Resilience, PsychologicalBCRNCT06771167
Building Community Resilience Program
A study testing Building Community Resilience Program (BCR) in people with Resilience, Psychological and Burnout, Psychological, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Established in 2021, NYCEAL consists of approximately 40 organizational partners and 120 Community Health Workers (CHWs). Over the next four years (2024-2028), NYCEAL will work with this network to implement the following intervention: Building Community Resilience Program (BCR). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Resilience, Psychological, Burnout, Psychological, Stress, Psychological
- What is being tested?
- Building Community Resilience Program (BCR)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 168 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 Dec 2024to 15 Nov 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Able to consent
- Able to fill out the screening RedCap short survey
- Have access to a computer or smart gadget that will allow participant to be able to join the zoom call
- English speaking
- Living in NYC (5 boroughs)
- 18+ years of age (no upper bound age limit)
- Working with an NYCEAL CBO participating in BCR programming
Who cannot join
- An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Incapacitated to an extent that they are unable to comprehend a conversation or communicate effectively in a group setting
- Unable to consent to be part of the study
- Does not have access to a computer or smart gadget that will allow participant to be able to join the zoom call
- Does not speak English
- Not living in NYC
- Not 18+ years of age
- Not working with an NYCEAL CBO participating in BCR programming
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Nita Vangeepuram, MD, MPH contact
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029
Devin Madden, MPH, PhD, 212-659-9552, devin.madden@mountsinai.org
Rachel Reich, BA, rachel.reich@mountsinai.org
About this study
Official title: NYC Community Engagement Alliance (NYCEAL) Against COVID-19 Disparities
Established in 2021, NYCEAL consists of approximately 40 organizational partners and 120 Community Health Workers (CHWs). Over the next four years (2024-2028), NYCEAL will work with this network to implement the following intervention: Building Community Resilience Program (BCR). To assess the impact of this intervention, an implementation research framework will be used, and pre- and post-surveys conducted, and other process evaluation measures collected. Changes in outcomes measures such as stress, resilience, overall wellbeing, and other related outcomes for participants in the BCR program will be measured for community healthcare workers and/or frontline workers that receive educational workshops.
Read the detailed description
BCR Study Design and Methods: To incorporate adequacy and plausibility, approaches in public health research often move beyond randomized trials to better support evaluation and public health decision-making, while being responsive to the three hallmarks of sound study design: minimizing selection and information bias, controlling confounding, and ruling out chance. BCR will leverage a quasi-experimental approach to evaluate the impact of the proposed intervention on participating NYCEAL CBOs' CHWs. The researchers will employ a pre-post non-equivalent waitlist control group design to proactively minimize logistical barriers, maximize feasibility of implementing the intervention, and reduce ethical concerns of depriving communities of beneficial interventions. The waitlist control sites (the second cohort of CBOs receiving the educational workshops) are expected to have similar sociodemographic characteristics and health burdens as the intervention sites. Data collection in the second cohort of sites will allow the researchers to examine whether observed changes in outcomes are attributable to the intervention and ensure that all of the partnering CBO sites have access to BCR educational workshops for CHWs and frontline workers. The researchers will assess impact using an outcomes survey co-developed with NYCEAL CBO partners (not individuals receiving the intervention). The researchers will conduct surveys via RedCap at pre- and 6-month post-intervention timepoints with CHWs at BCR sites (for both cohorts). The primary outcome for the CHW intervention is burnout (Mini-Z burnout scale), which is closely linked to workforce retention, work quality, and client interactions. Secondary outcomes include validated measures for resilience, stress, worker wellbeing, and job satisfaction. BCR intervention sites were chosen based on interest, history of collaboration, readiness, capacity and interest in promoting resilience, and consequently overall good health at the organizational level, and as they serve priority populations in high disparity neighborhoods (and the wellbeing of these sites is important for continuing the work of supporting local communities).
The BCR educational workshops will take place over two years, with two cohorts of six CBOs each (12 CBOs total). Both cohorts will be recruited simultaneously, with the second cohort serving as a waitlist control group during the first year. To improve CHW resilience and wellbeing, during each BCR cycle, the 6 participating CBOs will send groups of four to six CHWs to participate in the program (48-72 CHWs over the 2 cycles). Each cohort will receive six virtual, hour-long, evidence-based interactive workshops, delivered once per month over a six-month period. The first cohort will receive the intervention in year 1, while the second cohort will receive the intervention in year 2.
Topics include: 1) realistic optimism ("Build Your Hope"); 2) active coping and facing fears ("Face Your Fears"); 3) self-care ("Mind Your Body"); 4) social support and networks ("Mind Your Circle"); 5) building our "why" ("Mind Your Purpose"); and 6) addressing social justice ("Mind Your Community"). DePierro and an experienced social worker will co-facilitate the interactive, skills based workshops. They will include information in lay format about the importance of resilience factors and activities that result in the development of resilience plans. For example, activities to support the development of "utilizing social support networks"include building/mapping a social support network tree that allows people to take stock of the areas of support needed to further cultivate, and develop action-oriented SMART goals that address specific needs. Workshop participants will also have free access to a mobile app (Wellness Hub) that was developed by DePierro they can use to reinforce these topics through maintenance activities.
- Being tested
- Building Community Resilience Program (BCR)
- Keywords
- Resilience, Community Health Workers, Burnout, Emotional Well-Being, Educational Workshops, Community-Based Organizations
- Medical subject headings
- Burnout, Psychological, Stress, Psychological
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Building Community Resilience Program (BCR)Behavioural
To improve CHW resilience and wellbeing, during each BCR cycle, the 6 participating CBOs will send groups of four to six CHWs to six virtual, hour-long, evidence-based interactive workshops (48-72 CHWs over the 2 cycles).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate Intervention Group (First Cohort) | Experimental | The first cohort of up to 36 participants will complete two surveys: a baseline survey within one month before the workshops begin, and a post-test survey within one month after the final workshop (approximately 8 months total from first to last survey) Receives: Behavioral: Building Community Resilience Program (BCR) |
| Waitlist Group (Second Cohort) | Experimental | The second cohort of up to 36 participants will complete four surveys: two surveys in year 1 (matching the timing of the first cohort's surveys to serve as a control group), and two additional surveys in year 2 when they receive the intervention (a baseline survey within one month before their workshops begin, and a post-test survey within one month after their final workshop). Receives: Behavioral: Building Community Resilience Program (BCR) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mini-Z Burnout Scale Score
The Mini Z Burnout Inventory score measures burnout and is calculated by summing responses from all 10 questions, with possible scores ranging from 10 to 50. Higher scores indicate a more positive and joyful work environment, with scores of 40 or above representing a joyful workplace.
Measured: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
Secondary outcomes (6)
The Mount Sinai Resilience Scale Scores
The Mount Sinai Resilience Scale (MSRS) measures resilience with scores ranging from 0 to 144. Scores of 45 or higher may indicate average or above-average resilience levels. Higher scores indicate higher level of resilience.
Measured: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire - Stress
The stress measure consists of 4 selected items from the NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire (WellBQ). The overall stress score is calculated as the average of these 4 items, with scores above the midpoint indicating high stress levels. Responses are indicated on a 7-item Likert scale from. Full scale from 1-7. Higher scores indicate stronger feelings of collegial support.
Measured: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire - Collegial Support
Collegial Support is measured using 9 items from the NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire (WellBQ). Responses are indicated on a 5 point Likert scale with '1' being "Strongly Disagree", '4' being "Strongly Agree", and '5' being "Does not apply". Full scale from 1-5. Higher scores indicate stronger feelings of collegial support.
Measured: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire - Meaningful Work
Meaningful work is measured using 2 selected items from the NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire (WellBQ). Responses are indicated on a 5 point Likert scale with '1' being "Strongly Disagree", '4' being "Strongly Agree", and '5' being "Does not apply". Full scale from 1-4. Higher scores indicate stronger feelings of engaging in meaningful work.
Measured: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire - Fair/Equitable Compensation
Fair/equitable job compensation is measured using 1 selected items from the NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire (WellBQ). The response is indicated on a 5 point Likert scale with '1' being "Strongly Disagree", '4' being "Strongly Agree", and '5' being "Does not apply". Higher scores indicate stronger feelings of fair compensation.
Measured: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire - Job Security
Job security is measured using 1 selected items from the NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire (WellBQ). The response is indicated on a 5 point Likert scale with '1' being "Strongly Disagree", '4' being "Strongly Agree", and '5' being "Does not apply". Higher scores indicate stronger feelings of job security.
Measured: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2025
- Study start11 Dec 2024
- Primary completion15 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Nov 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Resilience, PsychologicalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The researchers will employ a quasi-experimental pre-post non-equivalent waitlist control group design to proactively minimize logistical barriers, maximize feasibility of implementing the intervention, and reduce ethical concerns of depriving communities of beneficial interventions. The waitlist control sites (the second cohort of CBOs receiving the educational workshops) are expected to have similar sociodemographic characteristics and health burdens as the intervention sites. Data collection in the second cohort of sites will allow the researchers to examine whether observed changes in outcomes are attributable to the intervention and ensure that all of the partnering CBO sites have access to BCR educational workshops for CHWs and frontline workers.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Carol R Horowitz, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- Investigators
- Carol Horowitz, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06771167
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GCO 21-0396
- Other IDs
- HL158287
- Acronym
- BCR
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 9 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The researchers will not be sharing IPD, all results will be in aggregate.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- NYC Community Engagement Alliance (NYCEAL) Against COVID-19 Disparities
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06771167
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BCR / GCO 21-0396
- Keywords
- Resilience, Community Health Workers, Burnout, Emotional Well-Being, Educational Workshops, Community-Based Organizations
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Established in 2021, NYCEAL consists of approximately 40 organizational partners and 120 Community Health Workers (CHWs). Over the next four years (2024-2028), NYCEAL will work with this network to implement the following intervention: Building Community Resilience Program (BCR). To assess the impact of this intervention, an implementation research framework will be used, and pre- and post-surveys conducted, and other process evaluation measures collected. Changes in outcomes measures such as stress, resilience, overall wellbeing, and other related outcomes for participants in the BCR program will be measured for community healthcare workers and/or frontline workers that receive educational workshops.
Detailed description
BCR Study Design and Methods: To incorporate adequacy and plausibility, approaches in public health research often move beyond randomized trials to better support evaluation and public health decision-making, while being responsive to the three hallmarks of sound study design: minimizing selection and information bias, controlling confounding, and ruling out chance. BCR will leverage a quasi-experimental approach to evaluate the impact of the proposed intervention on participating NYCEAL CBOs' CHWs. The researchers will employ a pre-post non-equivalent waitlist control group design to proactively minimize logistical barriers, maximize feasibility of implementing the intervention, and reduce ethical concerns of depriving communities of beneficial interventions. The waitlist control sites (the second cohort of CBOs receiving the educational workshops) are expected to have similar sociodemographic characteristics and health burdens as the intervention sites. Data collection in the second cohort of sites will allow the researchers to examine whether observed changes in outcomes are attributable to the intervention and ensure that all of the partnering CBO sites have access to BCR educational workshops for CHWs and frontline workers. The researchers will assess impact using an outcomes survey co-developed with NYCEAL CBO partners (not individuals receiving the intervention). The researchers will conduct surveys via RedCap at pre- and 6-month post-intervention timepoints with CHWs at BCR sites (for both cohorts). The primary outcome for the CHW intervention is burnout (Mini-Z burnout scale), which is closely linked to workforce retention, work quality, and client interactions. Secondary outcomes include validated measures for resilience, stress, worker wellbeing, and job satisfaction. BCR intervention sites were chosen based on interest, history of collaboration, readiness, capacity and interest in promoting resilience, and consequently overall good health at the organizational level, and as they serve priority populations in high disparity neighborhoods (and the wellbeing of these sites is important for continuing the work of supporting local communities).
The BCR educational workshops will take place over two years, with two cohorts of six CBOs each (12 CBOs total). Both cohorts will be recruited simultaneously, with the second cohort serving as a waitlist control group during the first year. To improve CHW resilience and wellbeing, during each BCR cycle, the 6 participating CBOs will send groups of four to six CHWs to participate in the program (48-72 CHWs over the 2 cycles). Each cohort will receive six virtual, hour-long, evidence-based interactive workshops, delivered once per month over a six-month period. The first cohort will receive the intervention in year 1, while the second cohort will receive the intervention in year 2.
Topics include: 1) realistic optimism ("Build Your Hope"); 2) active coping and facing fears ("Face Your Fears"); 3) self-care ("Mind Your Body"); 4) social support and networks ("Mind Your Circle"); 5) building our "why" ("Mind Your Purpose"); and 6) addressing social justice ("Mind Your Community"). DePierro and an experienced social worker will co-facilitate the interactive, skills based workshops. They will include information in lay format about the importance of resilience factors and activities that result in the development of resilience plans. For example, activities to support the development of "utilizing social support networks"include building/mapping a social support network tree that allows people to take stock of the areas of support needed to further cultivate, and develop action-oriented SMART goals that address specific needs. Workshop participants will also have free access to a mobile app (Wellness Hub) that was developed by DePierro they can use to reinforce these topics through maintenance activities.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The researchers will employ a quasi-experimental pre-post non-equivalent waitlist control group design to proactively minimize logistical barriers, maximize feasibility of implementing the intervention, and reduce ethical concerns of depriving communities of beneficial interventions. The waitlist control sites (the second cohort of CBOs receiving the educational workshops) are expected to have similar sociodemographic characteristics and health burdens as the intervention sites. Data collection in the second cohort of sites will allow the researchers to examine whether observed changes in outcomes are attributable to the intervention and ensure that all of the partnering CBO sites have access to BCR educational workshops for CHWs and frontline workers.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate Intervention Group (First Cohort) | Experimental | Behavioral: Building Community Resilience Program (BCR)The first cohort of up to 36 participants will complete two surveys: a baseline survey within one month before the workshops begin, and a post-test survey within one month after the final workshop (approximately 8 months total from first to last survey) |
| Waitlist Group (Second Cohort) | Experimental | Behavioral: Building Community Resilience Program (BCR)The second cohort of up to 36 participants will complete four surveys: two surveys in year 1 (matching the timing of the first cohort's surveys to serve as a control group), and two additional surveys in year 2 when they receive the intervention (a baseline survey within one month before their workshops begin, and a post-test survey within one month after their final workshop). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Able to consent
- Able to fill out the screening RedCap short survey
- Have access to a computer or smart gadget that will allow participant to be able to join the zoom call
- English speaking
- Living in NYC (5 boroughs)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Incapacitated to an extent that they are unable to comprehend a conversation or communicate effectively in a group setting
- Unable to consent to be part of the study
- Does not have access to a computer or smart gadget that will allow participant to be able to join the zoom call
- Does not speak English
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Building Community Resilience Program (BCR)To improve CHW resilience and wellbeing, during each BCR cycle, the 6 participating CBOs will send groups of four to six CHWs to six virtual, hour-long, evidence-based interactive workshops (48-72 CHWs over the 2 cycles). | Behavioural | Immediate Intervention Group (First Cohort), Waitlist Group (Second Cohort) |
Primary outcome
Mini-Z Burnout Scale Score
Time frame: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
The Mini Z Burnout Inventory score measures burnout and is calculated by summing responses from all 10 questions, with possible scores ranging from 10 to 50. Higher scores indicate a more positive and joyful work environment, with scores of 40 or above representing a joyful workplace.
6 secondary outcomes
The Mount Sinai Resilience Scale Scores
Time frame: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire - Stress
Time frame: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire - Collegial Support
Time frame: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire - Meaningful Work
Time frame: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire - Fair/Equitable Compensation
Time frame: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
NIOSH Worker Well-being Questionnaire - Job Security
Time frame: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The researchers will not be sharing IPD, all results will be in aggregate.
Related trials for Resilience, Psychological
Active, not recruiting
Resilient Students Training (ReST) : A Pilot RCT
Psychological Wellness
Recruiting
Study: Tea(m)Time - Strengthening the Team Resilience of Hospital Staff Through the Tea(m)Time Intervention
Resilience, Psychological, Personnel, Hospital
Recruiting
Child Cognitive-Affective Resilience Following 13-11 Event : A Pluridisciplinary Study of Intergenerational Transmission of a Traumatic Event
Intergenerational Trauma
RecruitingPhase 3
Influence of Art Workshops and Cognitive Support for Families of Children With Cancer.
Psychologic Resilience
Not yet recruiting
Nurse-Led AI-Supported Psychosocial Support for Palliative Caregivers
Primary Caregiver Readiness for Care and Psychological Resilience in Palliative Care
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Nita Vangeepuram, MD, MPH contact
Carol Horowitz, MD, MPH principal investigator
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Building Community Resilience Program (BCR) in people with Resilience, Psychological and Burnout, Psychological, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Devin Madden, PhD, MPH (212-659-9552, devin.madden@mountsinai.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mini-Z Burnout Scale Score (time frame: Baseline (within one month before workshops begin) and post-test (within one month after workshops end at 6 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2026.