AnalgesiaECLUNCT06849804
Comparing the Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block, Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block, and Local Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair as a Day-Case Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial
A study testing Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®), Caudal Block Anesthesia and Local infiltration in the wound in people with Analgesia, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound guided Erector block versus caudal block versus local wound infiltration perioperatively according to: Primary outcome: to assess and compare the postoperative analgesic effect using pain score: Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability tool (FLACC, 0- 10) at… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 24 to 84 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Analgesia
- What is being tested?
- Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®), Caudal Block Anesthesia and Local infiltration in the wound
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 20 Jan 2025to 15 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 24 to 84 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Inclusion Criteria: pediatric patients of both sexes undergoing elective unilateral inguinal hernia surgeries aged from 2 year to 7 years belonging to ASA I or II.
Who cannot join
- Parents refusal. Coagulopathy. Allergy to local anesthesia. Local infection at the site of injection. Neurological anomalies.
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound guided Erector block versus caudal block versus local wound infiltration perioperatively according to:
Primary outcome: to assess and compare the postoperative analgesic effect using pain score:
Read more
Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability tool (FLACC, 0- 10) at 15 min, 30 min and 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after operation
Secondary outcomes:
First dose of fentanyl as a rescue analgesia in dose of 0.5 μg/kg. Total doses of fentanyl as a rescue analgesia. Demographic data: age, sex, weight, ASA class. Hemodynamic parameter (MAP in (mm/hg) and heart rate (beats/minute)) Motor function will be assessed using the following scale: 0, no motor block; 1, able to move legs; 2, unable to move legs.
Assessment of sedation will be done with objective score based on eye opening: 0- spontaneously, 1- on verbal stimulation, 2- on physical stimulation Adverse events: bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression, local anesthesia toxicity, subarachnoid injection in caudal block, PONV, agitation, or urinary catheterization.
Read the detailed description
This randomized double-blinded study will be carried out on 75 pediatric patients of both sexes undergoing elective unilateral inguinal hernia surgeries in Tanta University Hospitals for a period of from December 2024 to March 2025.
Informed written consent will be obtained from the parents. They will receive an explanation of the purpose of the study, and every patient will have a secret code number. All data of the patients will be confidential with secret codes and private file for each patient, all given data will be used for the current medical research only.
Any unexpected risks that appeared during the research will be cleared to the participants and ethical committee on time. Investigator who is blinded to group allocation provided postoperative care and assessments. Postoperative pain will be assessed. Motor functions and sedation will be assessed as well.
Inclusion Criteria: pediatric patients of both sexes undergoing elective unilateral inguinal hernia surgeries aged from 2 year to 7 years belonging to ASA I or II.
Exclusion Criteria:
Parents refusal. Coagulopathy. Allergy to local anesthesia. Local infection at the site of injection. Neurological anomalies.
Randomization and blindness:
Computer-generated randomization numbers will be used for random allocation and each patients' code will be kept in an opaque sealed envelope. Patients will be randomly allocated with 1:1:1 allocation ratio into three groups in a parallel manner:
Group E (n=25): Erector spinae plain block group will receive 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25%bupivacaine.
Group C (n=25): Caudal block group will receive 1 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine. Group L (n=25): Local Infiltration Group will receive 0.2 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine
Methods:
Preoperative:
Medical and surgical history of the patients will be taken, clinical examination of the patients will be performed and routine laboratory investigations as CBC, and coagulation studies.
Intraoperative:
Monitoring (non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiogram and temperature probe) will be applied during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. No premedication will be administered. Anesthesia will be induced with of sevoflurane in 100% oxygen. The intravenous line will be inserted, inject propofol 1-2 mg/kg and airway will be established by using a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane, O2 to Air 50%: 50%, hemodynamic will be adjusted accordingly with a goal of 80-120% baseline arterial pressure and 4.7-6 kPa end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2). Spontaneous breathing will be maintained during surgery. After completion of surgery, the LMA will be removed, and the child will be sent to a post-anesthetic care unit (PACU) so long as there will be no compromise in airway or hemodynamic instability perioperatively.
In group E: A unilateral block will be performed in the lateral decubitus position, with the patient turned on his/her side so that the blocked side will be facing up. Using strict sterilization techniques, the skin will be sterilized with povidone-iodine at the site of needle entry. The level of the 10th thoracic vertebrae will be determined on ultrasound. The ultrasound transducer will be placed at the mid-vertebral line in the sagittal plane. The transducer will be shifted 3.5-4 cm laterally from midline to the surgical side to visualize the erector spinae muscle and transverse process. Using the in-plane technique, the needle will be advanced until the transverse process will be reached. The correct location of the needle tip in the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle will be confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 ml of saline and observing the fluid lifting the erector spinae muscle off the transverse process while avoiding muscle distension (hydro dissection). Once the needle will be at the correct location, a negative aspiration test will be confirmed. Bupivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 0.5 ml/kg will be then injected. The distribution of the injectate within the fascial plane will be observed. The patient will be then placed in the supine position, and we will wait 15 min before beginning of surgery.
In group C: After induction of anesthesia, children from Group C for a right-handed provider, place the patient in the left lateral position (hips and knees flexed). Place the patient in the right lateral position if the provider is left-handed. Prepare the field with sterilizing solution(povidone-iodine) and a sterile drape. Cover the ultrasound probe in a sterile cover. Initial scanning in the transverse plane allows for visualization of the midline and identification of the sacrococcygeal ligament between the 2 sacral cornua. The 2 cornua resemble the 2 eyes of a frog and thus are collectively called the frog-eye sign. The probe will be then rotated 90 degrees to acquire a longitudinal view. The needle will be advanced at a 20-degree angle with needle tip and length visualization. A pop can be appreciated as the needle passes through the sacrococcygeal ligament.
Once the needle will be confirmed to be in the caudal space on the screen, carefully aspirate to confirm absence of CSF or blood. The use of a saline bolus (0.1-0.2 mL/kg) can be performed to confirm correct positioning. If this is the case, real-time visualization of cranial spread of the saline with anterior displacement of the posterior dura will be seen. Lack of dural displacement can be associated with intrathecal or intravascular injection requiring repositioning of the needle. A slow injection of the local anesthetic can then be performed. Wait 15 min before beginning of surgery.
In group L: The patients will be received local infiltration of the surgical area with 0, 25% bupivacaine 10 min before skin incision. The infiltration technique will be standardized as follows: the subcutaneous tissue in the proposed area will be infiltrated with 0.25% bupivacaine before incision. A 16-mm 26-gauge needle will be inserted in the center of the area, and the medial and lateral parts of the proposed skin incision will be infiltrated. The needle still in central position, a fan-shaped application will be administered under the external abdominal fascia. We will wait 15 min before beginning of surgery.
Postoperative: Surgery will be initiated ten minutes after performing the erector spinae block, caudal block or local infiltration. Failure of block will be considered if the patient moves his or her limbs, increase heart rate, mean arterial pressure, or both of more than 15% will be compared with baseline during the surgery. In such instances, the patient will be withdrawn from the study and will be treated with 1-2 μg/kg of fentanyl.
Another investigator who will be blinded to group allocation provided postoperative care and assessments. Postoperative pain will be assessed using Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability tool (FLACC, 0- 10) at 15 min, 30 min and 1, 2, and 3 h after operation. A child with a score of more than 4 on FLACC received 0.5 μg/kg of fentanyl intravenous for rescue analgesia.
Motor function will be assessed using the following scale: 0, no motor block; 1, able to move legs; 2, unable to move legs. Assessment of sedation will be done with objective score based on eye opening: 0- spontaneously, 1- on verbal stimulation, 2- on physical stimulation. The presence of other adverse events will be evaluated as well including bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression, local anesthesia toxicity PONV, agitation, or urinary catheterization. Hypotension and respiratory depression are defined as 80% of baseline arterial pressure and ≤ 95% of pulse oxygen saturation, respectively. The decision to place a urinary catheter for urinary retention and the evaluation of micturition will be made by a urologist. Analgesia on ward will be provided with oral acetaminophen (15 mg/kg).
Children will be discharged from the hospital after 4 to 6 h if they will meet the following discharge criteria: conscious, hemodynamically stable, tolerating oral intake, voiding, walking in an appropriate manner for age, with the absence of side-effects.
- Conditions
- Analgesia
- Being tested
- Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®), Caudal Block Anesthesia, Local infiltration in the wound
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®)Procedure or surgery
Group E (n=25): Erector spinae plain block group will receive 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25%bupivacaine.
Caudal Block AnesthesiaProcedure or surgery
Caudal block group will receive 1 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine
Local infiltration in the woundProcedure or surgery
Local Infiltration Group will receive 0.2 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group E | Active comparator | Ultrasound guided erector spinae block Receives: Procedure: Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®) |
| Group C | Active comparator | Ultrasound guided caudal block Receives: Procedure: Caudal Block Anesthesia |
| Group L | Active comparator | Local infiltration of the wound Receives: Procedure: Local infiltration in the wound |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability tool (FLACC, 0- 10) at 15 min, 30 min and 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after operation
Measured: 4 hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
Analgesic effect of the block
First dose of fentanyl as a rescue analgesia in dose of 0.5 μg/kg. Total doses of fentanyl as a rescue analgesia. Motor function sedation score based on eye opening: 0- spontaneously, 1- on verbal stimulation, 2- on physical stimulation
Measured: 4 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Feb 2025
- Study start20 Jan 2025
- Primary completion10 Jun 2025
- Study completion15 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AnalgesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Tanta UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Group E : erector spinae block ultrasound guided Group C: ultrasound guided caudal block Group L: local infiltration
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohamed Zakarea Wfa, Tanta University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06849804
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 36264PR1045/1/25
- Acronym
- ECLU
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 16 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing the Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block, Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block, and Local Infiltration for Postoperative Pain Control in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair as a Day-Case Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06849804
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ECLU / 36264PR1045/1/25
- Conditions
- Analgesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tanta UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound guided Erector block versus caudal block versus local wound infiltration perioperatively according to:
Primary outcome: to assess and compare the postoperative analgesic effect using pain score:
Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability tool (FLACC, 0- 10) at 15 min, 30 min and 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after operation
Secondary outcomes:
First dose of fentanyl as a rescue analgesia in dose of 0.5 μg/kg. Total doses of fentanyl as a rescue analgesia. Demographic data: age, sex, weight, ASA class. Hemodynamic parameter (MAP in (mm/hg) and heart rate (beats/minute)) Motor function will be assessed using the following scale: 0, no motor block; 1, able to move legs; 2, unable to move legs.
Assessment of sedation will be done with objective score based on eye opening: 0- spontaneously, 1- on verbal stimulation, 2- on physical stimulation Adverse events: bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression, local anesthesia toxicity, subarachnoid injection in caudal block, PONV, agitation, or urinary catheterization.
Detailed description
This randomized double-blinded study will be carried out on 75 pediatric patients of both sexes undergoing elective unilateral inguinal hernia surgeries in Tanta University Hospitals for a period of from December 2024 to March 2025.
Informed written consent will be obtained from the parents. They will receive an explanation of the purpose of the study, and every patient will have a secret code number. All data of the patients will be confidential with secret codes and private file for each patient, all given data will be used for the current medical research only.
Any unexpected risks that appeared during the research will be cleared to the participants and ethical committee on time. Investigator who is blinded to group allocation provided postoperative care and assessments. Postoperative pain will be assessed. Motor functions and sedation will be assessed as well.
Inclusion Criteria: pediatric patients of both sexes undergoing elective unilateral inguinal hernia surgeries aged from 2 year to 7 years belonging to ASA I or II.
Exclusion Criteria:
Parents refusal. Coagulopathy. Allergy to local anesthesia. Local infection at the site of injection. Neurological anomalies.
Randomization and blindness:
Computer-generated randomization numbers will be used for random allocation and each patients' code will be kept in an opaque sealed envelope. Patients will be randomly allocated with 1:1:1 allocation ratio into three groups in a parallel manner:
Group E (n=25): Erector spinae plain block group will receive 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25%bupivacaine.
Group C (n=25): Caudal block group will receive 1 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine. Group L (n=25): Local Infiltration Group will receive 0.2 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine
Methods:
Preoperative:
Medical and surgical history of the patients will be taken, clinical examination of the patients will be performed and routine laboratory investigations as CBC, and coagulation studies.
Intraoperative:
Monitoring (non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximetry, electrocardiogram and temperature probe) will be applied during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. No premedication will be administered. Anesthesia will be induced with of sevoflurane in 100% oxygen. The intravenous line will be inserted, inject propofol 1-2 mg/kg and airway will be established by using a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane, O2 to Air 50%: 50%, hemodynamic will be adjusted accordingly with a goal of 80-120% baseline arterial pressure and 4.7-6 kPa end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2). Spontaneous breathing will be maintained during surgery. After completion of surgery, the LMA will be removed, and the child will be sent to a post-anesthetic care unit (PACU) so long as there will be no compromise in airway or hemodynamic instability perioperatively.
In group E: A unilateral block will be performed in the lateral decubitus position, with the patient turned on his/her side so that the blocked side will be facing up. Using strict sterilization techniques, the skin will be sterilized with povidone-iodine at the site of needle entry. The level of the 10th thoracic vertebrae will be determined on ultrasound. The ultrasound transducer will be placed at the mid-vertebral line in the sagittal plane. The transducer will be shifted 3.5-4 cm laterally from midline to the surgical side to visualize the erector spinae muscle and transverse process. Using the in-plane technique, the needle will be advanced until the transverse process will be reached. The correct location of the needle tip in the fascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle will be confirmed by injecting 0.5-1 ml of saline and observing the fluid lifting the erector spinae muscle off the transverse process while avoiding muscle distension (hydro dissection). Once the needle will be at the correct location, a negative aspiration test will be confirmed. Bupivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 0.5 ml/kg will be then injected. The distribution of the injectate within the fascial plane will be observed. The patient will be then placed in the supine position, and we will wait 15 min before beginning of surgery.
In group C: After induction of anesthesia, children from Group C for a right-handed provider, place the patient in the left lateral position (hips and knees flexed). Place the patient in the right lateral position if the provider is left-handed. Prepare the field with sterilizing solution(povidone-iodine) and a sterile drape. Cover the ultrasound probe in a sterile cover. Initial scanning in the transverse plane allows for visualization of the midline and identification of the sacrococcygeal ligament between the 2 sacral cornua. The 2 cornua resemble the 2 eyes of a frog and thus are collectively called the frog-eye sign. The probe will be then rotated 90 degrees to acquire a longitudinal view. The needle will be advanced at a 20-degree angle with needle tip and length visualization. A pop can be appreciated as the needle passes through the sacrococcygeal ligament.
Once the needle will be confirmed to be in the caudal space on the screen, carefully aspirate to confirm absence of CSF or blood. The use of a saline bolus (0.1-0.2 mL/kg) can be performed to confirm correct positioning. If this is the case, real-time visualization of cranial spread of the saline with anterior displacement of the posterior dura will be seen. Lack of dural displacement can be associated with intrathecal or intravascular injection requiring repositioning of the needle. A slow injection of the local anesthetic can then be performed. Wait 15 min before beginning of surgery.
In group L: The patients will be received local infiltration of the surgical area with 0, 25% bupivacaine 10 min before skin incision. The infiltration technique will be standardized as follows: the subcutaneous tissue in the proposed area will be infiltrated with 0.25% bupivacaine before incision. A 16-mm 26-gauge needle will be inserted in the center of the area, and the medial and lateral parts of the proposed skin incision will be infiltrated. The needle still in central position, a fan-shaped application will be administered under the external abdominal fascia. We will wait 15 min before beginning of surgery.
Postoperative: Surgery will be initiated ten minutes after performing the erector spinae block, caudal block or local infiltration. Failure of block will be considered if the patient moves his or her limbs, increase heart rate, mean arterial pressure, or both of more than 15% will be compared with baseline during the surgery. In such instances, the patient will be withdrawn from the study and will be treated with 1-2 μg/kg of fentanyl.
Another investigator who will be blinded to group allocation provided postoperative care and assessments. Postoperative pain will be assessed using Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability tool (FLACC, 0- 10) at 15 min, 30 min and 1, 2, and 3 h after operation. A child with a score of more than 4 on FLACC received 0.5 μg/kg of fentanyl intravenous for rescue analgesia.
Motor function will be assessed using the following scale: 0, no motor block; 1, able to move legs; 2, unable to move legs. Assessment of sedation will be done with objective score based on eye opening: 0- spontaneously, 1- on verbal stimulation, 2- on physical stimulation. The presence of other adverse events will be evaluated as well including bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression, local anesthesia toxicity PONV, agitation, or urinary catheterization. Hypotension and respiratory depression are defined as 80% of baseline arterial pressure and ≤ 95% of pulse oxygen saturation, respectively. The decision to place a urinary catheter for urinary retention and the evaluation of micturition will be made by a urologist. Analgesia on ward will be provided with oral acetaminophen (15 mg/kg).
Children will be discharged from the hospital after 4 to 6 h if they will meet the following discharge criteria: conscious, hemodynamically stable, tolerating oral intake, voiding, walking in an appropriate manner for age, with the absence of side-effects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Group E : erector spinae block ultrasound guided Group C: ultrasound guided caudal block Group L: local infiltration
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group E | Active comparator | Procedure: Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®)Ultrasound guided erector spinae block |
| Group C | Active comparator | Procedure: Caudal Block AnesthesiaUltrasound guided caudal block |
| Group L | Active comparator | Procedure: Local infiltration in the woundLocal infiltration of the wound |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 24 to 84 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Inclusion Criteria: pediatric patients of both sexes undergoing elective unilateral inguinal hernia surgeries aged from 2 year to 7 years belonging to ASA I or II.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Parents refusal. Coagulopathy. Allergy to local anesthesia. Local infection at the site of injection. Neurological anomalies.
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®)Group E (n=25): Erector spinae plain block group will receive 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25%bupivacaine. | Procedure or surgery | Group E |
| Caudal Block AnesthesiaCaudal block group will receive 1 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine | Procedure or surgery | Group C |
| Local infiltration in the woundLocal Infiltration Group will receive 0.2 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine | Procedure or surgery | Group L |
Primary outcome
Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability tool (FLACC, 0- 10) at 15 min, 30 min and 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after operation
Time frame: 4 hours
1 secondary outcome
Analgesic effect of the block
Time frame: 4 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Analgesia
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Laparoscopic-Assisted TAP Block in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Blockades Neuromuscular
Recruiting
SIRI Levels Following PENG Block in Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Dysplasia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of MK-6916 in Participants With Pain After Bunion Removal Surgery (MK-6916-007)
Pain Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Erector Spinae (ESP) Block with Bupivacaine (Marcaine®), Caudal Block Anesthesia and Local infiltration in the wound in people with Analgesia, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Faces Legs Activity Cry Consolability tool (FLACC, 0- 10) at 15 min, 30 min and 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after operation (time frame: 4 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2026.