Catheter BlockageCASSETTENCT06815120
A Novel Ureteric Stent in Kidney Stone Patients and Oncology Patients Compared to a Conventional JJ Stent
A study testing Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B) and Qualitative interview in people with Catheter Blockage and Oncology, run by University of Southampton at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Urological stents and catheters often lead to inflammation, causing pain and infection in the urinary tract. Moreover, 80% of stents are associated with pain, negatively impacting on QoL and mental health. Offering novel designs with significantly lower E\&B leads to a reduction in UTIs and improves QoL. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Catheter Blockage, Oncology, Kidney Stone
- What is being tested?
- Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B) and Qualitative interview
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 6 Aug 2025to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18 years or over
- Ureteric stents clinically indicated either due to kidney stones or abdominal/pelvic cancers compressing ureters
- Previous experience with ureteric stents
- Awaiting insersion/replacement of stents
- Ability to give consent
- Ability to interact with study documentation
- Sufficient English to complete study documentations and questionnaires
Who cannot join
- Expected survival <4months
- Unfit for stent insertion
- Unable to comply with study processes Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
University College Hospital London
London, London, W1G 8PH
Daron Smith, 07929716429, daron.smith1@nhs.net
- Recruiting
University Hospital Southampton
Southampton, England, SO16 6YD
Bhaskar Sohani, 02381204911, bhaskar.somani@uhs.nsh.uk
About this study
Official title: Two Single Arm, Multicentre Unblinded First-in-human Trials Investigating a Novel Ureteric Stent to Determine the Reduction of Encrustation, Biofilm Deposition and Complications Compared to a Conventional JJ Stent
Urological stents and catheters often lead to inflammation, causing pain and infection in the urinary tract. Moreover, 80% of stents are associated with pain, negatively impacting on QoL and mental health. Offering novel designs with significantly lower E\&B leads to a reduction in UTIs and improves QoL. Reducing hospital admissions (from 3 to 1 per patient, annually) would free >100,000 bed-nights, allowing the elderly to regain independence. Our proposed research could have a significant impact towards fulfilling the 'healthy-ageing' Grand Challenge. Additionally, the novel stent reduces prevalence of infections and therefore, of antibiotic prescriptions contributing to the Global AMR challenge.
Read the detailed description
Ureteric stents and catheters are deployed clinically as temporary measures to restore urinary drainage, in patients with kidney stones, tumours and strictures. Prevalence of these increases with age. Device-associated encrustation-and-biofilm-formation (E\&B) are key complications, leading to urinary-tract-infections (UTIs) in >90% of stents, causing stent blockage and favouring development of antibiotic resistance.
UTIs are a significant cause of morbidity, especially among the elderly population, with 4,835 deaths in England and Wales reported in 2012. The National Institute for Health Research reported that 1-3% of all primary care consultations concern UTI-related symptoms, leading to 13.7% of antibiotic prescriptions globally. The report also revealed that >92m people globally are diagnosed with UTIs annually.
Urological-device-associated infections significantly compromise patient' quality of life and the effectiveness of services, imposing a £2.5b annual burden on the NHS. Patients' exposure to hospital environment and general anaesthetic use impact on Quality-of-Life (QoL), resulting in unnecessary hospital bed-nights. A novel urological stent has been developed which is associated with significantly reduced particle deposition , potentially extending the stent's lifetime, resulting in reduced hospitalisation and improved QoL.
Urological stents and catheters often lead to inflammation, causing pain and infection in the urinary tract. Moreover, 80% of stents are associated with pain, negatively impacting on QoL and mental health. Offering novel designs with significantly lower E\&B leads to a reduction in UTIs and improves QoL. Reducing hospital admissions (from 3 to 1 per patient, annually) would free >100,000 bed-nights, allowing the elderly to regain independence. Our proposed research could have a significant impact towards fulfilling the 'healthy-ageing' Grand Challenge. Additionally, the novel stent reduces prevalence of infections and therefore, of antibiotic prescriptions contributing to the Global AMR challenge.
Considering only onco-urological patients, >30,000 stents are inserted every year across 200 NHS units. Due to stent failures, each patient undergoes 3 to 6 replacements, resulting in >90,000 stent replacements. Under the current tariff-based system, hospitals are paid for each intervention, costing the NHS >£3,500, bringing the total cost of replacements to ~£315m annually. Unnecessary replacements increase the number of bed-nights and use of anaesthetics. A longer-lasting stent means that each patient comes to the hospital ideally only once, reducing their exposure to the hospital environment and anaesthetic-associated risks. Additionally, under the current model hospitals would improve their quality of service and save at least 2 bed-nights per patient. The NHS is moving towards a "block contract" model, meaning that hospitals will receive a lump sum for the year and they'll regularly monitor budgets and improve cost efficiency where possible. Improved stents will allow the same urology budget to deliver more healthcare, reducing theatre time for stent insertion-and-replacement. This innovative stent design offers a potential annual saving of >£210m for the NHS, allowing hospitals to reallocate their resources. Today E\&B is still a major determinant of stent failure and associated side effects. The trial aims to address this challenge through the novel stent, and if equivalent safety and improved efficacy are demonstrated, anticipate market launch via third-party suppliers 2-3 years post project.
Solutions to break this pathway (stent presence >> inflammation, pain and infection) have been developed, including materials (e.g. metallic alloys, polymers, biodegradable and drug-eluting materials), coatings (e.g. heparin, chitosan, hydrogel, carbon) and shapes (e.g. double-J, loop, mesh, string, expandable) to improve the efficacy and safety of stents. Despite all these advances, there is still a significant prevalence of E\&B. This is also due to the lack of studies correlating fluid dynamic metrics with deposition of particles causing E\&B. The lead applicant's PhD investigated the mechanisms of particle deposition in urological stents, and successfully determined fluid dynamic parameters governing particle deposition on ureteric stents and catheters. The research led to developing a stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E\&B). These developments demonstrated >80% reduction in particle deposition at side-holes, in-vitro. Their innovative architecture can be implemented on stents and catheters. The technology, including the stent design and manufacturing process, is protectable - Patent# WO2019048860A1, WIPO(PCT). These results were further validated in an animal study (6 pigs: 3 novel-design-stent vs 3 conventional-design-stent for a 4-weeks period) at Stone-Centre at Vancouver-General-Hospital (VGH), a centre of excellence in animal studies on urological products. The study (available upon request) concluded that the functionality of stents with novel side-holes is the same as that of standard stents in terms of safety. Specifically, the novel stent does not result in increased risk of irritation, inflammation and hydronephrosis. Furthermore, SEM/EDX imaging showed that the novel design decreased the build-up of particles on the stent surface. Thus, it demonstrated significant potential for the new side-hole configuration to change patterns of particle deposition on the stent's surface, decreasing encrustation
- Conditions
- Catheter Blockage, Oncology, Kidney Stone
- Being tested
- Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B), Qualitative interview
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Kidney Calculi
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B)Device
Kidney stone patients and Oncology patients admitted to either the University Hospital Southampton (UHS) or University College London Hospital (UCLH) for management of kidney stones or for the management of urine drainage in ureter will have a novel ureteric stent instead of their planned conventional stent. The novel stent will be removed after 4 weeks (kidney stone patients) or 25 weeks (oncology patients). Recruitment to the cohort of oncology patients will only commence once the results for kidney stones patients have been reviewed.
Qualitative interviewOther
Kidney stone patients, Oncology patients and doctors will be interviewed about their experience of having a stent, or their experience in managing patients with a stent.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Kidney Stone cohort | Experimental | Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E\&B) Receives: Device: Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B); Other: Qualitative interview |
| Oncology cohort | Experimental | Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E\&B) Receives: Device: Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B); Other: Qualitative interview |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To determine rates of stent failure
Outcome measure: Stent failure, defined as any of: a): a stent change earlier than planned (oncology only); b) need for additional surgical or radiological intervention; c): kidney failure (evidenced by acute kidney injury (AKI) on blood tests (eGFR or creatinine kidney function tests) and/or worsening hydronephrosis on imaging
Summary method: Frequency and percentage of people experiencing any stent failure
Measured: From enrolment to stent removal (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)
Secondary outcomes (4)
To assess extent of encrustation and biofilm (E&B)
Outcome measure:
- Cell culturing (CFU counts per ml per bacterial microorganism)
- Flow study (pressure value): A section of the retrieved stent will be used for flow study. The part will be placed into a larger diameter tube. DI water/Saline is injected using a pump into the inlet of the external tube and pressure sensor is connected to the inlet tube. Pressure readings will be captured per stent.
- Dwell time
Summary method:
- Imaging (selected samples of stents will be examined using non-contact, non-destructive SEM (scanning-electron-microscopy) and/or episcopic-differential-interference-contrast (EDIC) microscopy allowing imaging of the surface with the biofilm in-situ and colonisation by bacteria - when needed)
- Mean and standard deviation or median and quartiles of pressure readings
Measured: From enrolment to stent removal (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)
To determine whether the novel stent leads to better clinical outcomes
Outcome measure:
- Individual component of the primary outcome
- Urinary symptoms
- Infections
Summary method:
- As per primary outcome
- Frequency and percentage of participants experiencing each symptom
- Frequency and percentage of people with antibiotic
- use, readmission, urosepsis, ITU, death; number of infections per unit of time stent is in use
Measured: From enrolment to completion of patient questionnaires 2-3 weeks post surgery 2 (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), 2-3 weeks post surgery 2 (~25 weeks for Oncology cohort)
To assess impact of the novel stent on quality of life
Outcome measure:
Questionnaires at:
- Baseline
- While stent is in situ
- Post-surgery
Summary method:
Appropriate descriptive summaries (e.g., median and quartiles) per timepoint
Measured: Within first month of stent removal for participants (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)
To understand patient experience in having the novel ureteric stent inserted and reason for participation in the trial
Outcome measure:
30-45-minute Qualitative interviews with Oncology and Kidney stone cohorts
Summary method:
An inductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts
Measured: From enrolment to stent removal (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Feb 2025
- Study start6 Aug 2025
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Catheter BlockageStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two single arm, multicentre unblinded first-in-human trials, including 2 phases and a qualitative substudy
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southampton
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom, University College London Hospitals
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ali Mosayyebi, Principal investigator, University of Southampton
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06815120
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 63246
- Acronym
- CASSETTE
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 11 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: To be decided
Publications
Prattley S, Voss J, Cheung S, Geraghty R, Jones P, Somani BK. Ureteroscopy and stone treatment in the elderly (>/=70 years): prospective outcomes over 5- years with a review of literature. Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Jul-Aug;44(4):750-757. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0516.
PubMed 29522293Heers H, Turney BW. Trends in urological stone disease: a 5-year update of hospital episode statistics. BJU Int. 2016 Nov;118(5):785-789. doi: 10.1111/bju.13520. Epub 2016 May 26.
PubMed 27128735Z. Chen, M. Prosperi, and V. Y. Bird, "Prevalence of kidney stones in the USA: The National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey," J Clin Urol, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 296-302, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1177/2051415818813820
C. R. UK, "Cancer incidence by age," 2020. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/incidence/age#heading-Zero (accessed Apr. 11, 2021)
Kehinde EO, Rotimi VO, Al-Hunayan A, Abdul-Halim H, Boland F, Al-Awadi KA. Bacteriology of urinary tract infection associated with indwelling J ureteral stents. J Endourol. 2004 Nov;18(9):891-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.891.
PubMed 15659928S. T. Thomas, C. Heneghan, C. P. Price, A. van den Bruel, and A. Plüddemann, "Point-of-care testing for urinary tract infections - NIHR Community Healthcare MIC," NIHR, Jun. 2016. https://www.community.healthcare.mic.nihr.ac.uk/reports-and-resources/horizon-scanning-reports/point-of-care-testing-for-urinary-tract-infections (accessed Feb. 01, 2023)
Zumstein V, Betschart P, Albrich WC, Buhmann MT, Ren Q, Schmid HP, Abt D. Biofilm formation on ureteral stents - Incidence, clinical impact, and prevention. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Feb 3;147:w14408. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14408. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28165539Feneley RC, Hopley IB, Wells PN. Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda. J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39(8):459-70. doi: 10.3109/03091902.2015.1085600. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
PubMed 26383168Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG, Barry MJ. Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1065-9; discussion 1069. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000048980.33855.90.
PubMed 12576847Ramachandra M, Mosayyebi A, Carugo D, Somani BK. Strategies to Improve Patient Outcomes and QOL: Current Complications of the Design and Placements of Ureteric Stents. Res Rep Urol. 2020 Jul 31;12:303-314. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S233981. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32802807Mosayyebi A, Manes C, Carugo D, Somani BK. Advances in Ureteral Stent Design and Materials. Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Apr 10;19(5):35. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0779-y.
PubMed 29637309Mosayyebi A, Vijayakumar A, Yue QY, Bres-Niewada E, Manes C, Carugo D, Somani BK. Engineering solutions to ureteral stents: material, coating and design. Cent European J Urol. 2017;70(3):270-274. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1520. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
PubMed 29104790Liatsikos EN, Kallidonis P, Kyriazis I, Karnabatidis D, Tsamandas A, Sakellaropoulos G, Flaris N, Rigopoulos C, Toronidis C, Efthimiou I, Filos K, Siablis D, Perimenis P. Metallic double pigtail ureteral stent usage during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the swine model: is there any effect on the ureter? J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):685-91. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0569.
PubMed 19335328S. Zheng et al., "Quantitative Evaluation of Encrustations in Double-J Ureteral Stents With Micro-Computed Tomography and Semantic Segmentation," Frontiers in Urology, vol. 2, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fruro.2022.836563
Tomer N, Garden E, Small A, Palese M. Ureteral Stent Encrustation: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Management and Current Technology. J Urol. 2021 Jan;205(1):68-77. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001343. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
PubMed 32856981
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Two Single Arm, Multicentre Unblinded First-in-human Trials Investigating a Novel Ureteric Stent to Determine the Reduction of Encrustation, Biofilm Deposition and Complications Compared to a Conventional JJ Stent
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06815120
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CASSETTE / 63246
- Conditions
- Catheter Blockage, Oncology, Kidney Stone
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of SouthamptonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom, University College London Hospitals
- Study start
- 6 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Urological stents and catheters often lead to inflammation, causing pain and infection in the urinary tract. Moreover, 80% of stents are associated with pain, negatively impacting on QoL and mental health. Offering novel designs with significantly lower E\&B leads to a reduction in UTIs and improves QoL. Reducing hospital admissions (from 3 to 1 per patient, annually) would free >100,000 bed-nights, allowing the elderly to regain independence. Our proposed research could have a significant impact towards fulfilling the 'healthy-ageing' Grand Challenge. Additionally, the novel stent reduces prevalence of infections and therefore, of antibiotic prescriptions contributing to the Global AMR challenge.
Detailed description
Ureteric stents and catheters are deployed clinically as temporary measures to restore urinary drainage, in patients with kidney stones, tumours and strictures. Prevalence of these increases with age. Device-associated encrustation-and-biofilm-formation (E\&B) are key complications, leading to urinary-tract-infections (UTIs) in >90% of stents, causing stent blockage and favouring development of antibiotic resistance.
UTIs are a significant cause of morbidity, especially among the elderly population, with 4,835 deaths in England and Wales reported in 2012. The National Institute for Health Research reported that 1-3% of all primary care consultations concern UTI-related symptoms, leading to 13.7% of antibiotic prescriptions globally. The report also revealed that >92m people globally are diagnosed with UTIs annually.
Urological-device-associated infections significantly compromise patient' quality of life and the effectiveness of services, imposing a £2.5b annual burden on the NHS. Patients' exposure to hospital environment and general anaesthetic use impact on Quality-of-Life (QoL), resulting in unnecessary hospital bed-nights. A novel urological stent has been developed which is associated with significantly reduced particle deposition , potentially extending the stent's lifetime, resulting in reduced hospitalisation and improved QoL.
Urological stents and catheters often lead to inflammation, causing pain and infection in the urinary tract. Moreover, 80% of stents are associated with pain, negatively impacting on QoL and mental health. Offering novel designs with significantly lower E\&B leads to a reduction in UTIs and improves QoL. Reducing hospital admissions (from 3 to 1 per patient, annually) would free >100,000 bed-nights, allowing the elderly to regain independence. Our proposed research could have a significant impact towards fulfilling the 'healthy-ageing' Grand Challenge. Additionally, the novel stent reduces prevalence of infections and therefore, of antibiotic prescriptions contributing to the Global AMR challenge.
Considering only onco-urological patients, >30,000 stents are inserted every year across 200 NHS units. Due to stent failures, each patient undergoes 3 to 6 replacements, resulting in >90,000 stent replacements. Under the current tariff-based system, hospitals are paid for each intervention, costing the NHS >£3,500, bringing the total cost of replacements to ~£315m annually. Unnecessary replacements increase the number of bed-nights and use of anaesthetics. A longer-lasting stent means that each patient comes to the hospital ideally only once, reducing their exposure to the hospital environment and anaesthetic-associated risks. Additionally, under the current model hospitals would improve their quality of service and save at least 2 bed-nights per patient. The NHS is moving towards a "block contract" model, meaning that hospitals will receive a lump sum for the year and they'll regularly monitor budgets and improve cost efficiency where possible. Improved stents will allow the same urology budget to deliver more healthcare, reducing theatre time for stent insertion-and-replacement. This innovative stent design offers a potential annual saving of >£210m for the NHS, allowing hospitals to reallocate their resources. Today E\&B is still a major determinant of stent failure and associated side effects. The trial aims to address this challenge through the novel stent, and if equivalent safety and improved efficacy are demonstrated, anticipate market launch via third-party suppliers 2-3 years post project.
Solutions to break this pathway (stent presence >> inflammation, pain and infection) have been developed, including materials (e.g. metallic alloys, polymers, biodegradable and drug-eluting materials), coatings (e.g. heparin, chitosan, hydrogel, carbon) and shapes (e.g. double-J, loop, mesh, string, expandable) to improve the efficacy and safety of stents. Despite all these advances, there is still a significant prevalence of E\&B. This is also due to the lack of studies correlating fluid dynamic metrics with deposition of particles causing E\&B. The lead applicant's PhD investigated the mechanisms of particle deposition in urological stents, and successfully determined fluid dynamic parameters governing particle deposition on ureteric stents and catheters. The research led to developing a stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E\&B). These developments demonstrated >80% reduction in particle deposition at side-holes, in-vitro. Their innovative architecture can be implemented on stents and catheters. The technology, including the stent design and manufacturing process, is protectable - Patent# WO2019048860A1, WIPO(PCT). These results were further validated in an animal study (6 pigs: 3 novel-design-stent vs 3 conventional-design-stent for a 4-weeks period) at Stone-Centre at Vancouver-General-Hospital (VGH), a centre of excellence in animal studies on urological products. The study (available upon request) concluded that the functionality of stents with novel side-holes is the same as that of standard stents in terms of safety. Specifically, the novel stent does not result in increased risk of irritation, inflammation and hydronephrosis. Furthermore, SEM/EDX imaging showed that the novel design decreased the build-up of particles on the stent surface. Thus, it demonstrated significant potential for the new side-hole configuration to change patterns of particle deposition on the stent's surface, decreasing encrustation
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two single arm, multicentre unblinded first-in-human trials, including 2 phases and a qualitative substudy
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Kidney Stone cohort | Experimental | Device: Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B), Other: Qualitative interviewExperimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E\&B) |
| Oncology cohort | Experimental | Device: Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B), Other: Qualitative interviewExperimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E\&B) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Aged 18 years or over
- Ureteric stents clinically indicated either due to kidney stones or abdominal/pelvic cancers compressing ureters
- Previous experience with ureteric stents
- Awaiting insersion/replacement of stents
- Ability to give consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Expected survival <4months
- Unfit for stent insertion
- Unable to comply with study processes Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B)Kidney stone patients and Oncology patients admitted to either the University Hospital Southampton (UHS) or University College London Hospital (UCLH) for management of kidney stones or for the management of urine drainage in ureter will have a novel ureteric stent instead of their planned conventional stent. The novel stent will be removed after 4 weeks (kidney stone patients) or 25 weeks (oncology patients). Recruitment to the cohort of oncology patients will only commence once the results for kidney stones patients have been reviewed. | Device | Kidney Stone cohort, Oncology cohort |
| Qualitative interviewKidney stone patients, Oncology patients and doctors will be interviewed about their experience of having a stent, or their experience in managing patients with a stent. | Other | Kidney Stone cohort, Oncology cohort |
Primary outcome
To determine rates of stent failure
Time frame: From enrolment to stent removal (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)
Outcome measure: Stent failure, defined as any of: a): a stent change earlier than planned (oncology only); b) need for additional surgical or radiological intervention; c): kidney failure (evidenced by acute kidney injury (AKI) on blood tests (eGFR or creatinine kidney function tests) and/or worsening hydronephrosis on imaging Summary method: Frequency and percentage of people experiencing any stent failure
4 secondary outcomes
To assess extent of encrustation and biofilm (E&B)
Time frame: From enrolment to stent removal (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)
To determine whether the novel stent leads to better clinical outcomes
Time frame: From enrolment to completion of patient questionnaires 2-3 weeks post surgery 2 (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), 2-3 weeks post surgery 2 (~25 weeks for Oncology cohort)
To assess impact of the novel stent on quality of life
Time frame: Within first month of stent removal for participants (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)
To understand patient experience in having the novel ureteric stent inserted and reason for participation in the trial
Time frame: From enrolment to stent removal (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 29522293Prattley S, Voss J, Cheung S, Geraghty R, Jones P, Somani BK. Ureteroscopy and stone treatment in the elderly (>/=70 years): prospective outcomes over 5- years with a review of literature. Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Jul-Aug;44(4):750-757. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0516.
- Background: PubMed 27128735Heers H, Turney BW. Trends in urological stone disease: a 5-year update of hospital episode statistics. BJU Int. 2016 Nov;118(5):785-789. doi: 10.1111/bju.13520. Epub 2016 May 26.
- BackgroundZ. Chen, M. Prosperi, and V. Y. Bird, "Prevalence of kidney stones in the USA: The National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey," J Clin Urol, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 296-302, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1177/2051415818813820
- BackgroundC. R. UK, "Cancer incidence by age," 2020. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/incidence/age#heading-Zero (accessed Apr. 11, 2021)
- Background: PubMed 15659928Kehinde EO, Rotimi VO, Al-Hunayan A, Abdul-Halim H, Boland F, Al-Awadi KA. Bacteriology of urinary tract infection associated with indwelling J ureteral stents. J Endourol. 2004 Nov;18(9):891-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.891.
- BackgroundS. T. Thomas, C. Heneghan, C. P. Price, A. van den Bruel, and A. Plüddemann, "Point-of-care testing for urinary tract infections - NIHR Community Healthcare MIC," NIHR, Jun. 2016. https://www.community.healthcare.mic.nihr.ac.uk/reports-and-resources/horizon-scanning-reports/point-of-care-testing-for-urinary-tract-infections (accessed Feb. 01, 2023)
- Background: PubMed 28165539Zumstein V, Betschart P, Albrich WC, Buhmann MT, Ren Q, Schmid HP, Abt D. Biofilm formation on ureteral stents - Incidence, clinical impact, and prevention. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Feb 3;147:w14408. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14408. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 26383168Feneley RC, Hopley IB, Wells PN. Urinary catheters: history, current status, adverse events and research agenda. J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39(8):459-70. doi: 10.3109/03091902.2015.1085600. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
- Background: PubMed 12576847Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG, Barry MJ. Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1065-9; discussion 1069. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000048980.33855.90.
- Background: PubMed 32802807Ramachandra M, Mosayyebi A, Carugo D, Somani BK. Strategies to Improve Patient Outcomes and QOL: Current Complications of the Design and Placements of Ureteric Stents. Res Rep Urol. 2020 Jul 31;12:303-314. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S233981. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 29637309Mosayyebi A, Manes C, Carugo D, Somani BK. Advances in Ureteral Stent Design and Materials. Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Apr 10;19(5):35. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0779-y.
- Background: PubMed 29104790Mosayyebi A, Vijayakumar A, Yue QY, Bres-Niewada E, Manes C, Carugo D, Somani BK. Engineering solutions to ureteral stents: material, coating and design. Cent European J Urol. 2017;70(3):270-274. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1520. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
- NHS, "Overview - Hydronephrosis," NHS website, 2018Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. To be decided
Related trials for Catheter Blockage
Recruiting
Effectiveness of the NowCath Foley in Reducing Catheter-Associated UTIs and Blockages in Long-Term Indwelling Catheter Users (REDUCE)
Urinary Catheters, Urinary Catheterization
Recruiting
Nylon Versus Polyurethane Epidural Catheters In Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery
Epidural; Anesthesia, Catheter Complications
RecruitingObservational study
POLish Registry of CArdioneuroablation and CArdioneuromodulation
Vasovagal Syndrome VVS, Cardioinhibitory Carotid Sinus Syndrome CSS
Enrolling by invitation
UROtainer for Bladder Catheter Maintenance, Infection Prevention and Quality of Life
Catheter Blockage
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ali Mosayyebi principal investigator
University of Southampton
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Experimental ureteric stent with specially shaped side-holes that prevent stagnation points (i.e., areas of low flow that cause particles to settle and E&B) and Qualitative interview in people with Catheter Blockage and Oncology, run by University of Southampton at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ali Mosayyebi (02380594767, a.mosayyebi@soton.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To determine rates of stent failure (time frame: From enrolment to stent removal (4 weeks for Kidney cohort), (25 weeks for Oncology cohort)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06815120, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2026.