AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteoporosis, Post-TraumaticMONTE-CRIST'OSNCT06847087

Study of the Adequacy Between Calcium Supplementation and Dietary Intake in Treatment-naive Patients After a Fracture

An observational study of Osteoporosis, Post-Traumatic and Calcium Supplementation, run by Centre Hospitalier de Colmar at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Osteoporosis is a disease that causes many fractures. However, treatments exist such as anti-osteoporotic treatments, vitamin D supplementation and an adaptation of calcium intake. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Self-questionnaire
How many people
86 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
3 Apr 2025to 29 Jan 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients consulting in a rheumatology department for a hospital

Who may be able to join

  • Patient meeting a first rheumatologist after a fracture suspected of being due to bone insufficiency, whether or not he is already treated for osteoporosis
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patient followed in one of the three investigation centers within the framework of the bone sector.
  • Patient affiliated to a social security system

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusing to participate in the study
  • Patient already followed by a rheumatologist
  • Legal incapacity or any physical, psychological, social or geographical condition likely to hinder the patient's ability to participate in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hôpitaux Civils de Colmar

    Colmar, 68024

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Study of the Adequacy Between Calcium Supplementation and Dietary Intake in Treatment-naive Patients After Fracture With a Fracture Suspected of Being Due to Bone Insufficiency, Consulting a Rheumatologist for the First Time in at Least 5 Years.

Osteoporosis is a disease that causes many fractures. However, treatments exist such as anti-osteoporotic treatments, vitamin D supplementation and an adaptation of calcium intake. 80% of patients with an indication for anti-osteoporotic treatment are never treated with these anti-osteoporotic treatments after a first fracture. On the other hand, more than 84% of them are supplemented with calcium and vitamin D. It often appears in the practice of rheumatologists that some patients are supplemented while their dietary intake is sufficient, and vice versa. The objective of the study is therefore to take stock of the (in)adequacy between the dietary intake of patients and the supplementation prescribed to them following an osteoporotic-like fracture.

Being tested
Self-questionnaire
Medical subject headings
Osteoporosis, Fractures, Bone

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Self-questionnaireOther

    Assessment of the inadequacy between dietary and medicinal calcium intake by the Fardellone self-questionnaire and the patient's clinical record

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of patients deficient, within the norm and above the norm with or without supplementation

    percentage of patients

    Measured: Day 1

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Previously performed bone densitometry

    Results of densitormetry by a T score

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Prevalence of a history of fracture

    Number of bone fractures the patient has already had before inclusion

    Measured: Day 1

  3. First indication for the initiation of anti-osteoporotic treatment.

    Date of the first indication for the initiation of an anti-osteoporotic treatment.

    This date is appearing in the medical record

    Measured: Day 1

  4. Duration without treatment before a fracture occurs

    Duration without treatment before a fracture occurs and type of the treatment

    Measured: Day 1

  5. Number of participants who need for readjustment by the rheumatologist after inclusion

    Implementation of educational measures by the rheumatologist in the event of inadequacy and optimization of anti-osteoporotic treatments

    Measured: Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Feb 2025
  2. Study start3 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion29 Jan 2026
  4. Study completion29 Jan 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
86 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06847087
Sponsor's protocol ID
HCC-008
Other IDs
ID-RCB 2024-A02648-39
Acronym
MONTE-CRIST'OS
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
21 Feb 2025
Last updated
3 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Osteoporosis, Post-Traumatic and Calcium Supplementation, run by Centre Hospitalier de Colmar at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of patients deficient, within the norm and above the norm with or without supplementation (time frame: Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in