THE DUAL-SYSTEM HYPOTHESIS OF ANOSOGNOSIA: The Interplay Between Emotional Processing and Self-Monitoring in Neurodegenerative Patients

1. INTRODUCTION The ability to appraise our own performance is a unique component of human functioning. It is impaired in brain diseases responsible for anosognosia, resulting in poor self-appraisal of one's own deficits. Anosognosia negatively impacts on capacity issues, such as treatment compliance and the patients' ability to deal appropriately with risk situations, with damaging consequences on their quality of life. Furthermore, it places a serious burden on the healthcare systems and may be extremely distressing for the patients' caregivers. Although initially described after vascular brain lesions and frequently observed in neurodegenerative disorders, such as the Alzheimer's disease (AD) or the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), anosognosia remains an intriguing phenomenon and its neural mechanisms largely unknown. There is, however, evidence in neurodegenerative disorders pointing to frontally-mediated dysfunctions as causes of anosognosia. Here, we build on a convergence of emotional and self-monitoring processes, and specifically explore their role in the emergence of anosognosia in AD and bvFTD patients, thus predicting that unawareness across domains may depend on common processes. In particular, we hypothetize that anosognosia might result from the inability to establish the linkage between emotional arousal and self-monitoring (that would normally trigger adaptive behaviors), due to critical connectivity impairments in the uncinate fasciculus in both AD and bvFTD (regardless to the nature of the deficits to which the patients are unaware). Indeed, by virtue of its connectivity, linking limbic with frontal/executive systems, one might expect that the uncinate fasciculus plays a major role in the interplay between emotional arousal and self-monitoring.
2. OBJECTIVES

The main scientific, clinical and technological objectives of this project are:

1. To test the interplay between self-monitoring and autonomic reactivity (as a proxy of emotional arousal) and then determine whether it is disturbed in both groups of patients relative to healthy controls, and whether it correlates with the patients' anosognosia level, as measured by standard scales (STUDY 1);
2. To test whether structural and functional damage to the uncinate fasciculus correlate with the patients' anosognosia level, and whether it may be critical for the emergence of this neurological syndrome (STUDY 2); and
3. To establish the neurophysiological markers of anosognosia in order to further develop a cognitive Brain-computer interface (BCI) aimed at monitoring patients' self-awareness in real time (STUDY 3).
4. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

The current project will be implemented over three distinct periods, corresponding to 3 well-identified work packages (WPs), during 48 months: 1. Data Acquisition; 2. Data Analysis; and 3. BCI Application WPs, as follows:

1. Data Acquisition: This WP 1 corresponds to a 24-months period that will be devoted to participants' recruitment, including both patients and healthy controls; and data acquisition, including behavioral, electrophysiological and neuroimaging data. Behavioral and electrophysiological data will be collected at the IM2A, whereas neuroimaging data will be acquired at the center for neuroimaging research (CENIR), both at the Salpêtrière's hospital, in Paris.
2. Data Analysis: This WP 2 corresponds to an 18-months period (partially overlapping with the WP1), during which we will be aimed at analyzing the acquired new data and further developing the functional and mechanistic foundations of the findings, as well as their theoretical and practical implications. During this period, we will also work on the discussion and publication of preliminary findings.
3. BCI Application: This WP 3 corresponds to the last 12-months period of the project; the main focus will be on the development of a cognitive BCI-system specifically targeting anosognosia. In parallel, we will continue working on the publication and dissemination of the project results.
4. METHODS Participants An hundred (n=100) native French speakers, age 50 years or above, with normal color vision and with normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity, will be recruited for the project. A signed informed consent will be obtained from all participants, as well as from the patients' caregivers. Patients : Two groups of patients (n=60) will be recruited at the Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer of the Salpêtrière's hospital, as follows: 1. One group of 30 patients fulfilling the core diagnostic features of bvFTD (Rascovsky et al, 2011); and 2. One group of 30 patients fulfilling the core diagnostic features of AD (Dubois et al, 2014), both in a mild cognitive and functional severity stage, as determined by a Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE; Folstein et al, 1975) score greater than or equal to 18, and a Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR; Hughes et al, 1982; Morris, 1993) global score less than or equal to 2. The other group corresponds to 40 cognitively healthy controls (MMSE score, >27; CDR score, 0; education-, gender-, and aged-matched) that will be recruited among patients' spouses and from the community. Neuropsychological tests In addition to the MMSE and the CDR, patients will be administered the frontal assessment battery (FAB; Dubois et al, 2000), as well as neuropsychological tests of verbal episodic memory (Grober \& Buschke, 1987), short term memory (digit span), phonemic and semantic verbal fluency, visual-spatial function and calculations. Patients' mood will be assessed with both the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (Hamilton, 1960) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (Yesavage et al, 1983; Greenberg, 2007), while apathy will be assessed with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI; Cummings et al, 1994). Anosognosia measures Patients level of self-appraisal accuracy will be evaluated by using i) patient-informant questionnaires designed to assess both episodic memory and executive functions' abilities, as well as activities of daily living (Migliorelli et al,1995; Dalla Barba et al, 2015); and ii) patients' postdiction-performance (Fragkiadaki et al, 2016) approaches. Neuroimaging and electrophysiological techniques An EEG and a brain MRI will also be administered to the patients (AD and bvFTD) and the healthy controls. In particular, our methodological approach will combine behavioral with advanced electrophysiological and neuroimaging methods that all tap on self-monitoring abilities and their relation to both emotional arousal and measures of self-appraisal accuracy. Importantly, recent evidence supports the brain's ability to modify and learn even in early stages of dementia, which may thus constitute a critical window for Brain Computer-Interfaces (BCI) interventions in neurodegenerative patients. Typically, BCIs acquire brain waves from an EEG amplifier and then utilize the biomarkers derived from the brain signal and adapt to the user's performance. The goal is to apply neuro-physiological regulation to foster cortical reorganization, thus promoting neural plasticity. The development of a cognitive BCI monitoring anosognosia is a necessary step to design specific neurofeedback strategies improving self-awareness, even though considerable development and controlled clinical trials will be required before these BCI interventions earn a place in our standard of clinical care. Exclusion criteria for all participants are: i) prior neurological disease or neurosurgery; ii) report of a present or prior major psychiatric disorder; iii) potentially confounding medications, particularly those with effects on the peripheral nervous system; and iv) contraindication for magnetic resonance imaging.
5. OPERATIONAL PART OF THE PROTOCOL Cognitive and electrophysiological data will be collected at the Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A) during the first visit (V1), whereas neuroimaging data will be acquired at the Center for Neuroimaging Research (CENIR) during the second and last visit (V2), both at the Salpêtrière's hospital, in Paris. The V2 must take place 1 day up to 3 months after the V1.

First visit (V1): The V1 is also the screening visit and all assessments to be performed at this visit are shown in the study flow-chart, section 3. Both the cognitive/behavioural and EEG data will be acquired at the IM2A. The complete visit will last approximately 3h30min.

Second visit (V2): The V2 will take place one day up to three months after the V1.

During this visit, both patients and controls will be administered a brain MRI (structural and functional). This MRI will be performed using a 3 Tesla Scanner at the CENIR, in the Salpêtrière's hospital. A custom-built head holder will be used to prevent head movement. Both resting-state BOLD images and DTI images will be acquired using SENSE acquisition, 45 min total imaging time.