Pregnancy RelatedHASTANCT06859177
Feasibility of Remote eCTG Monitoring Home@Hospital in Complicated Pregnancies
A study testing Remote eCTG in people with Pregnancy Related and Remote Monitoring, run by Maxima Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The objective of this single center, interventional cohort study is to evaluate the feasibility of remote electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG) monitoring in complicated pregnancies in a home@hospital setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnancy Related, Remote Monitoring, Feasibility
- What is being tested?
- Remote eCTG
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 25 Mar 2025to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:
- Minimum age of 18 years old
- Pregnant patients with a gestational age between 32+0 and 36+6 weeks and days
- Singleton pregnancy
- Any indication for fetal monitoring at least twice per week (e.g.):
- Pre-eclampsia (PE)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Fetal growth restriction (FGR)
- Preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM)
- Absence of exclusion criteria > 24 hours after admission.
- Oral and written informed consent is obtained.
Who cannot join
- A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- An indication for intravenous medication
- Blood pressure >160/110 A millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
- Absent-/or reversed flow umbilical artery Doppler
- Hemolysis Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets (HELLP) (Table 1)
- Obstetric intervention expected <48 hours, e.g. due to:
Show all 17Show fewer
- Non reassuring cardiotocography (CTG)
- Active vaginal blood loss
- Signs of abruption placentae
- Meconium stained amniotic fluid
- Signs of chorioamnionitis
- Patients admitted with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis with hypotension (i.e. septic shock).
- Insufficient knowledge of Dutch or English language
- Insufficient comprehension of instruction Nemo Remote® or patient information
- Fetal and/or maternal cardiac arrhythmias
- Contraindications to abdominal patch placement (dermatologic diseases of the abdomen precluding preparation of the abdomen with abrasive paper)
- Patients connected to an external or implanted electrical stimulator, such as Transcutaneous Electro Neuro Stimulation (TENS) and pacemaker (because of disturbance of the electrophysiological signal).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Maxima Medical Center
Veldhoven, North Brabant, 5504DB
dr. Anke M. Nieuwesteeg, +31-408889528, anke.nieuwesteeg@mmc.nl
Judith O.E.H. van Laar, MD, PhD
About this study
Official title: Remote Electrophysiological Cardiotocography (eCTG), Evaluation of Feasibility in (a Selected Group of) Complicated Pregnancies From 32 Until 37 Weeks Gestational Age in a Home@Hospital Setting: a Prospective Cohort Study
The objective of this single center, interventional cohort study is to evaluate the feasibility of remote electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG) monitoring in complicated pregnancies in a home@hospital setting.
The primary objective is to assess:
Read more
- The success rate of the self-administered eCTG measurement
The secondary objective is to asses:
- Maternal and perinatal outcomes
- Patients wellbeing and satisfaction.
- Healthcare professionals' (HCPs') satisfaction
- Analysis of antenatal costs
Participants will:
- Self-administer remote eCTG monitoring once daily during admission (or at least twice weekly at the outpatient clinic)
- Self-measure their blood pressure, heartrate and temperature
- Enter the measurements, symptoms and worries into an application on their telephone.
- Answer questionnaires at 3 moments during the study, assessing their wellbeing and satisfaction of the received care and self-administered remote monitoring device.
- Conditions
- Pregnancy Related, Remote Monitoring, Feasibility
- Being tested
- Remote eCTG
- Keywords
- feasibility, remote, complicated pregnancies, antenatal, Non invasive fetal electrocardiography (NI-fECG), electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG), high-risk pregnancies, pregnancy, maternal and fetal monitoring, monitoring, electrophysiological, non invasive, preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM), pre-eclampsia (PE), fetal growth restriction (FGR), home monitoring, remote monitoring, second trimester, self-administered, satisfaction
- Medical subject headings
- Pregnancy Complications, Pre-Eclampsia, Fetal Growth Retardation, Personal Satisfaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Remote eCTGDevice
Also called NI-fECG
Device: Remote eCTG monitoring
A remote self-administered electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG) monitoring (using Nemo Remote®), daily in a Home@Hospital setting, or at least twice weekly at the outpatient clinic, between 32 and 37 weeks of pregnancy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Remote self-administered eCTG monitoring (using Nemo Remote®) | Experimental | Subjects will receive remote self-administered eCTG monitoring (using Nemo Remote®), daily in a Home@Hospital setting for 30-90 minutes, or at least twice weekly at the outpatient clinic. Receives: Device: Remote eCTG |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of successful eCTG measurements on the first day of inclusion.
Count of successful* self-administered eCTG measurements on the first day of inclusion in a Home@Hospital setting, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
- Successful* eCTG measurement the first day at inclusion or; 2. Successful* following eCTG measurement that same day, repeated because of (reassuring but) insufficient interpretability. and no switch to conventional CTG based on interpretability was needed.
*Successful eCTG including the following: 1. a minimum of 30 minutes eCTG registration; 2. an overall a maximum of 20% signal loss (minutes, seconds); 3. sufficient interpretability according to HCPs clinical interpretation, if not maximum extended until 90 minutes when reassuring but insufficient.
Measured: On the first day of inclusion
Secondary outcomes (49)
Number of eCTG measurements
Count of eCTG measurements, measured in numbers and percentages
Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Number of days with eCTG measurements
Count of days with eCTG measurements, measured in numbers and percentages.
Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Number of successful eCTG measurements
Count of eCTG measurements assessed successful* at closure by healthcare professional, Success rate, qualified as yes or no measured in numbers and percentages of total.
*Successful eCTG including the following: 1. a minimum of 30 minutes eCTG registration; 2. an overall a maximum of 20% signal loss (minutes, seconds); 3. sufficient interpretability according to HCPs clinical interpretation, if not maximum extended until 90 minutes when reassuring but insufficient.
The amount of signal loss will be calculated based on the CTG. Signal loss is defined as minutes without registration of the fetal heart rate
Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Number of repeated eCTG measurements
Count of repeated eCTG measurements the same day because of reassuring but insufficient interpretability, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Number of switches of monitoring method from eCTG to conventional CTG monitoring, because of insufficient signal quality.
Count of participants in which a switch is made from eCTG to CTG monitoring because of insufficient signal quality of the eCTG measurement, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Switch from eCTG to conventional CTG because of maternal and/or fetal reason
Count of participants in which a switch is made from eCTG to CTG monitoring because of maternal and/or fetal reason, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Success rate of conventional CTG measurement after switch from eCTG
Count of successful* CTG measurements after switch from eCTG based on same criteria as in eCTG monitoring, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
*Successful eCTG including the following: 1. a minimum of 30 minutes eCTG registration; 2. an overall a maximum of 20% signal loss (minutes, seconds); 3. sufficient interpretability according to HCPs clinical interpretation, if not maximum extended until 90 minutes when reassuring but insufficient.
Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Number of eCTG measurements prematurely closed
Count of eCTG measurements prematurely closed by healthcare professional before complying the criteria of a successful measurement, qualified as yes of no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Number of participants with irritation abdominal skin
Count of patients with abdominal skin irritation, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Inclusion up to 12 hours after removal last abdominal eCTG patch
Number of "unscheduled antenatal visits"
Count of antenatal "unscheduled antenatal visits", qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) to time of delivery
Duration of pregnancy at inclusion (days)
Duration of pregnancy at inclusion, measured in days.
Measured: At inclusion
Maternal diagnosis at inclusion
Maternal diagnosis at inclusion
Measured: At inclusion
Reason(s) for fetal monitoring at inclusion
Reason(s) for fetal monitoring (at least 2 times a week), at the moment of inclusion (eg.
pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction, preterm prelabour rupture of membranes, recurred decreased fetal movements, other reason needing monitoring at least 2 times a week)
Measured: At inclusion
Number of mothers admitted to the Intensive Care Unit
Count of mothers admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Inclusion up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of maternal mortality
Count of maternal mortality, qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentage in total.
Measured: Inclusion up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of participants with emergency and or secondary cesarean section
Count of participants with emergency and or secondary cesarean section, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages in total.
Measured: Inclusion up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)
Number of participants diagnosed with abruptio placentae
Count of participants diagnosed with abruptio placentae, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentage of total.
Measured: Inclusion up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)
Number of participants diagnosed with eclampsia
Count of participants diagnosed with eclampsia, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Inclusion up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of participants diagnosed with HELLP syndrome
Count of participants diagnosed HELLP syndrome, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Inclusion up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of participants diagnosed with prolapse of the umbilical cord
Number of participants diagnosed with prolapse of the umbilical cord, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentage of total.
Measured: Inclusion up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)
Composite of maternal morbidity
Composite score of maternal morbidity, measured in number and percentage of one or more of the following: (eg. Emergency/secondary caesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage (bloodloss >1000ml), abruptio placentae, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, prolapse umbilical cord, pulmonary- and/or deep venous thrombosis (combined), chorioamnionitis)
Measured: Start pregnancy up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of perinatal mortality
Count of fetal mortality qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentage in total.
General definition perinatal mortality: The number of fetal death past 22 completed weeks (154 days) of gestation plus the number of deaths among live-born children up to seven completed days of life).
Measured: Inclusion up to 7 completed days of life
Number of fetal mortality
Count of fetal death, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Inclusion up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)
Number of neonatal mortality
Count of neonatal mortality, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages, after the seventh day up to 28 completed days of life.
Measured: After the seventh day but before the 28th day of life
Duration of pregnancy at childbirth (days)
Duration of pregnancy at childbirth, measured in days.
Measured: Start pregnancy up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)
Number of neonates with involvement of a pediatrician
Count of participants with involvement of pediatrician, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number op neonates with dysmaturity (birthweight <p3, p3-p10, <p10)
Count of participants with dysmaturity qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Based on birth weight, measured in grammes and percentiles.
- Below the 3th percentile; 2. From the 3th up to the 10th percentile; 3. Below 10th percentile.
Measured: At childbirth (maximum 42 weeks of gestation)
Number of neonates with a congenital anomality
Count of neonates with a neonatal anomality diagnosed at childbirth, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: At childbirth
Number of neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE)
Count of neonates with a HIE, diagnosed at childbirth, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of neonates with Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS)
Count of neonates with RDS, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS)
Count of neonates with MAS, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of neonates with convulsions
Count of neonates with convulsions, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of neonates with a Clinical Early Onset Sepsis (EOS)
Number of neonates with a clinical EOS*, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
*Clinical early onset is defined as clinical sepsis within the first 72 hours after childbirth with > 3 days of antibiotics. Assessment from childbirth until the first 72 hours after childbirth. Or in case antibiotics later started (eg. on day 2-3) following > 3 days of antibiotics, assessment will be up to 7 days.
Measured: Childbirth up to the first 72 hours, or up to 7 days after childbirth
Number of neonates with confirmed early onset sepsis (EOS)
Count of neonates with confirmed Early Onset Sepsis (EOS) is defined as positive cultures of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, or urine from the first 72 hours after birth, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of neonates with an Apgar score at 5 minutes below 7
Count of neonates with an Apgar score below at 5 minutes, qualified as yes or no, measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Apgar score (1-10) a higher score meaning a better outcome. An Apgar score of lower than 7 at 5 minutes after birth meaning a worse outcome and will be defined as asphyxia.
Measured: 5 minutes after childbirth
Number of neonates with an umbilical cord blood pH <7.05
Count of neonates with an umbilical cord blood pH <7.05, meaning a severe metabolic acidosis (pH <7.05 and base deficit ≥12mmol/L), qualified as yes or no, and measured in numbers and percentages of total.
Measured: Directly after childbirth
Number of neonates with neonatal asphyxia
Count of neonates with neonatal asphyxia, qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentages of total.
Comprised one or more of the following:
- An Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes (Apgar score (1-10) a higher score meaning a better outcome);
- Umbilical cord blood pH <7.05 directly after childbirth;
An Apgar score of lower than 7 at 5 minutes and/or an umbilical cord blood pH <7.05 after birth (combined) meaning a worse outcome and will be defined as asphyxia.
Measured: Directly after childbirth up to 5 minutes after childbirth
Number of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Medium Care Unit (NMCU)
Count of neonates with admission to neonatal medium care unit, qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentages of total.
Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks after delivery
Number of neonatal morbidities (composite)
Count of participants with fetal morbidity comprised one or more of the following, qualified as yes or no, and measured in number and percentages of total.
Dysmaturity (below 3th percentile, between 3th and 10th percentile, below 10th percentile), congenital anomalies, Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, umbilical cord blood pH <7.05, asphyxia (Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes and/or umbilical cord pH <7.05 combined)
Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of neonates with at least one neonatal diagnosis (composite)
Count of neonates with at least one neonatal diagnosis (composite), qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentages of total.
Complying at least one of the following: (eg. intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, neonatal convulsions, neonatal sepsis (culture proven), needing antibiotics within the first 72 hours after birth, spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) necessitating surgery, surfactant treatment.
Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of neonates with the need for intubation and/or mechanical ventilation
Count of neonates with the need for intubation an/or mechanical ventilation within the first 72 hours after childbirth, qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentages of total.
Measured: Childbirth up to 72 hours after childbirth
Duration admission to the Neonatal Medium Care Unit (days)
Duration admission to neonatal medium care unit, measured in days.
Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks after delivery
Number of neonates with an admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)
Count of neonates with the need of admission to NICU, qualified as yes or no, measured in number and percentages of total.
Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Duration of admission to the NICU (neonatal intensive care unit) in days.
Duration of admission to the NICU (neonatal intensive care unit), measured in days.
Measured: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Assessment (twice) using a survey EuroQol including 5 dimensions and 5 levels (EQ5D-5L) to measure patient wellbeing, including visual analog pain scale (VAS)
Patient wellbeing of the given monitoring method, measured using EQ5D-5L a survey:
This assessment tool assigns a numerical value to each response level (i.e., 1 for "no problems", 5 for "extreme problems"/"unable to") and the summing of these values across the 5 items, results in a score.
The score is then placed on a scale, which is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health one can imagine. 0 means the worst health one can imagine.
The questionnaire is given twice to the patient during the trial. VAS: This assessment tool assigns a score between 0 and 100 - indicating their overall health will be summarized. A higher score meaning a better health.
Measured: At inclusion and at 4 weeks post-delivery
Assessment (once) using a surveys (D-QUEST) to measure patient satisfaction of the received monitoring method (device)
Patient satisfaction of the given monitoring method (device), measured using a survey, given once to the patient during the trial.
Questionnaire comprises 12 items that can influence the users' satisfaction of a device and the provision process with a 5-point rating system and 2 composite items with a 5-point rating system.
Total score range from 14 to 70, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.
5-point rating: not satisfied at all (1), displeased (2), more or less satisfied (3), satisfied (4) or very satisfied (5). Personal additional information can be given in a free description space. Patients are asked to underline the 3 most important aspects of the questionnaire.
Measured: At discharge from the hospital, at 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) post-delivery
Assessment (once) using a survey (CSQ-8) to measure patient satisfaction of the overall received care
Client/patient satisfaction of the overall received care, measured using a survey, given once to the participants, at 4 weeks post-delivery.
CSQ-8: comprises 8 items including scores from 1 to 4. Items 2, 4, 5, and 8 are reverse scored. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.
Measured: At 4 weeks post-delivery
Assessment (once) using a survey (D-Quest) to measure Healthcare professional (HCP) satisfaction of the given monitoring method.
HCP satisfaction of the given monitoring method (device), measured using a survey:
Questionnaire comprises 12 items that can influence the HCP' satisfaction of a device and the provision process with a 5-point rating system and 2 composite items with a 5-point rating system.
Total score range from 14 to 70, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.
5-point rating: not satisfied at all (1), displeased (2), more or less satisfied (3), satisfied (4) or very satisfied (5). Personal additional information can be given in a free description space. HCP are asked to underline the 3 most important aspects of the questionnaire.
The D-Quest survey is based on a validated patient questionnaire and suitable for HCPs after minimal adjustments. HCP will receive the survey once, at the moment when the last participant has delivered or has reached the gestational age of 37 weeks.
Measured: At the moment when the last participant has delivered or has reached the gestational age of 37 weeks, assessed up to 1 month.d
Antenatal costs as a business case model
To assess the costs (euro) of remote home monitoring versus in-hospital monitoring, patient journeys will be followed and costs calculated (N,n, Euro) as if they were at home using remote eCTG compared to in- hospital standard care using conventional CTG. (eg. eCTG, CTG, admission day, visits, emergency ambulance rides)
The patient journey will not depend on participation in the HASTA study but is part of the standard care and HCP decision.
Total of costs: mean and median (euro) and the percentage (%) of patients with at least one registered activity (% treated). In addition, a sub-analysis will be presented of participants needing hospitalization and of participants monitoring at the outpatient clinic at inclusion.
Measured: Inclusion up to moment of start delivery (antenatal period), assessed up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Mar 2025
- Study start25 Mar 2025
- Primary completionJun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pregnancy RelatedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Prospective single center interventional cohort study, self-administered remote electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG) in a home@hospital setting between 32 and 37 weeks of pregnancy, patients will complete 3 questionnaires until 4 weeks after delivery, data will be collected until 6 weeks after delivery.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maxima Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eindhoven University of Technology
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Judith van Laar, Maxima Medical Center
- Investigators
- Judith O.E.H. van Laar, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Máxima Medical Center, Technical University of Eindhoven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06859177
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- W24.066
- Other IDs
- PPS23-2-03529539, NL87858.015.24
- Acronym
- HASTA
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 6 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 26 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Study protocol, anonymous data, Informed Consent Form, general assessment and registration formulary
Publications
van Weelden S, Monen L, van der Hout-van der Jagt MB, van Laar JOEH. Remote electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG), evaluation of feasibility in complicated pregnancies from 32 until 37 weeks gestational age in a home@hospital setting (HASTA): A prospective cohort study protocol. PLoS One. 2026 Feb 3;21(2):e0341554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341554. eCollection 2026.
PubMed 41632811
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Remote Electrophysiological Cardiotocography (eCTG), Evaluation of Feasibility in (a Selected Group of) Complicated Pregnancies From 32 Until 37 Weeks Gestational Age in a Home@Hospital Setting: a Prospective Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06859177
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HASTA / W24.066
- Conditions
- Pregnancy Related, Remote Monitoring, Feasibility
- Keywords
- feasibility, remote, complicated pregnancies, antenatal, Non invasive fetal electrocardiography (NI-fECG), electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG), high-risk pregnancies, pregnancy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Maxima Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eindhoven University of Technology
- Study start
- 25 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this single center, interventional cohort study is to evaluate the feasibility of remote electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG) monitoring in complicated pregnancies in a home@hospital setting.
The primary objective is to assess:
- The success rate of the self-administered eCTG measurement
The secondary objective is to asses:
- Maternal and perinatal outcomes
- Patients wellbeing and satisfaction.
- Healthcare professionals' (HCPs') satisfaction
- Analysis of antenatal costs
Participants will:
- Self-administer remote eCTG monitoring once daily during admission (or at least twice weekly at the outpatient clinic)
- Self-measure their blood pressure, heartrate and temperature
- Enter the measurements, symptoms and worries into an application on their telephone.
- Answer questionnaires at 3 moments during the study, assessing their wellbeing and satisfaction of the received care and self-administered remote monitoring device.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Prospective single center interventional cohort study, self-administered remote electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG) in a home@hospital setting between 32 and 37 weeks of pregnancy, patients will complete 3 questionnaires until 4 weeks after delivery, data will be collected until 6 weeks after delivery.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Remote self-administered eCTG monitoring (using Nemo Remote®) | Experimental | Device: Remote eCTGSubjects will receive remote self-administered eCTG monitoring (using Nemo Remote®), daily in a Home@Hospital setting for 30-90 minutes, or at least twice weekly at the outpatient clinic. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:
- Minimum age of 18 years old
- Pregnant patients with a gestational age between 32+0 and 36+6 weeks and days
- Singleton pregnancy
- Any indication for fetal monitoring at least twice per week (e.g.):
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- An indication for intravenous medication
- Blood pressure >160/110 A millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
- Absent-/or reversed flow umbilical artery Doppler
- Hemolysis Elevated Liver enzymes and Low Platelets (HELLP) (Table 1)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Remote eCTGAlso: NI-fECGDevice: Remote eCTG monitoring A remote self-administered electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG) monitoring (using Nemo Remote®), daily in a Home@Hospital setting, or at least twice weekly at the outpatient clinic, between 32 and 37 weeks of pregnancy. | Device | Remote self-administered eCTG monitoring (using Nemo Remote®) |
Primary outcome
Number of successful eCTG measurements on the first day of inclusion.
Time frame: On the first day of inclusion
Count of successful* self-administered eCTG measurements on the first day of inclusion in a Home@Hospital setting, measured in numbers and percentages of total. 1. Successful* eCTG measurement the first day at inclusion or; 2. Successful* following eCTG measurement that same day, repeated because of (reassuring but) insufficient interpretability. and no switch to conventional CTG based on interpretability was needed. *Successful eCTG including the following: 1. a minimum of 30 minutes eCTG registration; 2. an overall a maximum of 20% signal loss (minutes, seconds); 3. sufficient interpretability according to HCPs clinical interpretation, if not maximum extended until 90 minutes when reassuring but insufficient.
49 secondary outcomes
Number of eCTG measurements
Time frame: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Number of days with eCTG measurements
Time frame: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Number of successful eCTG measurements
Time frame: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Number of repeated eCTG measurements
Time frame: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Number of switches of monitoring method from eCTG to conventional CTG monitoring, because of insufficient signal quality.
Time frame: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Switch from eCTG to conventional CTG because of maternal and/or fetal reason
Time frame: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Success rate of conventional CTG measurement after switch from eCTG
Time frame: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Number of eCTG measurements prematurely closed
Time frame: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) up to time of delivery
Number of participants with irritation abdominal skin
Time frame: Inclusion up to 12 hours after removal last abdominal eCTG patch
Number of "unscheduled antenatal visits"
Time frame: Inclusion up to 37 weeks of gestational age or (when earlier) to time of delivery
Duration of pregnancy at inclusion (days)
Time frame: At inclusion
Maternal diagnosis at inclusion
Time frame: At inclusion
Reason(s) for fetal monitoring at inclusion
Time frame: At inclusion
Number of mothers admitted to the Intensive Care Unit
Time frame: Inclusion up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of maternal mortality
Time frame: Inclusion up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of participants with emergency and or secondary cesarean section
Time frame: Inclusion up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)
Number of participants diagnosed with abruptio placentae
Time frame: Inclusion up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)
Number of participants diagnosed with eclampsia
Time frame: Inclusion up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of participants diagnosed with HELLP syndrome
Time frame: Inclusion up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of participants diagnosed with prolapse of the umbilical cord
Time frame: Inclusion up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)
Composite of maternal morbidity
Time frame: Start pregnancy up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of perinatal mortality
Time frame: Inclusion up to 7 completed days of life
Number of fetal mortality
Time frame: Inclusion up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)
Number of neonatal mortality
Time frame: After the seventh day but before the 28th day of life
Duration of pregnancy at childbirth (days)
Time frame: Start pregnancy up to childbirth (up to maximum 42 weeks of gestation)
Number of neonates with involvement of a pediatrician
Time frame: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number op neonates with dysmaturity (birthweight <p3, p3-p10, <p10)
Time frame: At childbirth (maximum 42 weeks of gestation)
Number of neonates with a congenital anomality
Time frame: At childbirth
Number of neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE)
Time frame: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of neonates with Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS)
Time frame: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of neonates with Meconium Aspiration Syndrome (MAS)
Time frame: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of neonates with convulsions
Time frame: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of neonates with a Clinical Early Onset Sepsis (EOS)
Time frame: Childbirth up to the first 72 hours, or up to 7 days after childbirth
Number of neonates with confirmed early onset sepsis (EOS)
Time frame: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of neonates with an Apgar score at 5 minutes below 7
Time frame: 5 minutes after childbirth
Number of neonates with an umbilical cord blood pH <7.05
Time frame: Directly after childbirth
Number of neonates with neonatal asphyxia
Time frame: Directly after childbirth up to 5 minutes after childbirth
Number of neonates admitted to the Neonatal Medium Care Unit (NMCU)
Time frame: Childbirth up to 6 weeks after delivery
Number of neonatal morbidities (composite)
Time frame: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Number of neonates with at least one neonatal diagnosis (composite)
Time frame: Childbirth up to 6 weeks post-delivery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Sep 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41632811van Weelden S, Monen L, van der Hout-van der Jagt MB, van Laar JOEH. Remote electrophysiological cardiotocography (eCTG), evaluation of feasibility in complicated pregnancies from 32 until 37 weeks gestational age in a home@hospital setting (HASTA): A prospective cohort study protocol. PLoS One. 2026 Feb 3;21(2):e0341554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0341554. eCollection 2026.
- Central Committee on Human ResearchLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Study protocol, anonymous data, Informed Consent Form, general assessment and registration formulary
Related trials for Pregnancy Related
Recruiting
NightWare and Cardiovascular Health in Women With PTSD
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Cardiovascular Diseases
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Obesity-Related Indices and Albuminuria in Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Albuminuria
RecruitingObservational study
Growing Little PEAPODS Study
Premature Birth, Premature Infant
Not yet recruiting
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Methamphetamine Use Disorder During Pregnancy
Methamphetamine Use Disorder, Pregnancy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Judith O.E.H. van Laar, MD, PhD principal investigator
Máxima Medical Center, Technical University of Eindhoven
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Remote eCTG in people with Pregnancy Related and Remote Monitoring, run by Maxima Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sofie van Weelden, MSc (+31408888384, s.vanweelden@mmc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of successful eCTG measurements on the first day of inclusion. (time frame: On the first day of inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06859177, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2025.