Degenerative Disc DiseaseRESTORENCT06778447
Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Nucleus Pulposus Allograft in Participants With Degenerative Disc Disease
A study testing VIA Disc NP in people with Degenerative Disc Disease and Disc Degeneration, run by VIVEX Biologics, Inc. at 19 sites in United States.
Trial summary
VIA Disc NP is a non-surgical intervention intended to supplement nucleus pulposus tissue in degenerated intervertebral discs. This is a randomized, sham-controlled, multi-center, double-blind clinical trial with an open label roll-in period of one participant per site in which participants with lumbar discogenic pain… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Degenerative Disc Disease, Disc Degeneration, Lumbar Discogenic Pain
- What is being tested?
- VIA Disc NP
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 325 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Feb 2025to Oct 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 22 to 85 years old
- Diagnosis of moderate to severe DDD on MRI, Modified Pfirrmann Grade 3-7
- Chronic axial midline low-back pain in the absence of lower extremity motor/sensory/reflex changes with or without referred non-radicular leg pain for at least 6 months prior to screening; unresponsive to at least 3 months of conservative care
- Low-back pain severity score of ≥ 40 to ≤ 90 mm on the VAS
- ODI score of ≥ 40 to ≤ 80
- Positive sustained hip flexion test
Show all 9Show fewer
- Intolerance to prolonged sitting
- Able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate and have signed an Informed Consent Form specific to this study
- Willing and able to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study with a life expectancy of > 2 years
Who cannot join
- Contraindications to the proposed sedation/anesthetic protocol
- Involvement of more than two lumbar discs as evidenced by 3 or more discs with Modified Pfirrmann grade of 3 or greater
- Symptomatic vertebral compression fracture
- Previous surgical treatment of the lumbar spine
- History of sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion within the past six months
- Received lumbar epidural or intradiscal steroid injection, lumbar facet joint steroid injection, lumbar radiofrequency ablation, SI joint pain injection, injection of methylene blue, dextrose, glucosamine, and chondroitin sulfate, or biacuplasty within 3 months of the Day 0 procedure
Show all 29Show fewer
- Received intraosseous radiofrequency nerve ablation procedure at the same or adjacent level (e.g., Basivertebral nerve ablation or sinuvertebral nerve ablations)
- Received prior intradiscal stem cell/progenitor cell therapy or other biological intervention (e.g., MSC, PRP) at the target level within 12 months of the Day 0 procedure
- Evidence of dynamic instability on lumbar flexion-extension radiographs (>3 mm) at any level
- Grade 2 or higher spondylolisthesis at the target level, lumbar spondylitis or other undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy, or Type III Modic changes adjacent to the target disc
- Radiographic evidence of a full thickness annular tear at the target disc or other abnormal disc morphology
- Clinical suspicion of facet pain as primary pain generator
- A systemic condition or disease not stabilized or judged by the Investigator to be incompatible with participation in the study (e.g. current systemic infection, uncontrolled autoimmune disease, uncontrolled immunodeficiency disease, recent history of myocardial infarction, uncontrolled diabetes (>7.0% HbA1C), etc.)
- Received VIA Disc NP previously.
- Deemed unsuitable for clinical study participation by the Investigator
- Evidence of substance abuse (including marijuana); note: subjects using prescribed extended-release narcotics (e.g., fentanyl patch, MS Contin, oxycontin) within the 3 months prior to screening and subjects on long-acting opioids may be given option to wean off opiates before enrollment; participants on short-acting opiates (e.g., hydrocodone, oxycodone, tramadol, etc.) may be included and utilization monitored after the treatment
- Opioid use of more than 90 MME/day
- Currently receiving treatment with radiation, chemotherapy, immunosuppression, or chronic steroid therapy (prednisone, or its equivalent, use of up to 5 mg/qd, or inhalation steroids for asthma is allowed)
- Metal or ceramic implants in the lumbar spine region
- Contraindications to MRI, including non-MRI compatible devices and active implantable devices such as spinal cord stimulators, intrathecal pumps, etc.
- Involved in ongoing or closed (within 6 months of screening visit) litigation related to their back pain condition
- Any mental instability, unstable bipolar disorders, unmanaged post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or uncontrolled anxiety/depression and/or require new or changed anti-depressants or anti-psychotic medications within 3 months of enrollment
- Diagnosis of any traumatic neurological disorders that may impact the study as per the judgement of the Investigator
- Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding at the time of enrollment and/or plan to become pregnant during the study; pregnancy is confirmed by:
- a positive pregnancy test during the screening visit
- self-reported pregnancy
- Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) who are not using a reliable form of contraception (as determined by the Investigator)
- Received any experimental drug or device to treat the same condition used within 6 months prior to the screening visit or during the course of the clinical trial
- Other persistent pain/nerve issues including, for example, radiculopathy, cauda equine syndrome, etc.
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
19 sites in 1 country
United States19 sites, 19 recruiting
- Recruiting
The Spine and Nerve Center C/O Clinical Research
Charleston, West Virginia, 25301
Amy Young, RN, 304-347-6144, amelia.young3@wvumedicine.org
Tim Deer, National PI, MD
- Recruiting
Pacific Sports & Spine
Eugene, Oregon, 97404
Katie Fabian
Greg Moore, MD
- Recruiting
The Orthopaedic Institute
Gainesville, Florida, 32607
Aldrin Yumil
Ajay Antony, MD
- Recruiting
University of Kansas
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Karina Bravo
Usman Latif, MD
- Recruiting
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40504
Katie Eastridge
Christopher Mallard, MD
- Recruiting
Interventional Pain Management Napa Valley Orthopedic Medical Group
Napa, California, 94558
Sarah Habib
Jackie Weisbein, MD
- Recruiting
Crystal Coast Pain Management
New Bern, North Carolina, 28560
Amy Harum
Kirk Harum, MD
- Recruiting
Henry Community Health
New Castle, Indiana, 47362
Rebecca Layman
Andrew Davisson, MD
- Recruiting
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Raquel Walker
Maged Guirguis, MD
- Recruiting
Northwell Health
New York, New York, 10019
Jarka Faruq
Kiran Patel, MD
- Recruiting
Nevada Advanced Pain Specialists
Reno, Nevada, 89511
Madeline Benson
Denis Patterson, DO
- Recruiting
Source Healthcare
Santa Monica, California, 90403
Gabriel Wirnowski
Tim Davis, MD
- Recruiting
Procura Pain & Spine
Shenandoah, Texas, 77384
Courtney Harvey
Thomas White, MD
- Recruiting
Spine Institute of Louisiana
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101
Krista Kachnik
Pierce Nunley, MD
- Recruiting
Premier Pain Centers
Shrewsbury, New Jersey, 07702
Kathryn Gee
Sean Li, MD
- Recruiting
Paradigm Health System
Slidell, Louisiana, 70458
Chris Minnerly
Thomas Myers, MD
- Recruiting
Premier Spine and Pain Institute
Thornton, Colorado, 80229
Dennis Dickman
Amar Patel, MD
- Recruiting
Precision Spine Care
Tyler, Texas, 75701
Jessica Youngblood
Aaron Calodney, MD
- Recruiting
Georgia Pain Management
Woodstock, Georgia, 30189
Tina Hall
James Ellner, MD
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Multi-Center, Double-Blind Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Nucleus Pulposus Allograft to Supplement Nucleus Pulposus Tissue in Participants With Lumbar Discogenic Pain Associated With Degenerative Disc Disease
VIA Disc NP is a non-surgical intervention intended to supplement nucleus pulposus tissue in degenerated intervertebral discs.
This is a randomized, sham-controlled, multi-center, double-blind clinical trial with an open label roll-in period of one participant per site in which participants with lumbar discogenic pain associated with DDD will receive one VIA Disc NP treatment to each affected level (up to 2 levels). Participants enrolled after the roll-in stage will be randomized on a 2:1 basis to receive either a single VIA Disc NP intradiscal injection at 1 or 2 levels or the sham procedure at 1 or 2 levels. At 12 months, participants in the sham arm with continued symptoms may cross-over, receive VIA Disc NP, and will restart the study visit schedule, completing an additional 12 months of follow-up post-cross-over.
- Being tested
- VIA Disc NP, Sham
- Keywords
- Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Discogenic Pain
- Medical subject headings
- Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VIA Disc NPOther
Also called VIA Disc Nucleus Pulposus Allograft
VIA Disc NP is processed from donated cadaveric disc tissue, lyophilized, and micronized to particles.
ShamOther
A 20G spinal needle will be carefully inserted through the skin and muscle of the back but WILL NOT penetrate the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc. No saline or VIA Disc NP will be injected.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| VIA Disc NP | Experimental | A single dose, intradiscal delivery of 100mg of VIA Disc NP mixed with sterile saline according to product Instructions for Use (IFU) and administered at up to two affected levels, L1-S1. Receives: Other: VIA Disc NP |
| Sham | Sham comparator | The procedure will be identical to the investigational procedure with the following exception: A 20G spinal needle will be carefully inserted through the skin and muscle of the back but WILL NOT penetrate the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc. No saline or VIA Disc NP will be injected. Receives: Other: Sham |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint - Proportion of participants achieving MCID in VAS score from baseline to 12 months.
The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of participants who achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID), defined as at least a 30% reduction in back pain VAS score from baseline to 12 months, in the VIA Disc NP group compared to that in the sham-control group.
Measured: Baseline to 12 Months
Primary Safety Endpoint - Proportion of participants reporting treatment-related AEs at 12 months.
The primary safety endpoint will be the proportion of participants that experience one or more treatment-related (Investigational Product (IP) or procedure), adverse events (AE) in the VIA Disc NP group compared to the sham-control group at 12 months.
Measured: Baseline to 12 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jan 2025
- Study start17 Feb 2025
- Primary completionOct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Degenerative Disc DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Up to 325 subjects at up to 21 investigational sites in the United States.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 325 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VIVEX Biologics, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06778447
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VIA-2024-002
- Acronym
- RESTORE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 14 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Deer TR, Nunley PD, Naidu RK, Beall DP, Davis TT, Calodney AK, Soin A, Lorio MP, Block JE. Safety and efficacy of intradiscal nucleus pulposus allograft versus sham for lumbar discogenic pain associated with degenerative disc disease: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2026 Jun 8. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09826-w. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42260665
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Multi-Center, Double-Blind Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Nucleus Pulposus Allograft to Supplement Nucleus Pulposus Tissue in Participants With Lumbar Discogenic Pain Associated With Degenerative Disc Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06778447
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RESTORE / VIA-2024-002
- Keywords
- Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Discogenic Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 325 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- VIVEX Biologics, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 17 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
VIA Disc NP is a non-surgical intervention intended to supplement nucleus pulposus tissue in degenerated intervertebral discs.
This is a randomized, sham-controlled, multi-center, double-blind clinical trial with an open label roll-in period of one participant per site in which participants with lumbar discogenic pain associated with DDD will receive one VIA Disc NP treatment to each affected level (up to 2 levels). Participants enrolled after the roll-in stage will be randomized on a 2:1 basis to receive either a single VIA Disc NP intradiscal injection at 1 or 2 levels or the sham procedure at 1 or 2 levels. At 12 months, participants in the sham arm with continued symptoms may cross-over, receive VIA Disc NP, and will restart the study visit schedule, completing an additional 12 months of follow-up post-cross-over.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Up to 325 subjects at up to 21 investigational sites in the United States.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| VIA Disc NP | Experimental | Other: VIA Disc NPA single dose, intradiscal delivery of 100mg of VIA Disc NP mixed with sterile saline according to product Instructions for Use (IFU) and administered at up to two affected levels, L1-S1. |
| Sham | Sham comparator | Other: ShamThe procedure will be identical to the investigational procedure with the following exception: A 20G spinal needle will be carefully inserted through the skin and muscle of the back but WILL NOT penetrate the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc. No saline or VIA Disc NP will be injected. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age 22 to 85 years old
- Diagnosis of moderate to severe DDD on MRI, Modified Pfirrmann Grade 3-7
- Chronic axial midline low-back pain in the absence of lower extremity motor/sensory/reflex changes with or without referred non-radicular leg pain for at least 6 months prior to screening; unresponsive to at least 3 months of conservative care
- Low-back pain severity score of ≥ 40 to ≤ 90 mm on the VAS
- ODI score of ≥ 40 to ≤ 80
Key exclusion criteria (29 listed)
- Contraindications to the proposed sedation/anesthetic protocol
- Involvement of more than two lumbar discs as evidenced by 3 or more discs with Modified Pfirrmann grade of 3 or greater
- Symptomatic vertebral compression fracture
- Previous surgical treatment of the lumbar spine
- History of sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion within the past six months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VIA Disc NPAlso: VIA Disc Nucleus Pulposus AllograftVIA Disc NP is processed from donated cadaveric disc tissue, lyophilized, and micronized to particles. | Other | VIA Disc NP |
| ShamA 20G spinal needle will be carefully inserted through the skin and muscle of the back but WILL NOT penetrate the annulus fibrosus of the intervertebral disc. No saline or VIA Disc NP will be injected. | Other | Sham |
Primary outcome
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint - Proportion of participants achieving MCID in VAS score from baseline to 12 months.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 Months
The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of participants who achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID), defined as at least a 30% reduction in back pain VAS score from baseline to 12 months, in the VIA Disc NP group compared to that in the sham-control group.
Primary Safety Endpoint - Proportion of participants reporting treatment-related AEs at 12 months.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 Months
The primary safety endpoint will be the proportion of participants that experience one or more treatment-related (Investigational Product (IP) or procedure), adverse events (AE) in the VIA Disc NP group compared to the sham-control group at 12 months.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Sep 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42260665Deer TR, Nunley PD, Naidu RK, Beall DP, Davis TT, Calodney AK, Soin A, Lorio MP, Block JE. Safety and efficacy of intradiscal nucleus pulposus allograft versus sham for lumbar discogenic pain associated with degenerative disc disease: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2026 Jun 8. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09826-w. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Degenerative Disc Disease
Not yet recruiting
CANLINK: Evaluation of the Intralink Intradiscal Device for Low Back Pain Due to Degenerative Disc Disease
Degenerative Disc Disease(DDD)
Active, not recruiting
Post Marketing Study of MagnetOs Easypack Putty Standalone Compared to Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers Mixed With Autograft in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion
Degenerative Disc Disease, Spine Fusion
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Relationship Between Disability, Flexibility, Back Muscles, and Thoracolumbar Fascia in Patients With Lumbar Disc Degeneration
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
Active, not recruiting
ASCEND: A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of VIA Disc NP, a Supplement for Degenerated Intervertebral Discs
Degenerative Disc Disease, Disc Degeneration
Active, not recruiting
The Synergy Disc for the Treatment of 2 Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease Compared With Cervical Fusion Surgery
Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
19 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing VIA Disc NP in people with Degenerative Disc Disease and Disc Degeneration, run by VIVEX Biologics, Inc. at 19 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jennifer Martin (303-378-9778, jmartin@vivex.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint - Proportion of participants achieving MCID in VAS score from baseline to 12 months. (time frame: Baseline to 12 Months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06778447, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2026.