AzTrials
AzTrials

Sports Physical TherapyNCT06819397

Effects of Post-Isometric Relaxation Technique Vs Soft Tissue Mobilization in Leg Spin Bowlers

A study testing post isometric relaxation and cross friction soft tissue mobilization in people with Sports Physical Therapy, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Effects of Post-Isometric Relaxation Technique versus Cross Friction Soft Tissue Mobilization in Leg Spin Bowlers with Rotator cuff strain Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 30 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Sports Physical Therapy
What is being tested?
post isometric relaxation and cross friction soft tissue mobilization
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
24 Apr 2024to 15 Feb 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 30 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • age 16-30 years
  • Symptomatic male bowlers (leg spinners)
  • Pain from at least 2 months
  • Playing regularly from at least 1 year.
  • Difference of ROM as compared to contralateral extremity.

Who cannot join

  • Prior History of shoulder surgery
  • Shoulder symptoms requiring medical treatment.
  • Cricketers not involved in any other sports.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Jallo Cricket Academy

    Lahore, Punjab Province, 0423

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Effects of Post-Isometric Relaxation Technique Versus Cross Friction Soft Tissue Mobilization on Pain, Range of Motion, and Endurance in Leg Spin Bowlers With Rotator Cuff Strain

Effects of Post-Isometric Relaxation Technique versus Cross Friction Soft Tissue Mobilization in Leg Spin Bowlers with Rotator cuff strain

Read the detailed description

The existing body of research on Pakistani Cyclists lacks comprehensive investigation into the role of sciatic nerve flossing and active release technique, creating a noticeable gap in understanding the impact of such techniques on the performance, improving flexibility, and overall physical well-being of these athletes. Given the unique physical demands of Cyclists and the potential benefits associated with lower limb muscle strength, a focused exploration in this area is crucial to inform training strategies, enhance athletic performance, and contribute to the holistic development of Pakistani cyclists. To determine the comparative impact of sciatic nerve flossing and active release technique on pain, flexibility, and functionality in the lower limbs of cyclists with sciatica.

Being tested
post isometric relaxation, cross friction soft tissue mobilization
Keywords
cross friction soft tissue mobilization, spin bowlers

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • post isometric relaxationOther

    the athlete will be given instructions to perform a 7-second isometric contraction in the direction of horizontal abduction at about 25% of peak effort, while the examiner will apply an opposing force at the distal humerus.

  • cross friction soft tissue mobilizationOther

    by identifying the fascia restriction, patients in group B will be treated with the cross friction soft tissue mobilization approach, which comprised applying a low load and prolonged stretch through the knuckles or elbows to the constricted fascia. The therapist will then give the contralateral side of rotation resistance for ten seconds

Study groups in NCT06819397
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
post isometric relaxationExperimental17 participants will be in post isometric group, After telling the bowler to calm down, a fresh movement barrier will be activated. This will be done three times a week for four weeks, for a total of five sets of five repetitions.
Receives: Other: post isometric relaxation
cross friction soft tissue mobilizationExperimental17 participants will be in soft tissue mobilization group, Patients in each group will receive12 treatment sessions, 3 days a week for 4 weeks.
Receives: Other: cross friction soft tissue mobilization

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS):

    The patient's degree of pain is measured using the 11-point NPRS. The words "no pain" on the left and "worst imaginable pain" on the right serve as the scale's anchors. (34) Patients score how much pain they are in right now, as well as how much pain they have had in the past 24 hours.

    Measured: 4weeks

  2. Goniometer

    Studies have shown intra-rater reliability for goniometric measurements can vary but often falls within acceptable ranges. For instance, a study reported intra-rater reliability with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) ranging from 0.80 to 0.95, indicating good to excellent reliability.

    Measured: 4weeks

  3. Standard test for push-up (STPU) for measuring endurance

    Standard push-up test (STPU)" starts from either a prone position or a straight arm support position. Arms are about shoulder-width apart, palms are flat on the ground, and fingers are pointing forward. Legs should be together, ankles flexed, and knees locked. The only parts of the body that touch the ground are the balls of the feet and the palms of the hands. Until the chin, nose, or chest reaches the ground, the body is lowered.

    Measured: 4weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Feb 2025
  2. Study start24 Apr 2024
  3. Primary completion10 Feb 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Feb 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
parallel assignment randomized clinical design
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06819397
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC/RCR&AHS/24/0406
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
22 Jan 2025
Last updated
11 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Pandey V, Jaap Willems W. Rotator cuff tear: A detailed update. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2015 Feb 11;2(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2014.11.003. eCollection 2015 Jan.

    PubMed 29264234
  • Hermans J, Luime JJ, Meuffels DE, Reijman M, Simel DL, Bierma-Zeinstra SM. Does this patient with shoulder pain have rotator cuff disease?: The Rational Clinical Examination systematic review. JAMA. 2013 Aug 28;310(8):837-47. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.276187.

    PubMed 23982370
  • Jain NB, Wilcox RB 3rd, Katz JN, Higgins LD. Clinical examination of the rotator cuff. PM R. 2013 Jan;5(1):45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.08.019.

    PubMed 23332909
  • Tawfik AM, El-Morsy A, Badran MA. Rotator cuff disorders: How to write a surgically relevant magnetic resonance imaging report? World J Radiol. 2014 Jun 28;6(6):274-83. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i6.274.

    PubMed 24976930
  • Shaffer B, Huttman D. Rotator cuff tears in the throwing athlete. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2014 Jun;22(2):101-9. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000022.

    PubMed 24787724
  • Avci O, Rohrle O. Determining a musculoskeletal system's pre-stretched state using continuum-mechanical forward modelling and joint range optimization. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2024 Jun;23(3):1031-1053. doi: 10.1007/s10237-024-01821-x. Epub 2024 Apr 15.

    PubMed 38619712
  • Coviello JP, Kakar RS, Reynolds TJ. SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF INSTRUMENT-ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION ON PAIN FREE RANGE OF MOTION IN A WEIGHTLIFTER WITH SUBACROMIAL PAIN SYNDROME. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Feb;12(1):144-154.

    PubMed 28217425
  • Bailey LB, Shanley E, Hawkins R, Beattie PF, Fritz S, Kwartowitz D, Thigpen CA. Mechanisms of Shoulder Range of Motion Deficits in Asymptomatic Baseball Players. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2783-93. doi: 10.1177/0363546515602446. Epub 2015 Sep 24.

    PubMed 26403207
  • Kim J, Sung DJ, Lee J. Therapeutic effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization for soft tissue injury: mechanisms and practical application. J Exerc Rehabil. 2017 Feb 28;13(1):12-22. doi: 10.12965/jer.1732824.412. eCollection 2017 Feb.

    PubMed 28349028
  • Cunningham G, Charbonnier C, Ladermann A, Chague S, Sonnabend DH. Shoulder Motion Analysis During Codman Pendulum Exercises. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Jun 26;2(4):e333-e339. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.04.013. eCollection 2020 Aug.

    PubMed 32875297
  • Bhosale P, Kolke Pt S. Effectiveness of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and muscle energy technique (MET) on post-operative elbow stiffness: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2023 Oct;31(5):340-348. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2122372. Epub 2022 Sep 28.

    PubMed 36171728
  • Khan ZK, Ahmed SI, Baig AAM, Farooqui WA. Effect of post-isometric relaxation versus myofascial release therapy on pain, functional disability, rom and qol in the management of non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 13;23(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05516-1.

    PubMed 35698187
  • Cheatham SW, Stull KR, Kolber MJ. Roller massage: is the numeric pain rating scale a reliable measurement and can it direct individuals with no experience to a specific roller density? J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2018 Dec;62(3):161-169.

    PubMed 30662071
  • Shamsi M, Mirzaei M, Khabiri SS. Universal goniometer and electro-goniometer intra-examiner reliability in measuring the knee range of motion during active knee extension test in patients with chronic low back pain with short hamstring muscle. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2019 Mar 22;11:4. doi: 10.1186/s13102-019-0116-x. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 30949343
  • van Rijn SF, Zwerus EL, Koenraadt KL, Jacobs WC, van den Bekerom MP, Eygendaal D. The reliability and validity of goniometric elbow measurements in adults: A systematic review of the literature. Shoulder Elbow. 2018 Oct;10(4):274-284. doi: 10.1177/1758573218774326. Epub 2018 Jun 3.

    PubMed 30214494

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing post isometric relaxation and cross friction soft tissue mobilization in people with Sports Physical Therapy, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS): (time frame: 4weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06819397, which also lists 17 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in