AzTrials
AzTrials

Neisseria Gonorrheae InfectionMASTERMINDRINGNCT06815536

Master Protocol for Evaluating Multiple Infection Diagnostics for Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Neisseria Gonorrhoeae

An observational study of Neisseria Gonorrheae Infection, run by Duke University at 8 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to learn if a few investigational tests can correctly find the gene mutation (mutant allele gyrA 91F) that predicts ciprofloxacin resistance in clinical specimens that harbor Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Neisseria Gonorrheae Infection
What is being tested?
Investigational Reflex Test 1, Investigational Reflex Test 2 and Investigational Reflex Test 3
How many people
2,627 participants
Where
8 sitesUnited States
Study dates
16 Apr 2025to 31 Jul 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Clinical specimens from male and females that test positive for Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Who may be able to join

  • Be N. gonorrhoeae-positive on an FDA-cleared molecular assay
  • Have sufficient N. gonorrhoeae-positive specimen volume for testing using the corresponding investigational reflex test and genetic sequencing
  • Undergo proper handling and storage conditions

Who cannot join

  • The N. gonorrhoeae-positive specimen media is not compatible with the investigational reflex test(s) at the laboratory site
  • The N. gonorrhoeae-positive specimen is not clearly labeled by the laboratory to link to basic epidemiologic data (age, sex) and source

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

8 sites in 1 country

United States8 sites
  • University of Virginia School of Medicine

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908

  • LabCorp

    Durham, North Carolina, 27703

  • Indiana University School of Medicine

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Mississippi State Department of Public Health

    Jackson, Mississippi, 39216

  • Corewell Health

    Royal Oak, Missouri, 48073

  • ARUP Laboratories

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108

  • San Francisco Public Health Laboratory

    San Francisco, California, 94102

  • Molecular Testing Labs

    Vancouver, Washington, 98684

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this study is to learn if a few investigational tests can correctly find the gene mutation (mutant allele gyrA 91F) that predicts ciprofloxacin resistance in clinical specimens that harbor Neisseria gonorrhoeae. The main question the study aims to answer:

Can the investigational reflex test find the correct gene mutation (Neisseria gonorrhoeae gyrA 91F or gyrA 91S) as compared to the sequenced result?

Specimens that are collected for routine clinical care and harbor Neisseria gonorrhoeae will be evaluated in this study.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center, cross-sectional study using consecutive clinical specimens that are collected for routine clinical care and test positive for N. gonorrhoeae using an FDA-cleared molecular assay. The study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of multiple investigational reflex tests to detect the mutant allele gyrA 91F that predicts ciprofloxacin resistance in N. gonorrhoeae, as compared to a reference standard of Sanger sequencing of the gyrA codon 91. Specimens will be tested via a reference standard of Sanger sequencing and one investigational reflex test. The target sample size is 311 urine specimens, 496 vaginal swab specimens, and 469 pharyngeal specimens, for each investigational reflex test.

Being tested
Investigational Reflex Test 1, Investigational Reflex Test 2, Investigational Reflex Test 3
Keywords
mutant allele gyrA 91F, wildtype allele gyrA 91S, ciprofloxacin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Medical subject headings
Gonorrhea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Investigational Reflex Test 1Diagnostic test

    Investigational Reflex Test 1

  • Investigational Reflex Test 2Diagnostic test

    Investigational Reflex Test 2

  • Investigational Reflex Test 3Diagnostic test

    Investigational Reflex Test 3

Study groups in NCT06815536
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
UrineInvestigational Reflex Test performed to detect the mutant gyrA 91F allele or the wildtype gyrA 91S allele using urine samples.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Investigational Reflex Test 1; Diagnostic Test: Investigational Reflex Test 2; Diagnostic Test: Investigational Reflex Test 3
Vaginal SwabInvestigational Reflex Test performed to detect the mutant gyrA 91F allele or the wildtype gyrA 91S allele using vaginal swabs.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Investigational Reflex Test 1; Diagnostic Test: Investigational Reflex Test 2; Diagnostic Test: Investigational Reflex Test 3
Pharyngeal SwabsInvestigational Reflex Test performed to detect the mutant gyrA 91F allele or the wildtype gyrA 91S allele using pharyngeal swabs.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Investigational Reflex Test 1; Diagnostic Test: Investigational Reflex Test 2; Diagnostic Test: Investigational Reflex Test 3

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 1 relative to the sequenced results in urine

    Investigational Reflex Test 1 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Measured: One day

  2. Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 1 relative to the sequenced results in vaginal swabs

    Investigational Reflex Test 1 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Measured: One day

  3. Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 1 relative to the sequenced results in pharyngeal swabs

    Investigational Reflex Test 1 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Measured: One day

  4. Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 2 relative to the sequenced results in urine

    Investigational Reflex Test 2 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Measured: One day

  5. Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 2 relative to the sequenced results in vaginal swabs

    Investigational Reflex Test 2 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Measured: One day

  6. Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 2 relative to the sequenced results in pharyngeal swabs

    Investigational Reflex Test 2 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Measured: One day

  7. Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 3 relative to the sequenced results in urine

    Investigational Reflex Test 3 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Measured: One day

  8. Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 3 relative to the sequenced results in vaginal swabs

    Investigational Reflex Test 3 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Measured: One day

  9. Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 3 relative to the sequenced results in pharyngeal swabs

    Investigational Reflex Test 3 results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Sanger Sequencing reference results include gyrA 91F, gyrA 91S, invalid, and missing.

    Measured: One day

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 1 in urine

    Measured: One day

  2. Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 1 in vaginal swabs

    Measured: One day

  3. Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 1 in pharyngeal swabs

    Measured: One day

  4. Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 2 in urine

    Measured: One day

  5. Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 2 in vaginal swabs

    Measured: One day

  6. Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 2 in pharyngeal swabs

    Measured: One day

  7. Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 3 in urine

    Measured: One day

  8. Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 3 in vaginal swabs

    Measured: One day

  9. Number of invalid results for Investigational Reflex Test 3 in pharyngeal swabs

    Measured: One day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Feb 2025
  2. Study start16 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2026
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
2,627 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06815536
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00113379
Other IDs
UM1AI104681
Acronym
MASTERMINDRING
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
3 Feb 2025
Last updated
3 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data (IPD) including clinical specimen details, investigational testing results, and sequencing results can be shared with other researchers after primary publication. Investigators must apply to the Antibacterial Resistance Group for approval to receive and use the data. Investigators must comply with additional contractual and regulatory obligations.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Neisseria Gonorrheae Infection, run by Duke University at 8 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of participants with gyrA 91F identified by Investigational Reflex Test 1 relative to the sequenced results in urine (time frame: One day). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Sep 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in