AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV InfectionPhase 4HoTNCT06856174

Menopausal HT for Women Living With HIV (HoT)

A Phase 4 study testing Transdermal estradiol gel and Micronized Progesterone in people with HIV Infection and Menopause, run by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections at 23 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Women living with HIV have been shown to experience more frequent and severe hot flashes and night sweats (collectively known as vasomotor symptoms) as compared to women living without HIV. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 60 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
HIV Infection, Menopause
What is being tested?
Transdermal estradiol gel and Micronized Progesterone
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
105 participants
Where
23 sitesUnited States
Study dates
9 Apr 2026to 20 Sep 2027
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 60 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult
  • Living with HIV
  • Assigned female sex at birth
  • Between the ages of 40 and 60 years
  • In the late menopausal transition (perimenopause) or early postmenopause
  • Experiencing hot flashes and/or night sweats
  • Willing and able to complete a daily diary
  • Does not have medical condition that would contraindicate hormone therapy
  • Not taking medications to treat hot flashes
  • Not taking medications that cannot be combined with hormone therapy
  • Receiving antiretrovirals (HIV medication) for more than 1 year
  • Not pregnant and willing and able to use at least non-hormonal birth control to prevent pregnancy
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent after discussion with the research staff

Trial locations and contacts

23 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

ACTG ClinicalTrials.gov Coordinator contact

301-628-3348

ACTGCT.gov@dlhcorp.com

23 sites in 1 country

United States23 sites, 23 recruiting
  • The Ponce de Leon Center CRS (5802)

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30308

    Ericka Patrick, 404-616-6313, erpatri@emory.edu

    Valeria Cantos, MD

    Recruiting
  • University of Colorado Hospital CRS (6101)

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

    Nicola Haakonsen, BS, 303-724-5931, nicola.haakonsen@cuanschutz.edu

    Kristine Erlandson, MD

    Recruiting
  • 201 Johns Hopkins University CRS

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21205

    Rebecca Becker, 410-614-4036, rbecke22@jhmi.edu

    Charles Flexner, MD

    Recruiting
  • 31788 Alabama CRS

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

    Heather Logan, heatherlogan@uabmc.edu

    Sonya Heath, MD

    Recruiting
  • 101 Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) CRS

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

    Amy Sbrolla, asbrolla@mgh.harvard.edu

    Rajesh Gandhi, MD

    Recruiting
  • Brigham and Women's Hosp. ACTG CRS (107)

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

    Hannah Jordan, 617-732-4785, hcjordan@bwh.harvard.edu

    Jennifer Manne-Goehler, MD

    Recruiting
  • 3201 Chapel Hill CRS

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27516

    Erin Hoffman, erin_hoffman@med.unc.edu

    David A. Wohl, MD

    Recruiting
  • Northwestern University CRS (2701)

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

    Sherryl L Wolfe, BSN, RN, 312-695-4997, s-wolfe@northwestern.edu

    Amesika Nyaku, MD, MS

    Recruiting
  • 2401 Cincinnati CRS

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-0405

    Michelle Saemann, saemanmd@ucmail.uc.edu

    Carl Fichtenbaum, MD

    Recruiting
  • Case CRS (2501)

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

    Julie Pasternak, BSN, 216-844-2738, pasternak.julie@clevelandactu.org

    George Yendewa, MPH, TM, FACP

    Recruiting
  • Ohio State University CRS (2301)

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

    Lindsay Summers, MBA, MPH, (614) 293-8529, lindsay.summers@osumc.edu

    Carlos Malvestutto, MD, MPH, FIDSA

    Recruiting
  • 3203 Greensboro CRS

    Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401

    Kelly Phillips, Kelly.phillips@conehealth.com

    Cornelius Van Dam, MD

    Recruiting
  • Houston AIDS Research Team CRS (31473)

    Houston, Texas, 77030

    Maria Martinez, BS, 713-500-6718, maria.l.martinez@uth.tmc.edu

    Roberto Arduino, MD

    Recruiting
  • University of California, Los Angeles CARE Center CRS (601)

    Los Angeles, California, 90035

    Aleen Khodabakhshian, MD, 310-557-3798, akhodabakhshian@mednet.ucla.edu

    Kara Chew, MD, MS

    Recruiting
  • Weill Cornell Chelsea CRS (7804)

    New York, New York, 10010

    Keisha Ballentine-Cargill, DNP, MSN, BSN, 212-746-7804, keb4006@med.cornell.edu

    Kristin Marks, MD

    Recruiting
  • Columbia Physicians and Surgeons (P&S) CRS (30329)

    New York, New York, 10032

    Anyelina Cantos, 212-305-7897, ac4314@cumc.columbia.edu

    Magdalena Sobieszczyk, MD, MPH

    Recruiting
  • New Jersey Medical School Clinical Research Center CRS (31786)

    Newark, New Jersey, 07103

    Christie Lyn Costanza, MPH, BSN, RN, CCRC, 972-972-9069, costancl@njms.rutgers.edu

    Shobha Swaminathan, MD

    Recruiting
  • 6201 Penn Therapeutics CRS

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

    Jason Kirschner, jason.kirschner@pennmedicine.upenn.edu

    Pablo Tebas, MD

    Recruiting
  • Univ of Pittsburgh

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

    Stacey Edick, DMSc, 412-383-1748, edicksm2@upmc.edu

    Sharon Riddler, MD, MPH

    Recruiting
  • UCSD Antiviral Research Center CRS (701)

    San Diego, California, 92103

    Hendrickx M. Steven, BSN, 619-708-1210, smhendrickx@ucsd.edu

    Timothy Wilkin, MD, MPH

    Recruiting
  • 801 University of California, San Francisco HIV/AIDS CRS

    San Francisco, California, 94110

    Jay Dwyer, RN, 415-514-0550 ext. 354, jdwyer@php.ucsf.edu

    Annie Luetkemeyer, MD

    Recruiting
  • 2101 Washington University Therapeutics (WT) CRS

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

    Michael Klebert, RN, PhD, CANP, 314-454-0058, mklebert@im.wustl.edu

    Rachel Presti, MD, PhD

    Recruiting
  • Harbor - UCLA Med. Ctr. CRS

    Torrance, California, 90502

    Mario Guerrero, 310-222-3848, mguerrero@labiomed.org

    Eric S. Daar, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Menopausal Hormone Therapy for Women Living With HIV (HoT)

Women living with HIV have been shown to experience more frequent and severe hot flashes and night sweats (collectively known as vasomotor symptoms) as compared to women living without HIV. This correlates with disturbed sleep, increased depressive symptoms, increased anxiety, worse mental function, interference with activities of daily living including work, and worse overall quality of life.

Hormone therapy is considered to be the most effective therapy for hot flashes and night sweats and the most appropriate choice to prevent bone loss at the time of menopause for women without HIV. However, the usefulness of hormone therapy has not been specifically studied in women living with HIV.

Read more

This trial is being done to see if:

  • There is evidence to support the use of hormone therapy (estradiol with or without progesterone) for the treatment of hot flashes and night sweats in women living with HIV
  • Hormone therapy improves mental function, mood, sleep, quality of life, bone health, heart health, and inflammation in women living with HIV
  • Hormone therapy is safe and tolerable for women living with HIV
Being tested
Transdermal estradiol gel, Micronized Progesterone, Placebo for estradiol gel, Placebo for micronized progesterone
Medical subject headings
HIV Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transdermal estradiol gelDrug

    All participants: Estradiol gel 0.1%, 0.75 grams (corresponding to estradiol 0.75 mg) applied to the skin of the upper thigh once daily for 12 weeks.

  • Micronized ProgesteroneDrug

    Participants with intact uterus: Encapsulated micronized progesterone 100 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks.

  • Placebo for estradiol gelDrug

    All participants: Placebo for estradiol gel 0.1%, 0.75 grams applied to the skin of the upper thigh once daily for 12 weeks.

  • Placebo for micronized progesteroneDrug

    • Participants with intact uterus: Encapsulated placebo for micronized progesterone 100 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks.
Study groups in NCT06856174
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm A: Hormone TherapyActive comparatorPARTICIPANTS WITH INTACT UTERUS: Transdermal estradiol gel plus oral micronized progesterone daily for 12 weeks. PARTICIPANTS WITHOUT A UTERUS: Transdermal estradiol gel daily for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Transdermal estradiol gel; Drug: Micronized Progesterone
Arm B: Hormone Therapy PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPARTICIPANTS WITH INTACT UTERUS: Transdermal placebo gel plus oral encapsulated placebo pill daily for 12 weeks. PARTICIPANTS WITHOUT A UTERUS: Transdermal placebo gel alone daily for 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo for estradiol gel; Drug: Placebo for micronized progesterone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in vasomotor symptoms (VMS) frequency

    Change in self-reported mean VMS frequency per day from 5-week observation phase prior to randomization to the one-week period prior to week 12 visit following.

    Measured: From 5 weeks prior to randomization to Week 12

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Change in vasomotor symptom (VMS) severity

    Change in self-reported mean severity of VMS from 5-week observation phase prior to randomization to the one-week period prior to week 12 visit following randomization; severity scale is ordinal: none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3).

    Measured: From 5 weeks prior to randomization to week 12

  2. Change in sleep

    Change in total sleep scores from randomization visit to week 12 visit as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Total sleep score determined by summing responses from seven assessments, where each assessment is scored from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). The minimum possible total sleep score is 0 (best) and the maximum possible score is 21 (worst). Higher total scores suggest more severe sleep problems. Change in total score calculated as Week 12 minus baseline. Negative change indicates better outcomes.

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  3. Change in insomnia

    Change in total insomnia scores from randomization visit to week 12 visit as measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Total insomnia score determined by summing responses from seven assessments, each rated on a Likert 5-point scale, where 0 indicates no problems and 4 indicates severe problems. The minimum possible total insomnia score is 0 (best) and the maximum possible score is 28 (worst). Higher total scores suggest more severe insomnia problems. Change in total score calculated as Week 12 minus baseline. Negative change indicates better outcomes.

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  4. Change in quality of life

    Change in total health-related quality of life score, from randomization visit to week 12 visit as measured by Menopause specific Quality of life questionnaire (MenQOL). Total health-related quality of life score is determined by averaging responses from four domain-specific scores (vasomotor [3 items], physical [16 items], psychosocial [7 items], sexual functioning [3 items], each ranging from 1 (best) to 8 (worst)). Domain-specific scores represent the average score among the items in a domain. The score for each item, ranging from 1 (best) to 8 (worst), represents the sum of the presence of the symptom (1 for no, 2 for yes) and the severity, rated on a Likert 7-point scale (0, not bothered at all to 6, extremely bothered), The minimum possible quality of life score is 1 (best) and the maximum possible score is 8 (worst). Higher scores suggest more severe quality of life problems. Change in total score calculated as Week 12 minus baseline. Negative change indicates better outcomes.

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  5. Percentage of participants with adverse events associated with hormone therapy

    Adverse events (AE) associated with study treatment with severity grade of 3 or higher as per DAIDS Toxicity grading scale.

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  6. Percentage of participants with occurrence of abnormal vaginal bleeding

    Abnormal vaginal bleeding adverse event defined as any of the following: any report of heavy bleeding, 2 or more episodes of spotting or greater at intervals of < 21 days among participants in late menopausal transition, any occurrence after 6 weeks of hormone treatment among post-menopausal participants.

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  7. Percentage of participants with intolerance of hormone therapy

    Intolerance of hormone therapy is defined as permanent discontinuation prior to the week 12 visit that was not required per protocol nor recommended due to safety considerations.

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  8. Change in neurocognitive test results

    Change in neurocognition as measured by the neuropsychological (NP) battery from randomization visit to week 12 visit.

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  9. Change in depression symptoms

    Change in depression symptoms score from randomization visit to week 12 visit as measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Total depression score determined by summing responses from nine assessments, where each assessment is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The minimum possible total sleep score is 0 (best) and the maximum possible score is 27 (worst). Higher total scores suggest more severe depression problems. Change in total score calculated as Week 12 minus baseline. Negative change indicates better outcomes.

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  10. Change in anxiety symptoms

    Change in anxiety symptoms score from randomization visit to week 12 as measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7). Total anxiety score determined by summing responses from seven Likert assessments, where each assessment is scored from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). The minimum possible total anxiety score is 0 (best) and the maximum possible score is 21 (worst). Higher total scores suggest more severe anxiety problems. Change in total score calculated as Week 12 minus baseline. Negative change indicates better outcomes.

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  11. Change in weight

    Absolute and Percent change in total body weight from randomization visit to week 12 visit.

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  12. Change in body mass index (BMI)

    Absolute change in BMI from randomization visit to week 12 visit

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  13. Change in waist circumference

    Absolute change in minimum waist circumference from randomization visit to week 12 visit

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  14. Change in waist-to-hip ratio

    Change in waist-to-hip circumference ratio between the randomization visit and the week 12 visit

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  15. Change in sexual function

    Change in total sexual function score from randomization visit to week 12 visit as measured by the female sexual function index (FSFI). Total sexual function score is determined by summing six domain-specific scores (desire [2 items], arousal [4 items], lubrication [4 items], orgasm [3 items], satisfaction [3 items], and pain [3 items]), ranging from 0 (worst) to 6 (best). Domain-specific scores represent the sum of the scores for each item within a domain (ranging from 0 (worst) to 6 (best)), multiplied by a factor to adjust for relative weighting (0.6 for desire; 0.3 for arousal; 0.3 for lubrication; 0.4 for orgasm; 0.4 for satisfaction; and 0.4 for pain). The minimum possible sexual function score is 2 (worst) and the maximum possible score is 36 (best). Lower scores indicate worse sexual function. Change in total score calculated as Week 12 minus baseline. Positive change indicates better outcomes.

    Measured: From randomization to week 12

  16. Percentage of participants with female sexual distress

    Female sexual distress defined as, at the week 12 visit, endorsing frequently or always to question regarding how often distressed or bothered about sex life in the past 4 weeks.

    Measured: Week 12 visit

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Mar 2025
  2. Study start9 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion20 Sep 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion20 Sep 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
105 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06856174
Sponsor's protocol ID
ACTG A5424
Other IDs
UM1AI068636
Acronym
HoT
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
19 Feb 2025
Last updated
22 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data that underlie results in the publication, after deidentification.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Transdermal estradiol gel and Micronized Progesterone in people with HIV Infection and Menopause, run by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections at 23 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 23 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact ACTG ClinicalTrials.gov Coordinator (301-628-3348, ACTGCT.gov@dlhcorp.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in vasomotor symptoms (VMS) frequency (time frame: From 5 weeks prior to randomization to Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in