Geographic AtrophyNCT06860568
The GA in HSI Study
An observational study of Geographic Atrophy and Healthy, run by Optina Diagnostics Inc. at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This study used a retrospective dataset collected by Optina under different study protocols. The target study population will include adults over the age of 50 years, with and without the presence of AMD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Geographic Atrophy, Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Retrospective Study
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 24 Dec 2024to 18 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: This study will use a retrospective dataset collected by Optina under different study protocols. The target study population will include adults over the age of 50 years, with and without the presence of AMD.
Who may be able to join
- Participants may enter the study only if ALL the following inclusion criteria are present:
- Study participants over the age of 50 years who consented to participate in Optina studies CIP-22-003, CIP-22-004, DOC100463, or RWD-24-011.
- MHRC H5 Image Cube has been reviewed by an Optina Analyst and identified as aligned with the Target Population (see Section 5.2).
- MHRC H5 Image Cube has a corresponding OCT image.
Who cannot join
- No exclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Annotation of Geographic Atrophy in Hyperspectral Images Captured With the Optina-4C™
This study used a retrospective dataset collected by Optina under different study protocols. The target study population will include adults over the age of 50 years, with and without the presence of AMD.
Read the detailed description
This retrospective, case-control study used the clinical data previously collected by Optina (CIP 22-003 AND Study, CIP 22-004 CAS Training Study and RWD 24-011 RWD Study). As such, no new participants were enrolled for this study. The review and annotation of the MHRC H5 Images for GA are within the scope of each of these studies and the study participants have provided their Informed Consent for use of their retinal scans to assess clinical diagnostic applications. Images from the above-mentioned studies that met the inclusion criteria (there were no exclusion criteria) were classified into 3 different cohorts per the selection process described in the Study Protocol. Each cohort required a minimum of 10 MHRC Images from unique eyes with matched OCT scans.
- Cohort A: Eyes of patients with a diagnosis of dry AMD with GA lesions:
- This cohort included patients with intermediate-or late-stage dry AMD where GA lesions are present, based on either the diagnostic information provided by the clinic, or by visible assessment of either the HSI or OCT images performed by the Optina Analyst.
- Cohort B: Eyes of patients with diagnosis of dry AMD without the presence of GA lesions
- This cohort included patients with early or intermediate dry AMD where GA lesions are not present, based on either the diagnostic information provided by the clinic, or by visible assessment of either the HSI or OCT images performed by the Optina Analyst.
- Cohort C: Eyes of age-matched healthy patients (no AMD or GA lesions)
- This cohort included patients with healthy retinas, based on either the diagnostic information provided by the clinic, or by visible assessment of either the HSI or OCT images performed by the Optina Analyst. Knowledge Transfer and Training Optina facilitated a Knowledge Transfer and Training session by the IOI for CapeStart Study Personnel.
CapeStart Study Personnel were trained in using Optivizon Viewing Software, the viewing software included in the marketed version of Optina-4C (MHRC device), and the Optina Segmentation tool.
Additionally, they were trained in the presentation of GA in HSI Images. Evaluation Phase CapeStart were provided with the Test Dataset of eye scans (n=40 eyes). CapeStart Optometristsreviewed all the HSI Images from the Optina-4C in Optivizon, annotated any GA lesions (if present) in the RelSpec@560 image using the Optina Segmentation tool, and completed the HSI Questionnaire for the MHRC H5 Images. Annotation Process The HSI RelSpec@560 Images were annotated by the CapeStart Optometrists for the Evaluation Phase.
The annotations were completed using the validated Optina Segmentation Tool per the User Manual, and all image annotations were performed on the Virtual Machine established and validated by Optina for this study.
If the eye was considered to have at least one GA lesion after viewing the MHRC H5 Images in Optivizon, the RelSpec@560 Image was annotated using the Optina Segmentation Tool. The annotator used the yellow label for high confidence level for GA visualization and Blue label for low confidence level.
Reference Data The IOI was responsible for generating the reference data. The IOI reviewed all OCT images as well as the MHRC H5 Images, then annotated the RelSpec@560 images. The IOI visual assessment made note of all cRORA (GA lesions) and iRORA (nascent GA lesion) in the OCT and aligned where possible with corresponding lesions in the HSI images. Lastly, the IOI completed the HSI Questionnaire for all annotated Relspec images.
- Conditions
- Geographic Atrophy, Healthy
- Being tested
- Retrospective Study
- Medical subject headings
- Geographic Atrophy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Retrospective StudyOther
Retrospective Study This study will use a retrospective Test Dataset of eye scans collected by Optina under different study protocols. MHRC H5 Images collected as part of Optina studies CIP-22-003, CIP-22-004, DOC100463 or RWD-24-011 will be reviewed by an Optina Data Analyst and flagged for potential match to the Target Population. Of the flagged images, 40 will be selected and allocated to the Test Dataset. All selected images must have a matching OCT image for review as part of the Reference Data. The Test Dataset will be documented in the CIP-24-015 data spreadsheet and archived in the CIP-24-015 central files.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A | Eyes of patients with a diagnosis of dry AMD with GA lesions Receives: Other: Retrospective Study | |
| Cohort B | Eyes of patients with a diagnosis of AMD without the presence of RPE disruptions Receives: Other: Retrospective Study | |
| Cohort C | Eyes of age-matched healthy patients (no AMD or GA lesions) Receives: Other: Retrospective Study |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison of the total number of Relspec images annotated for GA lesions
Comparison of the total number of Relspec images annotated for GA lesions of at least 29 pixels or larger with the total number of OCT images with identified GA lesions (cRORA) in the Test Dataset.
Measured: 45 days
Comparison of the total number of 'high certainty' GA lesions
Comparison of the total number of 'high certainty' GA lesions (Yellow label) of at least 29 pixels annotated in all Relspec images with the total number of (cRORA) identified in the OCT images in the Test Dataset.
Measured: 45 days
Comparison of the total number of GA lesions
Comparison of the total number of GA lesions (Yellow label and Dark Blue label) of at least 29 pixels or larger annotated in all Relspec images with the total number of identified GA lesions (cRORA) in the OCT images in the Test Dataset.
Measured: 45 days
Evaluation of the Global DICE Score
Evaluation of the Global DICE Score for annotations of 29 pixels or larger performed by CapeStart compared with the Reference Data.
Measured: 45 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Mar 2025
- Study start24 Dec 2024
- Primary completion18 Feb 2025
- Study completion18 Feb 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Geographic AtrophyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Optina Diagnostics Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ramina Nissan, OD, Principal investigator, The Glen Site, McGill University Health Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06860568
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIP-24-015
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Annotation of Geographic Atrophy in Hyperspectral Images Captured With the Optina-4C™
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06860568
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIP-24-015
- Conditions
- Geographic Atrophy, Healthy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Optina Diagnostics Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 24 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Feb 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study used a retrospective dataset collected by Optina under different study protocols. The target study population will include adults over the age of 50 years, with and without the presence of AMD.
Detailed description
This retrospective, case-control study used the clinical data previously collected by Optina (CIP 22-003 AND Study, CIP 22-004 CAS Training Study and RWD 24-011 RWD Study). As such, no new participants were enrolled for this study. The review and annotation of the MHRC H5 Images for GA are within the scope of each of these studies and the study participants have provided their Informed Consent for use of their retinal scans to assess clinical diagnostic applications. Images from the above-mentioned studies that met the inclusion criteria (there were no exclusion criteria) were classified into 3 different cohorts per the selection process described in the Study Protocol. Each cohort required a minimum of 10 MHRC Images from unique eyes with matched OCT scans.
- Cohort A: Eyes of patients with a diagnosis of dry AMD with GA lesions:
- This cohort included patients with intermediate-or late-stage dry AMD where GA lesions are present, based on either the diagnostic information provided by the clinic, or by visible assessment of either the HSI or OCT images performed by the Optina Analyst.
- Cohort B: Eyes of patients with diagnosis of dry AMD without the presence of GA lesions
- This cohort included patients with early or intermediate dry AMD where GA lesions are not present, based on either the diagnostic information provided by the clinic, or by visible assessment of either the HSI or OCT images performed by the Optina Analyst.
- Cohort C: Eyes of age-matched healthy patients (no AMD or GA lesions)
- This cohort included patients with healthy retinas, based on either the diagnostic information provided by the clinic, or by visible assessment of either the HSI or OCT images performed by the Optina Analyst. Knowledge Transfer and Training Optina facilitated a Knowledge Transfer and Training session by the IOI for CapeStart Study Personnel.
CapeStart Study Personnel were trained in using Optivizon Viewing Software, the viewing software included in the marketed version of Optina-4C (MHRC device), and the Optina Segmentation tool.
Additionally, they were trained in the presentation of GA in HSI Images. Evaluation Phase CapeStart were provided with the Test Dataset of eye scans (n=40 eyes). CapeStart Optometristsreviewed all the HSI Images from the Optina-4C in Optivizon, annotated any GA lesions (if present) in the RelSpec@560 image using the Optina Segmentation tool, and completed the HSI Questionnaire for the MHRC H5 Images. Annotation Process The HSI RelSpec@560 Images were annotated by the CapeStart Optometrists for the Evaluation Phase.
The annotations were completed using the validated Optina Segmentation Tool per the User Manual, and all image annotations were performed on the Virtual Machine established and validated by Optina for this study.
If the eye was considered to have at least one GA lesion after viewing the MHRC H5 Images in Optivizon, the RelSpec@560 Image was annotated using the Optina Segmentation Tool. The annotator used the yellow label for high confidence level for GA visualization and Blue label for low confidence level.
Reference Data The IOI was responsible for generating the reference data. The IOI reviewed all OCT images as well as the MHRC H5 Images, then annotated the RelSpec@560 images. The IOI visual assessment made note of all cRORA (GA lesions) and iRORA (nascent GA lesion) in the OCT and aligned where possible with corresponding lesions in the HSI images. Lastly, the IOI completed the HSI Questionnaire for all annotated Relspec images.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort A | – | Other: Retrospective StudyEyes of patients with a diagnosis of dry AMD with GA lesions |
| Cohort B | – | Other: Retrospective StudyEyes of patients with a diagnosis of AMD without the presence of RPE disruptions |
| Cohort C | – | Other: Retrospective StudyEyes of age-matched healthy patients (no AMD or GA lesions) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This study will use a retrospective dataset collected by Optina under different study protocols. The target study population will include adults over the age of 50 years, with and without the presence of AMD.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participants may enter the study only if ALL the following inclusion criteria are present:
- Study participants over the age of 50 years who consented to participate in Optina studies CIP-22-003, CIP-22-004, DOC100463, or RWD-24-011.
- MHRC H5 Image Cube has been reviewed by an Optina Analyst and identified as aligned with the Target Population (see Section 5.2).
- MHRC H5 Image Cube has a corresponding OCT image.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- No exclusion criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Retrospective StudyRetrospective Study This study will use a retrospective Test Dataset of eye scans collected by Optina under different study protocols. MHRC H5 Images collected as part of Optina studies CIP-22-003, CIP-22-004, DOC100463 or RWD-24-011 will be reviewed by an Optina Data Analyst and flagged for potential match to the Target Population. Of the flagged images, 40 will be selected and allocated to the Test Dataset. All selected images must have a matching OCT image for review as part of the Reference Data. The Test Dataset will be documented in the CIP-24-015 data spreadsheet and archived in the CIP-24-015 central files. | Other | Cohort A, Cohort B, Cohort C |
Primary outcome
Comparison of the total number of Relspec images annotated for GA lesions
Time frame: 45 days
Comparison of the total number of Relspec images annotated for GA lesions of at least 29 pixels or larger with the total number of OCT images with identified GA lesions (cRORA) in the Test Dataset.
Comparison of the total number of 'high certainty' GA lesions
Time frame: 45 days
Comparison of the total number of 'high certainty' GA lesions (Yellow label) of at least 29 pixels annotated in all Relspec images with the total number of (cRORA) identified in the OCT images in the Test Dataset.
Comparison of the total number of GA lesions
Time frame: 45 days
Comparison of the total number of GA lesions (Yellow label and Dark Blue label) of at least 29 pixels or larger annotated in all Relspec images with the total number of identified GA lesions (cRORA) in the OCT images in the Test Dataset.
Evaluation of the Global DICE Score
Time frame: 45 days
Evaluation of the Global DICE Score for annotations of 29 pixels or larger performed by CapeStart compared with the Reference Data.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2025.
Related trials for Geographic Atrophy
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of RO7965032 in Participants With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Enrolling by invitation
Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) and Microperimetry (MP) Sub-study
Geographic Atrophy
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Efficacy Study of OpRegen for Treatment of Advanced Dry-Form Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-Related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2 Efficacy and Safety Study of GAL-101, 2% Ophthalmic Solution in Non-foveal Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Non-neovascular AMD
Geographic Atrophy of the Macula
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Safety and Efficacy Study of a One-time Intravitreal Injection of SAR446597 in Participants With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration
Geographic Atrophy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ramina Nissan, OD principal investigator
The Glen Site, McGill University Health Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Geographic Atrophy and Healthy, run by Optina Diagnostics Inc. at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison of the total number of Relspec images annotated for GA lesions (time frame: 45 days). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2025.