DenturesNCT06856239
Comparison of Flexural Strength and Flexural Modulus of Conventional and Graphene-Reinforced Polymethyl Methacrylate
A study testing Graphene in people with Dentures and Denture,Complete, run by Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine at 2 sites in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Study Title: Comparison of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Conventional and Graphene-Reinforced PMMA Introduction: This in-vitro experimental study aims to compare the flexural strength and flexural modulus of conventional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and graphene-reinforced PMMA (G-PMMA) used in denture bases. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Dentures, Denture,Complete
- What is being tested?
- Graphene
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 76 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesPakistan
- Study dates
- 24 Feb 2025to 25 Jan 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Samples that are dimensionally accurate in accordance to ISO Standard 178.21
- Sample that are free from surface porosities like gaseous, granular or contraction porosities.
- Samples have uniform color and surface texture indicating proper curing.
- Samples free from crazing defects and warpage.
- Samples with no signs of distortion after thermocycling.
- Samples with homogeneously distributed graphene by visual inspection of samples.
Who cannot join
- • Samples with incorrect mixing ratio of base to catalyst.
- Samples in which the metal bar is partially exposed.
- Samples that are not fully embedded in plaster.
- Samples showing sign of contamination from foreign body during packing process.
- Samples with improper mixing of plaster shows a sign of cracks and voids surrounding the samples.
- Samples in which the flask will not properly sealed during flasking.
- Samples fractured due to thermocycling.
- Samples fractured during handling or transportation before testing.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Pakistan2 sites
Altamash institute of dental medicine
Karachi, Sindh
Altamash institute of dental medicine
Karachi
About this study
Study Title: Comparison of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Conventional and Graphene-Reinforced PMMA
Introduction:
Read more
This in-vitro experimental study aims to compare the flexural strength and flexural modulus of conventional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and graphene-reinforced PMMA (G-PMMA) used in denture bases. PMMA is widely used for dentures due to its affordability, aesthetics, and biocompatibility but has limitations such as low flexural strength and susceptibility to fracture. Graphene, a strong and flexible nanomaterial, has demonstrated potential in enhancing PMMA's mechanical properties.
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the flexural strength and flexural modulus of conventional and graphene reinforced polymethyl methacrylate
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis:
There is no difference in flexural strength and flexural modulus of graphene reinforced PMMA and conventional PMMA.
Alternative Hypothesis:
There is a difference in flexural strength and flexural modulus of graphene-reinforced PMMA and conventional PMMA.
Methodology:
- Study Design: In-vitro experimental trial
- Study SETTING:
- The study will be carried out at Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine in the department of prosthodontic, Karachi Pakistan.
- The graphene (Miraculum Graphene Private Limited,Gujrat, Ahmedabad,India) will be reduced at Karachi University's Food Science Department.
- For the formation of mold, the digital metal bar (CoCr, Eplus3D, Hangzhou China) will be fabricated by Selective laser melting (SLM) (Audental Shanghai, East-central China) at Chughtai Lab in Peshawar, Pakistan.
- The acrylic (Mr. Teeth, Royale Elite, Surrey,United Kingdom) samples will be cured by short curing cycling in the prosthodontic department at Bahria dental University, Karachi.
- The thermocycling (thermocycler, San Francisco, USA) and universal testing for flexural strength and modulus of acrylic samples will be performed at the research laboratory of Dow University of health sciences.
- Sample Size: The projected sample size for this study is 76 specimen, 38 samples per group by comparing two means in open epi software19 (version 3).The calculation was based on the result of Kaan Yerliyurt 11 study, considering the mean value of 68.16 MPa and standard deviation (SD) of 5.79 MPa for the experimental group and the mean value of 72.6 MPa and standard deviation (SD) of 7.84 MPa for the control group of flexural strength. The analysis accounts for multiple time intervals, and the significance level (α) is set at 0.05, with a power of 80%, confidence interval (CI) of 95%, a margin of error (ME) of 5%. 76 specimens (38 for conventional PMMA, 38 for G-PMMA)
- Subgroups: Each group will have thermocycled and non-thermocycled samples to assess durability.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE:
Stratified sampling followed by systematic division.
- Methodology:
- Thermocycling: 2000 cycles (5°C-55°C) simulating oral temperature variations
Data Collection:
A metal bar mold (65 mm × 10 mm × 3 mm) will be designed using Exocad CAD software and 3D-printed from CoCr material using Selective Laser Melting (SLM). After fabrication, the bar will be used to create a silicone mold, which will then be invested in dental plaster to prepare the final mold for specimen curing. Graphene oxide (GO) will be chemically reduced, purified, dried, and mixed into PMMA powder. The acrylic resin will then be packed into the mold and processed via short curing cycle (74°C for 2 hours, 100°C for 1 hour). Then all the specimen will be prepared, thermocycle and ready for flexural strength and flexural modulus.
- Data Analysis: The data will be evaluated using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS version 29, IBM, Chicago, Illinois United States). Descriptive statistics will be evaluated by mean, standard deviation, median, interquartile range of flexural strength, flexural modulus for PMMA, and GPMMA. Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to check the normality of the data distribution. For interferential statistics, Kruskal Wallis or ANOVA will be used with factors of loading force (N) and deflection (Y) between G-PMMA and conventional PMMA. Post-hoc analysis will be performed by Bonferroni or Tukey's test. In order to assess the effect of the external environment, the cofounding variable in this study will be thermocycling, which will influence the flexural strength and flexural modulus of PMMA and graphene-reinforced PMMA samples. A Chi-square or independent t-test will be used to analyze the impact of the cofounding variable, thermocycling, on flexural strength and modulus. The level of significance will be set at p < 0.05.
Rationale:
This study aims to determine whether graphene reinforcement improves the mechanical properties of PMMA, potentially leading to stronger and more fracture-resistant dentures. The findings could contribute to the development of more durable denture base materials with enhanced longevity and performance.
- Conditions
- Dentures, Denture,Complete
- Being tested
- Graphene
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GrapheneOther
The study follows an in-vitro experimental design with 76 specimens divided into two groups (conventional PMMA and G-PMMA). These samples will be further divided into two group, the one which undergo thermocycling (simulating oral temperature changes) and the other which don't undergo thermocycling. Flexural strength and modulus will be tested on all these by using a three-point bending test.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PMMA(polymethyl methacrylate) | No intervention | Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), which was invented by Dr. Walter Wright1 in 1937, and is now one of the most widely used denture base materials. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has gained popularity due to its low cost, adequate mechanical strength, acceptable aesthetics, good dimensional stability, and biocompatibility. However, it has low flexural strength, fatigue fracture, and impact strength which can lead to fracture of the prosthesis. |
| G-PMMA( Graphene-polymethyl methacrylate) | Experimental | Graphene was first invented by Novoselov et al,16 Graphene is a two dimensional (2D), monolayer sp2 hybridized carbon atoms and recognized as the thinnest material in the universe. Comparing it to other traditional nanofillers, its large surface area, tensile strength, flexibility, strong thermal and electrical conductivity, and low coefficient of thermal expansion give it a better result.17 Recent studies have discovered that graphene and its derivatives, which include graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide, have better outcomes as compared to conventional materials Receives: Other: Graphene |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Flexural strength and Flexural modulus
Outcome Measure 1: Flexural Strength (MPa) The flexural strength of the specimens will be measured using a three-point bending test on a universal testing machine (Testometric testing machine, model VB50-300, Rochdale, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom).
A load of 0N at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min will be applied. The force will be increased until the specimens fracture. The maximum force (N) applied before fracture will be recorded to calculate the flexural strength (MPa).
Outcome Measure 2: Flexural Modulus (MPa) The flexural modulus of the specimens will be tested using a universal testing machine (Testometric testing machine, model VB50-300, Rochdale, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom).
A constant load of 0N at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min will be applied. The load (N) and deflection (Y) will be recorded using WinTest software. The initial slope of the load-deflection curve (elastic region) will be used to determine flexural modulus (MPa).
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2025
- Study start24 Feb 2025
- Primary completion25 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion25 Jan 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DenturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Wajiha Zia, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine
- Investigators
- Dr.Naseer Ahmed, Bds,Fcps,PhD, Study director, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06856239
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AltamashWZ
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 19 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Di Carlo S, De Angelis F, Brauner E, Pranno N, Tassi G, Senatore M, Bossu M. Flexural strength and elastic modulus evaluation of structures made by conventional PMMA and PMMA reinforced with graphene. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 May;24(10):5201-5208. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202005_21301.
PubMed 32495852
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Flexural Strength and Flexural Modulus of Conventional and Graphene-Reinforced Polymethyl Methacrylate
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06856239
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AltamashWZ
- Conditions
- Dentures, Denture,Complete
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 76 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Altamash Institute of Dental MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 25 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Study Title: Comparison of Flexural Strength and Modulus of Conventional and Graphene-Reinforced PMMA
Introduction:
This in-vitro experimental study aims to compare the flexural strength and flexural modulus of conventional polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and graphene-reinforced PMMA (G-PMMA) used in denture bases. PMMA is widely used for dentures due to its affordability, aesthetics, and biocompatibility but has limitations such as low flexural strength and susceptibility to fracture. Graphene, a strong and flexible nanomaterial, has demonstrated potential in enhancing PMMA's mechanical properties.
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the flexural strength and flexural modulus of conventional and graphene reinforced polymethyl methacrylate
HYPOTHESIS:
Null Hypothesis:
There is no difference in flexural strength and flexural modulus of graphene reinforced PMMA and conventional PMMA.
Alternative Hypothesis:
There is a difference in flexural strength and flexural modulus of graphene-reinforced PMMA and conventional PMMA.
Methodology:
- Study Design: In-vitro experimental trial
- Study SETTING:
- The study will be carried out at Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine in the department of prosthodontic, Karachi Pakistan.
- The graphene (Miraculum Graphene Private Limited,Gujrat, Ahmedabad,India) will be reduced at Karachi University's Food Science Department.
- For the formation of mold, the digital metal bar (CoCr, Eplus3D, Hangzhou China) will be fabricated by Selective laser melting (SLM) (Audental Shanghai, East-central China) at Chughtai Lab in Peshawar, Pakistan.
- The acrylic (Mr. Teeth, Royale Elite, Surrey,United Kingdom) samples will be cured by short curing cycling in the prosthodontic department at Bahria dental University, Karachi.
- The thermocycling (thermocycler, San Francisco, USA) and universal testing for flexural strength and modulus of acrylic samples will be performed at the research laboratory of Dow University of health sciences.
- Sample Size: The projected sample size for this study is 76 specimen, 38 samples per group by comparing two means in open epi software19 (version 3).The calculation was based on the result of Kaan Yerliyurt 11 study, considering the mean value of 68.16 MPa and standard deviation (SD) of 5.79 MPa for the experimental group and the mean value of 72.6 MPa and standard deviation (SD) of 7.84 MPa for the control group of flexural strength. The analysis accounts for multiple time intervals, and the significance level (α) is set at 0.05, with a power of 80%, confidence interval (CI) of 95%, a margin of error (ME) of 5%. 76 specimens (38 for conventional PMMA, 38 for G-PMMA)
- Subgroups: Each group will have thermocycled and non-thermocycled samples to assess durability.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE:
Stratified sampling followed by systematic division.
- Methodology:
- Thermocycling: 2000 cycles (5°C-55°C) simulating oral temperature variations
Data Collection:
A metal bar mold (65 mm × 10 mm × 3 mm) will be designed using Exocad CAD software and 3D-printed from CoCr material using Selective Laser Melting (SLM). After fabrication, the bar will be used to create a silicone mold, which will then be invested in dental plaster to prepare the final mold for specimen curing. Graphene oxide (GO) will be chemically reduced, purified, dried, and mixed into PMMA powder. The acrylic resin will then be packed into the mold and processed via short curing cycle (74°C for 2 hours, 100°C for 1 hour). Then all the specimen will be prepared, thermocycle and ready for flexural strength and flexural modulus.
- Data Analysis: The data will be evaluated using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS version 29, IBM, Chicago, Illinois United States). Descriptive statistics will be evaluated by mean, standard deviation, median, interquartile range of flexural strength, flexural modulus for PMMA, and GPMMA. Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to check the normality of the data distribution. For interferential statistics, Kruskal Wallis or ANOVA will be used with factors of loading force (N) and deflection (Y) between G-PMMA and conventional PMMA. Post-hoc analysis will be performed by Bonferroni or Tukey's test. In order to assess the effect of the external environment, the cofounding variable in this study will be thermocycling, which will influence the flexural strength and flexural modulus of PMMA and graphene-reinforced PMMA samples. A Chi-square or independent t-test will be used to analyze the impact of the cofounding variable, thermocycling, on flexural strength and modulus. The level of significance will be set at p < 0.05.
Rationale:
This study aims to determine whether graphene reinforcement improves the mechanical properties of PMMA, potentially leading to stronger and more fracture-resistant dentures. The findings could contribute to the development of more durable denture base materials with enhanced longevity and performance.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PMMA(polymethyl methacrylate) | No intervention | –Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), which was invented by Dr. Walter Wright1 in 1937, and is now one of the most widely used denture base materials. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has gained popularity due to its low cost, adequate mechanical strength, acceptable aesthetics, good dimensional stability, and biocompatibility. However, it has low flexural strength, fatigue fracture, and impact strength which can lead to fracture of the prosthesis. |
| G-PMMA( Graphene-polymethyl methacrylate) | Experimental | Other: GrapheneGraphene was first invented by Novoselov et al,16 Graphene is a two dimensional (2D), monolayer sp2 hybridized carbon atoms and recognized as the thinnest material in the universe. Comparing it to other traditional nanofillers, its large surface area, tensile strength, flexibility, strong thermal and electrical conductivity, and low coefficient of thermal expansion give it a better result.17 Recent studies have discovered that graphene and its derivatives, which include graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide, have better outcomes as compared to conventional materials |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- • Samples with incorrect mixing ratio of base to catalyst.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GrapheneThe study follows an in-vitro experimental design with 76 specimens divided into two groups (conventional PMMA and G-PMMA). These samples will be further divided into two group, the one which undergo thermocycling (simulating oral temperature changes) and the other which don't undergo thermocycling. Flexural strength and modulus will be tested on all these by using a three-point bending test. | Other | G-PMMA( Graphene-polymethyl methacrylate) |
Primary outcome
Flexural strength and Flexural modulus
Time frame: 1 year
Outcome Measure 1: Flexural Strength (MPa) The flexural strength of the specimens will be measured using a three-point bending test on a universal testing machine (Testometric testing machine, model VB50-300, Rochdale, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom). A load of 0N at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min will be applied. The force will be increased until the specimens fracture. The maximum force (N) applied before fracture will be recorded to calculate the flexural strength (MPa). Outcome Measure 2: Flexural Modulus (MPa) The flexural modulus of the specimens will be tested using a universal testing machine (Testometric testing machine, model VB50-300, Rochdale, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom). A constant load of 0N at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min will be applied. The load (N) and deflection (Y) will be recorded using WinTest software. The initial slope of the load-deflection curve (elastic region) will be used to determine flexural modulus (MPa).
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Nov 2025.
- Background: PubMed 32495852Di Carlo S, De Angelis F, Brauner E, Pranno N, Tassi G, Senatore M, Bossu M. Flexural strength and elastic modulus evaluation of structures made by conventional PMMA and PMMA reinforced with graphene. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 May;24(10):5201-5208. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202005_21301.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dentures
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of a New Printable Denture Base Material
Edentulous Mouth
Recruiting
Comparison of Conventional and Face Scan in Recording the Vertical Dimension of Completely Edentulous Patients
Edentulous Complete Denture Wearers
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Digital and Conventional Clasp-retained Partial Dentures (DIGICLASP)
Partial Edentulism
Active, not recruiting
Single-implant Versus Two-implant Mandibular Overdentures
Edentulism
Not yet recruiting
Comparison Between Neutral Zone and Admixed Impression Techniques for Atrophic Mandibular Ridges
Atrophic Mandibular Ridge in Edentulous Patients
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dr.Naseer Ahmed, Bds,Fcps,PhD study director
Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Graphene in people with Dentures and Denture,Complete, run by Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine at 2 sites in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Flexural strength and Flexural modulus (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06856239, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Nov 2025.