AzTrials
AzTrials

Eosinophilic EsophagitisNCT06817213

Patient-Centered Decision Support for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

A study testing Decision support tool in people with Eosinophilic Esophagitis, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The study team is conducting this project to learn more about how patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) like to use and receive educational materials about treatment options and treatment decision making. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
What is being tested?
Decision support tool
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
55 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
16 Apr 2025to 6 Jan 2027
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • New EoE patient evaluations ≥18 years old at University of Michigan (UM) that have an upcoming outpatient visit in a UM-gastroenterology or allergy \& immunology clinic,
  • Able to speak and read English.

Who cannot join

  • Prisoners and institutionalized individuals due to logistical limitations for use of a web app and follow-up interactions in these populations.
  • Patients that have significant cognitive or visual impairment that limits interaction with the decision aid (DA)
  • Patients that are terminally ill
  • Patients that do not have an email address or reliable access to the internet

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Patient-Centered Decision Support for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Pilot Study

The study team is conducting this project to learn more about how patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) like to use and receive educational materials about treatment options and treatment decision making.

This study will assess the efficacy of a decision support intervention to make decisions about treatment and disease management for patients with EoE and will assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention to inform future R01-level studies.

The study team hypothesize that deploying the intervention will be feasible, and it will demonstrate high acceptability among EoE patients. Additionally, that patients that use the intervention (vs general education about EoE) will report greater treatment knowledge, increased readiness to choose a therapy, adherence to therapy, and follow-up.

Being tested
General education control, Decision support tool
Keywords
tailored educational materials, general educational materials, online surveys, decision aid
Medical subject headings
Eosinophilic Esophagitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • General education controlBehavioural

    Participants will complete an online survey before reviewing education material for eosinophilic esophagitis, prior to patient's clinical physician's appointment (this appointment is a standard of care visit). Participants will complete a follow-up survey approximately 3 months after the clinic appointment.

  • Decision support toolBehavioural

    Participants will complete an online survey before reviewing tailored educational materials for eosinophilic esophagitis prior to patient's clinical physician's appointment (this appointment is a standard of care visit). The intervention is a tailored, electronic decision support intervention with a patient-facing decision aid (DA) with three components-EoE knowledge/education, values clarifications, and communication. Tailored feedback from the patient will be given to the patient's provider prior to the visit to facilitate shared decision-making in the visit. Participants will complete a follow-up survey approximately 3 months after the clinic appointment.

Study groups in NCT06817213
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
General education control groupActive comparatorGeneral educational materials
Receives: Behavioral: General education control
Decision support tool groupExperimentalTailored educational materials
Receives: Behavioral: Decision support tool

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility: measured as the proportion of eligible patients that consent to participate in the study

    The study aims to achieve at least 20% consented for eligible patients.

    Measured: Recruitment period approximately 18 months

  2. Acceptability: measured on a 4-point Likert scale

    Measured on a 4-point Likert-scale (1) Very Unhelpful to (4) Very Helpful. Analyzed as high scores indicate more helpful.

    Measured: Approximately 4 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Effectiveness (within-subjects)

    Objective eosinophilic esophagitis knowledge measured on 8 true/false/I don't know questions where wrong or "I don't know" answers are given 0 points and correct answers are given 1 point. Minimum points=0 and Maximum points=8

    Measured: Day 1 up to approximately 1 month (after consent prior to standard of care clinic visit)

  2. Effectiveness (between-subjects)

    Objective eosinophilic esophagitis knowledge measured on 8 true/false/I don't know questions where wrong or "I don't know" answers are given 0 points and correct answers are given 1 point. Minimum points=0 and Maximum points=8

    Measured: Approximately 4 months

  3. Preparation for Decision Making (PrepDM) scale

    Preparation for Decision making (PrepDM scale) score is a 10-item questionnaire and is scored on a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate participants being well prepared to make decisions after reviewing a decision aid (DA). The Prep-DM scale may be adapted slightly to meet the needs of the target population and the developed decision support tool.

    Measured: Approximately 4 months

  4. Completion rates

    Measured as the proportion of people that consented and completed all study measures, the pre-test, post-test, and 3-month follow-up survey

    Measured: Approximately 4 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Feb 2025
  2. Study start16 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion29 Sep 2026
  4. Study completion6 Jan 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Model description
Participants (n-20) will be enrolled into the control arm (general education about EoE), then 20 patients will go into the DA arm. Providers will not be formally consented to have their clinics screened for participants. The study team will coordinate with Gastroenterology and Allergy providers about the initiation of the study. Providers will be informed that the study is launching and given the opportunity to "opt-out".
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
55 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06817213
Sponsor's protocol ID
HUM00257119
Other IDs
1K23DK129784-01A1
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
4 Feb 2025
Last updated
15 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in