Familiar HypercholesterolemiaUPPA-FHNCT06833944
High Intensity Interval Training in the Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia (UPPA-FH)
A study testing HIIT intervention program and MICT intervention program in people with Familiar Hypercholesterolemia, run by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación Biomédica Andalucía Oriental at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
This study has one main objective: a) To assess the impact of two different supervised exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness and markers of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with Familiar Hipercolesterolemia (FH), and to unravel the underlying mechanisms behind these effects. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Familiar Hypercholesterolemia
- What is being tested?
- HIIT intervention program and MICT intervention program
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 20 Feb 2025to 31 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Individuals with a diagnosis of genetic FH.
- > 18 years old.
- Minimum follow-up of 1 year in the Vascular Risk Clinic of the Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (HUVN).
- Clinical and treatment stability.
- Non-pathological angio-TAC of coronary arteries in the 2 years prior to the study (for participants >45 years old).
Who cannot join
- Inability to read, understand and sign the informed consent.
- Contraindications to exercise.
- History of clinical CVD (ischemic heart disease, stroke, and/or peripheral arterial disease).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Alberto Soriano-Maldonado, PHD contact
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital
Granada, Granada, 18014
Jose A Vargas-Hitos, MD, PHD, +34625943933, joseantoniovh@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: Unraveling the Potential of Physical Activity in the Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Impact of Exercise on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Atherosclerosis Progression, and Underlying Mechanisms
This study has one main objective:
- To assess the impact of two different supervised exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness and markers of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with Familiar Hipercolesterolemia (FH), and to unravel the underlying mechanisms behind these effects.
The starting hypothesis of the UPPA-FH project anticipates that both exercise interventions will produce a large increase in cardiorespiratory fitness and will improve significant markers of atherosclerosis in patients with FH, with high-intensity interval training program (HIIT) being more efficient than the moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) modality. The main effects will be mediated by a significant change in the metabolomic signature of the participants. In addition, higher physical activity will be associated with more favorable markers of atherosclerosis progression, as shown through blood and image technique
Read the detailed description
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder characterized by high levels of LDL cholesterol and an increased risk of atherosclerosis and premature cardiovascular disease. From a clinical perspective, FH patients require lifelong management and monitoring of their cholesterol levels and may require multiple medications to control their cholesterol levels, leading to increased healthcare utilization and costs. From an economic perspective, the lifetime costs of managing FH can be significant and can include the cost of medications, diagnostic tests, and hospitalizations for cardiovascular events. In Spain, FH represents a heavy burden for the health care system, with direct costs of 37,299,000 €, indirect costs (due to loss of labor productivity) of 50,049,000 €, and an average of 25 years of life lost adjusted for labor productivity. From a public health perspective, FH affects around 25 million people worldwide that are at an increased risk of premature mortality, making FH a significant public health concern.
Hypercholesterolemia is one of the main vascular risk factors (VRF) related to the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), mainly myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke, the main causes of global mortality in the past decades. It is important to note that patients with FH present an increased prevalence of CVD at a very early age (44 years on average) and, in comparison to the general population, patients with FH have a 13.2 times higher risk of developing atherosclerotic CVD; specifically, up to 50% of men and 30% of women with FH will suffer an MI before the age of 60. Atherosclerosis is a complex process that involves endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, or oxidative stress. The presence of atherosclerosis can be assessed with positron emission tomography (PET), which has shown a high ability to predict the development of atherosclerotic plaque and cardiovascular events even after the consideration of classic VRF, so it is used as a method of early diagnosis of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with chronic proinflammatory diseases. Therefore, the use of PET along with various plasma markers of inflammation in patients with FH (including C-reactive protein, [CRP], interleukin 10 [IL10], oxidized LDL [oxLDL], and the intracellular adhesion molecule 1 [ICAM1]), could allow the detection of atherosclerotic disease in the very early stages. Consequently, understanding novel markers that allow early identification of subclinical atherosclerosis, as well as strategies for reducing the VRF associated with FH, are key targets in these patients.
The treatment of hypercholesterolemia is primarily based on pharmacological therapies such as statins, ezetimibe, and monoclonal antibodies, which can decrease LDL cholesterol levels by up to 60%. However, the rate of achieving LDL cholesterol targets set by clinical practice guidelines is low (30-40%) due to poor tolerance to high doses of statins and other reasons. Importantly, new risk factors such as chronic vascular inflammation and oxidative stress are now considered in the etiology of atherosclerotic CVD beyond LDL cholesterol levels. Consequently, new treatment approaches are needed to address the treatment of FH as an important public health concern.
For all the above, unraveling the role of potential protective factors and interventions that might significantly improve the cardiometabolic profile and reduce the risk of morbi-mortality in this population, as well as the mechanisms involved, is of wide clinical and public health interest.
The UPPA-FH project will unravel the role of physical activity and different exercise interventions on critical health markers in men and women with FH and will study the mechanisms by which these effects are produced. For instance, whether the effects of exercise are mediated by changes in the metabolomic signature related to blood lipids will be explored. This will enable i) international institutions to develop clinical guidelines including exercise as a first-line treatment for the management of FH and ii) to unravel (for the first time) the potential mechanisms behind the effects of exercise in this population.
Physical activity and physical fitness are strong markers of health that are positively and strongly associated with survival in the general population and in patients with CVD. However, the role of physical activity on markers of atherosclerosis progression, inflammation, endothelial function, and other CVD risk factors in patients with FH has not been explored and would provide a framework for targeted physical activity promotion interventions. Similarly, CRF is associated with a better lipid profile, lower rates of pro-atherosclerotic VRF (hypertension, diabetes), and less subclinical atherosclerosis in different populations and is associated with a lower risk of death from all causes and a lower risk of death from cardiovascular diseases (CVD). CRF has also been shown to be a better predictor of mortality than other traditional vascular risk factors (VRF), such as hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, smoking, or type 2 diabetes. In men with hypercholesterolemia, higher cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is associated with up to 45% lower risk of CVD mortality, independent of other clinical risk factors, which underscores the importance of CRF in the primary prevention of CVD in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Therefore, exploring the value of CRF as a marker of health in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and how exercise interventions can improve CRF is of high scientific and clinical value.
Although exercise interventions can reduce inflammation, oxidative stress and improve endothelial function in different populations and is a cost-effective therapy with similar benefits to pharmacological treatment in reducing CV and all-cause mortality, its effects in patients with FH have not been addressed before. The UPPA-FH will unravel the role of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on cardiorespiratory fitness and the course of atherosclerosis in men and women with FH. These interventions have proved to be effective in improving CRF and improve CVD risk factors, and HIIT has been shown to be a time-efficient intervention that increases adherence due to the limited amount of time needed and the clinically relevant benefits in patients with and without CVD. HIIT protocols also improve anthropometric, metabolic, and vascular function in people with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, coronary disease, obesity, or the general population. Furthermore, HIIT has been shown to be safe in patients with high CV risk, such as those with coronary disease and heart failure, when developed in supervised environments.
Unlocking how physical activity and fitness impact the development of atherosclerosis and the unique metabolomic signature of men and women with FH is a key goal of this proposal. But we're not stopping there. The UPPA-FH project goes one step further to uncover the specific effects of different exercise interventions and regimens on key health markers for FH, such as cardiorespiratory fitness and atherosclerosis, and to understand the underlying mechanisms for these benefits. This proposal has the potential to make breakthrough discoveries that will pave the way for future interventions and for developing clinical guidelines, including exercise recommendations for FH patients, which are currently lacking.
The novelty of this proposal relies on discovering the extent to which exercise can improve key health parameters in FM patients, which is currently unknown. The clinical guidelines for these patients lack specific information on physical activity and exercise, which limits the ability of the health care system to benefit this population. Based on evidence on many similar populations, it can be affirmed that exercise has a huge potential to improve critical markers in patients with FH. Another novelty of the UPPA-FH study is to unravel the mechanisms underlying the effects of exercise, including inflammatory markers, oxidative stress and the metabolomic signature. Finally, also a novelty of this study will be to address the safety of moderate and high intensity exercise in this special population of high CV risk by providing detailed information about the adverse effects of the interventions; the lack of adverse effects reporting in exercise trials is a very common issue that this study will clearly address. All in all, through a highly collaborative y multidisciplinary research approach team and design, this study will contribute to improve the current management of FH patients, and will allow to understand the reasons why exercise is beneficial in this genetic condition.
- Conditions
- Familiar Hypercholesterolemia
- Being tested
- HIIT intervention program, MICT intervention program
- Keywords
- Inflamation markers, Cardiovascular risk, Physical fitness, Exercise, Cardiovascular disease, LDL cholesterol
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity, Cardiovascular Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HIIT intervention programOther
The HIIT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 16 weeks (a total of 48 sessions lasting 36 minutes). The program will be divided into two phases: phase 1 (adaptation to HIIT training: during the first 4 weeks, the intensity will be progressively increased to ensure the safety and progressive physical conditioning of the patients.
The high-intensity intervals will follow the Norwegian 4 x 4-minute HIIT model: 4 bouts of 4 minutes of high intensity corresponding to a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) 15 to 18 on the Borg 6 to 20 Scale33 and an 85-95%HRmax, interspersed with 3-minute active recovery intervals (RPE of 11 to 13 and 54-69%HRmax). This protocol has been widely applied and is safe in general and in clinical populations. Additionally, this protocol includes the training parameters recently proposed in a recent meta-analysis to maximize the training effects of HIIT on cardiorespiratory fitness (primary outcome).
MICT intervention programOther
The MICT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 16 weeks (a total of 48 sessions lasting 44 minutes). The workout will be performed at RPE 11 to 13 (54-69%HRmax) to provide an isoenergetic workload (same energy expenditure) as the HIIT group.
Each session will include 3 parts: warm-up (5 min), main MICT workout (34 min), and a cool-down (5 min). Warm-up will include mobility, core, and aerobic exercise involving major muscle groups. The main workout (MICT) will include exercises involving major muscle groups using the same materials and rationale as commented on in the HIIT group. The cool-down phase will include aerobic exercise at a lower intensity, stretching, and relaxation exercises (RPE<11). The highest and average HR and RPE for each session will be registered.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) intervention program | Experimental | The HIIT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 16 weeks (a total of 48 sessions lasting 36 minutes). The high-intensity intervals will follow the Norwegian 4 x 4-minute HIIT model: 4 bouts of 4 minutes of high intensity corresponding to a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) 15 to 18 on the Borg 6 to 20 Scale and an 85-95%HRmax, interspersed with 3-minute active recovery intervals (RPE of 11 to 13 and 54-69%HRmax). Receives: Other: HIIT intervention program |
| Moderate Intensity Continous Training (MICT) intervention program | Experimental | The MICT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 16 weeks (a total of 48 sessions lasting 44 minutes). The workout will be performed at RPE 11 to 13 (54-69%HRmax) to provide an isoenergetic workload (same energy expenditure) as the HIIT group Receives: Other: MICT intervention program |
| Control group | No intervention | The control group will follow a usual care regime during the intervention and will not participate in supervised exercise. However, the participants randomized to this group will be invited to participate in a similar intervention once the study is completed (waiting list control group). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Cardiorespiratory fitness will be assessed using the Bruce Protocol Ramp, a variation of the widely used Bruce Protocol. The test will be performed on a treadmill, with speed and incline progressively increasing every 15 seconds until exhaustion. Because CRF is the primary study outcome, maximal oxygen uptake will be continuously measured using the Vyntus CPT.
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Secondary outcomes (18)
Vascular inflammation
Will be evaluated by performing a PET-CT. This examination is performed with an integrated PET/CT scanner (Siemens Biograph Vision 600, from Siemens Healthcare®, Erlangen, Germany). The protocol for the preparation procedure, administration of the radiopharmaceutical and image acquisition will be based on the available international recommendations. Before the examination, the patient is subjected to a fast of at least 6 hours and adequate hydration, and should present a capillary glucose level lower than 6.8 mmol/L (122.51 mg/dL) at the time of radiopharmaceutical administration. The evaluation of the images will include a visual and semi-quantitative analysis by calculating the different metabolic quantitative parameters that include the SUV (Standard Uptake Value) normalized by body weight and lean mass (SUL) maximum. The regions of interest (ROIs) for the calculation of SUL will be: carotid arteries, aortic arch, abdominal aorta and common iliac arteries.
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Carotid Doppler Ultrasound
Non-invasive technique that allows visualization of the walls of the carotid artery using ultrasound. The General Electric's Logic F6® ultrasound device will be used. The mean intima-media thickness (mean IMT, mm) will be used as a secondary outcome measure.
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Arterial Stiffness
Evaluated by determining the VOP, which depends on arterial stiffness (the more speed the more stiffness). Its elevation is a early marker of atherosclerosis. The Mobil-O-Graph® 24h pulse wave monitor device (IEM GmbH, Stolberg, Germany), whose operation is based on oscillometry recorded by a blood pressure cuff placed on the brachial artery, will be used.
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
IL-6
- Inflammatory marker: (pg/mL).
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Ultrasensitive PCR
Inflammatory marker (mg/L).
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Fibrinogen
Coagulation (mg/dL, von Clauss assay).
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Oxidized LDL
Oxidative stress marker: (U/L)
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
ICAM-1
Endothelial dysfunction marker: (pg/mL)
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
LDLc (mg/dL)
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
HDL-c (mg/dL)
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks)
Triglycerides
Lipid profile (mg/dL).
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Apolipoprotein B
ApoB (mg/dL)
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Lipoprotein(a)
Lp(a) (mg/dL)
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks)
Fat percentage
Total fat percentage will be measured by densitometry (DEXA).
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Visceral adipose tissue
Will be assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using a Discovery Wi system (Hologic, Bedford, MA, USA). Participants will be scanned in the supine posi-tion according to the manufacturer's standard protocol.
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks)
Lean tissue
Lean mass will be measured by densitometry (DEXA).
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Lower body strength
Lower body strength will be evaluated using 30 Second Chair Stand Test.
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Risk of suffering a cardiovascular event in 5 and 10 years
Will be estimated using the SAFEHEART-Risk Equation.
Measured: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2025
- Study start20 Feb 2025
- Primary completion28 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Familiar HypercholesterolemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel group randomized and controlled clinical trial
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación Biomédica Andalucía Oriental
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, José Antonio Vargas Hitos, Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación Biomédica Andalucía Oriental
- Investigators
- Jose A Vargas-Hitos, MD, PHD, Principal investigator, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, SpainAlberto Soriano Maldonado, PhD, Principal investigator, Universidad de Almeria
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06833944
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PID2022-142844OB-I00
- Acronym
- UPPA-FH
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 22 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The study protocol and participant data are not publicly available due to ethical and privacy considerations. However, deidentified participant data may be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to institutional and ethical approvals.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Unraveling the Potential of Physical Activity in the Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Impact of Exercise on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Atherosclerosis Progression, and Underlying Mechanisms
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06833944
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UPPA-FH / PID2022-142844OB-I00
- Conditions
- Familiar Hypercholesterolemia
- Keywords
- Inflamation markers, Cardiovascular risk, Physical fitness, Exercise, Cardiovascular disease, LDL cholesterol
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación Biomédica Andalucía OrientalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study has one main objective:
- To assess the impact of two different supervised exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness and markers of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with Familiar Hipercolesterolemia (FH), and to unravel the underlying mechanisms behind these effects.
The starting hypothesis of the UPPA-FH project anticipates that both exercise interventions will produce a large increase in cardiorespiratory fitness and will improve significant markers of atherosclerosis in patients with FH, with high-intensity interval training program (HIIT) being more efficient than the moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) modality. The main effects will be mediated by a significant change in the metabolomic signature of the participants. In addition, higher physical activity will be associated with more favorable markers of atherosclerosis progression, as shown through blood and image technique
Detailed description
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder characterized by high levels of LDL cholesterol and an increased risk of atherosclerosis and premature cardiovascular disease. From a clinical perspective, FH patients require lifelong management and monitoring of their cholesterol levels and may require multiple medications to control their cholesterol levels, leading to increased healthcare utilization and costs. From an economic perspective, the lifetime costs of managing FH can be significant and can include the cost of medications, diagnostic tests, and hospitalizations for cardiovascular events. In Spain, FH represents a heavy burden for the health care system, with direct costs of 37,299,000 €, indirect costs (due to loss of labor productivity) of 50,049,000 €, and an average of 25 years of life lost adjusted for labor productivity. From a public health perspective, FH affects around 25 million people worldwide that are at an increased risk of premature mortality, making FH a significant public health concern.
Hypercholesterolemia is one of the main vascular risk factors (VRF) related to the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), mainly myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke, the main causes of global mortality in the past decades. It is important to note that patients with FH present an increased prevalence of CVD at a very early age (44 years on average) and, in comparison to the general population, patients with FH have a 13.2 times higher risk of developing atherosclerotic CVD; specifically, up to 50% of men and 30% of women with FH will suffer an MI before the age of 60. Atherosclerosis is a complex process that involves endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, or oxidative stress. The presence of atherosclerosis can be assessed with positron emission tomography (PET), which has shown a high ability to predict the development of atherosclerotic plaque and cardiovascular events even after the consideration of classic VRF, so it is used as a method of early diagnosis of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with chronic proinflammatory diseases. Therefore, the use of PET along with various plasma markers of inflammation in patients with FH (including C-reactive protein, [CRP], interleukin 10 [IL10], oxidized LDL [oxLDL], and the intracellular adhesion molecule 1 [ICAM1]), could allow the detection of atherosclerotic disease in the very early stages. Consequently, understanding novel markers that allow early identification of subclinical atherosclerosis, as well as strategies for reducing the VRF associated with FH, are key targets in these patients.
The treatment of hypercholesterolemia is primarily based on pharmacological therapies such as statins, ezetimibe, and monoclonal antibodies, which can decrease LDL cholesterol levels by up to 60%. However, the rate of achieving LDL cholesterol targets set by clinical practice guidelines is low (30-40%) due to poor tolerance to high doses of statins and other reasons. Importantly, new risk factors such as chronic vascular inflammation and oxidative stress are now considered in the etiology of atherosclerotic CVD beyond LDL cholesterol levels. Consequently, new treatment approaches are needed to address the treatment of FH as an important public health concern.
For all the above, unraveling the role of potential protective factors and interventions that might significantly improve the cardiometabolic profile and reduce the risk of morbi-mortality in this population, as well as the mechanisms involved, is of wide clinical and public health interest.
The UPPA-FH project will unravel the role of physical activity and different exercise interventions on critical health markers in men and women with FH and will study the mechanisms by which these effects are produced. For instance, whether the effects of exercise are mediated by changes in the metabolomic signature related to blood lipids will be explored. This will enable i) international institutions to develop clinical guidelines including exercise as a first-line treatment for the management of FH and ii) to unravel (for the first time) the potential mechanisms behind the effects of exercise in this population.
Physical activity and physical fitness are strong markers of health that are positively and strongly associated with survival in the general population and in patients with CVD. However, the role of physical activity on markers of atherosclerosis progression, inflammation, endothelial function, and other CVD risk factors in patients with FH has not been explored and would provide a framework for targeted physical activity promotion interventions. Similarly, CRF is associated with a better lipid profile, lower rates of pro-atherosclerotic VRF (hypertension, diabetes), and less subclinical atherosclerosis in different populations and is associated with a lower risk of death from all causes and a lower risk of death from cardiovascular diseases (CVD). CRF has also been shown to be a better predictor of mortality than other traditional vascular risk factors (VRF), such as hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, smoking, or type 2 diabetes. In men with hypercholesterolemia, higher cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is associated with up to 45% lower risk of CVD mortality, independent of other clinical risk factors, which underscores the importance of CRF in the primary prevention of CVD in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Therefore, exploring the value of CRF as a marker of health in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and how exercise interventions can improve CRF is of high scientific and clinical value.
Although exercise interventions can reduce inflammation, oxidative stress and improve endothelial function in different populations and is a cost-effective therapy with similar benefits to pharmacological treatment in reducing CV and all-cause mortality, its effects in patients with FH have not been addressed before. The UPPA-FH will unravel the role of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on cardiorespiratory fitness and the course of atherosclerosis in men and women with FH. These interventions have proved to be effective in improving CRF and improve CVD risk factors, and HIIT has been shown to be a time-efficient intervention that increases adherence due to the limited amount of time needed and the clinically relevant benefits in patients with and without CVD. HIIT protocols also improve anthropometric, metabolic, and vascular function in people with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, coronary disease, obesity, or the general population. Furthermore, HIIT has been shown to be safe in patients with high CV risk, such as those with coronary disease and heart failure, when developed in supervised environments.
Unlocking how physical activity and fitness impact the development of atherosclerosis and the unique metabolomic signature of men and women with FH is a key goal of this proposal. But we're not stopping there. The UPPA-FH project goes one step further to uncover the specific effects of different exercise interventions and regimens on key health markers for FH, such as cardiorespiratory fitness and atherosclerosis, and to understand the underlying mechanisms for these benefits. This proposal has the potential to make breakthrough discoveries that will pave the way for future interventions and for developing clinical guidelines, including exercise recommendations for FH patients, which are currently lacking.
The novelty of this proposal relies on discovering the extent to which exercise can improve key health parameters in FM patients, which is currently unknown. The clinical guidelines for these patients lack specific information on physical activity and exercise, which limits the ability of the health care system to benefit this population. Based on evidence on many similar populations, it can be affirmed that exercise has a huge potential to improve critical markers in patients with FH. Another novelty of the UPPA-FH study is to unravel the mechanisms underlying the effects of exercise, including inflammatory markers, oxidative stress and the metabolomic signature. Finally, also a novelty of this study will be to address the safety of moderate and high intensity exercise in this special population of high CV risk by providing detailed information about the adverse effects of the interventions; the lack of adverse effects reporting in exercise trials is a very common issue that this study will clearly address. All in all, through a highly collaborative y multidisciplinary research approach team and design, this study will contribute to improve the current management of FH patients, and will allow to understand the reasons why exercise is beneficial in this genetic condition.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Parallel group randomized and controlled clinical trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) intervention program | Experimental | Other: HIIT intervention programThe HIIT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 16 weeks (a total of 48 sessions lasting 36 minutes). The high-intensity intervals will follow the Norwegian 4 x 4-minute HIIT model: 4 bouts of 4 minutes of high intensity corresponding to a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) 15 to 18 on the Borg 6 to 20 Scale and an 85-95%HRmax, interspersed with 3-minute active recovery intervals (RPE of 11 to 13 and 54-69%HRmax). |
| Moderate Intensity Continous Training (MICT) intervention program | Experimental | Other: MICT intervention programThe MICT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 16 weeks (a total of 48 sessions lasting 44 minutes). The workout will be performed at RPE 11 to 13 (54-69%HRmax) to provide an isoenergetic workload (same energy expenditure) as the HIIT group |
| Control group | No intervention | –The control group will follow a usual care regime during the intervention and will not participate in supervised exercise. However, the participants randomized to this group will be invited to participate in a similar intervention once the study is completed (waiting list control group). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Individuals with a diagnosis of genetic FH.
- > 18 years old.
- Minimum follow-up of 1 year in the Vascular Risk Clinic of the Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital (HUVN).
- Clinical and treatment stability.
- Non-pathological angio-TAC of coronary arteries in the 2 years prior to the study (for participants >45 years old).
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Inability to read, understand and sign the informed consent.
- Contraindications to exercise.
- History of clinical CVD (ischemic heart disease, stroke, and/or peripheral arterial disease).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HIIT intervention programThe HIIT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 16 weeks (a total of 48 sessions lasting 36 minutes). The program will be divided into two phases: phase 1 (adaptation to HIIT training: during the first 4 weeks, the intensity will be progressively increased to ensure the safety and progressive physical conditioning of the patients. The high-intensity intervals will follow the Norwegian 4 x 4-minute HIIT model: 4 bouts of 4 minutes of high intensity corresponding to a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) 15 to 18 on the Borg 6 to 20 Scale33 and an 85-95%HRmax, interspersed with 3-minute active recovery intervals (RPE of 11 to 13 and 54-69%HRmax). This protocol has been widely applied and is safe in general and in clinical populations. Additionally, this protocol includes the training parameters recently proposed in a recent meta-analysis to maximize the training effects of HIIT on cardiorespiratory fitness (primary outcome). | Other | High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) intervention program |
| MICT intervention programThe MICT protocol will involve 3 training sessions per week for 16 weeks (a total of 48 sessions lasting 44 minutes). The workout will be performed at RPE 11 to 13 (54-69%HRmax) to provide an isoenergetic workload (same energy expenditure) as the HIIT group. Each session will include 3 parts: warm-up (5 min), main MICT workout (34 min), and a cool-down (5 min). Warm-up will include mobility, core, and aerobic exercise involving major muscle groups. The main workout (MICT) will include exercises involving major muscle groups using the same materials and rationale as commented on in the HIIT group. The cool-down phase will include aerobic exercise at a lower intensity, stretching, and relaxation exercises (RPE<11). The highest and average HR and RPE for each session will be registered. | Other | Moderate Intensity Continous Training (MICT) intervention program |
Primary outcome
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Cardiorespiratory fitness will be assessed using the Bruce Protocol Ramp, a variation of the widely used Bruce Protocol. The test will be performed on a treadmill, with speed and incline progressively increasing every 15 seconds until exhaustion. Because CRF is the primary study outcome, maximal oxygen uptake will be continuously measured using the Vyntus CPT.
18 secondary outcomes
Vascular inflammation
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Carotid Doppler Ultrasound
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Arterial Stiffness
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
IL-6
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Ultrasensitive PCR
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Fibrinogen
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Oxidized LDL
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
ICAM-1
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks)
Triglycerides
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Apolipoprotein B
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Lipoprotein(a)
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks)
Fat percentage
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Visceral adipose tissue
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks)
Lean tissue
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Lower body strength
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Risk of suffering a cardiovascular event in 5 and 10 years
Time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Sep 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The study protocol and participant data are not publicly available due to ethical and privacy considerations. However, deidentified participant data may be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to institutional and ethical approvals.
Related trials for Familiar Hypercholesterolemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Early Detection of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Pre-school Children ( CzeCH-IT)
Familial Hypercholesterolaemia
Recruiting
Pilot Study of "Bottarga" Supplementation: A Little-known, Sustainable "Blue" Food
Prediabetes, Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Alberto Soriano-Maldonado, PHD contact
Jose A Vargas-Hitos, MD, PHD principal investigator
Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain
Alberto Soriano Maldonado, PhD principal investigator
Universidad de Almeria
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HIIT intervention program and MICT intervention program in people with Familiar Hypercholesterolemia, run by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación Biomédica Andalucía Oriental at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jose A Vargas-Hitos, MD, PHD (+34625943933, joseantoniovh@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cardiorespiratory fitness (time frame: Before and after the training intervention or control (16 weeks).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2026.