The randomization sequence will done through the sealed envelope method. 200 envelopes will be made ready with the name of each group on 50 envelopes. participants will be asked to pick one envelope. and then their group will be mentioned in the performa.
intervention: Group A will receive a basic protocol of 40 minutes involving 10 minutes warm up 10 10 mins of task-specific training 10 mins of leg strength exercises and 10 mins of cool-down exercises. For group B, a series of yoga poses will be applied. Each training session consists of a 10-minute warm-up, 20 minutes of yoga exercises, and a 10-minute cool-down. Group C will be 40 minutes involving 10 minutes of warm-up 10 mins of task-specific training involving perturbation 10 mins of leg strength exercises involving perturbation and 10 mins of cool-down exercises. Group D training session consists of a 10-minute warm-up, 20 minutes of yoga exercises with perturbation, and a 10-minute cool-down
- Conditions
- Cognitive Functioning of Healthy Individuals, Balance, Strength, Muscle, Quality of Life (QOL)
- Being tested
- Task specific Training, Specific Yoga Poses, Tasl specific Training with perturbation, Specific yoga poses with perturbation
- Keywords
- Task-specific training, yoga poses, perturbation, reactive balance, overall leg strength
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Task specific TrainingOther
Group A will receive a basic protocol of 40 minutes involving 10 minutes of warm up 10 10 mins of task-specific training 10 mins of leg strength exercises and 10 mins of cool-down exercises.
Specific Yoga PosesOther
For group B, a series of yoga poses will be applied. Each training session consists of a 10-minute warm-up, 20 minutes of yoga exercises, and a 10-minute cool-down.
Tasl specific Training with perturbationOther
GGroup C will be 40 minutes involving 10 minutes of warm-up 10 minutes of task-specific training involving perturbation 10 mins of leg strength exercises involving perturbation and 10 mins of cool-down exercises.
Specific yoga poses with perturbationOther
Group D training session consists of a 10-minute warm-up, 20 minutes of yoga exercises with perturbation, and a 10-minute cool-down
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: task specific training | Experimental | Group A will receive a basic protocol of 40 minutes involving 10 minutes of warm up 10 10 mins of task-specific training and 10 mins of leg strength exercises and 10 mins of cool-down exercises. Receives: Other: Task specific Training |
| Group B specific Yoga poses | Experimental | For group B, a series of yoga poses will be applied. Each training session consists of a 10-minute warm-up, 20 minutes of yoga exercises, and a 10-minute cool-down. Receives: Other: Specific Yoga Poses |
| Group C Task specific with perturbation | Experimental | Group C will be 40 minutes involving 10 minutes warm up 10 mins of task-specific training involving perturbation and 10 mins of leg strength exercises involving perturbation and 10 mins of cool-down exercises. Receives: Other: Tasl specific Training with perturbation |
| Group D Specific yoga Poses with Perturbation | Experimental | Group D training session consists of a 10-minute warm-up, 20 minutes of yoga exercises with perturbation, and a 10-minute cool-down Receives: Other: Specific yoga poses with perturbation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Manual Release from Lean (MRFL) Test:
This methodology assesses balance recovery using MFRL and CRFL-inspired tests. Participants wear a safety harness and stand on a standardized foot placement template (17cm heel distance, 14° angle). Trained personnel and a cushioned mat ensure safety. The test involves a controlled forward lean (≤15°) with sudden release by an administrator. A practice trial familiarizes participants before three test trials. Balance recovery is assessed qualitatively (e.g., stepping, arm use) and quantitatively (distance covered, time). Core muscles, including glutes, hamstrings, and abdominals, stabilize movement. Safety measures include verbal cues, secure harness checks, and moderate perturbations.
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, an average of 3 months
Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest)
The Mini-BESTest is a clinical tool assessing dynamic balance and postural control in individuals with neurological conditions, older adults, and those recovering from injuries. It consists of 14 items across four categories: Anticipatory Postural Adjustments, Reactive Postural Control, Sensory Orientation, and Dynamic Gait. Each item is scored from 0-2, with a maximum score of 28; ≤19 indicates a high fall risk. The test is more sensitive than traditional balance assessments and helps guide rehabilitation by identifying specific impairments and tracking progress. It is widely used in neurology, geriatrics, and rehabilitation for fall prevention and treatment planning.
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, an average of 3 months
Manual Muscle Testing (MMT):
Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) is a clinical assessment used to evaluate muscle strength and function by applying resistance against a patient's voluntary movement. It helps diagnose neuromuscular conditions, monitor progress, and guide rehabilitation. MMT grades muscle strength on a 0-5 scale: 0 (no contraction), 1 (visible contraction, no movement), 2 (movement without gravity), 3 (movement against gravity), 4 (movement against moderate resistance), and 5 (normal strength). Testing involves positioning the patient, stabilizing the joint, and applying resistance while observing for compensatory movements. MMT is widely used in physical therapy, neurology, and sports medicine to assess muscular imbalances, nerve injuries, and overall functional capacity. Though subjective, when combined with functional tests and dynamometry, it provides valuable insight into muscle performance, aiding in treatment planning and progress tracking for various musculoskeletal and neurological conditions.
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, an average of 3 months
30- secs sit to stand test
The 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test (30s STS) assesses lower body strength, endurance, and balance, especially in older adults and those with mobility impairments. Participants repeatedly stand from a sturdy chair for 30 seconds, with total repetitions recorded. It evaluates leg strength and functional power, essential for daily activities and fall prevention. Scores ≤12 indicate increased fall risk. Key muscles involved include the quadriceps, gluteus maximus, hamstrings, calves, and core. The test is widely used in clinical and research settings to track rehabilitation progress and guide fall prevention strategies. Its simplicity makes it a reliable tool for identifying mobility decline and designing targeted interventions.
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, an average of 3 months
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
used For mental status and cognitive function The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function; a score of 24 or higher is generally considered normal, while scores below 24 may suggest cognitive impairment.
Here's a more detailed breakdown of the scoring guide and what the scores mean:
Scoring:
Maximum Score: 30 Normal: 24 or higher Mild Cognitive Impairment: 18-23 Moderate Cognitive Impairment: 10-17 Severe Cognitive Impairment: 0-9 <23 is generally accepted as indicating cognitive impairment
Areas Assessed:
The MMSE assesses five key areas of cognitive function:
Orientation: (Time and Place) Registration: (Repeating named prompts) Attention and Calculation: (Serial sevens or spelling "world" backward) Recall: (Registration recall) Language: (Naming a pencil and a watch)
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, an average of 3 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version ( WHOQOL-BREF )
For assessing the quality of life:
- A shorter, 26-item version of the original 100-item WHOQOL questionnaire. It assesses four domains of quality of life: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment.
- It is a self-report questionnaire, meaning individuals answer the questions themselves.
- Each of the 26 items in the WHOQOL-BREF is scored on a 5-level scale(e.g., 1- 5), allowing for the calculation of domain-specific and overall quality-of-life scores.
- Higher scores generally indicate a better quality of life.
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, an average of 3 months
The Barthel Scale/Index (BI)
Used for assessing functional independence in activities of daily living (ADLs) with scores ranging from 0 to 100 The Barthel Index is a 100-point scale, with each activity assigned a numeric value based on the level of assistance needed.
Total Score: The total score is calculated by summing the scores for each of the 10 ADLs.
Higher Scores: Indicate greater independence. Lower Scores: Indicate less independence.
Interpretation:
0-20: Total dependency. 21-60: Severe dependency. 61-90: Moderate dependency. 91-99: Slight dependency. 100: Total independence.
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, at an average of 3 months
Mini Stroop test
The Mini Stroop Test is a cognitive assessment measuring inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and attentional control. It requires individuals to name the ink color of printed words while ignoring the word itself, assessing the ability to override automatic reading responses. Performance is evaluated based on response time and error rate, with longer times and higher errors indicating cognitive control difficulties. It primarily assesses the prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex, involved in executive functions like attention and inhibition. Poor performance may indicate issues with cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control, or executive dysfunction seen in ADHD, brain injuries, and frontal lobe disorders. Its simplicity makes it useful in clinical and research settings for identifying cognitive impairments and understanding brain-behavior relationships.
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, at an average of 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Mar 2025
- Study start9 Jan 2025
- Primary completionJun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cognitive Functioning of Healthy IndividualsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- * Appropriate research strategy: Experimental study * Appropriate sampling method; non probability convenient sampling * Appropriate variable selected \& defined; yes * State study design; randomized trail
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Saima Gul, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University
- Investigators
- Saima Gul Associate Professor, PhD, Principal investigator, Shifa Tammer e Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06875388
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB#545-24
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 9 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Task-specific Training vs Different Yoga Poses With and Without Perturbation to Improve Reactive Balance and Overall Leg Strength in Older Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06875388
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB#545-24
- Conditions
- Cognitive Functioning of Healthy Individuals, Balance, Strength, Muscle, Quality of Life (QOL)
- Keywords
- Task-specific training, yoga poses, perturbation, reactive balance, overall leg strength
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shifa Tameer-e-Millat UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This experimental study is designed to observe the effectiveness of task-specific training vs yoga with and without perturbation on reactive balance and leg strength in older individuals in Islamabad/Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Older adults meeting the criteria will be grouped into 4 intervention groups. One group will be doing task-specific training, the second will be doing yoga poses, the third will be doing task-specific with perturbation, and 4th will be doing yoga poses with perturbation.
Baseline readings through manual release from lean, minbest test, manual muscle testing (MMT), WHO quality of life, Barthel index, 30-sec sit-to-stand test, Stroop test, and mini-mental state examination, will be taken before starting the intervention, and post-intervention readings will be taken after 3 months of intervention. After this, all readings will be retaken 1 month after stopping the intervention
Detailed description
Plan of Work: males and females above 60 as per eligibility criteria will be enrolled Baseline Assessment: all variables Manual release from leans for reactive Balance, Minbest test questionnaire, Manual Muscle testing, Stroop test, Barthel Index scale, 30 sec-sit to stand test, WHOQOL questionnaire will be measured at the baseline Randomization \& Allocation: Eligible consenting subjects will be randomly allocated to all four groups Follow-up Assessment: All the outcome measures observed at baseline will be re-assessed after 3 months of intervention and then 1 month after stopping the intervention.
Statistical Analysis: Pre \& post-analysis will be conducted.
study design: it will be an experimental study and non- probability-convenient sampling method will be used. data will be collected from the old homes of Islamabad/ Rawalpindi after seeking approval from the authorities. A randomized control trial will be carried out to enroll older male and female individuals into 4 separate groups with random allocation through the sealed envelope method. 50 individuals will be located in each group. After achieving informed consent from all the participants, a baseline assessment will be conducted. Baseline- and post-intervention assessments of the reactive balance and overall leg strength will be completed one week before the intervention and following the last training session, respectively. Both variables will be tested through reliable tests stated in the next session. Only participants fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be recruited in the study. Then a 12-week intervention of task-specific training vs yoga poses in combination with and without perturbation will be implemented on the study population, having 3 sessions per week and a post-intervention assessment will be conducted afterward
Participants including males and females above 60 will be recruited with no restriction for ethnicity or race. The participants from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds will be considered eligible if they meet the inclusion criteria. The study objective will be explained and participants will be invited to participate based on their free will.
Sampling size: The sample size was calculated using G power and taking the following parameters: Effect size f = 0.25, α err prob = 0.05, Power (1-β err prob) = 0.85, No of groups = 04 Total sample size = 204
Randomization: After assessing the eligibility the participants will be randomly allocated in a study groups through sealed envelop method (group A task-specific training, Group B yoga training, group C task-specific with perturbation, group D yoga with perturbation ). The randomization sequence will done through the sealed envelope method. 200 envelopes will be made ready with the name of each group on 50 envelopes. participants will be asked to pick one envelope. and then their group will be mentioned in the performa.
intervention: Group A will receive a basic protocol of 40 minutes involving 10 minutes warm up 10 10 mins of task-specific training 10 mins of leg strength exercises and 10 mins of cool-down exercises. For group B, a series of yoga poses will be applied. Each training session consists of a 10-minute warm-up, 20 minutes of yoga exercises, and a 10-minute cool-down. Group C will be 40 minutes involving 10 minutes of warm-up 10 mins of task-specific training involving perturbation 10 mins of leg strength exercises involving perturbation and 10 mins of cool-down exercises. Group D training session consists of a 10-minute warm-up, 20 minutes of yoga exercises with perturbation, and a 10-minute cool-down
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- * Appropriate research strategy: Experimental study * Appropriate sampling method; non probability convenient sampling * Appropriate variable selected \& defined; yes * State study design; randomized trail
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: task specific training | Experimental | Other: Task specific TrainingGroup A will receive a basic protocol of 40 minutes involving 10 minutes of warm up 10 10 mins of task-specific training and 10 mins of leg strength exercises and 10 mins of cool-down exercises. |
| Group B specific Yoga poses | Experimental | Other: Specific Yoga PosesFor group B, a series of yoga poses will be applied. Each training session consists of a 10-minute warm-up, 20 minutes of yoga exercises, and a 10-minute cool-down. |
| Group C Task specific with perturbation | Experimental | Other: Tasl specific Training with perturbationGroup C will be 40 minutes involving 10 minutes warm up 10 mins of task-specific training involving perturbation and 10 mins of leg strength exercises involving perturbation and 10 mins of cool-down exercises. |
| Group D Specific yoga Poses with Perturbation | Experimental | Other: Specific yoga poses with perturbationGroup D training session consists of a 10-minute warm-up, 20 minutes of yoga exercises with perturbation, and a 10-minute cool-down |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age above 60
- Males and females with regular medical follow-up, physically autonomous but not doing regular physical activity.
- FRAT Score below 15
- Elders having difficulty in executive function (MMSE score more than 25¬).
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- • Elderly people confined to bed, using wheelchairs, or unable to walk
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Task specific TrainingGroup A will receive a basic protocol of 40 minutes involving 10 minutes of warm up 10 10 mins of task-specific training 10 mins of leg strength exercises and 10 mins of cool-down exercises. | Other | Group A: task specific training |
| Specific Yoga PosesFor group B, a series of yoga poses will be applied. Each training session consists of a 10-minute warm-up, 20 minutes of yoga exercises, and a 10-minute cool-down. | Other | Group B specific Yoga poses |
| Tasl specific Training with perturbationGGroup C will be 40 minutes involving 10 minutes of warm-up 10 minutes of task-specific training involving perturbation 10 mins of leg strength exercises involving perturbation and 10 mins of cool-down exercises. | Other | Group C Task specific with perturbation |
| Specific yoga poses with perturbationGroup D training session consists of a 10-minute warm-up, 20 minutes of yoga exercises with perturbation, and a 10-minute cool-down | Other | Group D Specific yoga Poses with Perturbation |
Primary outcome
Manual Release from Lean (MRFL) Test:
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, an average of 3 months
This methodology assesses balance recovery using MFRL and CRFL-inspired tests. Participants wear a safety harness and stand on a standardized foot placement template (17cm heel distance, 14° angle). Trained personnel and a cushioned mat ensure safety. The test involves a controlled forward lean (≤15°) with sudden release by an administrator. A practice trial familiarizes participants before three test trials. Balance recovery is assessed qualitatively (e.g., stepping, arm use) and quantitatively (distance covered, time). Core muscles, including glutes, hamstrings, and abdominals, stabilize movement. Safety measures include verbal cues, secure harness checks, and moderate perturbations.
Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest)
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, an average of 3 months
The Mini-BESTest is a clinical tool assessing dynamic balance and postural control in individuals with neurological conditions, older adults, and those recovering from injuries. It consists of 14 items across four categories: Anticipatory Postural Adjustments, Reactive Postural Control, Sensory Orientation, and Dynamic Gait. Each item is scored from 0-2, with a maximum score of 28; ≤19 indicates a high fall risk. The test is more sensitive than traditional balance assessments and helps guide rehabilitation by identifying specific impairments and tracking progress. It is widely used in neurology, geriatrics, and rehabilitation for fall prevention and treatment planning.
Manual Muscle Testing (MMT):
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, an average of 3 months
Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) is a clinical assessment used to evaluate muscle strength and function by applying resistance against a patient's voluntary movement. It helps diagnose neuromuscular conditions, monitor progress, and guide rehabilitation. MMT grades muscle strength on a 0-5 scale: 0 (no contraction), 1 (visible contraction, no movement), 2 (movement without gravity), 3 (movement against gravity), 4 (movement against moderate resistance), and 5 (normal strength). Testing involves positioning the patient, stabilizing the joint, and applying resistance while observing for compensatory movements. MMT is widely used in physical therapy, neurology, and sports medicine to assess muscular imbalances, nerve injuries, and overall functional capacity. Though subjective, when combined with functional tests and dynamometry, it provides valuable insight into muscle performance, aiding in treatment planning and progress tracking for various musculoskeletal and neurological conditions.
30- secs sit to stand test
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, an average of 3 months
The 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test (30s STS) assesses lower body strength, endurance, and balance, especially in older adults and those with mobility impairments. Participants repeatedly stand from a sturdy chair for 30 seconds, with total repetitions recorded. It evaluates leg strength and functional power, essential for daily activities and fall prevention. Scores ≤12 indicate increased fall risk. Key muscles involved include the quadriceps, gluteus maximus, hamstrings, calves, and core. The test is widely used in clinical and research settings to track rehabilitation progress and guide fall prevention strategies. Its simplicity makes it a reliable tool for identifying mobility decline and designing targeted interventions.
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, an average of 3 months
used For mental status and cognitive function The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function; a score of 24 or higher is generally considered normal, while scores below 24 may suggest cognitive impairment. Here's a more detailed breakdown of the scoring guide and what the scores mean: Scoring: Maximum Score: 30 Normal: 24 or higher Mild Cognitive Impairment: 18-23 Moderate Cognitive Impairment: 10-17 Severe Cognitive Impairment: 0-9 <23 is generally accepted as indicating cognitive impairment Areas Assessed: The MMSE assesses five key areas of cognitive function: Orientation: (Time and Place) Registration: (Repeating named prompts) Attention and Calculation: (Serial sevens or spelling "world" backward) Recall: (Registration recall) Language: (Naming a pencil and a watch)
3 secondary outcomes
World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version ( WHOQOL-BREF )
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, an average of 3 months
The Barthel Scale/Index (BI)
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, at an average of 3 months
Mini Stroop test
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, at an average of 3 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cognitive Functioning of Healthy Individuals
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Outdoor vs. Indoor Exercises and Cognitive Functions in Older Adults
Exercise Environment and Cognitive Performance in Older Adults
RecruitingObservational study
Health Literacy, Physical and Cognitive Function, Health-related Behaviors, and Quality of Life in COPD
COPD, Health Literacy
Recruiting
Computerized Cognitive Training in Healthy Older Adults and Mild Cognitive Impairment
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Healthy Aging
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Retrospective Analysis of CPET and Cognitive Tests of Healthy Individuals, Treated With 60 Treatment of HBOT
Hyperbaric Oxygenation, Cardiorespiratory Fitness
RecruitingObservational study
Neural Bases of Social Cognitive Processing in Healthy Individuals
Healthy Volunteers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Saima Gul Associate Professor, PhD principal investigator
Shifa Tammer e Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Task specific Training, Specific Yoga Poses and Tasl specific Training with perturbation in people with Cognitive Functioning of Healthy Individuals and Balance, run by Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Manual Release from Lean (MRFL) Test: (time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at baseline as a pre-intervention procedure. 2nd time point will be 'immediately after the six-week intervention.' Third time point will be 'through study completion, an average of 3 months). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2025.