Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)Phase 4NCT06855615
Comparison of Thrice-Daily Premixed Human Insulin With Basal-Bolus Therapy Among Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
A Phase 4 study testing Mixtard® 30 TDS and Insulatard® once daily and thrice daily prandial Actrapid® in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), run by Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru at 1 site in Malaysia.
Trial summary
The goal of this cross-over study is to learn if thrice-daily (TDS) premixed human insulin (PHI) is as useful as basal-bolus (BB) therapy as an intensification treatment in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
- What is being tested?
- Mixtard® 30 TDS and Insulatard® once daily and thrice daily prandial Actrapid®
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMalaysia
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2020to 1 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 2 Diabetes patients
- Age 18 to 65 years
- HbA1c 8 to 12%
- Taking twice-daily (BD) premixed human insulin for at least 6 months
Who cannot join
- Age more than 65 years
- Had more than one episode of severe hypoglycaemia within six months
- Received treatment with systemic glucocorticoid therapy or glucose-lowering drugs other than metformin, DPP4 inhibitor and SGLT-2 inhibitor within the last three months
- Cardiac disease with a class III or class IV functional capacity
- Decompensated heart failure, unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the previous six months
- Renal insufficiency with serum creatinine more than 150umol/L
Show all 9Show fewer
- Active liver disease or deranged liver function tests
- Untreated proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy
- Pregnant women
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Thrice-Daily Premixed Human Insulin With Basal-Bolus Therapy Among Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomised Cross-Over Study
The goal of this cross-over study is to learn if thrice-daily (TDS) premixed human insulin (PHI) is as useful as basal-bolus (BB) therapy as an intensification treatment in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- To determine the efficacy of TDS PHI compared to BB insulin regimen by measuring HbA1c changes over 12 weeks.
- To determine the changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), the total daily dose (TDD) of insulin, weight changes, and hypoglycaemia rate, and to study the adherence rate to insulin injection between the two regimens over 12 weeks.
Read more
Researchers will compare TDS-PHI to BB regimen to see if the glycemic control, TDD of insulin, weight gain, hypoglycemia and adherence rate are the same.
Participants will:
- take TDS-PHI or BB for 12 weeks and cross over to the other regimen for another 12 weeks
- visit the clinic once every 4 weeks for checkups and tests
- keep a diary of their self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), insulin doses, hypoglycaemic symptoms and blood glucose readings, and the number of times they miss insulin injections.
Read the detailed description
Thrice-daily (TDS) biphasic insulin analogues are suitable alternatives for intensifying insulin therapy, but the clinical use of TDS premixed human insulin (PHI) is unclear. When people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) require intensification of treatment, twice daily (BD) PHI is often intensified to a basal-bolus (BB) regimen, but compliance can be poor. The investigators hypothesised that TDS PHI is as efficacious as BB therapy. A cross-over study comparing TDS PHI with BB regimens among people with T2DM is conducted primarily aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of TDS PHI (Mixtard® 30) with the BB insulin regimen (Insulatard® once daily plus thrice daily prandial Actrapid®) in T2DM with inadequate glycaemic control on BD PHI and to assess the changes in FPG, TDD of insulin, weight changes, hypoglycaemia rate, and rate of adherence to insulin injection in local setting. Participants receive TDS-PHI or BB for 12 weeks and cross over to the other regimen for another 12 weeks. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), the total daily dose (TDD) of insulin, weight, hypoglycaemia, and adherence to insulin injections over 12 weeks are measured.
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
- Being tested
- Mixtard® 30 TDS, Insulatard® once daily and thrice daily prandial Actrapid®
- Keywords
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, thrice-daily premixed human insulin (TDS PHI), basal-bolus regimen, twice-daily premixed human insulin (BD PHI), intensification therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mixtard® 30 TDSDrug
The clinical use of TDS premixed human insulin (PHI) is unclear. In contrast, biphasic insulin analogue given thrice daily is a well-proven, safe and suitable alternative to an intensified insulin regimen.
Insulatard® once daily and thrice daily prandial Actrapid®Drug
Basal bolus regimen is considered a physiological form of treatment and the standard of care in clinical practice but the multiple daily injections often lead to poor compliance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (Mixtard® 30) | Active comparator | Participants start on TDS PHI (Mixtard® 30 TDS) and cross over to BB regimen (Insulatard® once daily plus thrice daily prandial Actrapid®) at 12 weeks (visit 4). The initial TDD of insulin equals the baseline TDD of the participants' original insulin regimen and is distributed in a 40:20:40 ratio (breakfast, lunch, and dinner). Receives: Drug: Mixtard® 30 TDS; Drug: Insulatard® once daily and thrice daily prandial Actrapid® |
| Group B (Insulatard® and Actrapid®) | Active comparator | Participants start on BB regimen (Insulatard® once daily plus thrice daily prandial Actrapid®) and cross over to TDS PHI (Mixtard® 30 TDS) at 12 weeks (visit 4). The initial TDD of insulin equals the baseline TDD of the participants' original insulin regimen and is split between Actrapid® and Insulatard® as 50 and 50 per cent, respectively. Actrapid® is further divided equally across the meals. Receives: Drug: Mixtard® 30 TDS; Drug: Insulatard® once daily and thrice daily prandial Actrapid® |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy of TDS PHI compared to BB insulin regimen as assessed by changes in HbA1c measured in percentage
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (5)
Changes in FPG measured in mmol/l
Measured: 12 weeks
Changes in TDD of insulin measured in units
Measured: 12 weeks
Changes in weight measured in kilograms
Measured: 12 weeks
Changes in hypoglycemia rate as assessed by episodes per subject year
Measured: 12 weeks
Adherence to insulin injection as assessed by the frequency of missed doses per month
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2025
- Study start1 Oct 2020
- Primary completion14 Jan 2021
- Study completion1 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Penang Hospital, Malaysia
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jamie Teoh Hong Im, Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru
- Investigators
- Jamie HI Teoh, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital Pulau Pinang, Malaysis
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06855615
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NMRR-20-599-54337
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Shanmugasundar G, Bhansali A, Walia R, Dutta P, Upreti V. Comparison of thrice daily biphasic human insulin (30/70) versus basal detemir & bolus aspart in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus - a pilot study. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135(1):78-83. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.93428.
PubMed 22382187
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Thrice-Daily Premixed Human Insulin With Basal-Bolus Therapy Among Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomised Cross-Over Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06855615
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NMRR-20-599-54337
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
- Keywords
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, thrice-daily premixed human insulin (TDS PHI), basal-bolus regimen, twice-daily premixed human insulin (BD PHI), intensification therapy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor BahruOther government
- Collaborators
- Penang Hospital, Malaysia
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this cross-over study is to learn if thrice-daily (TDS) premixed human insulin (PHI) is as useful as basal-bolus (BB) therapy as an intensification treatment in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- To determine the efficacy of TDS PHI compared to BB insulin regimen by measuring HbA1c changes over 12 weeks.
- To determine the changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), the total daily dose (TDD) of insulin, weight changes, and hypoglycaemia rate, and to study the adherence rate to insulin injection between the two regimens over 12 weeks.
Researchers will compare TDS-PHI to BB regimen to see if the glycemic control, TDD of insulin, weight gain, hypoglycemia and adherence rate are the same.
Participants will:
- take TDS-PHI or BB for 12 weeks and cross over to the other regimen for another 12 weeks
- visit the clinic once every 4 weeks for checkups and tests
- keep a diary of their self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), insulin doses, hypoglycaemic symptoms and blood glucose readings, and the number of times they miss insulin injections.
Detailed description
Thrice-daily (TDS) biphasic insulin analogues are suitable alternatives for intensifying insulin therapy, but the clinical use of TDS premixed human insulin (PHI) is unclear. When people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) require intensification of treatment, twice daily (BD) PHI is often intensified to a basal-bolus (BB) regimen, but compliance can be poor. The investigators hypothesised that TDS PHI is as efficacious as BB therapy. A cross-over study comparing TDS PHI with BB regimens among people with T2DM is conducted primarily aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of TDS PHI (Mixtard® 30) with the BB insulin regimen (Insulatard® once daily plus thrice daily prandial Actrapid®) in T2DM with inadequate glycaemic control on BD PHI and to assess the changes in FPG, TDD of insulin, weight changes, hypoglycaemia rate, and rate of adherence to insulin injection in local setting. Participants receive TDS-PHI or BB for 12 weeks and cross over to the other regimen for another 12 weeks. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), the total daily dose (TDD) of insulin, weight, hypoglycaemia, and adherence to insulin injections over 12 weeks are measured.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (Mixtard® 30) | Active comparator | Drug: Mixtard® 30 TDS, Drug: Insulatard® once daily and thrice daily prandial Actrapid®Participants start on TDS PHI (Mixtard® 30 TDS) and cross over to BB regimen (Insulatard® once daily plus thrice daily prandial Actrapid®) at 12 weeks (visit 4). The initial TDD of insulin equals the baseline TDD of the participants' original insulin regimen and is distributed in a 40:20:40 ratio (breakfast, lunch, and dinner). |
| Group B (Insulatard® and Actrapid®) | Active comparator | Drug: Mixtard® 30 TDS, Drug: Insulatard® once daily and thrice daily prandial Actrapid®Participants start on BB regimen (Insulatard® once daily plus thrice daily prandial Actrapid®) and cross over to TDS PHI (Mixtard® 30 TDS) at 12 weeks (visit 4). The initial TDD of insulin equals the baseline TDD of the participants' original insulin regimen and is split between Actrapid® and Insulatard® as 50 and 50 per cent, respectively. Actrapid® is further divided equally across the meals. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Type 2 Diabetes patients
- Age 18 to 65 years
- HbA1c 8 to 12%
- Taking twice-daily (BD) premixed human insulin for at least 6 months
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age more than 65 years
- Had more than one episode of severe hypoglycaemia within six months
- Received treatment with systemic glucocorticoid therapy or glucose-lowering drugs other than metformin, DPP4 inhibitor and SGLT-2 inhibitor within the last three months
- Cardiac disease with a class III or class IV functional capacity
- Decompensated heart failure, unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the previous six months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mixtard® 30 TDSThe clinical use of TDS premixed human insulin (PHI) is unclear. In contrast, biphasic insulin analogue given thrice daily is a well-proven, safe and suitable alternative to an intensified insulin regimen. | Drug | Group A (Mixtard® 30), Group B (Insulatard® and Actrapid®) |
| Insulatard® once daily and thrice daily prandial Actrapid®Basal bolus regimen is considered a physiological form of treatment and the standard of care in clinical practice but the multiple daily injections often lead to poor compliance. | Drug | Group A (Mixtard® 30), Group B (Insulatard® and Actrapid®) |
Primary outcome
Efficacy of TDS PHI compared to BB insulin regimen as assessed by changes in HbA1c measured in percentage
Time frame: 12 weeks
5 secondary outcomes
Changes in FPG measured in mmol/l
Time frame: 12 weeks
Changes in TDD of insulin measured in units
Time frame: 12 weeks
Changes in weight measured in kilograms
Time frame: 12 weeks
Changes in hypoglycemia rate as assessed by episodes per subject year
Time frame: 12 weeks
Adherence to insulin injection as assessed by the frequency of missed doses per month
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 22382187Shanmugasundar G, Bhansali A, Walia R, Dutta P, Upreti V. Comparison of thrice daily biphasic human insulin (30/70) versus basal detemir & bolus aspart in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus - a pilot study. Indian J Med Res. 2012;135(1):78-83. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.93428.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of SAL0150 Tablets in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Type 2 Diabetes
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Enicepatide in Participants With Obesity or Overweight, With or Without Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingObservational study
Chiglitazar Added to SGLT-2 Inhibitors for Type 2 Diabetes
T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
An Observational Study to Learn More About How Safe Finerenone is and How Well it Works in Indian People With Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes in Routine Medical Practice
Chronic Kidney Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jamie HI Teoh, MD principal investigator
Hospital Pulau Pinang, Malaysis
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Mixtard® 30 TDS and Insulatard® once daily and thrice daily prandial Actrapid® in people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), run by Hospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru at 1 site in Malaysia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy of TDS PHI compared to BB insulin regimen as assessed by changes in HbA1c measured in percentage (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06855615, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2025.