AzTrials
AzTrials

Scoliosis Idiopathic AdolescentPhase 4NCT06789029

The Effect of Dexamethasone Administration Route and Local Anesthetic Concentration on Pain, Inflammatory Response, and Neuromonitoring in Children Undergoing Scoliosis Correction

A Phase 4 study testing perineural Dexamethasone and intravenous Dexamethasone in people with Scoliosis Idiopathic Adolescent, run by Poznan University of Medical Sciences at 1 site in Poland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Scoliosis correction surgery in children is a complex procedure with significant risks, including postoperative pain, inflammatory response, and potential neurological complications. Effective pain control and minimizing inflammation are critical for faster recovery and improved patient outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Scoliosis Idiopathic Adolescent
What is being tested?
perineural Dexamethasone and intravenous Dexamethasone
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
1 Feb 2025to 30 Sep 2026
Phase
Phase 4

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • >10 and <18 years old
  • scheduled for idiopathic scoliosis surgery

Who cannot join

  • included infection at the site of the regional block,
  • coagulation disorders,
  • immunodeficiency,
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of IV or higher,
  • history of regular steroid medication.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • Poznan University of Medical Sciences

    Poznan, 60-701

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Scoliosis correction surgery in children is a complex procedure with significant risks, including postoperative pain, inflammatory response, and potential neurological complications. Effective pain control and minimizing inflammation are critical for faster recovery and improved patient outcomes. Dexamethasone is commonly used as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia due to its anti-inflammatory effects and ability to prolong analgesia. However, limited research exists on the optimal route of dexamethasone administration (intravenous vs. perineural) and the best local anesthetic concentration for pain management, inflammatory response, and neuromonitoring during surgery.

This study aims to compare the effects of different dexamethasone administration routes and local anesthetic concentrations on postoperative pain, inflammation (NLR, PLR), and neuromonitoring in pediatric scoliosis surgery. Results may improve regional anesthesia protocols, enhance patient safety, and offer valuable insights for clinical practice.

Read the detailed description

Scoliosis correction surgery in children is a complex procedure associated with a significant risk of postoperative pain, inflammatory response, and potential neurological complications. Ensuring optimal pain control and minimizing adverse inflammatory responses is crucial for shortening the recovery period, improving patient comfort, and reducing the risk of long-term complications. In clinical practice, dexamethasone is frequently used as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia techniques due to its anti-inflammatory properties and its potential to prolong the analgesic effect.

Although the use of dexamethasone as an adjuvant in regional anesthesia is well known, there is limited research focusing on the impact of its route of administration (local versus intravenous) and the optimal concentration of local anesthetic agents on the effectiveness of pain control, inflammatory response, and neuromonitoring parameters during surgical procedures in children. Understanding these aspects is particularly important in complex procedures such as scoliosis correction surgery, where precise neurological function monitoring is essential for patient safety.

The objective of the proposed study is to evaluate the impact of different dexamethasone administration routes (intravenous and perineural) and varying concentrations of local anesthetic agents on postoperative pain, inflammatory response (measured using NLR and PLR indices), and neuromonitoring parameters in children undergoing scoliosis correction surgery. The findings from this study may contribute to the development of more effective and safer regional anesthesia and analgesia protocols for this patient group.

Conducting this study will provide new insights into the optimization of anesthesia in pediatric spinal surgery, potentially leading to improved treatment outcomes and patient safety, as well as valuable data for clinical practice regarding the selection of anesthetic strategies.

Being tested
perineural Dexamethasone, intravenous Dexamethasone
Keywords
scoliosis, Neuromonitoring,, erector spinae plane block, dexamethasone
Medical subject headings
Scoliosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • perineural DexamethasoneDrug

    Erector Spinae Plane Block with 0.2% Ropivacaine + 0.1mg/kg perineural Dexamethasone

  • intravenous DexamethasoneDrug

    Erector Spinae Plane Block with 0.2% Ropivacaine + 0.1mg/kg intravenous Dexamethasone

Study groups in NCT06789029
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
perineural DexamethasoneActive comparatorErector Spinae Plane Block with 0.2% ropivacaine with perineural 0.1mg/kg dexamethasne
Receives: Drug: perineural Dexamethasone
intravenous dexamethasneActive comparatorErector Spinae Plane Block with 0.2% ropivacaine with intravenous 0.1mg/kg dexamethasne
Receives: Drug: intravenous Dexamethasone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to first rescue opioid analgesia

    Time to first rescue opioid analgesia

    Measured: 48 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. intraoperative requirement for propofol

    intraoperative requirement for propofol in mg/kg

    Measured: durring surgery

  2. intraoperative requirement for remifentanil

    intraoperative requirement for remifentanil in ug/kg

    Measured: durring surgery

  3. MEP

    Motor evoced potentials durring surgery

    Measured: durring surgery

  4. Total opioid consumption

    Total opioid consumption in milliequivalents of morphine per kg

    Measured: 48 after surgery

  5. NRS

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"

    Measured: 6 hours after surgery

  6. NRS

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"

    Measured: 12 hours after surgery

  7. NRS

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"

    Measured: 24 hours after surgery

  8. NRS

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"

    Measured: 36 hours after surgery

  9. NRS

    The numeric rating scale (NRS) with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"

    Measured: 48 hours after surgery

  10. NLR

    Neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Measured: 12 hours after surgery

  11. NLR

    Neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio

    Measured: 48 hours after surgery

  12. PLR

    Platelet-to-lymohocyte ratio

    Measured: 12 hours after surgery

  13. PLR

    Platelet-to-lymohocyte ratio

    Measured: 24 hours after surgery

  14. PLR

    Platelet-to-lymohocyte ratio

    Measured: 48 hours after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2025
  2. Study start1 Feb 2025
  3. Primary completion23 Sep 2026
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06789029
Sponsor's protocol ID
1/2025
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
17 Jan 2025
Last updated
19 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in