DiabetesNCT06778005
Investigation of Ultrasonographic Measurements of Lower Extremity Nerves in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Peripheral Polyneuropathy
An observational study of Diabetes and Diabetic Polyneuropathy, run by Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate ultrasonographic measurements of the lower extremity nerves in patients diagnosed with diabetic polyneuropathy and to investigate the relationship with gait, static and dynamic balance performance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes, Diabetic Polyneuropathy
- What is being tested?
- Ultrasonography, Biodex Balance System and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Pain Scale
- How many people
- 86 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2025to 1 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy and healthy volunteers aged between 18-65 years old will be evaluated visiting our physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinic between December 2024 and May 2025.
Who may be able to join
- Being between the ages of 18-65
- Being literate
- Signed a voluntary consent form agreeing to participate in the study
- Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes based on at least one of the following diagnostic criteria: fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl, 2-hour plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dl in an oral glucose tolerance test, HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, or diabetes symptoms (excessive thirst, eating, urination, and weight loss) + random plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dl. (14)
- Diagnosed with diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy through EMG evaluation in addition to Type 2 Diabetes.
- Being between the ages of 18-65
- Being literate
- Signed a voluntary consent form agreeing to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- Individuals under 18 years old and over 65 years old
- Diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes
- Use of medications that can cause polyneuropathy
- Other causes of neuropathic pain (lumbar radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, -hereditary, inflammatory, entrapment neuropathies)
- Undergoing lower extremity surgery (spine/hip/knee/foot) in the last 6 months
- Having peripheral artery disease
Show all 18Show fewer
- B12 vitamin deficiency
- Active foot ulcer
- History of lower extremity amputation
- Severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency (stage 3-4)
- History of myocardial infarction within the last 1 month
- History of unstable angina
- Active systemic inflammatory diseases and active malignancy
- Presence of vestibular disorders
- Presence of cognitive impairment
- Osteoarthritis in the lower extremity
- Pregnancy
- Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or higher
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites, 1 recruiting
- Active, not recruiting
Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Üsküdar, 34674
- Recruiting
Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Üsküdar
semiha özgüç acar, doctor, 5426311029, semihaozguc@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: Investigation of the Relationship of Ultrasonographic Measurements of Lower Extremity Nerves With Gait and Balance Performance in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Peripheral Polyneuropathy
The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate ultrasonographic measurements of the lower extremity nerves in patients diagnosed with diabetic polyneuropathy and to investigate the relationship with gait, static and dynamic balance performance.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of ultrasonographic findings of lower extremity nerves on quality of daily life, physical activity, gait and balance in patients with diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy.
Read the detailed description
Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia and the body's inability to adequately utilize carbohydrates, fats, and proteins due to a reduction in insulin secretion or insulin action. It requires continuous medical care.
One of the most common complications associated with diabetes is diabetic neuropathy, which affects the autonomic, motor, and sensory nerves of the peripheral nervous system. The most frequent form of diabetic neuropathy is peripheral sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Clinical and electrophysiological findings typically begin in the distal lower extremities.
While nerve conduction studies remain the gold standard for diagnosing diabetic neuropathy, they are time-consuming, require a separate patient visit, and are too costly to recommend for routine screening. Various methods can be employed to assess the morphological changes in nerves associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. With advancing technology in recent years, ultrasonography (US) has emerged as an affordable, reproducible, and more comfortable technique. It can be utilized as an effective method to evaluate structural changes in nerves. Diabetic neuropathy is a significant contributor to the severe morbidity, increased mortality, and reduced quality of life in diabetic patients. Therefore, the early detection of nerve dysfunction through ultrasonography is essential for providing appropriate care to patients with diabetic neuropathy.
The study will be conducted as a cross-sectional and single-center research involving patients with peripheral polyneuropathy secondary to type 2 diabetes and healthy volunteers who present to the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic at the Health Sciences University Sultan 2nd Abdülhamid Han Training and Research Hospital.
As part of the study, demographic data collected from participants will include age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, smoking and alcohol usage, marital status, occupation, educational level, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c levels, vitamin B12, ALT, AST, creatinine levels, duration of diabetes, duration of diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy (DPP) complaints, current antidiabetic medications, presence of comorbidities, and neuropathic pain treatment and duration. Patients will be evaluated once, and the assessment will include ultrasonography, the Biodex balance system, the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) pain scale, numeric pain scale, Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score, diapason vibration sensitivity test, 6-minute walk test, SF-12 quality of life scale, International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and motor and sensory examination.
The sample size for the study was calculated using G-Power version 3.1, based on ultrasonographic measurement data from a similar study conducted by Breiner et al. in 2016. The calculated sample size includes Group 1: 17 healthy participants of similar age and gender, and Group 2: 69 participants diagnosed with peripheral polyneuropathy and type 2 diabetes, amounting to a total of 86 participants. The study is planned to be conducted between December 2024 and May 2025.
- Conditions
- Diabetes, Diabetic Polyneuropathy
- Being tested
- Ultrasonography, Biodex Balance System, Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Pain Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score
- Keywords
- polyneuropathy, Ultrasound, diabetes, balance, gait
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Neuropathies, Polyneuropathies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
UltrasonographyDiagnostic test
Measurements will be performed using a 7-12 MHz Sonosite M-Turbo device (Fujifilm, USA) with a linear probe by an operator trained in peripheral nervous system ultrasonography. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and echogenicity measurements of the bilateral tibial, common peroneal, and sural nerves will be conducted using the ultrasound device. Tibial nerve assessment will be performed 3 cm proximal to the level of the medial malleolus. Common peroneal nerve assessment will be performed by identifying the nerve at the fibular head and tracking it proximally to image it at the level of the popliteal fossa. Sural nerve assessment will be conducted 10 cm proximal to the upper level of the lateral malleolus. All nerve measurements will be conducted twice in the transverse plane, and the obtained images will be recorded and uploaded into the ImageJ programming system.
Biodex Balance SystemDiagnostic test
The Biodex is a computer-assisted device with a movement system capable of providing surface inclinations ranging from 360 degrees to 20 degrees. It allows movement in anterior/posterior and mediolateral planes. The device has 12 levels of difficulty, where level 12 represents the highest stability and level 1 represents the lowest stability. It can be used for balance training with different therapy protocols and includes standardized programming systems for evaluating both static and dynamic balance. It provides numerical data for key parameters such as balance, fall risk, and proprioception. In this study, patients will be assessed using the fall risk test and postural stability evaluation test protocols on the Biodex balance system. All participants will be trained and familiarized with the system before the test.
Postural Stability Test: The difficulty level will be set to 8. Fall Risk Test: The difficulty level will progressively decrease from 6 to 2.
Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Pain ScaleDiagnostic test
The Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) pain scale score will be used to screen for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. The DN4 scale consists of 10 questions, 7 of which inquire about symptoms, and 3 that assess the patient's clinical examination for neuropathy. The symptoms assessed include a burning sensation, pain from cold, electric shock sensations, tingling, pins and needles, numbness, and itching. The sensory exams assess touch hypoesthesia, pin-prick hypoesthesia, and brush allodynia. Each "yes" response to a question receives 1 point. To calculate the total score, points obtained from the symptom inquiry and clinical examination are added together. The maximum total score is 10, and a score of 4 or higher is considered indicative of neuropathic pain
Numeric Rating ScaleDiagnostic test
The numeric pain scale will be used to assess the intensity of neuropathic pain. The patient is asked to provide a value between 0 and 10 to indicate the intensity of their pain. Higher scores are associated with an increase in pain severity.
Toronto Clinical Neuropathy ScoreDiagnostic test
The Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS) will be used to assess the severity of Diabetic Peripheral Polyneuropathy (DPPN). The Turkish version of the Toronto clinical scoring system is a reliable and valid tool for assessing polyneuropathy in Turkish-speaking patients. The TCNS is preferred in clinical studies because of its ease of use, patient acceptability, ability to classify the severity of DPPN, and its representation of clinical changes related to the progression of DPPN. The scale consists of three sections: symptom scores, sensory test scores, and reflex scores.The first section includes scoring symptoms in the upper and lower extremities .The second section includes scoring the bilateral Achilles and patellar reflexes. The third section involves scoring the sensation in the toe. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 (no neuropathy) to a maximum of 19 points.
Six-Minute Walk TestDiagnostic test
Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a commonly used test to assess functional capacity. The test area should be a corridor with a minimum length of 30 meters, flat, and firm surface. The corridor should be marked every 3 meters. Turnaround points are indicated with objects such as orange traffic cones. A line is drawn for the start and end of the test. Recommended materials for the test include a stopwatch, a device to count laps, cones to mark turning points, a chair placed within easy reach, oxygen support (to be given if necessary), and a blood pressure cuff. The patient should wear comfortable clothing and shoes suitable for walking. They can use any walking aids such as crutches or a walker. Medications or treatments should be taken as usual. The patient should have had a light meal before the test and should not have engaged in heavy physical activity within the 2 hours preceding the test. There should be no warm-up period before the test.
SF-12 Quality of Life ScaleDiagnostic test
The SF-12 Quality of Life Scale will be calculated using an online calculator tool, providing two types of scores: physical and mental scores.
International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ)Combination product
The IPAQ scale was developed to address the general health problem of insufficient physical activity, which necessitates large population studies and allows for cross-country comparisons. Validity studies conducted across multiple countries have proven that this questionnaire is valid and reliable. This survey assesses individuals based on the types of physical activities they perform in their daily lives. The questions asked pertain to the time spent physically active over the past 7 days.
Tuning Fork Vibration SenseDiagnostic test
Vibration sense will be assessed using a traditional 128 Hz tuning fork. When the stem of a 128 Hz tuning fork is placed on the dorsal aspect of the interphalangeal joint of the hallux, a healthy person can feel the vibration as long as it continues (15-20 seconds). In conditions leading to peripheral nerve damage (such as polyneuropathy), vibration sense is impaired. The examiner holds the proximal end of the tuning fork with one hand, while the distal end is struck strongly against the palm of the examiner's other hand. The examiner should try to strike the tuning fork with consistent force for each assessment. After striking, the tuning fork is placed just proximal to the nail bed, on the dorsal aspect of the distal phalanx of the hallux.Before applying the tuning fork, the participant is instructed to verbally respond with "yes" if they can initially feel the vibration, and they should also indicate "now" when they stop feeling the vibration.
Timed Up and Go TestDiagnostic test
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is designed to measure dynamic balance based on the time it takes for patients to stand up and walk, providing quantitative results. The patient starts the test by sitting on a standardized chair (46 cm high). During the test, the patient is instructed to stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters away, turn around, and then return to sit back down on the chair. The duration of this process is measured. Lower values indicate better stability. A cutoff value of 13.5 seconds has been used to identify high fall risk in the TUG test.
Physical ExaminationDiagnostic test
Manual Muscle Test: Muscle strength is evaluated using the MRC (Medical Research Council) muscle strength scale.
Reflexes:Patellar reflex: The reflex hammer is struck on the patella, and extension of the leg is observed. Achilles reflex: With one hand, the patient's foot is lightly dorsiflexed, and the Achilles tendon is struck; plantar flexion is observed in the ankle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (Healthy volunteers) | Healthy volunteers without diabetes diagnosis will be included in group 1. (n=17) Receives: Diagnostic Test: Ultrasonography; Diagnostic Test: Biodex Balance System; Diagnostic Test: Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Pain Scale; Diagnostic Test: Numeric Rating Scale; Diagnostic Test: Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score; Diagnostic Test: Six-Minute Walk Test; Diagnostic Test: SF-12 Quality of Life Scale; Combination Product: International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ); Diagnostic Test: Tuning Fork Vibration Sense; Diagnostic Test: Timed Up and Go Test; Diagnostic Test: Physical Examination | |
| Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy) | Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy will be included in group 2. (n=69) Receives: Diagnostic Test: Ultrasonography; Diagnostic Test: Biodex Balance System; Diagnostic Test: Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Pain Scale; Diagnostic Test: Numeric Rating Scale; Diagnostic Test: Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score; Diagnostic Test: Six-Minute Walk Test; Diagnostic Test: SF-12 Quality of Life Scale; Combination Product: International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ); Diagnostic Test: Tuning Fork Vibration Sense; Diagnostic Test: Timed Up and Go Test; Diagnostic Test: Physical Examination |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ultrasonography
Measurements will be performed using a 7-12 MHz Sonosite M-Turbo device (Fujifilm, USA) with a linear probe by an operator trained in peripheral nervous system ultrasonography. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and echogenicity measurements of the bilateral tibial, common peroneal, and sural nerves will be conducted using the ultrasound device. Tibial nerve assessment will be performed 3 cm proximal to the level of the medial malleolus. Common peroneal nerve assessment will be performed by identifying the nerve at the fibular head and tracking it proximally to image it at the level of the popliteal fossa. Sural nerve assessment will be conducted 10 cm proximal to the upper level of the lateral malleolus. All nerve measurements will be conducted twice in the transverse plane, and the obtained images will be recorded and uploaded into the ImageJ programming system.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Biodex Balance System
The Biodex is a computer-assisted device with a movement system capable of providing surface inclinations ranging from 360 degrees to 20 degrees. It allows movement in anterior/posterior and mediolateral planes. The device has 12 levels of difficulty, where level 12 represents the highest stability and level 1 represents the lowest stability. It can be used for balance training with different therapy protocols and includes standardized programming systems for evaluating both static and dynamic balance. It provides numerical data for key parameters such as balance, fall risk, and proprioception. In this study, patients will be assessed using the fall risk test and postural stability evaluation test protocols on the Biodex balance system. All participants will be trained and familiarized with the system before the test. Postural Stability Test: The difficulty level will be set to 8. Fall Risk Test: The difficulty level will progressively decrease from 6 to 2.
Measured: 6 months
Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Pain Scale
The Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) pain scale score will be used to screen for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. The DN4 scale consists of 10 questions, 7 of which inquire about symptoms, and 3 that assess the patient's clinical examination for neuropathy. The symptoms assessed include a burning sensation, pain from cold, electric shock sensations, tingling, pins and needles, numbness, and itching. The sensory exams assess touch hypoesthesia, pin-prick hypoesthesia, and brush allodynia. Each "yes" response to a question receives 1 point. To calculate the total score, points obtained from the symptom inquiry and clinical examination are added together. The maximum total score is 10, and a score of 4 or higher is considered indicative of neuropathic pain
Measured: 6 months
Numeric Rating Scale
The numeric pain scale will be used to assess the intensity of neuropathic pain. The patient is asked to provide a value between 0 and 10 to indicate the intensity of their pain. Higher scores are associated with an increase in pain severity.
Measured: 6 months
Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score
The Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS) will be used to assess the severity of Diabetic Peripheral Polyneuropathy (DPPN). The Turkish version of the Toronto clinical scoring system is a reliable and valid tool for assessing polyneuropathy in Turkish-speaking patients. The TCNS is preferred in clinical studies because of its ease of use, patient acceptability, ability to classify the severity of DPPN, and its representation of clinical changes related to the progression of DPPN. The scale consists of three sections: symptom scores, sensory test scores, and reflex scores.The first section includes scoring symptoms in the upper and lower extremities .The second section includes scoring the bilateral Achilles and patellar reflexes. The third section involves scoring the sensation in the toe. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 (no neuropathy) to a maximum of 19 points.
Measured: 6 months
Six-Minute Walk Test
Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a commonly used test to assess functional capacity. The test area should be a corridor with a minimum length of 30 meters, flat, and firm surface. The corridor should be marked every 3 meters. Turnaround points are indicated with objects such as orange traffic cones. A line is drawn for the start and end of the test. Recommended materials for the test include a stopwatch, a device to count laps, cones to mark turning points, a chair placed within easy reach, oxygen support (to be given if necessary), and a blood pressure cuff. The patient should wear comfortable clothing and shoes suitable for walking. They can use any walking aids such as crutches or a walker. Medications or treatments should be taken as usual. The patient should have had a light meal before the test and should not have engaged in heavy physical activity within the 2 hours preceding the test. There should be no warm-up period before the test.
Measured: 6 months
SF-12 Quality of Life Scale
The SF-12 Quality of Life Scale will be calculated using an online calculator tool, providing two types of scores: physical and mental scores.
Measured: 6 months
International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ)
The IPAQ scale was developed to address the general health problem of insufficient physical activity, which necessitates large population studies and allows for cross-country comparisons. Validity studies conducted across multiple countries have proven that this questionnaire is valid and reliable. This survey assesses individuals based on the types of physical activities they perform in their daily lives. The questions asked pertain to the time spent physically active over the past 7 days.
Measured: 6 months
Tuning Fork Vibration Sense
Vibration sense will be assessed using a traditional 128 Hz tuning fork. When the stem of a 128 Hz tuning fork is placed on the dorsal aspect of the interphalangeal joint of the hallux, a healthy person can feel the vibration as long as it continues (15-20 seconds). In conditions leading to peripheral nerve damage (such as polyneuropathy), vibration sense is impaired. The examiner holds the proximal end of the tuning fork with one hand, while the distal end is struck strongly against the palm of the examiner's other hand. The examiner should try to strike the tuning fork with consistent force for each assessment. After striking, the tuning fork is placed just proximal to the nail bed, on the dorsal aspect of the distal phalanx of the hallux.Before applying the tuning fork, the participant is instructed to verbally respond with "yes" if they can initially feel the vibration, and they should also indicate "now" when they stop feeling the vibration.
Measured: 6 months
Timed Up and Go Test
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is designed to measure dynamic balance based on the time it takes for patients to stand up and walk, providing quantitative results. The patient starts the test by sitting on a standardized chair (46 cm high). During the test, the patient is instructed to stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters away, turn around, and then return to sit back down on the chair. The duration of this process is measured. Lower values indicate better stability. A cutoff value of 13.5 seconds has been used to identify high fall risk in the TUG test.
Measured: 6 months
Physical Examination
Manual Muscle Test: Muscle strength is evaluated using the MRC (Medical Research Council) muscle strength scale. Reflexes:Patellar reflex: The reflex hammer is struck on the patella, and extension of the leg is observed. Achilles reflex: With one hand, the patient's foot is lightly dorsiflexed, and the Achilles tendon is struck; plantar flexion is observed in the ankle.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jan 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2025
- Primary completion15 Aug 2025
- Study completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Emre Ata, Ass. Prof., Study director, Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research HospitalFeyza Nur Yücel, Specialist, Study director, Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research HospitalSemiha Özgüç, M.D., Principal investigator, Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06778005
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14/2
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 10 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 12 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Bril V, Tomioka S, Buchanan RA, Perkins BA; mTCNS Study Group. Reliability and validity of the modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score in diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Diabet Med. 2009 Mar;26(3):240-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02667.x.
PubMed 19317818Arnold BL, Schmitz RJ. Examination of balance measures produced by the biodex stability system. J Athl Train. 1998 Oct;33(4):323-7.
PubMed 16558529Arumugam T, Razali SN, Vethakkan SR, Rozalli FI, Shahrizaila N. Relationship between ultrasonographic nerve morphology and severity of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Eur J Neurol. 2016 Feb;23(2):354-60. doi: 10.1111/ene.12836. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
PubMed 26498575Fisse AL, Katsanos AH, Gold R, Krogias C, Pitarokoili K. Cross-sectional area reference values for peripheral nerve ultrasound in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis-Part II: Lower extremity nerves. Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jul;28(7):2313-2318. doi: 10.1111/ene.14850. Epub 2021 May 7.
PubMed 33794049Sundaram TK. Myo-inositol catabolism in Salmonella typhimiurium: enzyme repression dependent on growth history of organism. J Gen Microbiol. 1972 Nov;73(2):209-19. doi: 10.1099/00221287-73-2-209. No abstract available.
PubMed 4567227Breiner A, Qrimli M, Ebadi H, Alabdali M, Lovblom LE, Abraham A, Albulahi H, Perkins BA, Bril V. Peripheral nerve high-resolution ultrasound in diabetes. Muscle Nerve. 2017 Feb;55(2):171-178. doi: 10.1002/mus.25223. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
PubMed 27312883Harreiter J, Roden M. [Diabetes mellitus: definition, classification, diagnosis, screening and prevention (Update 2023)]. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Jan;135(Suppl 1):7-17. doi: 10.1007/s00508-022-02122-y. Epub 2023 Apr 20. German.
PubMed 37101021
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of the Relationship of Ultrasonographic Measurements of Lower Extremity Nerves With Gait and Balance Performance in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Peripheral Polyneuropathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06778005
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 14/2
- Conditions
- Diabetes, Diabetic Polyneuropathy
- Keywords
- polyneuropathy, Ultrasound, diabetes, balance, gait
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 86 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to quantitatively evaluate ultrasonographic measurements of the lower extremity nerves in patients diagnosed with diabetic polyneuropathy and to investigate the relationship with gait, static and dynamic balance performance.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of ultrasonographic findings of lower extremity nerves on quality of daily life, physical activity, gait and balance in patients with diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy.
Detailed description
Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia and the body's inability to adequately utilize carbohydrates, fats, and proteins due to a reduction in insulin secretion or insulin action. It requires continuous medical care.
One of the most common complications associated with diabetes is diabetic neuropathy, which affects the autonomic, motor, and sensory nerves of the peripheral nervous system. The most frequent form of diabetic neuropathy is peripheral sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Clinical and electrophysiological findings typically begin in the distal lower extremities.
While nerve conduction studies remain the gold standard for diagnosing diabetic neuropathy, they are time-consuming, require a separate patient visit, and are too costly to recommend for routine screening. Various methods can be employed to assess the morphological changes in nerves associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. With advancing technology in recent years, ultrasonography (US) has emerged as an affordable, reproducible, and more comfortable technique. It can be utilized as an effective method to evaluate structural changes in nerves. Diabetic neuropathy is a significant contributor to the severe morbidity, increased mortality, and reduced quality of life in diabetic patients. Therefore, the early detection of nerve dysfunction through ultrasonography is essential for providing appropriate care to patients with diabetic neuropathy.
The study will be conducted as a cross-sectional and single-center research involving patients with peripheral polyneuropathy secondary to type 2 diabetes and healthy volunteers who present to the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic at the Health Sciences University Sultan 2nd Abdülhamid Han Training and Research Hospital.
As part of the study, demographic data collected from participants will include age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, smoking and alcohol usage, marital status, occupation, educational level, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c levels, vitamin B12, ALT, AST, creatinine levels, duration of diabetes, duration of diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy (DPP) complaints, current antidiabetic medications, presence of comorbidities, and neuropathic pain treatment and duration. Patients will be evaluated once, and the assessment will include ultrasonography, the Biodex balance system, the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) pain scale, numeric pain scale, Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score, diapason vibration sensitivity test, 6-minute walk test, SF-12 quality of life scale, International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and motor and sensory examination.
The sample size for the study was calculated using G-Power version 3.1, based on ultrasonographic measurement data from a similar study conducted by Breiner et al. in 2016. The calculated sample size includes Group 1: 17 healthy participants of similar age and gender, and Group 2: 69 participants diagnosed with peripheral polyneuropathy and type 2 diabetes, amounting to a total of 86 participants. The study is planned to be conducted between December 2024 and May 2025.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (Healthy volunteers) | – | Diagnostic Test: Ultrasonography, Diagnostic Test: Biodex Balance System, Diagnostic Test: Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Pain Scale, Diagnostic Test: Numeric Rating Scale, Diagnostic Test: Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score, Diagnostic Test: Six-Minute Walk Test, Diagnostic Test: SF-12 Quality of Life Scale, Combination Product: International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ), Diagnostic Test: Tuning Fork Vibration Sense, Diagnostic Test: Timed Up and Go Test, Diagnostic Test: Physical ExaminationHealthy volunteers without diabetes diagnosis will be included in group 1. (n=17) |
| Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy) | – | Diagnostic Test: Ultrasonography, Diagnostic Test: Biodex Balance System, Diagnostic Test: Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Pain Scale, Diagnostic Test: Numeric Rating Scale, Diagnostic Test: Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score, Diagnostic Test: Six-Minute Walk Test, Diagnostic Test: SF-12 Quality of Life Scale, Combination Product: International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ), Diagnostic Test: Tuning Fork Vibration Sense, Diagnostic Test: Timed Up and Go Test, Diagnostic Test: Physical ExaminationPatients with diabetic polyneuropathy will be included in group 2. (n=69) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy and healthy volunteers aged between 18-65 years old will be evaluated visiting our physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinic between December 2024 and May 2025.
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Being between the ages of 18-65
- Being literate
- Signed a voluntary consent form agreeing to participate in the study
- Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes based on at least one of the following diagnostic criteria: fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl, 2-hour plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dl in an oral glucose tolerance test, HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, or diabetes symptoms (excessive thirst, eating, urination, and weight loss) + random plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dl. (14)
- Diagnosed with diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy through EMG evaluation in addition to Type 2 Diabetes.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Individuals under 18 years old and over 65 years old
- Diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes
- Use of medications that can cause polyneuropathy
- Other causes of neuropathic pain (lumbar radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, -hereditary, inflammatory, entrapment neuropathies)
- Undergoing lower extremity surgery (spine/hip/knee/foot) in the last 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| UltrasonographyMeasurements will be performed using a 7-12 MHz Sonosite M-Turbo device (Fujifilm, USA) with a linear probe by an operator trained in peripheral nervous system ultrasonography. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and echogenicity measurements of the bilateral tibial, common peroneal, and sural nerves will be conducted using the ultrasound device. Tibial nerve assessment will be performed 3 cm proximal to the level of the medial malleolus. Common peroneal nerve assessment will be performed by identifying the nerve at the fibular head and tracking it proximally to image it at the level of the popliteal fossa. Sural nerve assessment will be conducted 10 cm proximal to the upper level of the lateral malleolus. All nerve measurements will be conducted twice in the transverse plane, and the obtained images will be recorded and uploaded into the ImageJ programming system. | Diagnostic test | Group 1 (Healthy volunteers), Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy) |
| Biodex Balance SystemThe Biodex is a computer-assisted device with a movement system capable of providing surface inclinations ranging from 360 degrees to 20 degrees. It allows movement in anterior/posterior and mediolateral planes. The device has 12 levels of difficulty, where level 12 represents the highest stability and level 1 represents the lowest stability. It can be used for balance training with different therapy protocols and includes standardized programming systems for evaluating both static and dynamic balance. It provides numerical data for key parameters such as balance, fall risk, and proprioception. In this study, patients will be assessed using the fall risk test and postural stability evaluation test protocols on the Biodex balance system. All participants will be trained and familiarized with the system before the test. Postural Stability Test: The difficulty level will be set to 8. Fall Risk Test: The difficulty level will progressively decrease from 6 to 2. | Diagnostic test | Group 1 (Healthy volunteers), Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy) |
| Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Pain ScaleThe Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) pain scale score will be used to screen for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. The DN4 scale consists of 10 questions, 7 of which inquire about symptoms, and 3 that assess the patient's clinical examination for neuropathy. The symptoms assessed include a burning sensation, pain from cold, electric shock sensations, tingling, pins and needles, numbness, and itching. The sensory exams assess touch hypoesthesia, pin-prick hypoesthesia, and brush allodynia. Each "yes" response to a question receives 1 point. To calculate the total score, points obtained from the symptom inquiry and clinical examination are added together. The maximum total score is 10, and a score of 4 or higher is considered indicative of neuropathic pain | Diagnostic test | Group 1 (Healthy volunteers), Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy) |
| Numeric Rating ScaleThe numeric pain scale will be used to assess the intensity of neuropathic pain. The patient is asked to provide a value between 0 and 10 to indicate the intensity of their pain. Higher scores are associated with an increase in pain severity. | Diagnostic test | Group 1 (Healthy volunteers), Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy) |
| Toronto Clinical Neuropathy ScoreThe Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS) will be used to assess the severity of Diabetic Peripheral Polyneuropathy (DPPN). The Turkish version of the Toronto clinical scoring system is a reliable and valid tool for assessing polyneuropathy in Turkish-speaking patients. The TCNS is preferred in clinical studies because of its ease of use, patient acceptability, ability to classify the severity of DPPN, and its representation of clinical changes related to the progression of DPPN. The scale consists of three sections: symptom scores, sensory test scores, and reflex scores.The first section includes scoring symptoms in the upper and lower extremities .The second section includes scoring the bilateral Achilles and patellar reflexes. The third section involves scoring the sensation in the toe. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 (no neuropathy) to a maximum of 19 points. | Diagnostic test | Group 1 (Healthy volunteers), Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy) |
| Six-Minute Walk TestSix-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a commonly used test to assess functional capacity. The test area should be a corridor with a minimum length of 30 meters, flat, and firm surface. The corridor should be marked every 3 meters. Turnaround points are indicated with objects such as orange traffic cones. A line is drawn for the start and end of the test. Recommended materials for the test include a stopwatch, a device to count laps, cones to mark turning points, a chair placed within easy reach, oxygen support (to be given if necessary), and a blood pressure cuff. The patient should wear comfortable clothing and shoes suitable for walking. They can use any walking aids such as crutches or a walker. Medications or treatments should be taken as usual. The patient should have had a light meal before the test and should not have engaged in heavy physical activity within the 2 hours preceding the test. There should be no warm-up period before the test. | Diagnostic test | Group 1 (Healthy volunteers), Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy) |
| SF-12 Quality of Life ScaleThe SF-12 Quality of Life Scale will be calculated using an online calculator tool, providing two types of scores: physical and mental scores. | Diagnostic test | Group 1 (Healthy volunteers), Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy) |
| International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ)The IPAQ scale was developed to address the general health problem of insufficient physical activity, which necessitates large population studies and allows for cross-country comparisons. Validity studies conducted across multiple countries have proven that this questionnaire is valid and reliable. This survey assesses individuals based on the types of physical activities they perform in their daily lives. The questions asked pertain to the time spent physically active over the past 7 days. | Combination product | Group 1 (Healthy volunteers), Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy) |
| Tuning Fork Vibration SenseVibration sense will be assessed using a traditional 128 Hz tuning fork. When the stem of a 128 Hz tuning fork is placed on the dorsal aspect of the interphalangeal joint of the hallux, a healthy person can feel the vibration as long as it continues (15-20 seconds). In conditions leading to peripheral nerve damage (such as polyneuropathy), vibration sense is impaired. The examiner holds the proximal end of the tuning fork with one hand, while the distal end is struck strongly against the palm of the examiner's other hand. The examiner should try to strike the tuning fork with consistent force for each assessment. After striking, the tuning fork is placed just proximal to the nail bed, on the dorsal aspect of the distal phalanx of the hallux.Before applying the tuning fork, the participant is instructed to verbally respond with "yes" if they can initially feel the vibration, and they should also indicate "now" when they stop feeling the vibration. | Diagnostic test | Group 1 (Healthy volunteers), Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy) |
| Timed Up and Go TestThe Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is designed to measure dynamic balance based on the time it takes for patients to stand up and walk, providing quantitative results. The patient starts the test by sitting on a standardized chair (46 cm high). During the test, the patient is instructed to stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters away, turn around, and then return to sit back down on the chair. The duration of this process is measured. Lower values indicate better stability. A cutoff value of 13.5 seconds has been used to identify high fall risk in the TUG test. | Diagnostic test | Group 1 (Healthy volunteers), Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy) |
| Physical ExaminationManual Muscle Test: Muscle strength is evaluated using the MRC (Medical Research Council) muscle strength scale. Reflexes:Patellar reflex: The reflex hammer is struck on the patella, and extension of the leg is observed. Achilles reflex: With one hand, the patient's foot is lightly dorsiflexed, and the Achilles tendon is struck; plantar flexion is observed in the ankle. | Diagnostic test | Group 1 (Healthy volunteers), Group 2 ( Patients with diabetic polyneuropathy) |
Primary outcome
Ultrasonography
Time frame: 6 months
Measurements will be performed using a 7-12 MHz Sonosite M-Turbo device (Fujifilm, USA) with a linear probe by an operator trained in peripheral nervous system ultrasonography. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and echogenicity measurements of the bilateral tibial, common peroneal, and sural nerves will be conducted using the ultrasound device. Tibial nerve assessment will be performed 3 cm proximal to the level of the medial malleolus. Common peroneal nerve assessment will be performed by identifying the nerve at the fibular head and tracking it proximally to image it at the level of the popliteal fossa. Sural nerve assessment will be conducted 10 cm proximal to the upper level of the lateral malleolus. All nerve measurements will be conducted twice in the transverse plane, and the obtained images will be recorded and uploaded into the ImageJ programming system.
10 secondary outcomes
Biodex Balance System
Time frame: 6 months
Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Pain Scale
Time frame: 6 months
Numeric Rating Scale
Time frame: 6 months
Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score
Time frame: 6 months
Six-Minute Walk Test
Time frame: 6 months
SF-12 Quality of Life Scale
Time frame: 6 months
International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ)
Time frame: 6 months
Tuning Fork Vibration Sense
Time frame: 6 months
Timed Up and Go Test
Time frame: 6 months
Physical Examination
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Sep 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 19317818Bril V, Tomioka S, Buchanan RA, Perkins BA; mTCNS Study Group. Reliability and validity of the modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score in diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Diabet Med. 2009 Mar;26(3):240-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02667.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 16558529Arnold BL, Schmitz RJ. Examination of balance measures produced by the biodex stability system. J Athl Train. 1998 Oct;33(4):323-7.
- Results publication: PubMed 26498575Arumugam T, Razali SN, Vethakkan SR, Rozalli FI, Shahrizaila N. Relationship between ultrasonographic nerve morphology and severity of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Eur J Neurol. 2016 Feb;23(2):354-60. doi: 10.1111/ene.12836. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 33794049Fisse AL, Katsanos AH, Gold R, Krogias C, Pitarokoili K. Cross-sectional area reference values for peripheral nerve ultrasound in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis-Part II: Lower extremity nerves. Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jul;28(7):2313-2318. doi: 10.1111/ene.14850. Epub 2021 May 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 4567227Sundaram TK. Myo-inositol catabolism in Salmonella typhimiurium: enzyme repression dependent on growth history of organism. J Gen Microbiol. 1972 Nov;73(2):209-19. doi: 10.1099/00221287-73-2-209. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 27312883Breiner A, Qrimli M, Ebadi H, Alabdali M, Lovblom LE, Abraham A, Albulahi H, Perkins BA, Bril V. Peripheral nerve high-resolution ultrasound in diabetes. Muscle Nerve. 2017 Feb;55(2):171-178. doi: 10.1002/mus.25223. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 37101021Harreiter J, Roden M. [Diabetes mellitus: definition, classification, diagnosis, screening and prevention (Update 2023)]. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2023 Jan;135(Suppl 1):7-17. doi: 10.1007/s00508-022-02122-y. Epub 2023 Apr 20. German.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Emre Ata, Ass. Prof. study director
Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital
Feyza Nur Yücel, Specialist study director
Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital
Semiha Özgüç, M.D. principal investigator
Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diabetes and Diabetic Polyneuropathy, run by Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Semiha Özgüç (5426311029, semihaozguc@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ultrasonography (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06778005, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2025.