AzTrials
AzTrials

SchizophreniaINVESTIGECCONCT06782672

Investigation of Objective Cognitive Effort in Neuropsychological Evaluation of Psychotic Disorders

An observational study of Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Psychotic disorders are characterised by a heterogeneity of symptoms, including cognitive disorders, which predict functional outcome. To date, the evaluation of cognitive functions essentially measures performance. Cognitive effort and the influence of psychological factors are rarely considered. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Cardiovascular measurements, Experimental memory task and Questionnaire and semi-structured psychological interview
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
27 Jan 2025to 1 Jul 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: Non-clinical group: Absence of any psychiatric disorder, community sample Psychotic disorders group : Patients with a diagnosis within the schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5; APA, 2015), selected from the adult psychiatry department, inpatient or outpatient hospitalisation

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years and ≤60 years
  • Patients with a diagnosis within the schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders according to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5; APA, 2015).
  • Absence of any psychiatric disorder.
  • non-inclusion criteria in both groups
  • Neurological disorder or history of head trauma;
  • Cardiovascular disease or treatment for hypertension;
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Substance abuse or dependence disorder;
  • Individuals who cannot understand or speak French;
  • Non-affiliation with a social security system;
  • Individuals participating in another study that includes an ongoing exclusion period;
  • Individuals who have not provided written informed consent to participate in the study;
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  • Absence of written consent from the legal guardian for patients under guardianship;
  • Absence of notification to the curator for patients under curatorship.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Montpellier University Hospital

    Montpellier, 34295

Other trials in France

About this study

Psychotic disorders are characterised by a heterogeneity of symptoms, including cognitive disorders, which predict functional outcome. To date, the evaluation of cognitive functions essentially measures performance. Cognitive effort and the influence of psychological factors are rarely considered.

Based on the principle of energy conservation, the Motivational Intensity Theory (MIT) allows to test cognitive effort independently of performance, by measuring cardiovascular reactivity, as well as controlling for psychological factors (e.g., mood, fatigue, anxiety).

Read more

The main aim of this study is to investigate in a memory task the interaction between cognitive effort, performance and psychological factors in individuals with psychotic disorders compared to a non-clinical group, based on the predictions of the MIT.

This study will provide insights into the nature of cognitive impairment in psychotic disorders: primary or secondary to motivational (effort) or psychological (mood, fatigue, anxiety) difficulties.

Read the detailed description

The study will be proposed to patients with psychotic disorders (n=50) and non clinical participants (n = 50) aged 18 to 60.

This is a non-interventional, randomized, prospective experimental study with mixed design: 2 groups (psychotic disorders vs. non-clinical) with 2 repeated measures of difficulty (easy vs. difficult).

The study comprises a single visit with memory tests recording cardiovascular, and performance data, as well as participants' perceptions of the task (effort invested, difficulty, motivation to perform the task), followed by a psychological assessment using questionnaires and a semi-structured interview.

The study of these different measures (cardiovascular, performance, perception) will enable us to refine the understanding of cognitive deficits in psychotic disorders, taking psychopathological variables into account. will provide better direction for the care of this population: cognitive remediation for primary cognitive disorders vs. cognitive and behavioral therapies for cognitive disorders secondary to psychopathological variables (mood, fatigue, defeatist beliefs, motivational deficits).

Being tested
Cardiovascular measurements, Experimental memory task, Questionnaire and semi-structured psychological interview
Keywords
memory, effort, cardiovascular reactivity
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia, Psychotic Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cardiovascular measurementsOther

    Measurement of pre-ejection period is the period between the onset of electrical excitation of the left ventricle and the opening of the aortic valve and heart rate will be continuous.

    These data will be collected using a cardiograph measuring the ECG signal and impedance cardiography (ICG). The system's four electrodes are positioned on the middle axillary line at the end of the sternum and at the base of the neck.

    Blood pressure measurements (PAS and PAD) will be taken from a cuff placed on the brachial artery of the non-dominant arm.

    cardiovascular values will be measured continuously:

    • Each participant rested while watching a documentary for 8 minutes.
    • During two 5-minute memory tasks of different difficulty levels (easy and difficult), separated by a 5-minute break.

    The averages of the last 5 minutes during the resting period will constitute the resting values, and the averages of the 5 minutes of each difficulty level will constitute the values during cognitive effort.

  • Experimental memory taskOther

    First, a quiet period with the viewing of a documentary film (8min).

    Then, participants will perform two 5-minute memory tasks of different difficulty levels (memorizing 3 letters corresponds to the easy level vs. 7 letters to the difficult level), separated by a 5-minute break. The order of difficulty will be counterbalanced.

    At the end of each difficulty level, self-report measures assessed by the following questions will be collected:

    • "How much effort did you exert during the task?";
    • How difficult did you find the task?
    • How motivated were you to perform the task? Responses will be in Likert scale format, ranging from 1 ("no effort at all", "very easy", "not at all motivated", respectively) to 7 ("a lot of effort", "very difficult", "very motivated", respectively).
  • Questionnaire and semi-structured psychological interviewOther

    psychopathological measures collected using questionnaires:

    • Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II): mood
    • State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y) (STAY-Y): anxiety
    • Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, 20-item version (MFI-20=): fatigue
    • General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES): defeatist beliefs
    • Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS) : psychotic symptoms for the psychotic disorders group
Study groups in NCT06782672
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
psychotic disordersThe target population is people with a psychotic disorder (diagnosed as schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder) according to DSM 5 criteria, aged between 18 and 60. The people with psychotic disorders recruited for this study are currently being cared for at the adult psychiatry department of Montpellier University Hospital. Participants will have a single visit with memory tests and data recording (cardiovascular, performance, perceptions), followed by a psychological assessment using questionnaires and a semi-structured interview.
Receives: Other: Cardiovascular measurements; Other: Experimental memory task; Other: Questionnaire and semi-structured psychological interview
non clinical, controlThe non-clinical population should be similar to the psychotic disorders population in terms of age, level of education and gender. Participants will have a single visit with memory tests and data recording (cardiovascular, performance, perceptions), followed by a psychological assessment using questionnaires and a semi-structured interview.
Receives: Other: Cardiovascular measurements; Other: Experimental memory task; Other: Questionnaire and semi-structured psychological interview

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Interaction effect of group x difficulty on cardiovascular reactivity (Pre-Ejection Period - PEP)

    The difference score between the pre-ejection period (PEP) during the task (easy and difficult) and the PEP at rest (i.e., baseline), expressed in ms.

    Measured: 18 minutes

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Investigation of systolic blood pressure in both groups and difficulties

    expressed in mmHg

    Measured: 18 minutes

  2. Investigation of diastolic blood pressure in both groups and difficulties

    expressed in mmHg

    Measured: 18 minutes

  3. Investigation of heart rate pressure in both groups and difficulties

    expressed in beats/minutes

    Measured: 18 minutes

  4. Comparison of correct performance

    The percentage of correct responses between the two groups and in both levels of difficulty

    Measured: 10 minutes

  5. Comparison of errors

    The rate of errors between the two groups and in both levels of difficulty

    Measured: 10 minutes

  6. Comparison of self-reported effort in both groups and both difficulties

    Self-reported effort will assess through the following question:

    • "How much effort did you exert during the task?" Response will be on a Likert scale ranging from 1 ('Not at all effort') to 7 ('A lot of effort').

    Measured: 1 minute

  7. Comparison of self-reported difficulty in both groups and both difficulties

    Self-reported difficulty will assess through the following question:

    "How difficult did you find the task?" Response will be on a Likert scale ranging from 1 ('Very easy') to 7 ('Very difficult').

    Measured: 1 minute

  8. Comparison of self-reported motivation in both groups and both difficulties

    Self-reported motivation will assess through the following question:

    "How motivated were you to complete the task?" Response will be on a Likert scale ranging from 1 ('Not at all motivated') to 7 ('Very motivated').

    Measured: 1 minute

  9. Influence of depressed mood on effort

    Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II, Beck et al., 1996, internal consistency α = .92). This self-administered questionnaire consists of 21 items, each scored from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 63.

    The higher the score, the more severe the depression.

    Measured: 5 minutes

  10. Influence of anxiety on effort

    State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y) (STAY-Y, Spielberger et al., 1983, Bruchon-Schweitzer \& Paulhan, 1993 for French validation, internal consistency α = .91). The STAY-Y assesses two scales momentary anxiety and trait anxiety, each comprising 20 items. Scores range from 1 ("Not at all for the momentary anxiety scale, "Almost never" for the trait anxiety scale) to 4 ("A lot", "Almost always", respectively). The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety.

    Measured: 5 minutes

  11. Influence of fatigue on effort

    Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, 20-item version (IMF-20, Smets et al., 1995, Gentille et al., 2003 for French validation, internal consistency α > .70). This scale comprises 20 items ranging from 1 ("Strongly disagree") to 5 ("Strongly agree").The total score is between 4 and 20, the higher the score, the greater the fatigue felt.The MFI has 5 subscales: general fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, physical fatigue, reduced activities.

    Measured: 3 minutes

  12. Influence of defeatist beliefs on effort

    General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES, Schwarzer \& Jerusalem, 1995, Dumont et al., 2000, for French validation, internal consistency α > .76).This scale measures feelings of self-efficacy . This scale measures feelings of self-efficacy (the opposite of defeatist beliefs). It comprises 10 items, scored on a Likert scale ranging from 1 ("Not at all true") to 4 ("Totally true"). The higher the score, the higher the sense of self-efficacy, and the lower the person's self-defeating beliefs.

    Measured: 3 minutes

  13. Influence of negatives symptomes on effort in schizophrenia group

    Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms (CAINS, Kring et al., 2013; Laraki et al., 2022 for French validation, internal consistency α = 0.87). This is a semi-structured interview assessing the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

    This interview is composed of 13 items ranging from 0 (absence/no deficit) to 5 (severe deficit). The interview includes two subscales: motivation and pleasure (MAP, 9 items) and expressivity (EXP, 4 items).

    Measured: 30 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jan 2025
  2. Study start27 Jan 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06782672
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECHLMPL23_0456
Acronym
INVESTIGECCO
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
10 Dec 2024
Last updated
20 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Amandine Décombe, PhD (0467332425 ext. +33, a-decombe@chu-montpellier.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Interaction effect of group x difficulty on cardiovascular reactivity (Pre-Ejection Period - PEP) (time frame: 18 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in