BacteremiaNCT06874920
Outcomes of Empiric Antibiotic Therapy Based on Hospital Antibiograms in Organ Transplant Recipients with Bacteraemia
An observational study of Bacteremia and Transplant Recipient, run by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The purpose of this observational study is to examine how using the hospital cumulative antibiogram to guide empirical antibiotic therapy affects outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections who have undergone solid organ transplants. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bacteremia, Transplant Recipient
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 3 Dec 2024to 1 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Solid organ transplant recipients with bloodstream infections.
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Being SOT
- Monomicrobial bloodstream infection due to Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella other-than pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, and Streptococcus spp.
- Hospitalization in Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Policlinico of Milano from 2015 to 2023.
Who cannot join
- Antibiotic therapy administration outside 48h before-after blood culture collection.
- Polymicrobial bloodstream infections.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Outcomes of Empiric Antibiotic Treatment Based on Hospital Cumulative Antibiograms in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients with Bacteraemia: a Retrospective Single-centre Study (OPTIMIST Study)
The purpose of this observational study is to examine how using the hospital cumulative antibiogram to guide empirical antibiotic therapy affects outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections who have undergone solid organ transplants. The key question is: does the use of a hospital cumulative antibiogram reduce mortality and improve outcomes in these patients?
Read the detailed description
Sepsis is a critical condition responsible for more than 750,000 hospitalisations and 200,000 deaths annually in the US. Severe sepsis remains a leading cause of death worldwide, with in-hospital mortality ranging from 12% to 26% in the US. An early and appropriate antimicrobial therapy in sepsis leads to a decreased progression to septic shock and death. However, physicians are often unaware of microbiological results when confronting sepsis; moreover, adopting a broad spectrum antibiotic therapy can lead to multiple adverse events. Therefore, a good balance between antibiotic efficacy and the consequence of indiscriminate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics is necessary, particularly for immunocompromised individuals at a higher risk of severe sepsis. Different studies have addressed choosing adequate empiric antibiotic in sepsis: multivariable models using readily available epidemiologic factors to predict antimicrobial susceptibility and clinical decision tree to estimate multi-drug resistance (MDR) infections have been developed to help clinicians. Moreover, hospital cumulative antibiograms have been created to identify the most common sensitivity profile for every bacterium.
In this study we will analyse the potential role of hospital cumulative antibiograms in the outcome of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with bacteraemia. In particular, the primary objective of the study is to assess the 15-days mortality of SOT recipients with bacteraemia according to the treatment administered referred to overall antimicrobial susceptibility (OAS), while the secondary objectives of the study are to assess the 30-days mortality, the in-hospital mortality, the length of in-hospital, the ICU admission, and the length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay in these patients. Moreover, we will also assess the frequency of empiric therapy change at antibiogram availability, and we will describe the reasons for empiric therapy change.
We will conduct a retrospective single-centre cohort study to investigate the effect of empiric antibiotic treatment according to OAS on outcomes of the target population composed by SOT recipients transplanted in our Centre who were hospitalized at Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Policlinico of Milano from 01/01/2015 to 31/12/2023 and developed monomicrobial bloodstream infection (BSI) due to Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella other-than pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, and Streptococcus spp.
Patients will be divided into two groups according to the overall antimicrobial susceptibility of the empiric antibiotic therapy prescribed based on hospital cumulative antibiograms:
- Patients who have been prescribed an empiric therapy with OAS < 90%;
- Patients who have been prescribed an empiric therapy with OAS ≥ 90%. Hospital cumulative antibiograms of the years included in the study are already available for the following temporal periods: 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023. OAS is defined as the ratio of strains of a pathogen which are sensitive to an antibiotic regimen referred to all the strain of this pathogen identified.
- Conditions
- Bacteremia, Transplant Recipient
- Being tested
- No intervention (observational study)
- Keywords
- Hospital cumulative antibiogram, Solid organ transplant, Bloodstream infections
- Medical subject headings
- Bacteremia, Sepsis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
No intervention (observational study)Other
No intervention (observational study)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients who was prescribed an empiric antibiotic therapy with OAS < 90% | Not described Receives: Other: No intervention (observational study) | |
| Patients who was prescribed an empiric antibiotic therapy with OAS ≥ 90% | Not described Receives: Other: No intervention (observational study) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
15-days mortality
Measured: 15 days from bloodstream infection
Secondary outcomes (7)
30-days mortality
Measured: 30 days from bloodstream infection
In-hospital mortality
From bloodstream infection to hospital discharge
Measured: Up to 24 weeks
Lenght of hospital stay
From hospital admission to hospital discharge
Measured: Up to 24 weeks
ICU admission
From bloodstream infection to hospital discharge
Measured: Up to 24 weeks
Lenght of ICU stay
From ICU admission to ICU discharge
Measured: Up to 24 weeks
Frequency of empiric therapy change at antibiogram availability
From empiric antibiotic therapy prescription to targeted antibiotic therapy prescription
Measured: Up to five days
Reason for empiric antibiotic change
Change from empiric to targeted antibiotic therapy
Measured: From empiric antibiotic therapy prescription to targeted antibiotic therapy prescription at 5 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Mar 2025
- Study start3 Dec 2024
- Primary completion1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for BacteremiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andrea Lombardi, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06874920
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 5392_20.11.2024_P_bis
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Outcomes of Empiric Antibiotic Treatment Based on Hospital Cumulative Antibiograms in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients with Bacteraemia: a Retrospective Single-centre Study (OPTIMIST Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06874920
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 5392_20.11.2024_P_bis
- Conditions
- Bacteremia, Transplant Recipient
- Keywords
- Hospital cumulative antibiogram, Solid organ transplant, Bloodstream infections
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this observational study is to examine how using the hospital cumulative antibiogram to guide empirical antibiotic therapy affects outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections who have undergone solid organ transplants. The key question is: does the use of a hospital cumulative antibiogram reduce mortality and improve outcomes in these patients?
Detailed description
Sepsis is a critical condition responsible for more than 750,000 hospitalisations and 200,000 deaths annually in the US. Severe sepsis remains a leading cause of death worldwide, with in-hospital mortality ranging from 12% to 26% in the US. An early and appropriate antimicrobial therapy in sepsis leads to a decreased progression to septic shock and death. However, physicians are often unaware of microbiological results when confronting sepsis; moreover, adopting a broad spectrum antibiotic therapy can lead to multiple adverse events. Therefore, a good balance between antibiotic efficacy and the consequence of indiscriminate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics is necessary, particularly for immunocompromised individuals at a higher risk of severe sepsis. Different studies have addressed choosing adequate empiric antibiotic in sepsis: multivariable models using readily available epidemiologic factors to predict antimicrobial susceptibility and clinical decision tree to estimate multi-drug resistance (MDR) infections have been developed to help clinicians. Moreover, hospital cumulative antibiograms have been created to identify the most common sensitivity profile for every bacterium.
In this study we will analyse the potential role of hospital cumulative antibiograms in the outcome of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with bacteraemia. In particular, the primary objective of the study is to assess the 15-days mortality of SOT recipients with bacteraemia according to the treatment administered referred to overall antimicrobial susceptibility (OAS), while the secondary objectives of the study are to assess the 30-days mortality, the in-hospital mortality, the length of in-hospital, the ICU admission, and the length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay in these patients. Moreover, we will also assess the frequency of empiric therapy change at antibiogram availability, and we will describe the reasons for empiric therapy change.
We will conduct a retrospective single-centre cohort study to investigate the effect of empiric antibiotic treatment according to OAS on outcomes of the target population composed by SOT recipients transplanted in our Centre who were hospitalized at Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Policlinico of Milano from 01/01/2015 to 31/12/2023 and developed monomicrobial bloodstream infection (BSI) due to Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella other-than pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, and Streptococcus spp.
Patients will be divided into two groups according to the overall antimicrobial susceptibility of the empiric antibiotic therapy prescribed based on hospital cumulative antibiograms:
- Patients who have been prescribed an empiric therapy with OAS < 90%;
- Patients who have been prescribed an empiric therapy with OAS ≥ 90%. Hospital cumulative antibiograms of the years included in the study are already available for the following temporal periods: 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023. OAS is defined as the ratio of strains of a pathogen which are sensitive to an antibiotic regimen referred to all the strain of this pathogen identified.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients who was prescribed an empiric antibiotic therapy with OAS < 90% | – | Other: No intervention (observational study) |
| Patients who was prescribed an empiric antibiotic therapy with OAS ≥ 90% | – | Other: No intervention (observational study) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Solid organ transplant recipients with bloodstream infections.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Being SOT
- Monomicrobial bloodstream infection due to Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella other-than pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, and Streptococcus spp.
- Hospitalization in Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Policlinico of Milano from 2015 to 2023.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Antibiotic therapy administration outside 48h before-after blood culture collection.
- Polymicrobial bloodstream infections.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| No intervention (observational study)No intervention (observational study) | Other | Patients who was prescribed an empiric antibiotic therapy with OAS < 90%, Patients who was prescribed an empiric antibiotic therapy with OAS ≥ 90% |
Primary outcome
15-days mortality
Time frame: 15 days from bloodstream infection
7 secondary outcomes
30-days mortality
Time frame: 30 days from bloodstream infection
In-hospital mortality
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Lenght of hospital stay
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
ICU admission
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Lenght of ICU stay
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Frequency of empiric therapy change at antibiogram availability
Time frame: Up to five days
Reason for empiric antibiotic change
Time frame: From empiric antibiotic therapy prescription to targeted antibiotic therapy prescription at 5 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Mar 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Bacteremia
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Nasal Intracellular Reservoir of Staphylococcus Aureus in Patients With S. Aureus Bacteremia
Bacteria Infection Mechanism
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Oral Switch in Bloodstream Infections in Immunocompromised Children
Bloodstream Infection, Bloodstream Infection Due to Central Venous Catheter
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of an AI-Assisted Tool for CLABSI Surveillance at VA Medical Centers
Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI), Bacteremia
RecruitingPhase 2
Combination Cefazolin With Ertapenem for Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia, Staphylococcus Aureus Septicemia
RecruitingObservational study
Middle East Study of Infections in Patients With Hematological Malignancies
Hematological Malignancy, Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bacteremia and Transplant Recipient, run by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
15-days mortality (time frame: 15 days from bloodstream infection). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2025.