Dental CariesNCT06833528
Clinical Performance of Novel Alkasite Restorative Material "Cention Forte" in Class II Restorations
A study testing tooth restoration in people with Dental Caries and Dental Caries Class II, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Background \& Rationale: Self-adhesive materials eliminate the need for adhesive protocols, offering advantages for direct restorations. The bulk-fill technique simplifies application by allowing a single-layer restoration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Caries, Dental Caries Class II
- What is being tested?
- tooth restoration
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 38 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 13 Jul 2023to 1 Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy individuals aged 18-35 years
- Brushing twice daily and maintaining good oral hygiene
- At least two interproximal Class II carious lesions in molar teeth
- At least 20 teeth in occlusion with antagonist contacts
- Signed informed consent and completion of initial periodontal therapy
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Advanced periodontal disease
- Bruxism or malocclusion
- Allergy to resin-based materials or local anesthesia
- Endodontically treated teeth or those requiring pulp capping
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Assessment of the Clinical Performance of Novel Alkasite Restorative Material "Cention Forte" in Class II Restorations
Background \& Rationale:
Self-adhesive materials eliminate the need for adhesive protocols, offering advantages for direct restorations. The bulk-fill technique simplifies application by allowing a single-layer restoration. Glass ionomer cements (GICs) provide benefits such as fluoride release, remineralization, and moisture tolerance but have limitations, including poor aesthetics and low mechanical strength. To overcome these, hybrid materials combining GIC properties with composite durability have emerged.
Read more
Cention Forte, a capsulated alkasite restorative material, offers high flexural strength (>100 MPa), bioactivity, and ease of application. The manufacturer claims it is an ideal posterior restorative, potentially replacing composite resins and amalgam. Given that composite restorations fail more frequently in patients with isolation difficulties, limited mouth opening, or parafunctional habits, alternative materials are needed. This study evaluates Cention Forte as an alternative to conventional composites.
Objective:
To compare the clinical performance of Cention Forte with a universal composite resin (G-aenial Achord, GC) in Class II restorations over 18 months using FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria.
Hypothesis:
H₀: No significant difference between Cention Forte and composite resin after 18 months based on FDI criteria.
Primary Endpoint: At least 90% of restorations remain intact at 18 months with no significant differences in clinical performance.
Study Design:
A randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial with 30 healthy volunteers (18-35 years old), each receiving two restorations (one with Cention Forte, one with G-aenial Achord). Bite-wing radiographs will be taken before and after treatment, and at 6 , 12 and 18 months.
Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion:
- 18-35 years old, systemically healthy.
- Brushing twice daily, at least 20 teeth in occlusion.
- At least two interproximal Class II lesions.
- Signed informed consent.
Exclusion:
- Pregnancy/lactation.
- Advanced periodontal disease, bruxism, malocclusion.
- Allergy to resin materials or local anesthesia.
- Endodontically treated teeth or pulp capping cases.
Restorative Procedure:
Study Group (Cention Forte):
Self-etch primer applied, followed by Cention Forte placement and light-curing.
Control Group (G-aenial Achord, GC):
Selective enamel etching with 37% phosphoric acid, followed by G-Premio Universal Adhesive and incremental layering with light-curing.
Clinical Evaluations (FDI Criteria):
Aesthetic properties: Color match, marginal discoloration, anatomical form. Functional properties: Fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, occlusal wear, proximal contact.
Biological properties: Postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries, periodontal response.
Scoring: 1 (excellent) to 5 (unacceptable).
Statistical Analysis:
Chi-square/Fisher's Exact Test: Compare clinical performance. Wilcoxon signed-rank test: Evaluate performance over time. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis: Assess restoration longevity. p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Ethical Considerations \& Data Management:
Ethical approval from Hacettepe University Clinical Research Ethics Committee. Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov. Data secured and encrypted, accessible only to authorized personnel.
Expected Impact:
This study will assess whether Cention Forte is a viable alternative to composites, particularly for challenging clinical cases where isolation and durability are concerns.
Read the detailed description
Background \& Rationale The development of self-adhesive restorative materials has significantly improved clinical workflows by eliminating the need for separate adhesive protocols. In addition, the bulk-fill technique, which allows restorations to be completed in a single increment, provides a more efficient and user-friendly approach for posterior restorations.
Glass ionomer cements (GICs) have been widely used due to their fluoride release, remineralization capability, moisture tolerance, and cariostatic effects. However, they have notable limitations, such as inferior aesthetics, lower mechanical strength, and reduced wear resistance, which restrict their use as definitive restorative materials. Over the years, modifications have been made to improve GIC performance, including adding resins, altering the powder-to-liquid ratio, and incorporating metal reinforcements.
To address these limitations, hybrid restorative materials that combine the advantages of GICs (fluoride release, remineralization) with composite resin durability have been introduced. Among these materials is Cention Forte (Ivoclar), a capsulated alkasite restorative material designed for durability, ease of use, and bioactivity.
Cention Forte offers:
- High flexural strength (>100 MPa), exceeding the threshold for conventional posterior restorations.
- Remineralization properties, which prevent demineralization and enhance long-term restoration integrity.
- Aesthetic tooth-colored properties, overcoming the traditional drawback of GICs.
- Capsule formulation, improving handling compared to its predecessor, Cention N, which required manual mixing.
Given that composite resin restorations have lower success rates in patients with challenges such as isolation difficulties, limited mouth opening, or parafunctional habits, the Minamata Convention's restriction on dental amalgam use has further emphasized the need for an alternative restorative material. This study aims to compare the clinical performance of Cention Forte with a universal composite resin (G-aenial Achord, GC) in Class II restorations over a 12-month follow-up period.
Study Objective The primary objective is to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of Cention Forte and G-aenial Achord (GC) in Class II posterior restorations using the FDI World Dental Federation criteria over 12 months.
Study Hypothesis Null Hypothesis (H₀): There will be no significant difference between Cention Forte and the universal composite resin based on FDI criteria at the end of 18 months.
Primary Endpoint: At least 90% of restorations remain intact after 18 months, with no significant differences in clinical performance.
Study Design This study is designed as a randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial. Participants will undergo a split-mouth design, where each individual receives two restorations: one with Cention Forte and the other with G-aenial Achord.
Study Center: Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry Study Duration: 18 months Sample Size: 38 volunteers (18-35 years old), each receiving two Class II restorations (total: 76 restorations) Randomization: The Research Randomizer Program will be used to allocate teeth into three restorative groups.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy individuals aged 18-35 years
- Brushing twice daily and maintaining good oral hygiene
- At least two interproximal Class II carious lesions in molar teeth
- At least 20 teeth in occlusion with antagonist contacts
- Signed informed consent and completion of initial periodontal therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Advanced periodontal disease
- Bruxism or malocclusion
- Allergy to resin-based materials or local anesthesia
- Endodontically treated teeth or those requiring pulp capping
Restorative Procedures
- Cavity Preparation Standardized Class II cavities will be prepared with dimensions ensuring the lesions remain within enamel and dentin. Bite-wing radiographs will be taken before treatment to assess lesion depth and proximity to the pulp. Rubber dam or cotton roll isolation will be used to control moisture.
- Study Group (Cention Forte): Self-etch primer will be applied. Cention Forte capsule will be activated, mixed, and directly applied. Light curing will be performed to accelerate polymerization.
- Control Group (G-aenial Achord, GC):
Selective enamel etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. G-Premio Universal Adhesive application. Incremental layering with light curing after each 2 mm layer. Clinical Evaluations
Restorations will be assessed immediately after placement, at 6 months, and at 18 months using the FDI criteria, which include:
- Aesthetic Properties: Color match and stability Marginal discoloration Anatomical form
- Functional Properties: Fracture resistance Marginal adaptation Occlusal wear Proximal contact integrity
- Biological Properties:
Postoperative sensitivity Secondary caries development Periodontal response Restorations will be photographed and scored from 1 (excellent) to 5 (unacceptable).
Statistical Analysis Chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test: Compare clinical performance of both materials.
Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test: Evaluate time-based changes in FDI scores. Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis: Assess restoration longevity. p < 0.05 will indicate statistical significance. Ethical Considerations \& Data Management Ethical approval from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Hacettepe University.
Study registration on ClinicalTrials.gov to ensure transparency and compliance with ethical guidelines.
Patient data and photographs will be securely stored in an encrypted system, accessible only to authorized personnel.
Expected Impact This study aims to determine whether Cention Forte can serve as a viable alternative to composite resins for posterior Class II restorations, particularly in challenging clinical scenarios. If successful, Cention Forte could provide a more durable, bioactive, and easy-to-use restorative option, reducing failures in cases with limited isolation or high caries risk.
- Conditions
- Dental Caries, Dental Caries Class II
- Being tested
- tooth restoration
- Keywords
- bioactive restorative materials, dental caries, alkasite
- Medical subject headings
- Dental Caries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tooth restorationDevice
restoration of class II cavities
tooth restorationDevice
restoration of class II cavities
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cention Forte | Experimental | Self-etch primer will be applied. Cention Forte capsule will be activated, mixed, and directly applied. Light curing will be performed to accelerate polymerization. Receives: Device: tooth restoration |
| Composite Resin | Active comparator | Selective enamel etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. G-Premio Universal Adhesive application. Incremental layering with light curing after each 2 mm layer. Receives: Device: tooth restoration |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Retention Alpha for at least 90% of the restorations
The primary factor for determining the clinical performance of a restorative material is the retention rate. It represents the survival rates of the restorations after a period of time. According to ADA guidelines, a restorative material should show at leat 90% alpha retention rate after 18 months to be considered as clinically acceptable. The retention is assesed as alpha (retentive restoratation) or charlie (failed restoration). Clinical evaluation is performed to examine if the restoration is in place or has fallen.
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Feb 2025
- Study start13 Jul 2023
- Primary completion1 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Mar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Dental CariesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hacettepe UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- randomized controlled clinical trial
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hacettepe University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ece Meral, Hacettepe University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06833528
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KA-23072
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of the Clinical Performance of Novel Alkasite Restorative Material "Cention Forte" in Class II Restorations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06833528
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KA-23072
- Conditions
- Dental Caries, Dental Caries Class II
- Keywords
- bioactive restorative materials, dental caries, alkasite
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hacettepe UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background \& Rationale:
Self-adhesive materials eliminate the need for adhesive protocols, offering advantages for direct restorations. The bulk-fill technique simplifies application by allowing a single-layer restoration. Glass ionomer cements (GICs) provide benefits such as fluoride release, remineralization, and moisture tolerance but have limitations, including poor aesthetics and low mechanical strength. To overcome these, hybrid materials combining GIC properties with composite durability have emerged.
Cention Forte, a capsulated alkasite restorative material, offers high flexural strength (>100 MPa), bioactivity, and ease of application. The manufacturer claims it is an ideal posterior restorative, potentially replacing composite resins and amalgam. Given that composite restorations fail more frequently in patients with isolation difficulties, limited mouth opening, or parafunctional habits, alternative materials are needed. This study evaluates Cention Forte as an alternative to conventional composites.
Objective:
To compare the clinical performance of Cention Forte with a universal composite resin (G-aenial Achord, GC) in Class II restorations over 18 months using FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria.
Hypothesis:
H₀: No significant difference between Cention Forte and composite resin after 18 months based on FDI criteria.
Primary Endpoint: At least 90% of restorations remain intact at 18 months with no significant differences in clinical performance.
Study Design:
A randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial with 30 healthy volunteers (18-35 years old), each receiving two restorations (one with Cention Forte, one with G-aenial Achord). Bite-wing radiographs will be taken before and after treatment, and at 6 , 12 and 18 months.
Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion:
- 18-35 years old, systemically healthy.
- Brushing twice daily, at least 20 teeth in occlusion.
- At least two interproximal Class II lesions.
- Signed informed consent.
Exclusion:
- Pregnancy/lactation.
- Advanced periodontal disease, bruxism, malocclusion.
- Allergy to resin materials or local anesthesia.
- Endodontically treated teeth or pulp capping cases.
Restorative Procedure:
Study Group (Cention Forte):
Self-etch primer applied, followed by Cention Forte placement and light-curing.
Control Group (G-aenial Achord, GC):
Selective enamel etching with 37% phosphoric acid, followed by G-Premio Universal Adhesive and incremental layering with light-curing.
Clinical Evaluations (FDI Criteria):
Aesthetic properties: Color match, marginal discoloration, anatomical form. Functional properties: Fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, occlusal wear, proximal contact.
Biological properties: Postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries, periodontal response.
Scoring: 1 (excellent) to 5 (unacceptable).
Statistical Analysis:
Chi-square/Fisher's Exact Test: Compare clinical performance. Wilcoxon signed-rank test: Evaluate performance over time. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis: Assess restoration longevity. p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Ethical Considerations \& Data Management:
Ethical approval from Hacettepe University Clinical Research Ethics Committee. Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov. Data secured and encrypted, accessible only to authorized personnel.
Expected Impact:
This study will assess whether Cention Forte is a viable alternative to composites, particularly for challenging clinical cases where isolation and durability are concerns.
Detailed description
Background \& Rationale The development of self-adhesive restorative materials has significantly improved clinical workflows by eliminating the need for separate adhesive protocols. In addition, the bulk-fill technique, which allows restorations to be completed in a single increment, provides a more efficient and user-friendly approach for posterior restorations.
Glass ionomer cements (GICs) have been widely used due to their fluoride release, remineralization capability, moisture tolerance, and cariostatic effects. However, they have notable limitations, such as inferior aesthetics, lower mechanical strength, and reduced wear resistance, which restrict their use as definitive restorative materials. Over the years, modifications have been made to improve GIC performance, including adding resins, altering the powder-to-liquid ratio, and incorporating metal reinforcements.
To address these limitations, hybrid restorative materials that combine the advantages of GICs (fluoride release, remineralization) with composite resin durability have been introduced. Among these materials is Cention Forte (Ivoclar), a capsulated alkasite restorative material designed for durability, ease of use, and bioactivity.
Cention Forte offers:
- High flexural strength (>100 MPa), exceeding the threshold for conventional posterior restorations.
- Remineralization properties, which prevent demineralization and enhance long-term restoration integrity.
- Aesthetic tooth-colored properties, overcoming the traditional drawback of GICs.
- Capsule formulation, improving handling compared to its predecessor, Cention N, which required manual mixing.
Given that composite resin restorations have lower success rates in patients with challenges such as isolation difficulties, limited mouth opening, or parafunctional habits, the Minamata Convention's restriction on dental amalgam use has further emphasized the need for an alternative restorative material. This study aims to compare the clinical performance of Cention Forte with a universal composite resin (G-aenial Achord, GC) in Class II restorations over a 12-month follow-up period.
Study Objective The primary objective is to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of Cention Forte and G-aenial Achord (GC) in Class II posterior restorations using the FDI World Dental Federation criteria over 12 months.
Study Hypothesis Null Hypothesis (H₀): There will be no significant difference between Cention Forte and the universal composite resin based on FDI criteria at the end of 18 months.
Primary Endpoint: At least 90% of restorations remain intact after 18 months, with no significant differences in clinical performance.
Study Design This study is designed as a randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial. Participants will undergo a split-mouth design, where each individual receives two restorations: one with Cention Forte and the other with G-aenial Achord.
Study Center: Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry Study Duration: 18 months Sample Size: 38 volunteers (18-35 years old), each receiving two Class II restorations (total: 76 restorations) Randomization: The Research Randomizer Program will be used to allocate teeth into three restorative groups.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy individuals aged 18-35 years
- Brushing twice daily and maintaining good oral hygiene
- At least two interproximal Class II carious lesions in molar teeth
- At least 20 teeth in occlusion with antagonist contacts
- Signed informed consent and completion of initial periodontal therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Advanced periodontal disease
- Bruxism or malocclusion
- Allergy to resin-based materials or local anesthesia
- Endodontically treated teeth or those requiring pulp capping
Restorative Procedures
- Cavity Preparation Standardized Class II cavities will be prepared with dimensions ensuring the lesions remain within enamel and dentin. Bite-wing radiographs will be taken before treatment to assess lesion depth and proximity to the pulp. Rubber dam or cotton roll isolation will be used to control moisture.
- Study Group (Cention Forte): Self-etch primer will be applied. Cention Forte capsule will be activated, mixed, and directly applied. Light curing will be performed to accelerate polymerization.
- Control Group (G-aenial Achord, GC):
Selective enamel etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. G-Premio Universal Adhesive application. Incremental layering with light curing after each 2 mm layer. Clinical Evaluations
Restorations will be assessed immediately after placement, at 6 months, and at 18 months using the FDI criteria, which include:
- Aesthetic Properties: Color match and stability Marginal discoloration Anatomical form
- Functional Properties: Fracture resistance Marginal adaptation Occlusal wear Proximal contact integrity
- Biological Properties:
Postoperative sensitivity Secondary caries development Periodontal response Restorations will be photographed and scored from 1 (excellent) to 5 (unacceptable).
Statistical Analysis Chi-square or Fisher's Exact Test: Compare clinical performance of both materials.
Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test: Evaluate time-based changes in FDI scores. Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis: Assess restoration longevity. p < 0.05 will indicate statistical significance. Ethical Considerations \& Data Management Ethical approval from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Hacettepe University.
Study registration on ClinicalTrials.gov to ensure transparency and compliance with ethical guidelines.
Patient data and photographs will be securely stored in an encrypted system, accessible only to authorized personnel.
Expected Impact This study aims to determine whether Cention Forte can serve as a viable alternative to composite resins for posterior Class II restorations, particularly in challenging clinical scenarios. If successful, Cention Forte could provide a more durable, bioactive, and easy-to-use restorative option, reducing failures in cases with limited isolation or high caries risk.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- randomized controlled clinical trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cention Forte | Experimental | Device: tooth restorationSelf-etch primer will be applied. Cention Forte capsule will be activated, mixed, and directly applied. Light curing will be performed to accelerate polymerization. |
| Composite Resin | Active comparator | Device: tooth restorationSelective enamel etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. G-Premio Universal Adhesive application. Incremental layering with light curing after each 2 mm layer. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Healthy individuals aged 18-35 years
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnancy or lactation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tooth restorationrestoration of class II cavities | Device | Cention Forte |
| tooth restorationrestoration of class II cavities | Device | Composite Resin |
Primary outcome
Retention Alpha for at least 90% of the restorations
Time frame: 18 months
The primary factor for determining the clinical performance of a restorative material is the retention rate. It represents the survival rates of the restorations after a period of time. According to ADA guidelines, a restorative material should show at leat 90% alpha retention rate after 18 months to be considered as clinically acceptable. The retention is assesed as alpha (retentive restoratation) or charlie (failed restoration). Clinical evaluation is performed to examine if the restoration is in place or has fallen.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Dental Caries
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of a New Dual-cure Universal Adhesive
Class I Dental Restorations, Class II Dental Restorations
Not yet recruiting
Safety of Intraosseous Anaesthesia in Children With Haemophilia
Haemophilia A, Haemophilia B
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Silver Diamine Fluoride Versus Light-Cured Silver Diamine Fluoride in Carious Primary Molars
Dental Caries
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Hard Hybrid Ceramic Inlays Versus Resin Composite Inlays in Vital Molars With Extensive Occluso-Proximal Cavities
Dental Caries, Cavity, Dental
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Xylitol- Versus Erythritol-Sweetened Mints on Plaque ATP-Bioluminescence Readings
Dental Caries, Dental Plaque
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing tooth restoration in people with Dental Caries and Dental Caries Class II, run by Hacettepe University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Retention Alpha for at least 90% of the restorations (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2025.