RosaceaPhase 1GabapentiNCT06776445
Efficacy and Safety of Different Dose Regimens of Gabapentin for Treating Erythema/Flushing in Rosacea: A Randomized Controlled Trial
A Phase 1 study testing minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, gabapentin 300mg bid and gabapentin 300mg tid in people with Rosacea and Rosacea Subtype 1 (Erythematotelangiectatic), run by First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Gabapentin works to treat flushing/erythema associated with rosacea. It will also learn about the safety of drug Gabapentin. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does drug Gabapentin reduce flushing and erythema associated with rosacea? What medical problems do… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rosacea, Rosacea Subtype 1 (Erythematotelangiectatic)
- What is being tested?
- minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, gabapentin 300mg bid and gabapentin 300mg tid
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 5 Jan 2024to 31 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Initial treatment in our hospital; ② Diagnosed by two experienced dermatologists and in accordance with the updated diagnostic criteria of the National Rosacea Society (NRS) Expert Committee [38], unconscious disorder and no communication disorder; ③ did not receive any other form of treatment within 4 weeks; ④ Patients who were followed up for 8 weeks or more and had complete clinical data; ⑤ Informed consent was signed before treatment, and the clinical data were agreed to be used for scientific research
Who cannot join
- ① received other treatment within 4 weeks of this treatment; ② facial flushing caused by other diseases and local irritation; ③ Patients with contraindication to minocycline, hydroxychloroquine, gabapentin and carvedilol; ④ Unable to complete follow-up and serum specimen collection; ○5 patients were intolerant to minocycline, hydroxychloroquine and carvedilol; ○6 Lactation, pregnancy, liver and kidney dysfunction, psychiatric diseases, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus and other systemic diseases.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, 404100
About this study
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Gabapentin works to treat flushing/erythema associated with rosacea. It will also learn about the safety of drug Gabapentin. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does drug Gabapentin reduce flushing and erythema associated with rosacea?
- What medical problems do participants have when taking drug Gabapentin? Researchers will compare Gabapentin to a positive control (minocycline plus hydroxychloroquine, a first-line treatment for rosacea) to see if drug Gabapentin works to reduce flushing and erythema associated with rosacea
- Being tested
- minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, gabapentin 300mg bid, gabapentin 300mg tid
- Keywords
- rosacea
- Medical subject headings
- Rosacea
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquineDrug
Patients with rosacea were collected and randomly divided into three groups for treatment, one group was treated with minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, one group was treated with gabapentin 300mg Bid, and the other group was treated with gabapentin 300mg tid. Before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment, the patient's condition score was statistically analyzed, and the efficacy and difference of each group were observed
gabapentin 300mg bidDrug
Patients with rosacea were collected and randomly divided into three groups for treatment, one group was treated with minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, one group was treated with gabapentin 300mg Bid, and the other group was treated with gabapentin 300mg tid. Before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment, the patient's condition score was statistically analyzed, and the efficacy and difference of each group were observed
gabapentin 300mg tidDrug
Patients with rosacea were collected and randomly divided into three groups for treatment, one group was treated with minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, one group was treated with gabapentin 300mg Bid, and the other group was treated with gabapentin 300mg tid. Before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment, the patient's condition score was statistically analyzed, and the efficacy and difference of each group were observed
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine |
| gabapentin 300mg bid | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: gabapentin 300mg bid |
| gabapentin 300mg tid | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: gabapentin 300mg tid |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the score of CEA ( Clinician Erythema Assessment )
The reduction of the CEA score was compared before treatment, 4 weeks and 8 weeks, 12 weeks after treatment. The CEA score was assessed by a scale, 0 = clear, 1= almost clear, 2 =Mild, 3= Moderate,4= Severe.
Measured: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks after treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jan 2025
- Study start5 Jan 2024
- Primary completion31 Jul 2025
- Study completion31 Jul 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for RosaceaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bin Wei, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06776445
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024MSXM069
- Other IDs
- CSTB2023NSCQ-MSX0078, 2024MSXM069
- Acronym
- Gabapenti
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 10 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 5 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Del Rosso JQ, Webster G, Weiss JS, Bhatia ND, Gold LS, Kircik L. Nonantibiotic Properties of Tetracyclines in Rosacea and Their Clinical Implications. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2021 Aug;14(8):14-21. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
PubMed 34840653Ma G, Zhang Y, Gao Q, Yuan X, Zhou Z, Jian D, Zhao Z, Wang B, Li J. Gabapentin improves the flushing of rosacea, but not other rosacea symptoms or quality of life: Results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 Apr;92(4):920-922. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.12.003. Epub 2024 Dec 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 39681269Wei J, Wan M, Chen Q, Fu J, Yang L, Ni R, Ge L, Dan Y, Chen X, Kong M, Li L, Chen S, Yang S, Zhang L, Xia A, Tang L, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Song Z, Li J. Gabapentin is an efficacy treatment for facial flushing and erythema of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea: A randomized clinical noninferiority trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 Apr;92(4):927-930. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.12.011. Epub 2024 Dec 20. No abstract available.
PubMed 39710117Logger JGM, Olydam JI, Driessen RJB. Use of beta-blockers for rosacea-associated facial erythema and flushing: A systematic review and update on proposed mode of action. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Oct;83(4):1088-1097. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.129. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
PubMed 32360760Husein-ElAhmed H, Steinhoff M. Evaluation of the efficacy of subantimicrobial dose doxycycline in rosacea: a systematic review of clinical trials and meta-analysis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2021 Jan;19(1):7-17. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14247. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
PubMed 32989925Clanner-Engelshofen BM, Bernhard D, Dargatz S, Flaig MJ, Gieler U, Kinberger M, Klovekorn W, Kuna AC, Lauchli S, Lehmann P, Nast A, Pleyer U, Schaller M, Schofer H, Steinhoff M, Schwennesen T, Werner RN, Zierhut M, Reinholz M. S2k guideline: Rosacea. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2022 Aug;20(8):1147-1165. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14849. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
PubMed 35929658Tu KY, Jung CJ, Shih YH, Chang ALS. Therapeutic strategies focusing on immune dysregulation and neuroinflammation in rosacea. Front Immunol. 2024 Jul 29;15:1403798. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1403798. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39136023Barakji YA, Ronnstad ATM, Christensen MO, Zachariae C, Wienholtz NKF, Halling AS, Maul JT, Thomsen SF, Egeberg A, Thyssen JP. Assessment of Frequency of Rosacea Subtypes in Patients With Rosacea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Jun 1;158(6):617-625. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0526.
PubMed 35385049
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of Different Dose Regimens of Gabapentin for Treating Erythema/Flushing in Rosacea: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06776445
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Gabapenti / 2024MSXM069
- Keywords
- rosacea
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Gabapentin works to treat flushing/erythema associated with rosacea. It will also learn about the safety of drug Gabapentin. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does drug Gabapentin reduce flushing and erythema associated with rosacea?
- What medical problems do participants have when taking drug Gabapentin? Researchers will compare Gabapentin to a positive control (minocycline plus hydroxychloroquine, a first-line treatment for rosacea) to see if drug Gabapentin works to reduce flushing and erythema associated with rosacea
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine | Experimental | Drug: minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine |
| gabapentin 300mg bid | Active comparator | Drug: gabapentin 300mg bid |
| gabapentin 300mg tid | Active comparator | Drug: gabapentin 300mg tid |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Initial treatment in our hospital; ② Diagnosed by two experienced dermatologists and in accordance with the updated diagnostic criteria of the National Rosacea Society (NRS) Expert Committee [38], unconscious disorder and no communication disorder; ③ did not receive any other form of treatment within 4 weeks; ④ Patients who were followed up for 8 weeks or more and had complete clinical data; ⑤ Informed consent was signed before treatment, and the clinical data were agreed to be used for scientific research
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- ① received other treatment within 4 weeks of this treatment; ② facial flushing caused by other diseases and local irritation; ③ Patients with contraindication to minocycline, hydroxychloroquine, gabapentin and carvedilol; ④ Unable to complete follow-up and serum specimen collection; ○5 patients were intolerant to minocycline, hydroxychloroquine and carvedilol; ○6 Lactation, pregnancy, liver and kidney dysfunction, psychiatric diseases, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus and other systemic diseases.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquinePatients with rosacea were collected and randomly divided into three groups for treatment, one group was treated with minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, one group was treated with gabapentin 300mg Bid, and the other group was treated with gabapentin 300mg tid. Before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment, the patient's condition score was statistically analyzed, and the efficacy and difference of each group were observed | Drug | minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine |
| gabapentin 300mg bidPatients with rosacea were collected and randomly divided into three groups for treatment, one group was treated with minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, one group was treated with gabapentin 300mg Bid, and the other group was treated with gabapentin 300mg tid. Before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment, the patient's condition score was statistically analyzed, and the efficacy and difference of each group were observed | Drug | gabapentin 300mg bid |
| gabapentin 300mg tidPatients with rosacea were collected and randomly divided into three groups for treatment, one group was treated with minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, one group was treated with gabapentin 300mg Bid, and the other group was treated with gabapentin 300mg tid. Before treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 8 weeks after treatment, the patient's condition score was statistically analyzed, and the efficacy and difference of each group were observed | Drug | gabapentin 300mg tid |
Primary outcome
the score of CEA ( Clinician Erythema Assessment )
Time frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks after treatment
The reduction of the CEA score was compared before treatment, 4 weeks and 8 weeks, 12 weeks after treatment. The CEA score was assessed by a scale, 0 = clear, 1= almost clear, 2 =Mild, 3= Moderate,4= Severe.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jan 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 34840653Del Rosso JQ, Webster G, Weiss JS, Bhatia ND, Gold LS, Kircik L. Nonantibiotic Properties of Tetracyclines in Rosacea and Their Clinical Implications. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2021 Aug;14(8):14-21. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 39681269Ma G, Zhang Y, Gao Q, Yuan X, Zhou Z, Jian D, Zhao Z, Wang B, Li J. Gabapentin improves the flushing of rosacea, but not other rosacea symptoms or quality of life: Results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 Apr;92(4):920-922. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.12.003. Epub 2024 Dec 15. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 39710117Wei J, Wan M, Chen Q, Fu J, Yang L, Ni R, Ge L, Dan Y, Chen X, Kong M, Li L, Chen S, Yang S, Zhang L, Xia A, Tang L, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Song Z, Li J. Gabapentin is an efficacy treatment for facial flushing and erythema of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea: A randomized clinical noninferiority trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025 Apr;92(4):927-930. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.12.011. Epub 2024 Dec 20. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 32360760Logger JGM, Olydam JI, Driessen RJB. Use of beta-blockers for rosacea-associated facial erythema and flushing: A systematic review and update on proposed mode of action. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Oct;83(4):1088-1097. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.129. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
- Results publication: PubMed 32989925Husein-ElAhmed H, Steinhoff M. Evaluation of the efficacy of subantimicrobial dose doxycycline in rosacea: a systematic review of clinical trials and meta-analysis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2021 Jan;19(1):7-17. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14247. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 35929658Clanner-Engelshofen BM, Bernhard D, Dargatz S, Flaig MJ, Gieler U, Kinberger M, Klovekorn W, Kuna AC, Lauchli S, Lehmann P, Nast A, Pleyer U, Schaller M, Schofer H, Steinhoff M, Schwennesen T, Werner RN, Zierhut M, Reinholz M. S2k guideline: Rosacea. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2022 Aug;20(8):1147-1165. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14849. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 39136023Tu KY, Jung CJ, Shih YH, Chang ALS. Therapeutic strategies focusing on immune dysregulation and neuroinflammation in rosacea. Front Immunol. 2024 Jul 29;15:1403798. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1403798. eCollection 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 35385049Barakji YA, Ronnstad ATM, Christensen MO, Zachariae C, Wienholtz NKF, Halling AS, Maul JT, Thomsen SF, Egeberg A, Thyssen JP. Assessment of Frequency of Rosacea Subtypes in Patients With Rosacea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Jun 1;158(6):617-625. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0526.
Related trials for Rosacea
RecruitingObservational study
Abdominal Symptoms and Rosacea: An Observational Study on the Association Between Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and the Gut-Skin Axis
IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome), Rosacea
Enrolling by invitation
Vbeam Pro Pulse Dye Laser for the Treatment of Vascular Conditions
Rosacea, Vascular Diseases
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2 Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Remibrutinib (LOU064) in Adult Patients With Papulopustular Rosacea (PPR)
Papulopustular Rosacea
Recruiting
Dermocosmetic Treatment for Facial Redness in Rosacea With or Without Laser Therapy
Rosacea, Erythematotelangiectatic, Rosacea Subtype 1 (Erythematotelangiectatic)
RecruitingObservational study
Determinants of Chronic Inflammatory Skin Disease Trajectories
Atopic Dermatitis, Psoriasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing minocycline combined with hydroxychloroquine, gabapentin 300mg bid and gabapentin 300mg tid in people with Rosacea and Rosacea Subtype 1 (Erythematotelangiectatic), run by First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the score of CEA ( Clinician Erythema Assessment ) (time frame: 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06776445, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jan 2026.