AzTrials
AzTrials

Bladder CancerNCT06796413

Loop Resection or Cold-cup Biopsy? A Study Comparing the Accuracy of Muscle Samples During Bladder Tumor Surgery

A study testing Loop Resection or Cold-cup biopsy in people with Bladder Cancer and Bladder Cancer Stage I, run by University of Stellenbosch at 1 site in South Africa.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this report the investigators compared two deep muscle sampling methods (Loop resection and Cold-Cup Biopsy) during endoscopic resection of bladder tumors for patients with suspected bladder cancer in Tygerberg hospital. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Bladder Cancer, Bladder Cancer Stage I, TURBT
What is being tested?
Loop Resection or Cold-cup biopsy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Africa
Study dates
14 Jul 2022to 1 Jul 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • • All patients requiring cystoscopy plus loop resection of bladder tumor.

Who cannot join

  • • Patients who underwent cystoscopy and no loop resection
  • Patients who underwent cystoscopy and only cold-cup biopsy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Africa1 site
  • Stellenbosch University - Faculty of Health Sciences - Department of Urology

    Cape Town, Western Cape, 7500

Other trials in South Africa

About this study

Official title: Loop Resection or Cold-cup Biopsy? A Prospective Randomized Study Evaluating the Accuracy of Detrusor Muscle Representation During Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors

In this report the investigators compared two deep muscle sampling methods (Loop resection and Cold-Cup Biopsy) during endoscopic resection of bladder tumors for patients with suspected bladder cancer in Tygerberg hospital. The investigators found that both sampling methods are equal effective with regards to muscle representation, regardless of surgeon experience. An important finding is that Loop Resection produced less tissue artefacts in the deep muscle specimen for the more experienced surgeons, while there was no difference for less experienced surgeons. The investigators thus conclude that - from a practical point of view - Loop Resection should be the deep muscle sampling method of choice.

Being tested
Loop Resection or Cold-cup biopsy
Keywords
Bladder Cancer, Detrusor Muscle Sampling, Detrusor Muscle Representation, Loop Resection, Cold-Cup Biopsy, Artifacts
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Loop Resection or Cold-cup biopsyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Loop Cautery, Cold-cup Biopsy

    Loop Resection or cold-cup biopsy of bladder tumor base - thus after the tumor has been resected and the deep muscle specimen needed to be obtained, the Loop Cautery or Lowsley Forceps (for cold-cup biopsy) was used to obtain the deep muscle specimen

Study groups in NCT06796413
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cold-Cup BiopsyActive comparatorCold-Cup Biopsy of bladder tumor base
Receives: Procedure: Loop Resection or Cold-cup biopsy
Loop Resection of bladder tumor baseExperimentalLoop Resection of bladder tumor base
Receives: Procedure: Loop Resection or Cold-cup biopsy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Detrusor Muscle Representation

    Histopathological confirmation of detrusor muscle representation in the Deep Muscle Specimen obtained by either the Loop Resection method or Cold-Cup Biopsy method

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2-4 weeks when histology results are available

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jan 2025
  2. Study start14 Jul 2022
  3. Primary completion23 May 2024
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
120 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06796413
Sponsor's protocol ID
17234
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
15 Jan 2025
Last updated
28 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Some of the personal detail of the participants may have changed or may not be so easily attainable.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Loop Resection or Cold-cup biopsy in people with Bladder Cancer and Bladder Cancer Stage I, run by University of Stellenbosch at 1 site in South Africa.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Detrusor Muscle Representation (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2-4 weeks when histology results are available). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in