Optimal Timing of Routine Cervical Length Measurements During Anatomy Survey

Study Title: Optimal Timing of Routine Cervical Length Measurements During Anatomy Survey

Study Aim and Background: This randomized controlled trial investigates whether the timing of cervical length measurements during fetal anatomy surveys impacts the accuracy of assessments. Current guidelines recommend transvaginal cervical length screening during anatomy surveys to identify individuals at risk for preterm birth. However, the guidelines do not specify whether measurements should be taken at the beginning or end of the ultrasound exam, a lengthy procedure (60-90 minutes) that may introduce uterine contractions and distort results. Additionally, the study evaluates whether using sepia-filtered ultrasound images can enhance measurement accuracy compared to conventional grayscale imaging.

Primary Hypothesis: Cervical lengths measured at the beginning of the fetal survey will result in a higher proportion of scans meeting the nine CLEAR criteria than those measured at the end.

Secondary Hypothesis: Sepia-filtered ultrasound imaging will yield a greater proportion of scans meeting the CLEAR criteria compared to grayscale imaging.

Study Design:

• Type: Randomized controlled trial.
• Setting: Conducted across all Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM) ultrasound units within Henry Ford Health (HFH).
• Population: Pregnant individuals between 16w0d and 23w6d gestation undergoing fetal anatomy surveys. Participants with a history of preterm birth or cervical insufficiency are excluded.
• Intervention: Randomization of participants to have cervical length measurements taken at either the beginning or end of the anatomy survey. Measurements will be performed using both grayscale and sepia-filtered imaging modalities.
• Randomization: Pre-prepared envelopes (n=550) direct sonographers to perform cervical length measurement either at the start or end of the anatomy survey. Envelopes are indistinguishable and shuffled to ensure blinding.

Procedures:

Patient Enrollment:

• Prior to the anatomy scan, participants receive a MyChart information sheet outlining the study.
• Participants provide verbal consent for cervical length measurement via transvaginal ultrasound and for study participation.
• Verbal consent is documented in the patient's chart.

Randomization:

• Upon consent, the sonographer randomly selects an envelope to determine the timing of cervical length measurement.
• Cervical length measurements are conducted per routine care, ensuring the bladder is emptied beforehand.

Data Collection:

• Cervical length is measured using both grayscale and sepia-filtered ultrasound images.
• Sonographers save the first image with the word "CLEAR" to indicate study participation.
• MFM physicians complete a worksheet assessing the nine CLEAR criteria for each scan. These worksheets are de-identified and stored securely in a binder.

Data Security:

• Worksheets containing study data are stored in a secure MFM physician workroom, accessible only via HFH badge access.
• De-identified data is entered into a secure database, password-protected and accessible only to authorized personnel. The database will be erased following data analysis and publication.

Analysis Plan:

• Primary Analysis: Proportion of scans meeting the nine CLEAR criteria will be compared between groups (cervical length measured at beginning vs. end of survey) using chi-square tests. Logistic regression will adjust for confounders such as gestational age and sonographer experience.
• Secondary Analysis: Effect of sepia-filtered imaging on CLEAR criteria adherence will be evaluated using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Interaction analysis will assess the combined effects of timing and imaging modality using two-way ANOVA or logistic regression.
• Handling Missing Data: Multiple imputation techniques will address missing values in the CLEAR criteria.
• Sample Size: A total of 550 participants (275 per group) provides 80% power to detect a 10-15% difference in the proportion of scans meeting the CLEAR criteria, assuming a baseline adherence of 60%.

Anticipated Risks and Benefits:

• Risks: No additional risks beyond standard cervical length screening.
• Benefits: Improved accuracy in cervical length measurements could optimize clinical decision-making and patient outcomes, particularly for managing short cervix during pregnancy.

Confidentiality:

• No personally identifiable information (PHI) is linked to study worksheets or data.
• IRB-approved procedures ensure confidentiality and data integrity.

Investigator Qualifications:

• Primary Author: Shelby Masters, MD, MFM Fellow.
• Principal Investigator: Raminder Khangura, MD, MFM Attending.
• Co-Investigators: Nicolina Smith, DO, and Shahd Karrar, MD, MFM Fellows.

This innovative study, which has not been explored previously in the literature, has the potential to influence clinical guidelines for cervical length measurement during pregnancy, ensuring more reliable assessments and improved care for at-risk patients.