AzTrials
AzTrials

Pregnancy RelatedHASTANCT06859177

Feasibility of Remote eCTG Monitoring Home@Hospital in Complicated Pregnancies

A study testing Remote eCTG in people with Pregnancy Related and Remote Monitoring, run by Maxima Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this single center, interventional cohort study is to evaluate the feasibility of remote electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG) monitoring in complicated pregnancies in a home@hospital setting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pregnancy Related, Remote Monitoring, Feasibility
What is being tested?
Remote eCTG
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
25 Mar 2025to Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:
  • Minimum age of 18 years old
  • Pregnant patients with a gestational age between 32+0 and 36+6 weeks and days
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Any indication for fetal monitoring at least twice per week (e.g.):
  • Pre-eclampsia (PE)
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Fetal growth restriction (FGR)
  • Preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM)
  • Absence of exclusion criteria > 24 hours after admission.
  • Oral and written informed consent is obtained.

Who cannot join

  • A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
  • An indication for intravenous medication
  • Blood pressure >160/110 A millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
  • Absent-/or reversed flow umbilical artery Doppler
  • Hemolysis Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets (HELLP) (Table 1)
  • Obstetric intervention expected <48 hours, e.g. due to:
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Non reassuring cardiotocography (CTG)
  • Active vaginal blood loss
  • Signs of abruption placentae
  • Meconium stained amniotic fluid
  • Signs of chorioamnionitis
  • Patients admitted with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis with hypotension (i.e. septic shock).
  • Insufficient knowledge of Dutch or English language
  • Insufficient comprehension of instruction Nemo Remote® or patient information
  • Fetal and/or maternal cardiac arrhythmias
  • Contraindications to abdominal patch placement (dermatologic diseases of the abdomen precluding preparation of the abdomen with abrasive paper)
  • Patients connected to an external or implanted electrical stimulator, such as Transcutaneous Electro Neuro Stimulation (TENS) and pacemaker (because of disturbance of the electrophysiological signal).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Sofie van Weelden, MSc contact

+31408888384

s.vanweelden@mmc.nl

Judith O.E.H. van Laar, MD, PHD contact

+314-8888384

gynaecologie.secr@mmc.nl

Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Maxima Medical Center

    Veldhoven, North Brabant, 5504DB

    dr. Anke M. Nieuwesteeg, +31-408889528, anke.nieuwesteeg@mmc.nl

    Judith O.E.H. van Laar, MD, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Remote Electrophysiological Cardiotocography (eCTG), Evaluation of Feasibility in (a Selected Group of) Complicated Pregnancies From 32 Until 37 Weeks Gestational Age in a Home@Hospital Setting: a Prospective Cohort Study

The objective of this single center, interventional cohort study is to evaluate the feasibility of remote electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG) monitoring in complicated pregnancies in a home@hospital setting.

The primary objective is to assess:

Read more
  • The success rate of the self-administered eCTG measurement

The secondary objective is to asses:

  • Maternal and perinatal outcomes
  • Patients wellbeing and satisfaction.
  • Healthcare professionals' (HCPs') satisfaction
  • Analysis of antenatal costs

Participants will:

  • Self-administer remote eCTG monitoring once daily during admission (or at least twice weekly at the outpatient clinic)
  • Self-measure their blood pressure, heartrate and temperature
  • Enter the measurements, symptoms and worries into an application on their telephone.
  • Answer questionnaires at 3 moments during the study, assessing their wellbeing and satisfaction of the received care and self-administered remote monitoring device.
Being tested
Remote eCTG
Keywords
feasibility, remote, complicated pregnancies, antenatal, Non invasive fetal electrocardiography (NI-fECG), electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG), high-risk pregnancies, pregnancy, maternal and fetal monitoring, monitoring, electrophysiological, non invasive, preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM), pre-eclampsia (PE), fetal growth restriction (FGR), home monitoring, remote monitoring, second trimester, self-administered, satisfaction
Medical subject headings
Pregnancy Complications, Pre-Eclampsia, Fetal Growth Retardation, Personal Satisfaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Remote eCTGDevice

    Also called NI-fECG

    Device: Remote eCTG monitoring

    A remote self-administered electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG) monitoring (using Nemo Remote®), daily in a Home@Hospital setting, or at least twice weekly at the outpatient clinic, between 32 and 37 weeks of pregnancy.

Study groups in NCT06859177
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Remote self-administered eCTG monitoring (using Nemo Remote®)ExperimentalSubjects will receive remote self-administered eCTG monitoring (using Nemo Remote®), daily in a Home@Hospital setting for 30-90 minutes, or at least twice weekly at the outpatient clinic.
Receives: Device: Remote eCTG

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of successful eCTG measurements on the first day of inclusion.

    Count of successful* self-administered eCTG measurements on the first day of inclusion in a Home@Hospital setting, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    1. Successful* eCTG measurement the first day at inclusion or; 2. Successful* following eCTG measurement that same day, repeated because of (reassuring but) insufficient interpretability. and no switch to conventional CTG based on interpretability was needed.

    *Successful eCTG including the following: 1. a minimum of 30 minutes eCTG registration; 2. an overall a maximum of 20% signal loss (minutes, seconds); 3. sufficient interpretability according to HCPs clinical interpretation, if not maximum extended until 90 minutes when reassuring but insufficient.

    Measured: On the first day of inclusion

Secondary outcomes (49)
  1. Number of eCTG measurements

    Count of eCTG measurements, measured in numbers and percentages

    Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery

  2. Number of days with eCTG measurements

    Count of days with eCTG measurements, measured in numbers and percentages.

    Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery

  3. Number of successful eCTG measurements

    Count of eCTG measurements assessed successful* at closure by healthcare professional, Success rate, qualified as yes or no measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    *Successful eCTG including the following: 1. a minimum of 30 minutes eCTG registration; 2. an overall a maximum of 20% signal loss (minutes, seconds); 3. sufficient interpretability according to HCPs clinical interpretation, if not maximum extended until 90 minutes when reassuring but insufficient.

    The amount of signal loss will be calculated based on the CTG. Signal loss is defined as minutes without registration of the fetal heart rate

    Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery

  4. Number of repeated eCTG measurements

    Count of repeated eCTG measurements the same day because of reassuring but insufficient interpretability, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery

  5. Number of switches of monitoring method from eCTG to conventional CTG monitoring, because of insufficient signal quality.

    Count of participants in which a switch is made from eCTG to CTG monitoring because of insufficient signal quality of the eCTG measurement, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery

  6. Switch from eCTG to conventional CTG because of maternal and/or fetal reason

    Count of participants in which a switch is made from eCTG to CTG monitoring because of maternal and/or fetal reason, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery

  7. Success rate of conventional CTG measurement after switch from eCTG

    Count of successful* CTG measurements after switch from eCTG based on same criteria as in eCTG monitoring, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    *Successful eCTG including the following: 1. a minimum of 30 minutes eCTG registration; 2. an overall a maximum of 20% signal loss (minutes, seconds); 3. sufficient interpretability according to HCPs clinical interpretation, if not maximum extended until 90 minutes when reassuring but insufficient.

    Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery

  8. Number of eCTG measurements prematurely closed

    Count of eCTG measurements prematurely closed by healthcare professional before complying the criteria of a successful measurement, qualified as yes of no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery

  9. Number of participants with irritation abdominal skin

    Count of patients with abdominal skin irritation, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to 12 hours after removal last abdominal eCTG patch

  10. Number of "unscheduled antenatal visits"

    Count of antenatal "unscheduled antenatal visits", qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) to time of delivery

  11. Duration of pregnancy at inclusion (days)

    Duration of pregnancy at inclusion, measured in days.

    Measured: At inclusion

  12. Maternal diagnosis at inclusion

    Maternal diagnosis at inclusion

    Measured: At inclusion

  13. Reason(s) for fetal monitoring at inclusion

    Reason(s) for fetal monitoring (at least 2 times a week), at the moment of inclusion (eg.

    pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction, preterm prelabour rupture of membranes, recurred decreased fetal movements, other reason needing monitoring at least 2 times a week)

    Measured: At inclusion

  14. Number of mothers admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

    Count of mothers admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  15. Number of maternal mortality

    Count of maternal mortality, qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentage in total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  16. Number of participants with emergency and or secondary cesarean section

    Count of participants with emergency and or secondary cesarean section, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages in total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)

  17. Number of participants diagnosed with abruptio placentae

    Count of participants diagnosed with abruptio placentae, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentage of total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)

  18. Number of participants diagnosed with eclampsia

    Count of participants diagnosed with eclampsia, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  19. Number of participants diagnosed with HELLP syndrome

    Count of participants diagnosed HELLP syndrome, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  20. Number of participants diagnosed with prolapse of the umbilical cord

    Number of participants diagnosed with prolapse of the umbilical cord, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentage of total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)

  21. Composite of maternal morbidity

    Composite score of maternal morbidity, measured in number and percentage of one or more of the following: (eg. Emergency/secondary caesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage (bloodloss >1000ml), abruptio placentae, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, prolapse umbilical cord, pulmonary- and/or deep venous thrombosis (combined), chorioamnionitis)

    Measured: Start pregnancy up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  22. Number of perinatal mortality

    Count of fetal mortality qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentage in total.

    General definition perinatal mortality: The number of fetal death past 22 completed weeks (154 days) of gestation plus the number of deaths among live-born children up to seven completed days of life).

    Measured: Inclusion up to 7 completed days of life

  23. Number of fetal mortality

    Count of fetal death, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Inclusion up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)

  24. Number of neonatal mortality

    Count of neonatal mortality, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages, after the seventh day up to 28 completed days of life.

    Measured: After the seventh day but before the 28th day of life

  25. Duration of pregnancy at childbirth (days)

    Duration of pregnancy at childbirth, measured in days.

    Measured: Start pregnancy up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)

  26. Number of neonates with involvement of a pediatrician

    Count of participants with involvement of pediatrician, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  27. Number op neonates with dysmaturity (birthweight <p3, p3-p10, <p10)

    Count of participants with dysmaturity qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Based on birth weight, measured in grammes and percentiles.

    1. Below the 3th percentile; 2. From the 3th up to the 10th percentile; 3. Below 10th percentile.

    Measured: At childbirth (maximum 42 weeks of gestation)

  28. Number of neonates with a congenital anomality

    Count of neonates with a neonatal anomality diagnosed at childbirth, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: At childbirth

  29. Number of neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE)

    Count of neonates with a HIE, diagnosed at childbirth, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  30. Number of neonates with Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS)

    Count of neonates with RDS, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  31. Number of neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS)

    Count of neonates with MAS, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  32. Number of neonates with convulsions

    Count of neonates with convulsions, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  33. Number of neonates with a Clinical Early Onset Sepsis (EOS)

    Number of neonates with a clinical EOS*, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    *Clinical early onset is defined as clinical sepsis within the first 72 hours after childbirth with > 3 days of antibiotics. Assessment from childbirth until the first 72 hours after childbirth. Or in case antibiotics later started (eg. on day 2-3) following > 3 days of antibiotics, assessment will be up to 7 days.

    Measured: Childbirth up to the first 72 hours, or up to 7 days after childbirth

  34. Number of neonates with confirmed early onset sepsis (EOS)

    Count of neonates with confirmed Early Onset Sepsis (EOS) is defined as positive cultures of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, or urine from the first 72 hours after birth, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  35. Number of neonates with an Apgar score at 5 minutes below 7

    Count of neonates with an Apgar score below at 5 minutes, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Apgar score (1-10) a higher score meaning a better outcome. An Apgar score of lower than 7 at 5 minutes after birth meaning a worse outcome and will be defined as asphyxia.

    Measured: 5 minutes after childbirth

  36. Number of neonates with an umbilical cord blood pH <7.05

    Count of neonates with an umbilical cord blood pH <7.05, meaning a severe metabolic acidosis (pH <7.05 and base deficit ≥12mmol/L), qualified as yes or no, and measured in numbers and percentages of total.

    Measured: Directly after childbirth

  37. Number of neonates with neonatal asphyxia

    Count of neonates with neonatal asphyxia, qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentages of total.

    Comprised one or more of the following:

    1. An Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes (Apgar score (1-10) a higher score meaning a better outcome);
    2. Umbilical cord blood pH <7.05 directly after childbirth;

    An Apgar score of lower than 7 at 5 minutes and/or an umbilical cord blood pH <7.05 after birth (combined) meaning a worse outcome and will be defined as asphyxia.

    Measured: Directly after childbirth up to 5 minutes after childbirth

  38. Number of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Medium Care Unit (NMCU)

    Count of neonates with admission to neonatal medium care unit, qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentages of total.

    Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks after delivery

  39. Number of neonatal morbidities (composite)

    Count of participants with fetal morbidity comprised one or more of the following, qualified as yes or no, and measured in number and percentages of total.

    Dysmaturity (below 3th percentile, between 3th and 10th percentile, below 10th percentile), congenital anomalies, Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, umbilical cord blood pH <7.05, asphyxia (Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes and/or umbilical cord pH <7.05 combined)

    Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  40. Number of neonates with at least one neonatal diagnosis (composite)

    Count of neonates with at least one neonatal diagnosis (composite), qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentages of total.

    Complying at least one of the following: (eg. intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, neonatal convulsions, neonatal sepsis (culture proven), needing antibiotics within the first 72 hours after birth, spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) necessitating surgery, surfactant treatment.

    Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  41. Number of neonates with the need for intubation and/or mechanical ventilation

    Count of neonates with the need for intubation an/or mechanical ventilation within the first 72 hours after childbirth, qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentages of total.

    Measured: Childbirth up to 72 hours after childbirth

  42. Duration admission to the Neonatal Medium Care Unit (days)

    Duration admission to neonatal medium care unit, measured in days.

    Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks after delivery

  43. Number of neonates with an admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)

    Count of neonates with the need of admission to NICU, qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentages of total.

    Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  44. Duration of admission to the NICU (neonatal intensive care unit) in days.

    Duration of admission to the NICU (neonatal intensive care unit), measured in days.

    Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery

  45. Assessment (twice) using a survey EuroQol including 5 dimensions and 5 levels (EQ5D-5L) to measure patient wellbeing, including visual analog pain scale (VAS)

    Patient wellbeing of the given monitoring method, measured using EQ5D-5L a survey:

    This assessment tool assigns a numerical value to each response level (i.e., 1 for "no problems", 5 for "extreme problems"/"unable to") and the summing of these values across the 5 items, results in a score.

    The score is then placed on a scale, which is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health one can imagine. 0 means the worst health one can imagine.

    The questionnaire is given twice to the patient during the trial. VAS: This assessment tool assigns a score between 0 and 100 - indicating their overall health will be summarized. A higher score meaning a better health.

    Measured: At inclusion and at 4 weeks post-delivery

  46. Assessment (once) using a surveys (D-QUEST) to measure patient satisfaction of the received monitoring method (device)

    Patient satisfaction of the given monitoring method (device), measured using a survey, given once to the patient during the trial.

    Questionnaire comprises 12 items that can influence the users' satisfaction of a device and the provision process with a 5-point rating system and 2 composite items with a 5-point rating system.

    Total score range from 14 to 70, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.

    5-point rating: not satisfied at all (1), displeased (2), more or less satisfied (3), satisfied (4) or very satisfied (5). Personal additional information can be given in a free description space. Patients are asked to underline the 3 most important aspects of the questionnaire.

    Measured: At discharge from the hospital, at 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) post-delivery

  47. Assessment (once) using a survey (CSQ-8) to measure patient satisfaction of the overall received care

    Client/patient satisfaction of the overall received care, measured using a survey, given once to the participants, at 4 weeks post-delivery.

    CSQ-8: comprises 8 items including scores from 1 to 4. Items 2, 4, 5, and 8 are reverse scored. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.

    Measured: At 4 weeks post-delivery

  48. Assessment (once) using a survey (D-Quest) to measure Healthcare professional (HCP) satisfaction of the given monitoring method.

    HCP satisfaction of the given monitoring method (device), measured using a survey:

    Questionnaire comprises 12 items that can influence the HCP' satisfaction of a device and the provision process with a 5-point rating system and 2 composite items with a 5-point rating system.

    Total score range from 14 to 70, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.

    5-point rating: not satisfied at all (1), displeased (2), more or less satisfied (3), satisfied (4) or very satisfied (5). Personal additional information can be given in a free description space. HCP are asked to underline the 3 most important aspects of the questionnaire.

    The D-Quest survey is based on a validated patient questionnaire and suitable for HCPs after minimal adjustments. HCP will receive the survey once, at the moment when the last participant has delivered or has reached the gestational age of 37 weeks.

    Measured: At the moment when the last participant has delivered or has reached the gestational age of 37 weeks, assessed up to 1 month.d

  49. Antenatal costs as a business case model

    To assess the costs (euro) of remote home monitoring versus in-hospital monitoring, patient journeys will be followed and costs calculated (N,n, Euro) as if they were at home using remote eCTG compared to in- hospital standard care using conventional CTG. (eg. eCTG, CTG, admission day, visits, emergency ambulance rides)

    The patient journey will not depend on participation in the HASTA study but is part of the standard care and HCP decision.

    Total of costs: mean and median (euro) and the percentage (%) of patients with at least one registered activity (% treated). In addition, a sub-analysis will be presented of participants needing hospitalization and of participants monitoring at the outpatient clinic at inclusion.

    Measured: Inclusion up to moment of start delivery (antenatal period), assessed up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Mar 2025
  2. Study start25 Mar 2025
  3. Primary completionJun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Prospective single center interventional cohort study, self-administered remote electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG) in a home@hospital setting between 32 and 37 weeks of pregnancy, patients will complete 3 questionnaires until 4 weeks after delivery, data will be collected until 6 weeks after delivery.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06859177
Sponsor's protocol ID
W24.066
Other IDs
PPS23-2-03529539, NL87858.015.24
Acronym
HASTA
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
6 Nov 2024
Last updated
26 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Study protocol, anonymous data, Informed Consent Form, general assessment and registration formulary

Publications

  • van Weelden S, Monen L, van der Hout-van der Jagt MB, van Laar JOEH. Remote electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG), evaluation of feasibility in complicated pregnancies from 32 until 37 weeks gestational age in a home@hospital setting (HASTA): A prospective cohort study protocol. PLoS One. 2026 Feb 3;21(2):e0341554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341554. eCollection 2026.

    PubMed 41632811

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Remote eCTG in people with Pregnancy Related and Remote Monitoring, run by Maxima Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sofie van Weelden, MSc (+31408888384, s.vanweelden@mmc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of successful eCTG measurements on the first day of inclusion. (time frame: On the first day of inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06859177, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in