AzTrials
AzTrials

Traumatic Brain InjuryNCT06766435

Evaluation of the Abbott i-STAT TBI Biomarker Test

A study testing i-STAT TBI Test in people with Traumatic Brain Injury, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 3 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 200,000 hospitalizations occurred in 2020 related to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), which does not include many TBIs treated only in emergency departments, urgent care, primary care, or that are not evaluated by a clinician. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Traumatic Brain Injury
What is being tested?
i-STAT TBI Test
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
42 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
30 Jan 2025to 30 May 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Head injury within 24 hours of research blood collection
  • CT head ordered as part of routine care, not yet completed.
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 13 - 15

Who cannot join

  • Unknown whether head injury occurred, and signs of head injury are absent
  • Previously enrolled in this study in the past 30 days
  • Prisoner or in police custody or known pregnancy
  • Suspected current ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
  • Suspected open or depressed skull fracture, or signs of skull base fracture
  • History of multiple sclerosis
  • Venipuncture not feasible

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Mount Sinai Morningside

    New York, New York, 10025

  • Mount Sinai Hospital

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Mount Sinai West

    New York, New York, 10029

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Abbott i-STAT TBI Biomarker Test for Effect on Decreasing CT Utilization Among Adult Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Traumatic Brain Injury

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 200,000 hospitalizations occurred in 2020 related to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), which does not include many TBIs treated only in emergency departments, urgent care, primary care, or that are not evaluated by a clinician. Head CT is a critical component of care for severe TBI, however in mild TBI there is practice variation with a wider risk to benefit estimation for obtaining head CT imaging. Potential disadvantages of head CT include longer Emergency Department (ED) length of stay (LOS), higher costs, and diagnostic radiation exposure. The i-STAT TBI test is a panel of in vitro diagnostic immunoassays for the quantitative measurements of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) in whole blood and a semi-quantitative interpretation of test results derived from these measurements, using the i-STAT Alinity instrument. This biomarker test is cleared for use in adults with mild TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 13-15) within 24 hours of injury, to aid in determining the need for head CT imaging. Currently, CT head imaging for adults with suspected mild TBI is obtained based on clinicians' usual practice patterns and beliefs about patient expectations. Prior research has demonstrated the blood TBI test may reduce unnecessary CT scans by up to 40%, however the impact on head CT ordering has not yet been studied prospectively. It is important to understand the extent to which a negative TBI biomarker result empowers a clinician to cancel a previously ordered head CT. Given that adult patients with mild TBI often present to EDs, which have access to CT scanners, this is a key setting to assess real-world impact of the i-STAT TBI test on CT head utilization.

Being tested
i-STAT TBI Test
Keywords
Point of Care Testing, Emergency Care, Clinical Decision Making, Head Injury
Medical subject headings
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Craniocerebral Trauma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • i-STAT TBI TestDevice

    Also called Abbott iSTAT Alinity

    The Abbott i-STAT TBI test result is shared with the enrolled patient and treating clinicians.

Study groups in NCT06766435
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Notification Arm (Abbott iSTAT TBI test)ExperimentalThe ED clinicians caring for the enrolled patient, along with the patient, receive the TBI blood test result with just-in-time education on the TBI test to aid in clinical decision making.
Receives: Device: i-STAT TBI Test
Non-Notification Arm (Control)No interventionClinicians and enrolled patients do not receive the TBI blood test result.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Head CT scans canceled

    Number of head CTs canceled in patients not on anticoagulants as measurement of percentage of reduction in the number of canceled head CTs out of total head CTs ordered (total number and percentage)

    Measured: Within 24 hours of Traumatic Brain Injury

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Subset of Number of Head CT scans completed

    If the i-STAT TBI test results had been strictly adhered to by clinicians, subset of negative i-STAT TBI test results, Potential reduction in the number of completed head CTs (canceled) out of total head CTs ordered (total number and percentage)

    Measured: Within 24 hours of Traumatic Brain Injury

  2. ED Length of Stay

    Length of stay for the Emergency Department patient encounter

    Measured: Day 1 after patient ED care visit has ended

  3. Number of cancellations of head CT scan order in patients on anticoagulants

    Number of cancellations in head CTs in patients on anticoagulation

    Measured: Day 1 after patient ED care visit has ended

  4. Patient Satisfaction Scale

    Assessment of patient satisfaction with care during ED visit. Full scale from 1 (worst care possible) to 10 (best care possible)

    Measured: At 14 days after ED visit

  5. Number of head CT scans completed

    Number of head CT scans completed for patients within 14 days after index ED visit

    Measured: At 14 days after ED visit

  6. Stress of Uncertainty Scale (SUS)

    Clinicians vary in their use of diagnostic testing and treatments, and stress of uncertainty may be one explanation for this variation. The stress of uncertainty scale measures clinician tolerance of uncertainty during patient care. SUS scores range from 15-90 with a higher score indicating greater fear of uncertainty.

    Measured: Day 1 during patient ED care visit

  7. Malpractice Fear Scale (MFS) Scores

    Malpractice Fear Scale (MFS) scores. MFS scores range from 6 to 36 with a higher score indicating greater fear of malpractice.

    Measured: Day 1 during patient ED care visit

  8. Whole blood concentrations of GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein)

    Whole blood concentrations for GFAP on the iSTAT device. Biomarker for use with mild TBI within 24 hours of injury to aid in determining the need for head CT imaging.

    Measured: Day 1 during patient ED care visit

  9. Whole blood concentrations of UCH-L1 (ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1)

    Whole blood concentrations for UCH-L1 on the iSTAT device. Biomarker for use with mild TBI within 24 hours of injury to aid in determining the need for head CT imaging.

    Measured: Day 1 during patient ED care visit

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jan 2025
  2. Study start30 Jan 2025
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2026
  4. Study completion30 May 2026

Why it stopped: Study was terminated early due to recruitment limitations and available funding for continued recruitment and follow up

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Multisite randomized controlled clinical trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
42 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06766435
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY-24-01057
Other IDs
CRS-2024-001-257
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
4 Jan 2025
Last updated
15 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: There is no plan to share IPD at this time.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in