PreventionTD-CHATNCT06852443
Troubled-Desire & Therapeutic Chat for Reduction of CSAM Use (TD-CHAT)
A study testing Selfhelp modules and Therapist Chat Service in people with Prevention and Well Being, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The goal of this prospective multicentred, stratified, parallel-group superiority study is to prevent and reduce the usage of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) by a Therapist Chat Service (TCS) and Selfhelp Platform for Self-Referred Patients, mostly men with a sexual interest in children. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Prevention, Well Being, Sexual Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Selfhelp modules and Therapist Chat Service
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2025to 31 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult participant (≥18 years);
- recent (last 2 weeks) CSAM use or past CSAM use and self-reported risk;
- proficiency in English, German or Spanish;
- voluntary participation and agreement to the terms of the study.
Who cannot join
- Severe neuropsychiatric comorbidities (unstable psychotic disorder, organic brain damage, diminished intellectual functioning, untreated drug or alcohol addiction);
- history of contact CSA perpetration (past or present);
- ongoing criminal investigation, trial, punishment, or probation status for online or offline CSA or CSAM use;
- current inpatient psychiatric treatment or other concurrent treatment targeting CSAM behaviours
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
2 sites in 2 countries
Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlion
Berlin, 10117
Hannes Gieseler, +49(0)30450629318, hannes.gieseler@charite.de
Klaus M Beier, Prof. Dr. Dr., +49(0)30450529301, klaus.beier@charite.de
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Catalonia, Spain
Barcelona
Carlos García Forero, Prof., cgarciaf@uic.es
About this study
Official title: Troubled Desire & Therapeutic Chat for Reduction of CSAM Use
The goal of this prospective multicentred, stratified, parallel-group superiority study is to prevent and reduce the usage of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) by a Therapist Chat Service (TCS) and Selfhelp Platform for Self-Referred Patients, mostly men with a sexual interest in children. The interventions are based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) principles and designed to treat the sexual behavioral disorder related with CSAM consumption.
- Participants in the Selfhelp modules group will show a statistically significantly higher proportion of reduction in CSAM behaviours four weeks after baseline, as compared to participants in the waitlist control group.
- Participants in the Selfhelp modules followed by TCS group will show a statistically significantly higher reduction of CSAM behaviours compared to participants in the Selfhelp-only and TCS-only groups, post-intervention.
Read more
Researchers will compare TCS-only-, Selfhelp-only-, Selfhelp + TCS- and Waiting group to see if if the interventions decrease CSAM use and improve mental well-being.
Participants will get web based selfhelp-modules and/or text-based chat intervention operated by trained therapists.
Read the detailed description
The study will evaluate whether the TCS intervention and Selfhelp modules, independently or combined, effectively reduce CSAM use or risk of CSAM consumption and improve mental well-being among self-referred participants.
- Objectives 1.1 Primary objectives
- To compare the effectiveness in reducing CSAM behaviours between the TD only group and the waitlist group four weeks after the baseline assessment.
- To compare the post-intervention effectiveness in reducing CSAM behaviours of the Selfhelp modules versus TCS alone and Selfhelp modules followed by TCS.
1.2 Secondary objectives
- To assess the reduction in severity, time and self-rated risk of CSAM consumption among participants in the intervention groups (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) compared to the waitlist control group, at post-intervention.
- To compare the impact of the interventions (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) on mental wellbeing, in contrast to the control group, at the end of the intervention period.
- To evaluate the effect of the interventions (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) on total sexual outlet compared with the waitlist control group after the intervention period.
- To identify any adverse effects associated with the interventions (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS).
- Hypotheses
2.1 Primary hypothesis
- Participants in the Selfhelp-only modules group will show a statistically significantly higher proportion of reduction in CSAM behaviours four weeks after baseline, as compared to participants in the waitlist control group.
- Participants in the Selfhelp modules followed by TCS group will show a statistically significantly higher reduction of CSAM behaviours compared to participants in the Selfhelp-only and TCS-only groups, post-intervention.
2.2 Secondary hypothesis
- Participants in the intervention groups (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) will show a statistically significant reduction in the severity, time and self-rated risk of CSAM consumption compared to participants in the waitlist control group, four weeks after the initial intervention. Among the intervention groups, it is expected that the Selfhalp + TCS group will show the greatest reduction in CSAM consumption, followed by the TCS group and then the Selfhelp-only group.
- Participants in the intervention groups (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) will show a statistically significant improvement in their mental well-being (measured using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing scale). compared to participants in the waitlist control group, at post-intervention. Among the intervention groups, the Selfhelp + TCS group is expected to show the greatest improvement, followed by the TCS group, and then the Selfhelp-only group.
- Participants in the intervention groups (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) will show a statistically significant reduction in total sexual outlet (measured using a self-reported measure) compared to participants in the waitlist control group, after the intervention. Among the intervention groups, the Selfhelp + TCS group is expected to show the greatest reduction, followed by the TCS group, and then the Selfhelp-only group.
- All intervention groups (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) will experience adverse effects (psychological and emotional distress) to a similar extent, with no significant differences in the number or type of adverse effects reported. Adverse effects are expected to primarily involve mild to moderate psychological and emotional distress, such as feelings of anxiety or frustration, but are not expected to lead to severe distress or long-term harm.
3.Trial design
This is a prospective, randomised, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, superiority trial designed to compare stratified, pair-matched CSAM users across three intervention groups and one wait-list control group, with an allocation ratio of 1:1:1:1. Following participant agreement to the terms of the study, demographic information, measures for stratified randomization, and baseline outcome data will be collected. Additionally, data collected from the four groups Selfhelp modules, TCS, Selfhelp + TCS, and waitlist) of the TD-CHAT study will be compared with data from a fifth group (waitlist + TCS) sourced from the "Scalable Technology for Online Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse and Child Sexual Abuse Materials" (STOP-CSAM) project.
- Conditions
- Prevention, Well Being, Sexual Behavior, Behavior Change, Behavior Problems, Behavior Change Interventions
- Being tested
- Selfhelp modules, Therapist Chat Service
- Keywords
- Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) consumption, CSAM, Child Sexual Abuse, Digital online intervention, CSA, CBT, iCBT, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Pedophilia, chat Intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Sexual Behavior, Mental Disorders, Pedophilia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Selfhelp modulesBehavioural
16 web-based structured selfhelp modules, based on CBT techniques from the Berlin Dissexuality Therapy (Beier, K. M. (2021). Pedophilia, hebephilia and sexual offending against children. The Berlin Dissexuality Therapy (BEDIT). Springer)
Therapist Chat ServiceBehavioural
Online Therapy Chat Service (TCS) based on CBT techniques from the Berlin Dissexuality Therapy (Beier, K. M. (2021). Pedophilia, hebephilia and sexual offending against children. The Berlin Dissexuality Therapy (BEDIT). Springer)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Selfhelp+TCS | Experimental | Selfhelp modules followed by Therapist Chat Service Receives: Behavioral: Selfhelp modules; Behavioral: Therapist Chat Service |
| Selfhelp modules | Active comparator | Selfhelp modules only Receives: Behavioral: Selfhelp modules |
| TCS only | Active comparator | 4-6 Sessions text message-based Therapist Chat Service only Receives: Behavioral: Therapist Chat Service |
| Waitlist | No intervention | Participants will remain on a waitlist for the first two weeks without receiving any kind of intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reduction in Child Sexual Abuse Material (RCSAM) severity
- Reduction in Child Sexual Abuse Material severity (RCSAM severity): A reduction in CSAM severity in the last 2 weeks, defined as the pre-post difference in highest "Combating Paedophile Information Networks in Europe" (COPINE) scale scores, with a reduction from severity levels 4 or higher to levels 3 or lower after the intervention.
Measured: every 2 weeks for 12 weeks after onboarding
Reduction in Child Sexual Abuse Material (RCSAM) time
- Reduction in Child Sexual Abuse Material time (RCSAM time): A 50% or greater decrease in CSAM consumption time (minutes) over the past 2 weeks. CSAM time is measured as the time (in minutes) spent consuming CSAM materials over the past 2 weeks.
Measured: every 2 weeks for 12 weeks after onboarding
Reduction in Child Sexual Abuse Material (RCSAM) risk
- Reduction in self-reported risk of Child Sexual Abuse Material use (RCSAM risk): A reduction in self-reported risk of CSAM use (RCSAM risk): A decrease in the risk of CSAM consumption over the last 2 weeks, defined as a pre-post decrease in self-reported risk, as measured using an adapted version of the "Sexual Child Molestation Risk Assessment" (SChiMRA+) Part A.
Measured: every 2 weeks for 12 weeks after onboarding
Secondary outcomes (4)
Risk of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) consumption
Risk of CSAM consumption: Sexual Child Molestation Risk Assessment (SchiMRA+ part A) at baseline and follow-up.
Measured: baseline and 12 weeks after onboarding
Frequency of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) consumption
Frequency of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) consumption: Self-reported every two weeks, at baseline and follow-up.
Measured: baseline and every 2 weeks for 12 weeks after onboarding
Mental Wellbeing
Mental wellbeing: The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMBWS; Tennant et al., 2007). The total score is obtained by summing the score for each of the 14 items. The scoring range for each item is from 1 - 5 and the total score is from 14-70. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Mental wellbeing is measured over the past 2 weeks.
Measured: baseline and every 2 weeks during 12 weeks after onboarding
Total Sexual Outlet
- Self-reported number of orgasms achieved from masturbation using Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) in the past week
- Self-reported number of orgasms achieved from masturbation not using CSAM in the past week
- Self-reported number of orgasms achieved from sexual interaction in the past week
- Total sexual outlet: sum of self-reported number of orgasms from masturbation (with and without using CSAM) + self-reported number of orgasms from sexual interaction.
This outcome is measured at baseline and follow-up.
Measured: baseline and every 2 weeks during 12 weeks after onboarding
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Feb 2025
- Study start1 Apr 2025
- Primary completion28 Feb 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PreventionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Charite University, Berlin, GermanyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- * Randomized * Multi-centre * Open label * Parallel assignment * Superiority
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hannes Gieseler, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06852443
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 8000502101
- Acronym
- TD-CHAT
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 7 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Landgren V, Malki K, Bottai M, Arver S, Rahm C. Effect of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist on Risk of Committing Child Sexual Abuse in Men With Pedophilic Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):897-905. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0440.
PubMed 32347899Merdian HL, Moghaddam N, Boer DP, Wilson N, Thakker J, Curtis C, Dawson D. Fantasy-Driven Versus Contact-Driven Users of Child Sexual Exploitation Material: Offender Classification and Implications for Their Risk Assessment. Sex Abuse. 2018 Apr;30(3):230-253. doi: 10.1177/1079063216641109. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
PubMed 27052851Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown S. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63.
PubMed 18042300Quayle, E. (2008). The COPINE project. Irish Probation Journal, 5(9), 65-83.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Troubled Desire & Therapeutic Chat for Reduction of CSAM Use
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06852443
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TD-CHAT / 8000502101
- Conditions
- Prevention, Well Being, Sexual Behavior, Behavior Change, Behavior Problems, Behavior Change Interventions
- Keywords
- Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) consumption, CSAM, Child Sexual Abuse, Digital online intervention, CSA, CBT, iCBT, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, GermanyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this prospective multicentred, stratified, parallel-group superiority study is to prevent and reduce the usage of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) by a Therapist Chat Service (TCS) and Selfhelp Platform for Self-Referred Patients, mostly men with a sexual interest in children. The interventions are based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) principles and designed to treat the sexual behavioral disorder related with CSAM consumption.
- Participants in the Selfhelp modules group will show a statistically significantly higher proportion of reduction in CSAM behaviours four weeks after baseline, as compared to participants in the waitlist control group.
- Participants in the Selfhelp modules followed by TCS group will show a statistically significantly higher reduction of CSAM behaviours compared to participants in the Selfhelp-only and TCS-only groups, post-intervention.
Researchers will compare TCS-only-, Selfhelp-only-, Selfhelp + TCS- and Waiting group to see if if the interventions decrease CSAM use and improve mental well-being.
Participants will get web based selfhelp-modules and/or text-based chat intervention operated by trained therapists.
Detailed description
The study will evaluate whether the TCS intervention and Selfhelp modules, independently or combined, effectively reduce CSAM use or risk of CSAM consumption and improve mental well-being among self-referred participants.
- Objectives 1.1 Primary objectives
- To compare the effectiveness in reducing CSAM behaviours between the TD only group and the waitlist group four weeks after the baseline assessment.
- To compare the post-intervention effectiveness in reducing CSAM behaviours of the Selfhelp modules versus TCS alone and Selfhelp modules followed by TCS.
1.2 Secondary objectives
- To assess the reduction in severity, time and self-rated risk of CSAM consumption among participants in the intervention groups (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) compared to the waitlist control group, at post-intervention.
- To compare the impact of the interventions (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) on mental wellbeing, in contrast to the control group, at the end of the intervention period.
- To evaluate the effect of the interventions (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) on total sexual outlet compared with the waitlist control group after the intervention period.
- To identify any adverse effects associated with the interventions (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS).
- Hypotheses
2.1 Primary hypothesis
- Participants in the Selfhelp-only modules group will show a statistically significantly higher proportion of reduction in CSAM behaviours four weeks after baseline, as compared to participants in the waitlist control group.
- Participants in the Selfhelp modules followed by TCS group will show a statistically significantly higher reduction of CSAM behaviours compared to participants in the Selfhelp-only and TCS-only groups, post-intervention.
2.2 Secondary hypothesis
- Participants in the intervention groups (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) will show a statistically significant reduction in the severity, time and self-rated risk of CSAM consumption compared to participants in the waitlist control group, four weeks after the initial intervention. Among the intervention groups, it is expected that the Selfhalp + TCS group will show the greatest reduction in CSAM consumption, followed by the TCS group and then the Selfhelp-only group.
- Participants in the intervention groups (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) will show a statistically significant improvement in their mental well-being (measured using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing scale). compared to participants in the waitlist control group, at post-intervention. Among the intervention groups, the Selfhelp + TCS group is expected to show the greatest improvement, followed by the TCS group, and then the Selfhelp-only group.
- Participants in the intervention groups (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) will show a statistically significant reduction in total sexual outlet (measured using a self-reported measure) compared to participants in the waitlist control group, after the intervention. Among the intervention groups, the Selfhelp + TCS group is expected to show the greatest reduction, followed by the TCS group, and then the Selfhelp-only group.
- All intervention groups (Selfhelp modules, TCS, or Selfhelp + TCS) will experience adverse effects (psychological and emotional distress) to a similar extent, with no significant differences in the number or type of adverse effects reported. Adverse effects are expected to primarily involve mild to moderate psychological and emotional distress, such as feelings of anxiety or frustration, but are not expected to lead to severe distress or long-term harm.
3.Trial design
This is a prospective, randomised, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, superiority trial designed to compare stratified, pair-matched CSAM users across three intervention groups and one wait-list control group, with an allocation ratio of 1:1:1:1. Following participant agreement to the terms of the study, demographic information, measures for stratified randomization, and baseline outcome data will be collected. Additionally, data collected from the four groups Selfhelp modules, TCS, Selfhelp + TCS, and waitlist) of the TD-CHAT study will be compared with data from a fifth group (waitlist + TCS) sourced from the "Scalable Technology for Online Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse and Child Sexual Abuse Materials" (STOP-CSAM) project.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- * Randomized * Multi-centre * Open label * Parallel assignment * Superiority
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Selfhelp+TCS | Experimental | Behavioral: Selfhelp modules, Behavioral: Therapist Chat ServiceSelfhelp modules followed by Therapist Chat Service |
| Selfhelp modules | Active comparator | Behavioral: Selfhelp modulesSelfhelp modules only |
| TCS only | Active comparator | Behavioral: Therapist Chat Service4-6 Sessions text message-based Therapist Chat Service only |
| Waitlist | No intervention | –Participants will remain on a waitlist for the first two weeks without receiving any kind of intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adult participant (≥18 years);
- recent (last 2 weeks) CSAM use or past CSAM use and self-reported risk;
- proficiency in English, German or Spanish;
- voluntary participation and agreement to the terms of the study.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Severe neuropsychiatric comorbidities (unstable psychotic disorder, organic brain damage, diminished intellectual functioning, untreated drug or alcohol addiction);
- history of contact CSA perpetration (past or present);
- ongoing criminal investigation, trial, punishment, or probation status for online or offline CSA or CSAM use;
- current inpatient psychiatric treatment or other concurrent treatment targeting CSAM behaviours
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Selfhelp modules16 web-based structured selfhelp modules, based on CBT techniques from the Berlin Dissexuality Therapy (Beier, K. M. (2021). Pedophilia, hebephilia and sexual offending against children. The Berlin Dissexuality Therapy (BEDIT). Springer) | Behavioural | Selfhelp modules, Selfhelp+TCS |
| Therapist Chat ServiceOnline Therapy Chat Service (TCS) based on CBT techniques from the Berlin Dissexuality Therapy (Beier, K. M. (2021). Pedophilia, hebephilia and sexual offending against children. The Berlin Dissexuality Therapy (BEDIT). Springer) | Behavioural | Selfhelp+TCS, TCS only |
Primary outcome
Reduction in Child Sexual Abuse Material (RCSAM) severity
Time frame: every 2 weeks for 12 weeks after onboarding
A) Reduction in Child Sexual Abuse Material severity (RCSAM severity): A reduction in CSAM severity in the last 2 weeks, defined as the pre-post difference in highest "Combating Paedophile Information Networks in Europe" (COPINE) scale scores, with a reduction from severity levels 4 or higher to levels 3 or lower after the intervention.
Reduction in Child Sexual Abuse Material (RCSAM) time
Time frame: every 2 weeks for 12 weeks after onboarding
B) Reduction in Child Sexual Abuse Material time (RCSAM time): A 50% or greater decrease in CSAM consumption time (minutes) over the past 2 weeks. CSAM time is measured as the time (in minutes) spent consuming CSAM materials over the past 2 weeks.
Reduction in Child Sexual Abuse Material (RCSAM) risk
Time frame: every 2 weeks for 12 weeks after onboarding
C) Reduction in self-reported risk of Child Sexual Abuse Material use (RCSAM risk): A reduction in self-reported risk of CSAM use (RCSAM risk): A decrease in the risk of CSAM consumption over the last 2 weeks, defined as a pre-post decrease in self-reported risk, as measured using an adapted version of the "Sexual Child Molestation Risk Assessment" (SChiMRA+) Part A.
4 secondary outcomes
Risk of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) consumption
Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks after onboarding
Frequency of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) consumption
Time frame: baseline and every 2 weeks for 12 weeks after onboarding
Mental Wellbeing
Time frame: baseline and every 2 weeks during 12 weeks after onboarding
Total Sexual Outlet
Time frame: baseline and every 2 weeks during 12 weeks after onboarding
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2025.
- Background: PubMed 32347899Landgren V, Malki K, Bottai M, Arver S, Rahm C. Effect of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist on Risk of Committing Child Sexual Abuse in Men With Pedophilic Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):897-905. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0440.
- Background: PubMed 27052851Merdian HL, Moghaddam N, Boer DP, Wilson N, Thakker J, Curtis C, Dawson D. Fantasy-Driven Versus Contact-Driven Users of Child Sexual Exploitation Material: Offender Classification and Implications for Their Risk Assessment. Sex Abuse. 2018 Apr;30(3):230-253. doi: 10.1177/1079063216641109. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
- Background: PubMed 18042300Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown S. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63.
- BackgroundQuayle, E. (2008). The COPINE project. Irish Probation Journal, 5(9), 65-83.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Prevention
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ilaprazole 10 mg in Prevention NSAIDs Associated Peptic Ulcer
Peptic Ulcer
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
De-escalated Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and Ruxolitinib for Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Prophylaxis
Graft-versus-host Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of OPTILENE® SILVER MESH ELASTIC in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and Incisional Hernia (IH)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Morbid Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Selfhelp modules and Therapist Chat Service in people with Prevention and Well Being, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Germany, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reduction in Child Sexual Abuse Material (RCSAM) severity (time frame: every 2 weeks for 12 weeks after onboarding). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06852443, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2025.