Prostate Cancer SurgeryNCT06776172
Extended vs. No Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy. DISSECTION 2.0.
A study testing Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in people with Prostate Cancer Surgery and Prostate Cancers, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 15 sites in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The aim of the DISSECTION 2.0 study is to determine whether extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) provides a therapeutic benefit for high-risk prostate cancer patients by improving cancer staging and potentially removing micrometastatic disease, ultimately improving their outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer Surgery, Prostate Cancers
- What is being tested?
- Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 400 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 10 Feb 2025to Feb 2040
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years and life expectancy >15 years
- Any biopsy-proven WHO/ISUP grade groups III-V PCa
- High-risk prostate cancer defined as:
- Any biopsy-proven WHO/ISUP grade group III-V PCa or
- ISUP grade group II and PSA > 20 ng/ml
- PSMA-PET: negative staging for regional and distant metastasis
Show all 9Show fewer
- multidisciplinary tumorboard recommendation for radical prostatectomy
- WHO performance status 0-1
- Adequate condition (ASA ≤ III) for general anesthesia and RP
Who cannot join
- ISUP grade group I PCa and cT1 or cT2 (MRI)
- cT4 (MRI) PCa
- PSMA-PET: positive staging for local and distant metastasis
- Any prior neoadjuvant, local or systemic treatment for PCa
- Previous PLND or pelvic radiotherapy
- Patients with a prior malignancy and treated with curative intention are eligible if all treatment of that malignancy was completed at least 2 years before registration and the patient has no evidence of disease at registration. Less than 2 years is acceptable for malignancies with low risk of recurrence and/or no late recurrence.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Any other serious underlying medical, psychiatric, psychological, familial, or geographical
- condition, which in the judgment of the investigator may interfere with the planned
- staging, treatment and follow-up, which affect patient compliance or place the patient at
- high risk from treatment-related complications.
- Vulnerable men (participants incapable of judgment or participants under tutelage) will not be included in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
15 sites in 1 country
Switzerland15 sites, 15 recruiting
- Recruiting
Cantonal Hospital Aarau
Aarau
Lukas Prause, Dr, +41 62 838 47 36, uro@ksa.ch
Lukas Prause, Dr.
- Recruiting
University Hospital Basel
Basel, 4031
Cyrill Rentsch, Prof. Dr. med., +41 61 2687122, cyrill.rentsch@usb.ch
Helge Seifert, Prof.
- Recruiting
Inselspital
Bern
Beat Roth, Prof. Dr., +41 31 63 2 36 64, beat.roth@insel.ch
Beat Roth, Prof. Dr.
- Recruiting
Lindenhof Hospital
Bern
Silvan Boxler, Dr, +41 31 300 38 88, silvan.boxler@hin.ch
Silvan Boxler, Dr.
- Recruiting
Cantonal Hospital Biel
Biel
Roland Seiler-Blarer, Prof, +41 32 324 32 06, urologie@szb-chb.ch
Roland Seiler-Blarer, Prof.
- Recruiting
Cantonal Hospital Chur
Chur
Räto Strebel, PD. Dr., +41 81 256 62 37, urologie@ksgr.ch
Räto Strebel, PD. Dr.
- Recruiting
University Hospital Geneva
Geneva
Massimo Valerio, Prof. Dr., +41 (0)22 372 79 53, secretariat.urologie@hug.ch
Massimo Valerio, Prof. Dr.
- Recruiting
Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV)
Lausanne
Ilaria Lucca, PD. Dr., +41 21 314 2981, Ilaria.Lucca@unil.ch
Ilaria Lucca, PD. Dr.
- Recruiting
Cantonal Hospital Liestal
Liestal, 4410
Svetozar Subotic, Dr, +41 61 400 21 72, svetozar.subotic@ksbl.ch
Svetozar Subotic, Dr.
- Recruiting
Cantonal Hospital Luzern
Lucerne
Christian Fankhauser, Prof. Dr., +41 41 205 45 10, info.urologie@luks.ch
Christian Fankhauser, Prof. Dr.
- Recruiting
Ospedale Regionale di Lugano
Lugano
Andrea Gallina, Prof. Dr., +41 918116176, AmbulatorioUrologia.ORL@eoc.ch
Andrea Gallina, Prof. Dr.
- Recruiting
Cantonal Hospital Neuchâtel
Neuchâtel
Daniel Nguyen, PD. Dr., +41 327133514, urologie@rhne.ch
Daniel Nguyen, PD. Dr.
- Recruiting
Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen
Daniel Engeler, Prof. Dr., +41 71 494 30 01, beckenbodenzentrum@kssg.ch
Daniel Engeler, Prof. Dr.
- Recruiting
Hospital Triemli, Zürich
Zurich
Michael Müntener, Prof. Dr., +41 44 416 48 61, urologie.triemli@stadtspital.ch
Michael Müntener, Prof. Dr.
- Recruiting
University Hospital Zürich
Zurich
Ashkan Mortezavi, PD. Dr., +41 44 255 54 40, ashkan.mortezavi@usz.ch
Ashkan Mortezavi, PD. Dr.
About this study
Official title: Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection vs. No Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy in PSMA PET Negative Staged Men: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial
The aim of the DISSECTION 2.0 study is to determine whether extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) provides a therapeutic benefit for high-risk prostate cancer patients by improving cancer staging and potentially removing micrometastatic disease, ultimately improving their outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men globally and a major cause of cancer deaths in Europe. For men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) and a life expectancy of over 10 years, radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard treatment. It improves survival compared to conservative management. However, there is debate about de benefit of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), the removal of lymph nodes in the pelvis, during RP. While PLND can be omitted in low risk PCa patients, extended PLND (ePLND) is recommended in PCa patients at high-risk for recurrence in order to improve nodal staging The DISSECTION 2.0 study aims to investigate whether extended PLND (ePLND) provides additional benefits for men with high-risk PCa. The hypothesis is that ePLND might help by removing undetectable cancer cells (micrometastases) in the lymph nodes or by better staging the disease for treatment planning. While imaging techniques like PSMA-PET are good at detecting cancer spread, they still miss approximately 60% of cancer-bearing lymph nodes, leaving room for ePLND to potentially improve outcomes.
ePLND involves removing more lymph nodes than standard PLND, leading to better detection of cancer spread. However, it also increases surgery time and complications slightly, though serious complications are rare.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer Surgery, Prostate Cancers
- Being tested
- Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
- Keywords
- Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Extended Pelvic Lymph Node DissectionProcedure or surgery
Also called Extended Lymph Node Dissection
Extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection |
| Radical prostatectomy without extended pelvic lymph node dissection | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) persistence
defined as failure to reach a PSA value of <0.1 ng/ml
Measured: 3 month (+/- 2 weeks) postoperatively
Biochemical recurrence free survival (BCRFS)
time from randomization to biochemical recurrence, defined as serum PSA level ≥ 0.2 ng/ml
Measured: within 24 months post surgery
Secondary outcomes (11)
PSA persistence (PSAP) above detection limit
cut-off ≥ 0.03 ng/ml
Measured: postoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 years
Initiation time of adjuvant or salvage therapies
Calculated from randomization to the start of any adjuvant or salvage therapy.
Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) to the prostatic fossa only excluding lymphatics and without androgen deprivation therapy) will not count as an event for this endpoint if:
- A PSMA-PET-computed tomography prior to SRT was negative for disease beyond the prostatic fossa, and
- the SRT led to a PSA <0.1 ng/ml (PSAP) or ≤ 0.2 ng/ml (biochemical recurrence-free survival, BCRFS), respectively.
Measured: postoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 years
Time to loco-regional recurrence
Calculated from randomization until the first local (prostate bed) or regional (within the extent of the ePLND template) recurrence.
Measured: from randomization to end of study at 10-15 years
Localization of progression
Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET)
Measured: from randomization to end of study at 10-15 years
Time to distant metastasis
Calculated from randomization until the first occurrence of distant metastasis.
Measured: postoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 years
Prostate cancer-specific survival
death due to prostate cancer
Measured: postoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 years
Overall survival
death from any cause
Measured: postoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 years
Intraoperative complications
Documented using the CLASSintra classification
Measured: during surgery
Postoperative complications
Assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification
Measured: postoperative up to 10-15 years
Adverse events (AEs) related to ePLND
Categorized according to CTCAE version 5.0
Measured: postoperative up to 10-15 years
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
tracked using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 questionnaire Score 1-100 (100 indicates best quality of life score)
Measured: postoperative up to 10-15 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jan 2025
- Study start10 Feb 2025
- Primary completionFeb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2040 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prostate Cancer SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without pelvic lymph node dissection
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06776172
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-02381; bb24Rentsch2
- Other IDs
- KFS-5775-02-2023
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 6 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 3 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection vs. No Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection at Radical Prostatectomy in PSMA PET Negative Staged Men: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06776172
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024-02381; bb24Rentsch2
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer Surgery, Prostate Cancers
- Keywords
- Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2040 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the DISSECTION 2.0 study is to determine whether extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) provides a therapeutic benefit for high-risk prostate cancer patients by improving cancer staging and potentially removing micrometastatic disease, ultimately improving their outcomes.
Detailed description
Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men globally and a major cause of cancer deaths in Europe. For men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) and a life expectancy of over 10 years, radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard treatment. It improves survival compared to conservative management. However, there is debate about de benefit of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), the removal of lymph nodes in the pelvis, during RP. While PLND can be omitted in low risk PCa patients, extended PLND (ePLND) is recommended in PCa patients at high-risk for recurrence in order to improve nodal staging The DISSECTION 2.0 study aims to investigate whether extended PLND (ePLND) provides additional benefits for men with high-risk PCa. The hypothesis is that ePLND might help by removing undetectable cancer cells (micrometastases) in the lymph nodes or by better staging the disease for treatment planning. While imaging techniques like PSMA-PET are good at detecting cancer spread, they still miss approximately 60% of cancer-bearing lymph nodes, leaving room for ePLND to potentially improve outcomes.
ePLND involves removing more lymph nodes than standard PLND, leading to better detection of cancer spread. However, it also increases surgery time and complications slightly, though serious complications are rare.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without pelvic lymph node dissection
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection | Experimental | Procedure: Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection |
| Radical prostatectomy without extended pelvic lymph node dissection | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years and life expectancy >15 years
- Any biopsy-proven WHO/ISUP grade groups III-V PCa
- High-risk prostate cancer defined as:
- PSMA-PET: negative staging for regional and distant metastasis
- multidisciplinary tumorboard recommendation for radical prostatectomy
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- ISUP grade group I PCa and cT1 or cT2 (MRI)
- cT4 (MRI) PCa
- PSMA-PET: positive staging for local and distant metastasis
- Any prior neoadjuvant, local or systemic treatment for PCa
- Previous PLND or pelvic radiotherapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Extended Pelvic Lymph Node DissectionAlso: Extended Lymph Node DissectionExtended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy | Procedure or surgery | Radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection |
Primary outcome
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) persistence
Time frame: 3 month (+/- 2 weeks) postoperatively
defined as failure to reach a PSA value of <0.1 ng/ml
Biochemical recurrence free survival (BCRFS)
Time frame: within 24 months post surgery
time from randomization to biochemical recurrence, defined as serum PSA level ≥ 0.2 ng/ml
11 secondary outcomes
PSA persistence (PSAP) above detection limit
Time frame: postoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 years
Initiation time of adjuvant or salvage therapies
Time frame: postoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 years
Time to loco-regional recurrence
Time frame: from randomization to end of study at 10-15 years
Localization of progression
Time frame: from randomization to end of study at 10-15 years
Time to distant metastasis
Time frame: postoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 years
Prostate cancer-specific survival
Time frame: postoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 years
Overall survival
Time frame: postoperative to the end of the study at 10-15 years
Intraoperative complications
Time frame: during surgery
Postoperative complications
Time frame: postoperative up to 10-15 years
Adverse events (AEs) related to ePLND
Time frame: postoperative up to 10-15 years
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Time frame: postoperative up to 10-15 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jul 2025.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer Surgery
Enrolling by invitation
Use of Tracking Devices to Locate Abnormalities During Invasive Procedures
Adenocarcinoma, Prostate Neoplasms
Recruiting
68Ga-XMFH01 PET/Fluorescence Imaging in Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis), ACP3
RecruitingPhase 2
Multimodal Prehabilitation and Rehabilitation for Men Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy, Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Safety and Efficacy of OTL78
Prostate Cancer Surgery, Prostate Cancer Metastatic Disease
Active, not recruiting
Mannitol Versus Nitroglycerin for Kidney Injury Prevention in Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy or Cystectomy
Prostate Cancer, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
15 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in people with Prostate Cancer Surgery and Prostate Cancers, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 15 sites in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Cyrill Rentsch, Prof. Dr. med. (+41 61 26 87122, cyrill.rentsch@usb.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) persistence (time frame: 3 month (+/- 2 weeks) postoperatively). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2025.