Non Muscle Invasive Bladder CancerPhase 4NCT06767982
Comparison of BCG RIVM and Russian Strains for Treating Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC)
A Phase 4 study testing Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) in people with Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer, run by Ankara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of two Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) substrains (RIVM and Russian) in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in adult patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 31 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age ≥18 years,
- histopathologically confirmed NMIBC (stages Ta, T1, or CIS),
- classification as intermediate, high, or very high risk (who either refused or were not suitable candidates for radical cystectomy),
- no prior BCG therapy,
- no evidence of upper urinary tract carcinoma or distant metastases and
- a minimum follow-up period of 12 months.
Who cannot join
- patients who did not receive adequate BCG therapy (defined as receiving fewer than 5 of the 6 induction doses or fewer than 2 of the 3 maintenance doses),
- patients with a follow-up period of less than 12 months and
- patients who received multiple BCG strains during the follow-up period.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Ibni Sina Hospital
Ankara, Altindag
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) RIVM and Russian Strains in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Efficacy and Side Effects
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of two Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) substrains (RIVM and Russian) in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in adult patients.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Is there a significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the BCG RIVM and BCG Russian substrains?
- Is there a significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between the two substrains?
- Are there notable differences in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events between the strains? Researchers will compare patients treated with BCG RIVM to patients treated with BCG Russian to determine whether one substrain offers superior clinical outcomes in terms of recurrence, progression, and adverse events.
Participants will:
Undergo transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) prior to initiating therapy.
Be randomly assigned to receive either BCG RIVM or BCG Russian intravesical therapy.
Receive an induction course of six weekly instillations of the assigned BCG substrain.
Receive maintenance therapy at regular intervals (3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months) based on risk classification.
Undergo regular follow-up with cystoscopy and urine cytology to assess recurrence, progression, and adverse events.
- Conditions
- Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
- Being tested
- Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)
- Medical subject headings
- Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)Drug
In this study we compared the efficacy and side effects of two different strains of BCG (RIVM and RUSSIAN strains) in non muscle invasive bladder cancer patients
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 which received BCG RIVM | Active comparator | following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), patients in Group 1 received BCG RIVM. Receives: Drug: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) |
| Group 2 which received BCG RUSSIAN | Active comparator | following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), patients in Group 2 received BCG RUSSIAN. Receives: Drug: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
recurrence free survival
Measured: Through study completion, up to 4 years
progression free survival
Measured: Through study completion, up to 4 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
side effects of the treatment
Measured: At each BCG instillation and follow-up visit, up to 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jan 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2022
- Study completion31 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non Muscle Invasive Bladder CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ankara UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This randomized, prospective trial included 125 patients with intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer. Patients were randomized into two groups to receive either the BCG RIVM or BCG Russian substrain following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT).
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Khaled Obaid, Ankara University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06767982
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- İ10-640-21
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 10 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Unda-Urzaiz M, Cozar-Olmos JM, Minana-Lopez B, Camarero-Jimenez J, Brugarolas-Rossello X, Zubiaur-Libano C, Ribal-Caparros MJ, Suarez-Charneco AJ, Rodriguez-Tesedo V, Chantada-Abal V, Ruiz-de-Leon C, Carrillo-George C, Carballido-Rodriguez J, Villacampa-Auba F; en representacion del Grupo Espanol del Registro de Cepas de BCG. Safety and efficacy of various strains of bacille Calmette-Guerin in the treatment of bladder tumours in standard clinical practice. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2018 May;42(4):238-248. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Dec 30. English, Spanish.
PubMed 29295749Niwa N, Kikuchi E, Matsumoto K, Kosaka T, Mizuno R, Oya M. Does switching the bacillus Calmette-Guerin strain affect clinical outcome in patients with recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer after initial bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy? Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;36(6):306.e1-306.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
PubMed 29530465Krajewski W, Matuszewski M, Poletajew S, Grzegrzolka J, Zdrojowy R, Kolodziej A. Are There Differences in Toxicity and Efficacy between Various Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Strains in Bladder Cancer Patients? Analysis of 844 Patients. Urol Int. 2018;101(3):277-284. doi: 10.1159/000492722. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
PubMed 30227437Del Giudice F, Busetto GM, Gross MS, Maggi M, Sciarra A, Salciccia S, Ferro M, Sperduti I, Flammia S, Canale V, Chung BI, Conti SL, Eisenberg ML, Skinner EC, De Berardinis E. Efficacy of three BCG strains (Connaught, TICE and RIVM) with or without secondary resection (re-TUR) for intermediate/high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers: results from a retrospective single-institution cohort analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct;147(10):3073-3080. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03571-0. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
PubMed 33675400Huang Z, Liu H, Wang Y, Zhang C, Xu T. Determining optimal maintenance schedules for adjuvant intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Aug;33(8):1379-1387. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1326889. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
PubMed 28471272
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) RIVM and Russian Strains in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Efficacy and Side Effects
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06767982
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- İ10-640-21
- Conditions
- Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of two Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) substrains (RIVM and Russian) in the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in adult patients.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is there a significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the BCG RIVM and BCG Russian substrains?
- Is there a significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between the two substrains?
- Are there notable differences in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events between the strains? Researchers will compare patients treated with BCG RIVM to patients treated with BCG Russian to determine whether one substrain offers superior clinical outcomes in terms of recurrence, progression, and adverse events.
Participants will:
Undergo transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) prior to initiating therapy.
Be randomly assigned to receive either BCG RIVM or BCG Russian intravesical therapy.
Receive an induction course of six weekly instillations of the assigned BCG substrain.
Receive maintenance therapy at regular intervals (3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months) based on risk classification.
Undergo regular follow-up with cystoscopy and urine cytology to assess recurrence, progression, and adverse events.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This randomized, prospective trial included 125 patients with intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer. Patients were randomized into two groups to receive either the BCG RIVM or BCG Russian substrain following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 which received BCG RIVM | Active comparator | Drug: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), patients in Group 1 received BCG RIVM. |
| Group 2 which received BCG RUSSIAN | Active comparator | Drug: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), patients in Group 2 received BCG RUSSIAN. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- age ≥18 years,
- histopathologically confirmed NMIBC (stages Ta, T1, or CIS),
- classification as intermediate, high, or very high risk (who either refused or were not suitable candidates for radical cystectomy),
- no prior BCG therapy,
- no evidence of upper urinary tract carcinoma or distant metastases and
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients who did not receive adequate BCG therapy (defined as receiving fewer than 5 of the 6 induction doses or fewer than 2 of the 3 maintenance doses),
- patients with a follow-up period of less than 12 months and
- patients who received multiple BCG strains during the follow-up period.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)In this study we compared the efficacy and side effects of two different strains of BCG (RIVM and RUSSIAN strains) in non muscle invasive bladder cancer patients | Drug | Group 1 which received BCG RIVM, Group 2 which received BCG RUSSIAN |
Primary outcome
recurrence free survival
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 4 years
progression free survival
Time frame: Through study completion, up to 4 years
1 secondary outcome
side effects of the treatment
Time frame: At each BCG instillation and follow-up visit, up to 4 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jan 2025.
- Background: PubMed 29295749Unda-Urzaiz M, Cozar-Olmos JM, Minana-Lopez B, Camarero-Jimenez J, Brugarolas-Rossello X, Zubiaur-Libano C, Ribal-Caparros MJ, Suarez-Charneco AJ, Rodriguez-Tesedo V, Chantada-Abal V, Ruiz-de-Leon C, Carrillo-George C, Carballido-Rodriguez J, Villacampa-Auba F; en representacion del Grupo Espanol del Registro de Cepas de BCG. Safety and efficacy of various strains of bacille Calmette-Guerin in the treatment of bladder tumours in standard clinical practice. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2018 May;42(4):238-248. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Dec 30. English, Spanish.
- Background: PubMed 29530465Niwa N, Kikuchi E, Matsumoto K, Kosaka T, Mizuno R, Oya M. Does switching the bacillus Calmette-Guerin strain affect clinical outcome in patients with recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer after initial bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy? Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;36(6):306.e1-306.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
- Background: PubMed 30227437Krajewski W, Matuszewski M, Poletajew S, Grzegrzolka J, Zdrojowy R, Kolodziej A. Are There Differences in Toxicity and Efficacy between Various Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Strains in Bladder Cancer Patients? Analysis of 844 Patients. Urol Int. 2018;101(3):277-284. doi: 10.1159/000492722. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
- Background: PubMed 33675400Del Giudice F, Busetto GM, Gross MS, Maggi M, Sciarra A, Salciccia S, Ferro M, Sperduti I, Flammia S, Canale V, Chung BI, Conti SL, Eisenberg ML, Skinner EC, De Berardinis E. Efficacy of three BCG strains (Connaught, TICE and RIVM) with or without secondary resection (re-TUR) for intermediate/high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers: results from a retrospective single-institution cohort analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct;147(10):3073-3080. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03571-0. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
- Background: PubMed 28471272Huang Z, Liu H, Wang Y, Zhang C, Xu T. Determining optimal maintenance schedules for adjuvant intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Aug;33(8):1379-1387. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1326889. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine PF-08052667 in People With Bladder Cancer
Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
FORAGER-1: A Study of Vepugratinib (LY3866288; LOXO-435) in Participants With Cancer With a Change in a Gene Called FGFR3
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis
RecruitingObservational study
Mood Alterations in the Patients With Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated With BCG
Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate TAR-210 Versus Intravesical Chemotherapy Treatment in Participants With High Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms
Recruiting
Using Urine Tumor DNA to De-Intensify Surveillance in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) in people with Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer, run by Ankara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
recurrence free survival (time frame: Through study completion, up to 4 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06767982, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2025.