AzTrials
AzTrials

Abdominal PainPhase 3MoKANCT06835504

Morphine or Ketamine for Analgesia

A Phase 3 study testing Ketamine hydrochloride and Morphine sulphate in people with Abdominal Pain and Isolated Extremity Fracture, run by Columbia University at 8 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Pain is common in children presenting to the emergency department but is frequently undertreated, leading to both short- and long-term consequences. Morphine is the standard treatment for children with moderate to severe acute pain, but its use is associated with serious side effects and caregiver and clinician… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Abdominal Pain, Isolated Extremity Fracture, Pain
What is being tested?
Ketamine hydrochloride and Morphine sulphate
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,010 participants
Where
8 sitesUnited States
Study dates
17 Oct 2026to 23 Apr 2030
Phase
Phase 3

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Age 6 to < 18 years old
  • Chief complaint includes abdominal pain OR isolated long-bone extremity fracture (suspected or proven)
  • Self-reported pain score of ≥ 6/10
  • Requires IV morphine for analgesia as determined by the treating physician

Who cannot join

  • Weighs more than 81.9 kg
  • Known allergy/contraindication to morphine or ketamine
  • Antecedent receipt of ketamine related to presenting complaint
  • Inability to use self-report measures of pain or questionnaires
  • Chronic disease associated with pain
  • Chronic pain conditions requiring use of opioids as an outpatient
Show all 19Show fewer
  • Abnormal vital signs at baseline, defined as oxygen saturation <92% and/or low respiratory rate and/or low heart rate and/or low blood pressure per age
  • Altered mental state (e.g., GCS < 14 or clinical intoxication)
  • Known history of schizophrenia, liver or kidney problems, or osteogenesis imperfecta
  • Concern for open fracture, neurovascular compromise, or compartment syndrome
  • Injuries in addition to the extremity injury (e.g., head, neck, abdomen)
  • Known or reported pregnancy
  • Patients who are breastfeeding
  • Patient or parent/guardian does not speak English or Spanish
  • Patient previously enrolled in this study
  • Known significant or uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
  • Known increased intracranial pressure and/or elevated intraocular pressure
  • Currently taking or having used a monoamine oxidase inhibitor within 14 days
  • Wards of state, foster children, or children in custody

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Daniel S Tsze, MD, MPH contact

917-375-2647

dst2141@cumc.columbia.edu

Amy L Drendel, DO, MS contact

adrendel@mcw.edu

8 sites in 1 country

United States8 sites, 8 recruiting
  • Arthur M. Blank Hospital

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30329

    Becky Burger, MD, 404-785-5437, beckyburger@emory.edu

    Claudia R Morris, claudia.r.morris@emory.edu

    Not yet recruiting
  • Children's Hospital Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, 90027

    Deborah Liu, MD, 323-660-2450, deliu@chla.usc.edu

    Not yet recruiting
  • Children's Wisconsin

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

    Amy L Drendel, DO, MS, 877-266-8989, adrendel@mcw.edu

    Recruiting
  • NewYork Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital

    New York, New York, 10032

    Daniel S Tsze, MD, MPH, 212-305-6628, dst2141@cumc.columbia.edu

    Raquel Shrager, rs3823@cumc.columbia.edu

    Not yet recruiting
  • UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224

    Maren Lunoe, MD, 412-692-5325, maren.lunoe@chp.edu

    Bob Hickey, MD, robert.hickey@chp.edu

    Not yet recruiting
  • UC Davis Children's Hospital

    Sacramento, California, 95817

    Leah Tzimenatos, MD, 800-282-3284, lstzimenatos@ucdavis.edu

    Recruiting
  • Seattle Children's Hospital

    Seattle, Washington, 98105

    Eileen Klein, MD, MPH, 206-987-8811, eileen.klein@seattlechildrens.org

    Recruiting
  • Nemours Children's Hospital

    Wilmington, Delaware, 19803

    Amy Thompson, MD, MSCR, 302-651-4200, amy.thompson@nemours.org

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Intravenous Sub-Dissociative Ketamine Versus Intravenous Morphine in Children With Acute Pain

Pain is common in children presenting to the emergency department but is frequently undertreated, leading to both short- and long-term consequences. Morphine is the standard treatment for children with moderate to severe acute pain, but its use is associated with serious side effects and caregiver and clinician concerns related to opioid administration. The investigators aim to determine if sub-dissociative ketamine is non-inferior to morphine for treating acute pain and a preferable alternative for treating acute pain in children because of its more favorable side effect profile and potential long-term benefits related to pain-related function, analgesic use/misuse, and mental and behavioral health outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Aim 1: To determine if IV sub-dissociative ketamine is non-inferior to IV morphine for decreasing pain intensity in children presenting to an ED with acute pain. The investigators hypothesize that IV sub-dissociative ketamine is non-inferior to IV morphine for decreasing pain intensity in children with acute abdominal pain or an extremity fracture.

Aim 2: To compare the rate of acute (<2 hours) adverse events, including cardiopulmonary adverse events requiring an intervention, associated with IV sub-dissociative ketamine and IV morphine. The investigators hypothesize that there is a smaller proportion of cardiopulmonary adverse events requiring an intervention associated with IV sub-dissociative ketamine compared to IV morphine.

Aim 3: To determine the relationship between ketamine and long-term sequelae of acute pain. The investigators hypothesize that children who receive ketamine will have better levels of pain-related function during the first week following ED presentation and will have greater odds of experiencing more favorable post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression outcomes 1-6 months after ED presentation compared to children who received IV morphine.

Being tested
Ketamine hydrochloride, Morphine sulphate
Keywords
Ketamine, Morphine, Pediatric, Children, Sub-dissociative, Opioid-sparing, Emergency medicine, Emergency care, Emergency department, Post-traumatic stress, Anxiety, Depression, Abdominal pain, Fracture, Analgesia
Medical subject headings
Abdominal Pain, Pain, Emergencies, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Fractures, Bone, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ketamine hydrochlorideDrug

    Sub-dissociative ketamine, IV

  • Morphine sulphateDrug

    Morphine, IV

Study groups in NCT06835504
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sub-dissociative ketamineExperimental0.25 mg/kg
Receives: Drug: Ketamine hydrochloride
MorphineActive comparator0.1 mg/kg
Receives: Drug: Morphine sulphate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain intensity

    Self-reported pain intensity measured using the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS). Scored from 0 to 10. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Measured: Up to 240 minutes after completion of study drug administration or until a terminal event occurs

  2. Cardiopulmonary adverse events requiring an intervention

    Cardiopulmonary adverse events (e.g., hypoxia, respiratory depression, hypotension) requiring an intervention (e.g., isotonic fluid bolus; vasopressor; chest compression; naloxone; supplemental oxygen; non-invasive positive pressure ventilation; bag-valve-mask ventilation; tracheal intubation)

    Measured: Up to 120 minutes after completion of study drug administration or until a terminal event occurs

  3. Pain-related function

    Pain intensity and related functional limitations due to pain, measured using the Parents' Postoperative Pain Measure (PPPM). Scored from 0 to 10. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Measured: Days 1, 2,3, and 7 after discharge.

  4. Post-traumatic stress

    Stress related to the pain experienced measured using the University of California Los Angeles Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (UCLA PTSD). Scored from 0 to 80. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline (at time of enrollment) and days 7, 30, 90 and 180 after discharge.

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Desire of rescue analgesia

    Number of participants who indicated that they desired a rescue analgesic

    Measured: Up to 120 minutes after completion of study drug administration or until a terminal event occurs

  2. Desire for same analgesic

    Number of participants who would want the same analgesic (i.e., study medication) again in the future.

    Measured: At 240 minutes after completion of study drug administration or when a terminal event occurs

  3. Depth of sedation

    Depth of sedation measured using the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). Scored from 0 to 4. 0 is deepest level of sedation (unarousable), 4 is awake and alert.

    Measured: Up to 240 minutes after completion of study drug administration or until a terminal event occurs

  4. Adverse events, non-cardiopulmonary

    Adverse events that are non-cardiopulmonary and can include (but are not limited to) opioid-related adverse events or those as measured using the Side Effects Rating Scale of Dissociative Anesthetics (SERSDA).

    Measured: Up to 120 minutes after completion of study drug administration or until a terminal event occurs

  5. Analgesic/opioid use after discharge

    Name, dose and duration of analgesics and/or opioids used to calculate total days of use during the elapsed time since last assessment

    Measured: Days 1, 2, 3, 7, 30, 90, and 180 after discharge

  6. Missed school or work

    Days of missed school or work related to the chief complaint.

    Measured: Day 7 after discharge

  7. Return visit

    Number of return visits related to the chief complaint, which can include (but not limited to) return visits to the emergency department or primary care physician

    Measured: Day 7, 30, 90, 180 after discharge

  8. Anxiety

    PROMIS Anxiety 8a. Scored from 8 to 40. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline (at time of enrollment) and days 7, 30, 90, and 180 after discharge

  9. Depression

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Scored from 8 to 40. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline (at time of enrollment) and days 7, 30, 90, and 180 after discharge

  10. Substance use

    National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) modified assist tool. Scored from 0 to 360. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline (at time of enrollment) and day 30 after discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Feb 2025
  2. Study start17 Oct 2026
  3. Primary completion23 Apr 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion23 Apr 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Non-inferiority trial design
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,010 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06835504
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAAV7115
Other IDs
U01HD116253, IRB00181652
Acronym
MoKA
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
16 Dec 2024
Last updated
20 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Consistent with the HEAL Public Access and Data Sharing Policy, one of our goals is to assure rapid data sharing. The de-identified Underlying Primary Data will only be shared when confirmed to be de-identified by the EMSC Data Center (EDC), according to the standards set forth in the Department of Health and Human Services Regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects, to ensure that the identities of research participants cannot be readily ascertained from the data. Underlying Primary Data will also be stripped of identifiers according to the HIPAA Privacy Rule. The EDC is familiar with these processes given their vast experience with data management. The de-identified data will be made available at the conclusion of the project period, and any manuscripts published before the end of the project period will have accompanying release of relevant deidentified data at the time of the manuscript publications.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in