AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ALLPhase 1/2NCT06865352

Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Donor-derived Anti-leukemia Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes for the Prevention of Leukemia Relapse in Children Given Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

A Phase 1/2 study testing HSCT donor leukemia-specific cytotoxic T-cells in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ALL and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), run by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The prognosis for children affected by acute leukemia and transplanted in an advanced disease stage, in the presence of MRD or with unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities, is still poor. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 month to 18 years
What is being tested?
HSCT donor leukemia-specific cytotoxic T-cells
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
15 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
13 Feb 2021to 30 Jan 2025
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 month to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≤ 18 years and ≥ 1 months
  2. Life expectancy > 12 weeks
  3. Patients affected by life-threatening acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with high risk of relapse after HSCT, namely: Patients affected by ALL:
  • in first morphological remission but with a positive minimal residual disease ≥ 1 x 10-3 before HSCT;
  • in second morphological remission after a high-risk relapse (patients belonging to the S3-S4 BFM risk group), independently of the level of minimal residual disease;
  • in second morphological remission with any positivity of minimal residual disease before HSCT;
  • in third or subsequent morphological remission, independently of the level of minimal residual disease;
  • patients not in morphological remission at time of HSCT. Patients affected by AML:
  • in first morphological remission and with a flow cytometry MRD at the end of induction therapy ≥ 0.1%;
  • in first morphological remission and with high-risk disease according to cytogenetics aberrations;
  • in first morphological remission after a primary induction failure;
  • in second morphological remission;
  • in third or subsequent morphological remission;
  • patients not in morphological remission at time of HSCT.
  1. Pre-HSCT Lansky / Karnofsky score ≥ 40%.
  2. HIV negativity.
  3. Written informed consent signed by the parents or legal guardians (in case of patients < 18 years) or by the patients (in the case of patients = 18 years).

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Ongoing active ≥ grade II acute GvHD or chronic extensive GvHD due to a previous allograft
  2. Current clinically active infectious disease (including positive HIV serology or viral RNA)
  3. Severe cardiovascular disease (arrhythmias requiring chronic treatment, congestive heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction <40%)
  4. Liver dysfunction (AST/ALT ≥ 3 times institutional upper limit normal value -ULN- or bilirubine > 3 times ULN)
  5. Renal dysfunction: serum creatinine > 1.5 times ULN or calculated creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2
  6. End stage irreversible multi-system organ failure.
  7. Other active malignancy.
  8. Pregnant or breast feeding female patient
  9. Lack of parents'/guardian's written informed consent for minors or lack of written informed consent for patients aged 18 y.

Donor inclusion criteria:

Eligible donors are the HSCT donors, i.e. HLA-haploidentical relative, including but not limited to biological parents, siblings, or half-siblings. Matching will be determined by class I and class II DNA typing.

  1. Age between 18 and 65 years.
  2. The donor should be sufficiently healthy not to be at increased risk from the leukapheresis procedure.
  3. Donors must meet the selection criteria as defined by the European Directive 2006/17/CE) and according to the FACT-JACIE International Standards and local regulations for donor selection.
  4. Donor must have adequate peripheral venous access for leukapheresis or must agree to placement of a central venous catheter.
  5. Signed informed consent.

Donor exclusion criteria:

  1. Evidence of active infection (including urinary tract infection, or upper respiratory tract infection) or viral hepatitis exposure (on screening), unless HBs Ab+ and HBV DNA negative.
  2. Factors which place the donor at increased risk for complications from leukapheresis (e.g. autoimmune disease, symptomatic sickle cell trait, symptomatic coronary artery disease requiring therapy, previous thrombotic events).
  3. Pregnancy or breastfeeding female donor.
  4. Lack of written informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, SC Ematologia 2 - Oncoematologia Pediatrica

    Pavia, Pavia, 27100

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial on the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Donor-derived Anti-leukemia Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes for the Prevention of Leukemia Relapse in Children Given Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The prognosis for children affected by acute leukemia and transplanted in an advanced disease stage, in the presence of MRD or with unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities, is still poor. Optimizing post-transplant management to maintain durable remission represents the greatest challenge to improve the outcome of pediatric patients with acute leukemia given an allogeneic HSCT.

The pivotal therapeutic role of immunity against acute leukemia has been highlighted by the immunological effect of donor T cells (GVL) observed following allogeneic HSCT, which is considered the only curative strategy for this type of cancer. Moreover, circulating leukemia-specific CTLs have been detected in patients with different forms of acute leukemia, and the presence of these specific T-cell responses in peripheral blood and bone marrow samples of leukemic patients has been associated with improved disease control and longer survival. This body of data suggests that immunological interventions could have an effect in preventing relapse and improving transplant outcome.

Read more

Unmanipulated donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is used after stem cell transplantation to treat and prevent relapse, to prevent infections and to establish full donor chimerism. However, an expected side effect of the presence of mature T cells is the potential occurrence of acute GvHD. Evidence has emerged that escalating DLI has achieved higher clinical response rates with lower GvHD occurrence. Optimization of DLI dose and schedule as well as strategies of donor T-cell manipulation may lead to the consistent ability to separate GvHD from GvL activity and improve the safety of DLI treatment. One way to manipulate donor lymphocytes to reduce GVHD is leukemia antigen stimulation, in order to increase antileukemia activity while reducing the number of alloreactive T cells by specific culture.

The aim of this study is to enhance the GVL effect, and reduce the rate of post-transplant relapse, with preventive post-HSCT infusions of donor anti-leukemia CTLs specifically directed to patient's leukemic blasts. The leukemia-reactive CTLs obtained by stimulation with patients' leukemia blasts are specific for each individual blast signature, and, due to their physiological recognition and effector mechanism through their natural T cell receptor, exert leukemia-specific killing with less severe adverse reactions than CAR-T cells. Moreover, due to their potential to recognize multiple leukemia-associated antigens present on the blast surface, they should be less prone to immune evasion strategies exerted by leukemic stem cells. Additionally, the risk of GVHD should be reduced by the culture procedure, which decreases the number of alloreactive T cells. For the reasons stated, the use of these T cells after HSCT in a highly personalized approach may be a safer and more efficient option than unmanipulated donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) to prevent leukemia relapse after HSCT.

Being tested
HSCT donor leukemia-specific cytotoxic T-cells
Medical subject headings
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HSCT donor leukemia-specific cytotoxic T-cellsBiological

    donor T-cells stimulated with patient leukemia blasts

Study groups in NCT06865352
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients cohortExperimentalsingle-arm study: patients receive leukemia-specific CTLs
Receives: Biological: HSCT donor leukemia-specific cytotoxic T-cells

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Safety evaluated as the incidence of acute GVHD

    Acute GVHD will be diagnosed and graded according to the NIH criteria. Grade II-IV acute GVHD will be expressedas cumulative incidence (CI) considering disease relapse and death in remission without GVHD as competing events. A CI of acute GVHD ≤ 25% will be considered as acceptable treatment toxicity.

    Measured: during the study and end of study

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Relapse (REL)

    REL, defined as the time from HSCT to the date of disease relapse will be expressed as cumulative incidence (CI) considering death in remission as a competing event. The CI of REL in treated patients will be compared with that of recipients of haplo-HSCT with the same disease characteristics and prognosis, give conventional infusions of unmanipulated, donor-derived T lymphocytes (DLI). Preliminary efficacy of the treatment will be a CI of REL ≤ of the CI of REL observed in the control group.

    Measured: Relapse will be calculated at 3, 6, 9, 12 18 and 24 months after HSCT

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Mar 2025
  2. Study start13 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion30 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
15 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06865352
Sponsor's protocol ID
Leuk-CTL-001
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
28 Feb 2025
Last updated
7 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Montagna D, Comoli P, Tanzi M, Montini E, Moretta A, Taurino G, Boghen S, Panigari A, Mina T, Giorgiani G, Del Fante C, Perotti C, Zecca M. Phase I/II clinical trial on the safety and preliminary efficacy of donor-derived anti-leukemia cytotoxic T lymphocytes for the prevention of leukemia relapse in children given haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: study rational and design. Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 6;16:1601961. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1601961. eCollection 2025.

    PubMed 40547030

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing HSCT donor leukemia-specific cytotoxic T-cells in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ALL and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), run by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Safety evaluated as the incidence of acute GVHD (time frame: during the study and end of study). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06865352, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in